Thu, May-27-10, 22:21
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 348
|
|
Plan: lacto-ovo moderate carb
Stats: 163/147/141
BF:
Progress: 73%
Location: India
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carne!
Many different modes of cohabitation arose, including polygamy. That is because people respond to different incentive structures, including many women whom, when allowed, would rather be 2nd or 3rd wife to a powerful man than 1st wife to a not so powerful men. Look at our society now. Almost every powerful man has a mistress, and those that do not would find it exceeding easy to attain one.
Furthermore, the biggest victims of polygamy are poor men, not women. Do the math.
|
Exactly.
Somehow discussions about evolutionary psychology always get misunderstood and messed up by people applying modern standards and modern memes/ideas.
If I were a HG woman, who would I rather pick ? I want my progeny to have good genes and a father who can "provide" well for them - fourth wife of the alpha male or first wife of someone who is neither strong enough nor prosperous enough ? The choice is simple.
As a well educated women having a good job living in 2010, my choices would obviously be based on different factors, but a lot of baggage from evolutionary thinking obviously exists - we cant undo millions of years of evolution with just a few decades (same concept as applied to paleo ).
Evolutionary psychology beautifully explains so many of our outdated concepts which exist even today - sexual jealousy, exaggerating the importance of so-called female "chastity" while not bothering so much about the male equivalent etc.
Unfortunately few people have read books about these. They prefer to armchair theorize instead.
|