Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Mark Forums Read Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Sun, Sep-14-03, 15:54
rustpot's Avatar
rustpot rustpot is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,110
 
Plan: atkins/protein power 1st
Stats: 269/278/210 Male 5 feet 10 ins.
BF:33%/30%/ ?
Progress: -15%
Location: Hertfordshire
Default Mr Bantings Old Diet Revolution

Sunday Telegraph (UK) 14 September
Mr Banting's Old Diet Revolution
(Filed: 14/09/2003)


Charlotte Edwardes reveals how a short, fat Victorian funeral director became a household name with a dietary regime amazingly similar to the most current food fad


On the August morning that he began his diet, 26 years into the reign of Queen Victoria, the short and very fat William Banting heaved himself out of bed at 8am, hoisted a corset around his bulging stomach and struggled into his three-piece suit. Unable to reach his laces, he gingerly eased his feet into his shoes with a boot hook - taking care as he stooped not to stress the angry boils on his buttocks.

As he negotiated the stairs in reverse (a method, he found, that eased the crushing pressure on his knees), he was looking forward to the cooked breakfast awaiting in the dining room below - but dreading the effect it would have on his ever-ballooning bulk.


William Banting
Twelve months later, the 5ft 5in Mr Banting had shed more than three stone to be a slightly portly 11 stone. It was 1863 and Banting declared the diet "simply miraculous". So evangelical was Banting in extolling and promoting the virtues of his diet that he became a household name: the verb, to bant, meaning to diet, was absorbed into the vernacular and appeared in the Oxford dictionary until 1963.

But in the century between Banting first taking a knife and fork to his new diet revolution and his last appearance in the OED, his name gradually slipped from the public consciousness . . . until, in 1972, an American cardiologist by the name of Dr Robert Atkins published his own New Diet Revolution.

Today, the Atkins diet is the household name and Banting is forgotten by all except a few students of dietetic history and a handful of lexicographers. Yet, remarkably, the Atkins diet is virtually identical to that which stripped William Banting of his excess pounds.

So who was this low-carb, high-protein pioneer for what is now a multi-million pound industry that numbers among its devotees such Hollywood stars as Jennifer Aniston, Catherine Zeta Jones, Demi Moore and Renee Zellweger? And how did he discover his diet?

William Banting, born in London in 1797, was an upper middle class funeral director, and for five generations the family firm held the Royal warrant until 1928. Among those whose state burials they organised were Admiral Nelson, George III, George IV, William IV and Prince Albert (just two years before William began his diet). Later, under the reigns of his second son, the company oversaw the funeral of Queen Victoria in 1901.

The Banting family business paid for his Georgian townhouse in Kensington, which was lavishly decorated and furnished. His wife, Mary Ann, had a jewellery collection worth several thousands of pounds and, in the basement of their four-storey property, he kept an enviable wine cellar which he passed on to his eight children (two boys, six girls) in his will which would be worth £3.3 million today.

From his mid-30s he struggled miserably against his burgeoning size. None of his family suffered from obesity, a condition, he viewed with "inexpressible dread". He blamed it for the catalogue of ills he suffered as over the next 30 years: failing sight, impaired hearing, insomnia, an umbilical rupture, "many obnoxious boils, and two rather formidable carbuncles".

He was so stung by the sniggers and snide asides of strangers as he waddled to his office at 27 St James's Street off Piccadilly, that he avoided social gatherings and public transport to escape, "the sneers and remarks of the cruel and injudicious".

Like his counterparts today, Banting tried every fashionable remedy on offer. In addition to regular trips to "the waters and climate of Leamington", Cheltenham and Harrogate, popular Victorian spa towns, Banting took up to three Turkish baths a week and only lost six pounds. He even experimented with starvation diets, living "upon sixpence a day, so to speak". Yet "the evil", as he describes his fat, "still increased".

A doctor and personal friend recommended extreme physical exertion: brisk walks, horse-riding and rowing on the Thames early every morning. "It is true I gained muscular vigour," Banting admitted, "but with it a prodigious appetite, which I was compelled to indulge, and consequently increased in weight, until my kind old friend advised me to forsake the exercise." Banting arrived at the Soho Square practice of Dr William Harvey, a distinguished surgeon, by chance. His usual specialist had taken his annual summer holiday, so Banting sort an alternative. Dr Harvey was available and, again by chance, had just returned from a Paris conference where he had heard a Monsieur Claude Bernard lecture on diet and diabetes.

