To me it's just a new idea. Well, I already see a problem with Kruze's premise. It seems he equates cellular requirements with diet requirements. The two are not the same: Diet gets translated by the gut, and then in turn by hormones that regulate fuel supply, i.e. insulin. The fact that KD regulates those hormones better than a high-carb diet for humans is merely a function of the diet-gut translation, not of cellular requirements. I forget exactly but we discussed a video of some guy I forget his name, he was talking about metabolism across species and how metabolism remains a constant in spite of wildly different diets, i.e. cows, gorillas, humans, etc. So for example, cows will eat tons of grass, yet their metabolism is geared toward ketogenesis.
From there, we could then argue the electron density stuff, and it would probably be correct, but it still doesn't prove diet requirements. On the other hand, we could start with the premise of cellular requirements (or electron density stuff etc), then work up the chain through experiment to eventually figure out a proper diet to satisfy the premise.
OK, I think I understand a bit. He's talking about magnetism. This makes sense if we see molecular interaction as a function of magnetic potential. The greater it is, the greater the tendency for molecules to interact with each other. This is also true of electric potential and charge, i.e. + or -. In this case, opposites attract, and the stronger the charge, the stronger the attraction. This means two molecules of opposite charge attract each other, and in proportion to their electric potential. Interaction is also a function of PH, and I don't exactly understand how that works yet. What this means is that magnetism and electric charge determine tendency of connecting, while PH determines tendency of interaction and strength of this interaction.
Moving fluid produces both electric charge and magnetic charge. So, the blood moves through arteries, and doing so produces electric and magnetic charge, which then affects tissues in certain ways. That's the gist of it.
Here's an idea based on that. If we're deficient in some hormone or other, and we supplement with this hormone but don't fix the underlying cause of this deficiency, the hormone may or may not work as intended because the cause also acts on blood flow and in turn on electric and magnetic charge which ultimately makes this hormone work as intended. We might have to supplement many times the natural dose to get the desired results, because we did not also treat blood flow/electric field/magnetic field.
Now for some really crazy stuff that just occurred to me. Don't get stuck on this one, though. OK, so recently several pyramids were discovered in Bosnia. People exposed to the tunnels saw changes in their aura, and also felt better as a result of this exposure. Like I said, don't get stuck on this. But if this aura is electric and/or magnetic in nature, and if the body works at a electric and magnetic level, then altering the electric and magnetic fields will have an effect on physiology. I should note that they measured extremely high negative ion levels in those tunnels - something on the order of 1,000x that of outside air.
All this is not necessarily controversial, it's just new stuff that we're just starting to look at.
|
Wacko, or more a snake oil salesman, therefore I have not looked at any articles by or his website in years, so really shouldn't comment. But any of the "Longevity" doctors selling unproven supplements, especially the high levels of hormones for older folks, raise warnings for me.
My opinion continues to shift in favor of the eclectic Dr. Kruse. Even though I don't understand everything he writes (I think he does some of this on purpose) I still sense genius under the hood. My opinion strengthened when I started seeing one of my favorite Doctors (Mercola) beginning to espouse most of Dr. Kruse's advice and theory. The two of them also recently made a movie together.
Linear Mode
