Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Fri, Jun-29-18, 07:04
teaser's Avatar
teaser teaser is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 15,075
 
Plan: mostly milkfat
Stats: 190/152.4/154 Male 67inches
BF:
Progress: 104%
Location: Ontario
Default Crummy adult guidelines for type II even worse for kids

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releas...80626113322.htm

Quote:
Youth need different approach to type 2 diabetes treatment
Two medications helpful for adults don't slow the progression of the disease in kids and teens

A major study has found that medicines used to treat diabetes in adults are not effective on youth. The researchers say the finding is disturbing because type 2 diabetes among youth is a growing problem.

In youth with impaired glucose tolerance or recent-onset type 2 diabetes, neither initial treatment with long-acting insulin followed by the drug metformin, nor metformin alone, preserved the body's ability to make insulin, according to results published online June 25 in Diabetes Care. The publication is concurrent to a presentation of the results at the American Diabetes Association Scientific Sessions in Orlando, Florida.

"These findings tell us that the treatments that work on adults and that we currently use for type 2 diabetes in youth are not as effective as we would like and therefore we need to develop new approaches to treat adolescents with the disease," said Dr. Steven Kahn, professor of medicine at the University of Washington School of Medicine and an endocrinologist at Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care. Kahn leads the site in Seattle and chairs the national study.

The results were published concurrently in Diabetes Care with two other manuscripts that compared participants of the pediatric trial with their adult counterparts participating in two other RISE, or Restoring Insulin Secretion, trials.

The results come from a study of 91 youth ages 10 to 19, part of the larger RISE study. Trials in the RISE Consortium are among the first to directly compare youth with type 2 diabetes to their adult counterparts.

To determine if early, aggressive treatment would improve outcomes, participants at four study sites were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. The first received three months of glargine, a long-acting insulin, followed by nine months of metformin, an oral medication which is commonly prescribed to help control high blood sugar levels. The second received only metformin for 12 months. Participants were then monitored for three more months after treatment ended.

The RISE Pediatric Medication Study found that beta cell function, which is key to the body's ability to make and release insulin, declined in both groups during treatment and worsened after treatment ended.

"These studies provide critical new information that helps us better understand why type 2 diabetes seems to progress more rapidly in young people. This is important news given the growing epidemic of this disease in youth, who were previously spared of type 2 diabetes and its complications," Kahn said.

RISE was funded primarily by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) of the National Institutes of Health and was conducted at eight study sites, including the University of Washington School of Medicine and the VA Puget Sound Health Care System.

"Only two drugs are currently approved for youth with type 2 diabetes, and we were disheartened to find that neither effectively slows disease progression," said Dr. Ellen Leschek, project scientist for the RISE Consortium and program director in NIDDK's Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolic Diseases. "Type 2 diabetes in youth has grown with the obesity epidemic, and we need treatments that work for kids. It's clear from this study and others that type 2 diabetes in youth is more aggressive than in adults."

The longer a person has type 2 diabetes, the greater the likelihood of developing complications including heart, kidney, eye, and nerve diseases, making it critical for young people with type 2 diabetes to quickly achieve and sustain control of their blood glucose. However, because type 2 diabetes has historically been an adult condition, information about how to effectively treat youth is limited, and pediatric diabetes experts have had to rely on best practices for adult treatment, an imperfect translation given the differences in physiology between the groups.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Fri, Jun-29-18, 07:16
khrussva's Avatar
khrussva khrussva is offline
Say NO to Diabetes!
Posts: 8,671
 
Plan: My own - < 30 net carbs
Stats: 440/228/210 Male 5' 11"
BF:Energy Unleashed
Progress: 92%
Location: Central Virginia - USA
Default

Why is the obvious so invisible to these people. If glucose tolerance is the problem, it seems like a no brainer to me that less glucose in the diet might be the place to start. But when the primary focus is to find a drug to 'cure' glucose intolerance then a nutritional solution isn't even a consideration. They are blind to the obvious.
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Fri, Jun-29-18, 07:19
cotonpal's Avatar
cotonpal cotonpal is online now
Senior Member
Posts: 5,308
 
Plan: very low carb real food
Stats: 245/125/135 Female 62
BF:
Progress: 109%
Location: Vermont
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by khrussva
Why is the obvious so invisible to these people. If glucose tolerance is the problem, it seems like a no brainer to me that less glucose in the diet might be the place to start. But when the primary focus is to find a drug to 'cure' glucose intolerance then a nutritional solution isn't even a consideration. They are blind to the obvious.


