Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Exercise Forums: Active Low-Carbers > Beginner/Low Intensity
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Tue, Sep-28-04, 16:03
lemontree lemontree is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 76
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 183/176/130 Female 5'6
BF:
Progress: 13%
Location: Sherwood Park, Alberta
Default which muscles do I work out on the same day?

Hey everyone,

There are so many different muscles in the upper body and I wanna split up the parts of the body of the days that I lift. I'll be lifting 3 days a week (every other day).

But the muscle groups I'll be lifting for are:

Shoulders
Upper Arm Forearms
Back
Chest
Waist
Hips
Thighs
Calves

I think the upper body will take me longer to finish than the lower body...how should I split it up or should I just keep it upper and lower and just go back and forth?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Tue, Sep-28-04, 16:06
diemde's Avatar
diemde diemde is offline
Posts: 7,547
 
Plan: lower carb
Stats: 333/199.8/172 Female 5'8"
BF:??/39.0/25
Progress: 83%
Location: Central Ohio
Default

I've been looking at this too. Here's a great link with some recommended split sessions:

http://exrx.net/WeightTraining/Instructions.html
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Tue, Sep-28-04, 16:07
Built's Avatar
Built Built is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 3,661
 
Plan: Metabolic Surge
Stats: 170/139/? Female 5'8"
BF:
Progress: 100%
Location: Canada's Wet Coast
Default

You may want two upper, one lower, say:

Shoulders, chest and triceps
Back and biceps
Quads, hams and calves

Do a short ab workout every training day, before your lifts on upper body days, after your lifts on leg day.

How does that sound for a start?
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Tue, Sep-28-04, 16:18
lemontree lemontree is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 76
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 183/176/130 Female 5'6
BF:
Progress: 13%
Location: Sherwood Park, Alberta
Default

That sounds awesome thanks so much.

I was worried cause I thought that there's no way I can finish that whole upper body workout in under an hour.

Have a good rest of the day!
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Tue, Sep-28-04, 18:45
Amzippity Amzippity is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 243
 
Plan: Curves eating plan
Stats: 186/152/140 Female 5'8'
BF:
Progress: 74%
Location: NH
Default

The split that built suggested is the split that I do, except I do abs only on back/bicep day (since this is my shortest day). I think it works well time-wise as each routine takes only 45-50 minutes to complete.
Reply With Quote
  #6   ^
Old Thu, Sep-30-04, 08:37
maddogtc's Avatar
maddogtc maddogtc is offline
New Member
Posts: 24
 
Plan: X-Factor
Stats: 175/161/220 Male 6'1"
BF:
Progress: -31%
Location: Crawley, UK
Default

Personally, I've never had any success with split body part routines.

Try picking 10 compound exercises and do them 3 times a week - the body adapts much better to this than to once a week.

See www.hypertrophy-specific.com/ for the full lowdown on maximal weight training.
Reply With Quote
  #7   ^
Old Thu, Sep-30-04, 08:43
Built's Avatar
Built Built is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 3,661
 
Plan: Metabolic Surge
Stats: 170/139/? Female 5'8"
BF:
Progress: 100%
Location: Canada's Wet Coast
Default

Maddogtc, there are quite a few people here who do HST from time to time, but I haven't run into very many people who do NOTHING but HST. Maybe you can start up a gym log and tell us how you train.

And pix please! Let's see what it's doing for you!

Reply With Quote
  #8   ^
Old Thu, Sep-30-04, 09:21
maddogtc's Avatar
maddogtc maddogtc is offline
New Member
Posts: 24
 
Plan: X-Factor
Stats: 175/161/220 Male 6'1"
BF:
Progress: -31%
Location: Crawley, UK
Default

I've only done the first hst rotation so I'm only 8 weeks in.

Haven't seen much muscle growth although this is probably because I am low carbing 27/7.

I am seeing good fat loss though which was stalling on CKD.

I may post a gym log once I start a bulking cycle (January?)

Haven't got a digital camera so pics are hard to come by
Reply With Quote
  #9   ^
Old Thu, Sep-30-04, 10:56
Built's Avatar
Built Built is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 3,661
 
Plan: Metabolic Surge
Stats: 170/139/? Female 5'8"
BF:
Progress: 100%
Location: Canada's Wet Coast
Default

I stalled on CKD, too, although it works well for a lot of men and some women - but I wasn't one of them.

I may return to NHE at some point for a minimal-fat gain bulker. The shorter carbups (relative to CKD) were less problematic for me.

