Mon, Nov-01-04, 14:01
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 129
|
|
Plan: atkins
Stats: 246/209.5/210
BF:
Progress: 101%
Location: Pennsylvania
|
|
I think the answer depends on your goals, level of experience, age, etc.
I train my son three days per week on a full body workout. I keep the emphasis on multi joint movements but try and not promote heavy resistance as hitting each muscle three time per week could become stressful. I'm looking for him to build good technique and a strong foundation in his body. If he progresses well I would then have him challenge himself with heavier weights but that may mean cutting back to just two days in order to handle the increased resistance.
I like full body routines. They are efficient and you can cover a lot of ground with simple basic exercises. Currently however I'm on a 3 day per week program but am splitting the body into three parts. My goals are not super strength at the moment and I'm challenging myself with a quicker pace, higher reps, more sets. As a result doing a full body work out would be too much for me because it's taking 50 miniutes just to do 1/3. This period for me gives me a break on the joints because the poundage is lighter but the pace and volume is faster. In addtion I get in include new and fresh movements that I could not fit into a full body routine.
I would say at some point experiment. I think it's good to mix it up from time to time to avoid getting stale. However I don't think one is better than the other for general resistance training. If you're starting to see results now then maybe stick with what you're doing for now. My only advice would be to watch yourself hitting the same muscle groups three days per week if you're going to start focusing on larger and larger weights.
Joe
|