As the barrel-shaped Banting stood before him, Harvey saw the opportunity of an experiment. Why not use Banting as a guinea pig and apply M. Bernard's ideas to "corpulence"?

Harvey took copious notes as Banting described his daily dietary intake: the breakfasts that included umpteen slices of buttered toast and a pint of tea with plenty of sugar; much bread - of which, he confessed "I was always very fond" - meat and beer. For lunch he ate meat, pastry, more bread and beer, followed by sweet tea; and a supper of bread, milk and a fruit tart.

Dr Harvey finished scribbling and ordered Banting to cut out potatoes, bread, sugar, milk and beer. He handed him a sheet of paper which detailed his new regime:
"Breakfast, 9am: 6oz of either beef, mutton, kidneys, broiled fish, bacon or cold meat of any kind except pork or veal; 9oz of tea or coffee without milk or sugar; a little biscuit or 1oz of dry toast.

"Lunch, 2pm: 5-6 oz of any fish except salmon, herrings or eels, or any meat except pork or veal; any vegetable except potato, parsnip or beetroot, turnip or carrot; 1oz of dry toast; fruit out of a pudding, not sweetened; any kind of poultry or game; 2-3 glasses of good claret, sherry or Madeira. Champagne, port and beer are forbidden.

"Tea, 6pm: 2-3oz of cooked fruit, a rusk or two, tea without milk or sugar.

"Supper, 9pm: 3-4oz of meat or fish similar to lunch. For nightcap, if required, a tumbler of grog (gin, whisky or brandy, without sugar) or a glass or two of claret or sherry."

Banting was so delighted with the prescription that he tipped Dr Harvey £50 to give to his favourite hospital, on top of the usual fee. He wrote: "It certainly appears to me that my present dietary table is far superior to the former [and] more luxurious and liberal."

It also worked. From the first week the undertaker began to shed pounds and as the months passed and his weight loss continued, Banting decided to share his "philosopher's stone" with the public. "Of all the parasites that affect humanity, I do not know of . . . any more distressing than that of obesity," he began his Letter On Corpulence in 1864. "I am desirous of circulating my humble knowledge and experience for the benefit of other sufferers, with an earnest hope that it may lead to the same comfort and happiness I now feel under the extraordinary change."

While Dr Atkins, who died earlier this year, reaped millions from his diet, Banting asked for no recompense for his publications. Indeed, he saw it as a public duty to pass on the "cure" for obesity and gave all the profits from the many editions of Letter on Corpulence to hospital charities. The Letter sold 63,000 copies in Britain - a staggering number in an era when many were illiterate - was translated into French and German, and sold widely in Europe and the US. Banting's once portly form was regularly satirised in Punch cartoons, even long after his death; his name was used in music hall ballads and the diet was even referred to by Evelyn Waugh in A Handful of Dust. Neither Banting nor Harvey made any attempt to copyright the idea, believing that the outline of the diet was "as old as the hills". Banting's descendants and biographers are scathing of Dr Atkins's "reinvention" of the low-carb diet. Dr Barry Groves, a nutritionist and author of Eat Fat Get Thin, says: "There is only one difference between the two diets: the quantity of carbohydrate allowed in Atkins is marginally less than in Banting's. I believe the extent that carbohydrate is restricted in Atkins is what makes it dangerous. Banting's diet was in fact more healthy."

Banting's papers - his letters, diary, details of where he was educated - were inherited by his great granddaughter-in-law, Nina Banting, who destroyed them in a bout of post-natal depression in the late 1950s, describing him as a "horrid little man." Nina's grandson, the Rev David Banting, from Harold Wood, Essex, says: "I believe my ancestor was a philanthropist and the fact that he did not attempt to profit from the diet is typical of the public-spirited Victorian age. He had a good heart and, in a time when dieting was not that common, he wanted to share with others in his position, his great find. He wanted the world to know."

