Quote:
Originally Posted by bonechew
You launched the thread with criticism of the diet (calling low carb an 'extreme diet'.) with no proof other than “it doesn’t fit me” – so I can see why you are being pummeled with study/articles/scientific proof that your statement is incorrect.
It’s not what you said, it was the way you said it. What you should have said is this diet isn't working for me right now. My tests show blah, blah, and blah.
|
You know, that's not even a correct statement. What I DID say was, "My tests show blah blah..." In fact, here is EXACTLY what I said in the first message in this thread:
Quote:
Originally Posted by edgy
I had a blood test after about two months of doing low-carb paleo. My creatinine was slightly high (above normal range), and my EGFR was significantly low (below normal range). These are indicators of stress on the kidneys. I have no prior history of kidney disease.
I get blood tests regularly to monitor my white cell count (I'm on an immune suppressant for an autoimmune disease), and I never had any abnormal readings in these areas before. It was this diet. So I'm not too impressed with that!
It also was making my autoimmune disease worse.
I've now moved away from extremes. I don't count carbs or calories or anything else. I just eat much less of everything, don't eat sweets, and eat very little grain or dairy. I think this is a better way for me to lose weight. I haven't gained any weight, despite that I must be retaining more water with the increase in carbs, and I expect I'll keep losing.
|
I never attacked low-carb eating in general. I just said that I had a blood test that indicated a problem. I had been eating extremely low-carb for over a month - about two months. My energy remained very low, and my blood work showed the beginnings of kidney problems. I was posting about me, me, me - not attacking anyone else or making any kind of global statements. I still think that keeping carbs fairly low is a good thing - just for ME, not as low as they had been.
I am not a medical expert and I don't pretend to be one. I did not dive into the medical literature to explain my results and I'm not going to do it now. I read in the Atkins book that if you have any kind of kidney disease (which I did NOT when I started this) that you should not go on the induction diet (and my carbs had been at induction levels). That was enough to suggest to me that it's related to the diet. I went off the extremely low-carb diet, and my kidney function is back to normal.
To all those pseudo-scientists trying to explain my blood work: I was NOT dehydrated, I was NOT taking medication with a side effect of kidney damage, and I was NOT eating excessively high protein (though I was eating more protein than I'm eating now since my carbs are now higher and my protein and fat are now lower).
Also, FYI, I am down another pound this morning, so what I'm doing is working - I'm 144 this morning, below 145 for the first time in YEARS. Before you all tell me I couldn't lose two pounds in two days, I lost nothing for two weeks, then lost the two pounds in two days. That's just how my body lets go of weight.
Not everything is known about weight loss, you know - the body is very mysterious in some ways.
For those interested, here's what I ate yesterday...
Breakfast: fruit salad with yogurt and granola
Lunch: grilled salmon salad (ate about half) then a small chocolate-dipped macaroon.
Dinner 1: Other half of salmon eaten on a whole grain roll with butter.
Dinner 2: More of the uneaten salad from lunch (didn't finish it).
I am happiest when I'm not following any kind of diet - just eating what I want but in moderation.