PS isn't HST a bulking programme?
Reply With Quote
  #10   ^
Old Thu, Sep-30-04, 11:06
mle_ii's Avatar
mle_ii mle_ii is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 427
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: // Male 69 inches
BF:27%/21%/15%
Progress: -27977%
Location: Redmond, WA
Default

Built, yes. HST is a bulking program.

I did 1 cycle of HST as well. I'm on my second.

On the first I saw only minimal gains. Clearly I lost fat and "seemed" to gain more muscle. But one thing I figure out is that I was not eating enough protein or calories for sure. I
changed my diet, but now you've got me wondering about the carb ups I'm doing after lifting. Perhaps they're not enough.

I can post some before and after pics, but they don't show a lot of difference, some, but not as much as I was hoping.

I'm hoping that this cycle I will see some progress.
Reply With Quote
  #11   ^
Old Thu, Sep-30-04, 11:45
Built's Avatar
Built Built is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 3,661
 
Plan: Metabolic Surge
Stats: 170/139/? Female 5'8"
BF:
Progress: 100%
Location: Canada's Wet Coast
Default

This body recomposition stuff can really drive you nuts, hey?
Reply With Quote
  #12   ^
Old Thu, Sep-30-04, 12:04
mle_ii's Avatar
mle_ii mle_ii is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 427
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: // Male 69 inches
BF:27%/21%/15%
Progress: -27977%
Location: Redmond, WA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Built
This body recomposition stuff can really drive you nuts, hey?


Where's my operators manual? It's gotta be in a spec somewhere...

LOL
Reply With Quote
  #13   ^
Old Fri, Oct-01-04, 01:41
maddogtc's Avatar
maddogtc maddogtc is offline
New Member
Posts: 24
 
Plan: X-Factor
Stats: 175/161/220 Male 6'1"
BF:
Progress: -31%
Location: Crawley, UK
Default

Built, yes HST is a bulking programme but (according to the literature) it should also minimize muscle loss whilst cutting.

Whilst I can see a lot of benefits to CKD (haven't tried NHE - I may have a Maths degree but it still seems over my head ) but it still forces the body between two extremes (gluttony and famine) and forces it to mix fat and carbs/glycogen as fuel sources within a very short space of time which I (now) don't think will be too efficient.

I also worry about the high GI insulin spikes - seems to me it's a bit like (analogy alert!) dumping several tonnes of rain on a baked, parched field - in theory the field should soak up all of the water but in practice it's only going to soak through the surface and the rest will just run off and cause a flood!

Last edited by maddogtc : Fri, Oct-01-04 at 01:49.
Reply With Quote
  #14   ^
Old Fri, Oct-01-04, 08:18
Built's Avatar
Built Built is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 3,661
 
Plan: Metabolic Surge
Stats: 170/139/? Female 5'8"
BF:
Progress: 100%
Location: Canada's Wet Coast
Default

Hey there maddog,

I have a math degree, too! Strangely, the Canadian version allows me to grasp NHE...

I've done NHE, and there's no feast and famine to it - it's really quite moderate, especially when compared to the carb-fest of CKD. RF asserts that starchy carbs should comprise at least 70% of the carbup, and it's only for the last one or two meals of the carbup days. Perhaps it would suit you better than CKD because of this.

And I like your parched field analogy!
Reply With Quote
  #15   ^
Old Fri, Oct-01-04, 08:43
maddogtc's Avatar
maddogtc maddogtc is offline
New Member
Posts: 24
 
Plan: X-Factor
Stats: 175/161/220 Male 6'1"
BF:
Progress: -31%
Location: Crawley, UK
Default

Touché!

When did you graduate? I did in 1997.

I think I'm in the minority here knocking the ckd's but I've convinced myself to go completely low carb till xmas and then re-evaluate and probably follow a high protein, moderate carb (low-moderate gi), moderate fat diet (with fat and carbs at separate meals).

Going low GI limits you to lactose, (may have some fruit - though no fruit juices) and certain starches which agrees in part with your NHE philosophy.

BTW if NHE worked for you why aren't you following it now?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Anti-Aging Medicine: Figuring out what might work isn't easy" gotbeer LC Research/Media 0 Tue, Aug-19-03 10:20
Will this work? TinaCMT Newbies' Questions 1 Sun, Aug-10-03 12:22
Too late to work out? AprilB Beginner/Low Intensity 3 Thu, Jun-05-03 08:33
Question regarding split routine training slim gym Beginner/Low Intensity 6 Fri, Aug-02-02 22:26


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 18:52.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.