Like its modern day reincarnation, however, Banting's diet also caused controversy. In a time when Mrs Isabella Beeton's newly published recipe book - filled with stodgy puddings and pies - was considered a domestic bible, a backlash was inevitable. Some newspapers reported gleefully that Banting had been killed by his own diet, a slight that he quickly rebuked in person. (Atkins, who died earlier this year after slipping on an icy pavement, was also incorrectly reported to have died from a heart attack brought on by his own diet.)
Banting was most frustrated by his lack of graphic evidence of the efficacy of his diet plan, something he believed would have silenced his critics and encouraged his adherents. "I deeply regret not having secured a photographic portrait of my original figure in 1862, to place in juxtaposition with one of my present form," he wrote. "It might have amused some, but certainly would have been very convincing to others and astonishing to all."

Instead, he was forced to illustrate the change in the only way available, "putting on my former clothing, over what I now wear, which is a thoroughly convincing proof of the remarkable change." While no photograph of that survives either, it may have consoled Banting to know that, 140 years on, his diet really is world renowned, albeit under another name.

Additional research: Duncan Abey
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Sun, Sep-14-03, 19:22
Samuel Samuel is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 1,200
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 200/176/176 Male 5' 8"
BF:
Progress: 100%
Default

Funny!

Too many people have been saying that cutting on bread could lead to fitness before Dr. Atkins was even born, but only an idiot would compare their sayings with a diet theory developed and tested by a professional physician who has spent most of his life collecting data and sientific evidence to prove his diet's effectiveness and safety!

Last edited by Samuel : Sun, Sep-14-03 at 20:38.
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Mon, Sep-15-03, 05:26
UrbanGypsy UrbanGypsy is offline
...
Posts: 1,432
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 184/162/112 Female 5'5"
BF:31/26/19
Progress: 31%
Location: Brighton
Default

Just goes to show there's no such thing as original thought!

Damned shame about the champagne if you ask me!

As Samuel says, at least Atkins has the benefit of modern science to better back up his claims. Though he also had the disadvantage of modern media giving a weightier backlash.

I wonder if she'd done her research here... the whole book is printed on this site.
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Mon, Sep-15-03, 06:14
Sheldon's Avatar
Sheldon Sheldon is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 411
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 174/163/163 Male 5 feet 7 inches
BF:21.1%/18.5%/18.5%
Progress: 100%
Location: Conway, AR
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rustpot
Dr Barry Groves, a nutritionist and author of Eat Fat Get Thin, says: "There is only one difference between the two diets: the quantity of carbohydrate allowed in Atkins is marginally less than in Banting's. I believe the extent that carbohydrate is restricted in Atkins is what makes it dangerous. Banting's diet was in fact more healthy."


I have to take issue with Dr. Groves here. Apparently one can live quite a healthful life without any carbs at all. Witness the Inuits and the Kung. A famous athropologist and his colleage went a full year on nothing but meat and fish--while under close medical scrutiny--and did fine: he lost his excess weight, his cholesterol dropped (if that matters), and he had no mineral or vitamin deficiencies. It made quite a bit of publicity. Read about it here.

Sheldon
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Mon, Sep-15-03, 07:41
Samuel Samuel is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 1,200
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 200/176/176 Male 5' 8"
BF:
Progress: 100%
Default

This article was not written to prove that "Low carb" diets have been known to be effective centuries ago or to glorify Mr. Banting. It was written to insult Dr. Atkins and to scare people of his diet.
Reply With Quote
  #6   ^
Old Mon, Sep-15-03, 10:26
rustpot's Avatar
rustpot rustpot is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,110
 
Plan: atkins/protein power 1st
Stats: 269/278/210 Male 5 feet 10 ins.
BF:33%/30%/ ?
Progress: -15%
Location: Hertfordshire
Default

Quote by Samuel:
"It was written to insult Dr. Atkins and to scare people of his diet."

I did not read it quite that way although the way the press have been "having a go" recently you could be right.

I saw it more along the lines of "there is nothing knew under the sun"

Moreover I suspect that Barry Groves was severely misquoted. It is not like him to call the Atkins diet "dangerous"

Last edited by rustpot : Mon, Sep-15-03 at 17:27.
Reply With Quote
  #7   ^
Old Tue, Sep-16-03, 06:15
Samuel Samuel is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 1,200
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 200/176/176 Male 5' 8"
BF:
Progress: 100%
Default

I think the aim is to give you the impression that Dr. Atkins motive was to create wealth out of nothing and also to make you suspect that a low carb diet can cause death.

Dr. Atkins has been a physician whose earning should come from what he did. He has developed his diet, studied the sience behind it and tested it on a large number of patients before presenting it to the public.