Exactly! I agree, blind to the obvious.
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Fri, Jun-29-18, 08:11
bevangel's Avatar
bevangel bevangel is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,312
 
Plan: modified adkins (sort of)
Stats: 265/176/167 Female 68.5 inches
BF:
Progress: 91%
Location: Austin, TX
Default

sigh... and even if some doctors somewhere were to suggest that their pediatric T2 patients TRY a low-carb/ketogenic diet and were to find that it works, there would probably be an outcry that we simply CANNOT ask teenagers to stop eating pizzas, french fries, hamburgers with buns, macaroni and cheese, candy, etc when that's what all of their friends eat.
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Fri, Jun-29-18, 08:41
Ambulo's Avatar
Ambulo Ambulo is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 3,194
 
Plan: LerC, TRE, IF
Stats: 150/120/120 Female 64 inches
BF:
Progress: 100%
Location: the North, England
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bevangel
sigh... and even if some doctors somewhere were to suggest that their pediatric T2 patients TRY a low-carb/ketogenic diet and were to find that it works, there would probably be an outcry that we simply CANNOT ask teenagers to stop eating pizzas, french fries, hamburgers with buns, macaroni and cheese, candy, etc when that's what all of their friends eat.


I often hear this attitude from parents who don't want their child to feel different by eating differently from their friends, e.g. the ketogenic diet for epilepsy. These parents want doctors to prescribe pills, and for there to be better pills. I wonder what they would do if their child had peanut allergy.
Reply With Quote
  #6   ^
Old Fri, Jun-29-18, 09:45
JEY100's Avatar
JEY100 JEY100 is online now
Posts: 13,433
 
Plan: P:E/DDF
Stats: 225/150/169 Female 5' 9"
BF:45%/28%/25%
Progress: 134%
Location: NC
Default

But they did hear about low carb this year. Two crummy papers out of the whole week...but it got press.

http://forum.lowcarber.org/showthread.php?t=480607
Reply With Quote
  #7   ^
Old Sat, Jun-30-18, 10:54
Bonnie OFS Bonnie OFS is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,573
 
Plan: Dr. Bernstein
Stats: 188/150/135 Female 5 ft 4 inches
BF:
Progress: 72%
Location: NE WA
Default

I read about this in our local paper & it got me to wondering: If meds & insulin don't help t2 kids, do they really help t2 adults?

Artificially lowering cholesterol with medication doesn't prevent heart attacks, so does artificially lowering blood glucose prevent side affects of diabetes or just lower the numbers?
Reply With Quote
  #8   ^
Old Sat, Jun-30-18, 13:20
Zei Zei is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,596
 
Plan: Carb reduction in general
Stats: 230/185/180 Female 5 ft 9 in
BF:
Progress: 90%
Location: Texas
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonnie OFS
I read about this in our local paper & it got me to wondering: If meds & insulin don't help t2 kids, do they really help t2 adults?

Artificially lowering cholesterol with medication doesn't prevent heart attacks, so does artificially lowering blood glucose prevent side affects of diabetes or just lower the numbers?

I think Dr. Jason Fung would say it does not help, that you must get the excess glucose out of the body, not just shift its location out of the blood and around like sweeping dirt under a rug. Because it is still in you causing harm someplace even though numbers look good.
Reply With Quote
  #9   ^
Old Sat, Jun-30-18, 15:42
Ms Arielle's Avatar
Ms Arielle Ms Arielle is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 19,219
 
Plan: atkins, carnivore 2023
Stats: 200/211/163 Female 5'8"
BF:
Progress: -30%
Location: Massachusetts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bevangel
sigh... and even if some doctors somewhere were to suggest that their pediatric T2 patients TRY a low-carb/ketogenic diet and were to find that it works, there would probably be an outcry that we simply CANNOT ask teenagers to stop eating pizzas, french fries, hamburgers with buns, macaroni and cheese, candy, etc when that's what all of their friends eat.


Our grammer schools allowed any parent to bring in 30 cupcakes for the class when their child had thier birthday!!!! WTH???? My kid did not need 30 cupcakeI s !!! Finally a committee put an end to this based on the sanitation of the product---NOT the content. The plan was to eliminate ALL food--then superintndent "suggested" a list of alternatives. Everyone caved and any junk food in original individual serving size is now allowed. I quit the committee.

My kids eat a great lunch FROM HOME, having better food choices than school lunch has helped PREVENT diabetes for my kids. So far. .....
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 17:04.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.