Mr. Bantings was only a patient who has merely described how his own body reacted to a treatment. His earning comes from the funeral business not from medicine. So no body could have expected him to make money from what he said.

Additionally, Atkins diet as you must know is not just "cutting on toast". It is mainly about the body's reaction to the state of ketosis.

Last edited by Samuel : Tue, Sep-16-03 at 10:17.
Reply With Quote
  #8   ^
Old Sat, Sep-20-03, 08:40
Samuel Samuel is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 1,200
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 200/176/176 Male 5' 8"
BF:
Progress: 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rustpot
I did not read it quite that way although the way the press have been "having a go" recently you could be right.


I have reread this article and now believe that you could be right. I was expecting it to be anti-Atkins from the start, and this could have influenced my judgment. So I apologize.

However, I still believe that the writer should have compared Mr. Banting's Doctor, Dr. Harvey with Dr. Atkins not Mr. Banting himself. In other words, this diet should have been described in Dr Harvey's biography not Mr. Banting's.

Although I believe that this diet is historically important, I still believe that it is not much similar to Dr. Atkin's diet. I see that Dr. Harvey's advice was to cut on both carbohydrates and fats. So, it was closer to a "low calorie diet" than to a "low carb. diet".

Sam
Reply With Quote
  #9   ^
Old Fri, Nov-21-03, 19:59
famdr famdr is offline
New Member
Posts: 1
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 175/159/135 Female 5'8-1/2"
BF:
Progress:
Location: FL
Default

Does anyone know if the Canadian Dr. Banting of Banting and Best, the discovers of Insulin and of the mechanisms of Insulin Dependent Diabetes - which occured in the 1920s, I'm pretty sure - was a relation of this Mr. Banting?
Reply With Quote
  #10   ^
Old Fri, Nov-21-03, 22:15
Dean4Prez's Avatar
Dean4Prez Dean4Prez is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 356
 
Plan: CKD
Stats: 225/170/150 Male 66
BF:
Progress: 73%
Location: Austin, TX
Default

Quote:
So who was this low-carb, high-protein pioneer for what is now a multi-million pound industry that numbers among its devotees such Hollywood stars as Jennifer Aniston, Catherine Zeta Jones, Demi Moore and Renee Zellweger? And how did he discover his diet?


I have this mental vision of her lawyers grabbing briefcases and sliding down a brass pole to jump into action, something like the Internet loan company commercial.
.
From a letter from Lavely & Singer, Attorneys at Law, to Court TV:
Quote:
"Please be advised that Ms. Zeta-Jones has never been on the Atkins diet...We also intend to pursue claims against those publications and electronic media who disseminate or re-publish these unjurious falsehoods, as well as those publications who present this story to its readers as fiction masquerading as fact."


Read it here: http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/czj1.html

Last edited by Dean4Prez : Sat, Nov-22-03 at 02:20.
Reply With Quote
  #11   ^
Old Sat, Nov-22-03, 09:23
Frederick's Avatar
Frederick Frederick is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,512
 
Plan: Atkins - Maintenance
Stats: 185/150/150 Male 5' 10"
BF:
Progress: 100%
Location: Northern California
Default

In my view, the article mainly points out that eating low carb isn't as incredulous as mainstream nutritionsists make it appear today. It vividly reminds us that the low fat/low meat diet is only about 20 years old, which wouldn't even justify more than a sentence in any history book.

For me, I think it was a nice compare and contrast between the different eras in which we live. A few hundred years ago, I believe people often shared their ideas, findings, and solutions more for altruistic reasons as opposed to today where it's always "it's my idea, so I should patent it, etc..."

I agree there are VERY few original ideas; and, eating low carb, which has been around since, oh, the dawn of civilization surely isn't one of them. Ironically, eating low fat & meatless diet would be an original idea since that novel concept has only been around for a very short time relative to how long people have been sustaining primarily on meats augmented by lesser amounts of veggies and fruits.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Food Network Broadcast - Lowcarb Revolution Sarlye LC Research/Media 3 Mon, Jan-26-04 21:15
Low Carb Revolution SeeMyself LC Research/Media 1 Thu, Jan-01-04 02:14
Dr. Atkins Original Diet Revolution? Kareny Atkins Diet 10 Sat, Apr-26-03 18:10
Long Live The Revolution BuffaloSue LC Research/Media 0 Thu, Apr-24-03 16:41


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 16:10.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.