Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Countdowns, Buddies & Challenges
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Mark Forums Read Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1606   ^
Old Fri, Feb-27-15, 15:01
teaser's Avatar
teaser teaser is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 15,075
 
Plan: mostly milkfat
Stats: 190/152.4/154 Male 67inches
BF:
Progress: 104%
Location: Ontario
Default

Do as I say not as I do, I guess. I actually keep forgetting to take it lately. I mean to take 5000 IU a day, though.

My manic periods have always been in the spring.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #1607   ^
Old Wed, Mar-18-15, 05:57
Zuleikaa Zuleikaa is offline
Finding the Pieces
Posts: 17,049
 
Plan: Mishmash
Stats: 365/308.0/185 Female 66
BF:
Progress: 32%
Location: Maryland, US
Default

Thought this was interesting:

Light therapy now treats even the deepest cancer
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/techn...ncer/ar-BBilohL

What was old (heliotherapy) is new again.
Reply With Quote
  #1608   ^
Old Wed, Mar-18-15, 06:10
Zuleikaa Zuleikaa is offline
Finding the Pieces
Posts: 17,049
 
Plan: Mishmash
Stats: 365/308.0/185 Female 66
BF:
Progress: 32%
Location: Maryland, US
Default Vitamin D3 administration to MS patients

Vitamin D3 administration to MS patients leads to increased serum levels of latency activated peptide (LAP) of TGF-beta.
Åivo J1, Hänninen A2, Ilonen J3, Soilu-Hänninen M4.
Author information
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Deficiency of vitamin D is an environmental risk factor for MS. Vitamin D has immunomodulatory effects, including promotion of T-cell differentiation into T-regulatory cells, which produces regulatory cytokines including TGF-β. Increasing serum vitamin D levels have been associated with decreased disease activity in MS patients, but there are only few studies concerning the immunological effects of vitamin D supplementation in MS. In this study we investigated the effect of weekly supplementation of vitamin D3 or placebo on serum levels of multiple cytokines in patients with relapsing remitting MS.
METHODS:
The study was conducted on the patient cohort of the Finnish Vitamin D study. All patients were using IFN-beta-1b and were randomized to add-on treatment with either cholecalciferol 20,000IU/week or placebo. Concentrations of LAP (TGF-β), INF-γ, IL-17A, IL-2, IL-10, IL-9, IL-22, IL-6, IL-13, IL-4, IL-5, IL-1β and TNF-α were determined at screening and at 12months using commercial fluorescent bead immunoassay kits.
RESULTS:
LAP (TGF-β) levels increased significantly in the vitamin D treated group from a mean of 47 (SE 11) pg/ml to 55 (SE 14) pg/ml in 12months (p-value=0.0249). Placebo treatment had no significant effect on LAP levels. The levels of the other cytokines did not change significantly in either group.
CONCLUSIONS:
We showed increased serum latency activated peptide (LAP) of TGF-β levels in MS patients treated with vitamin D3. The immune regulatory effects of TGF-beta may play a role in the improved MRI outcomes that we observed earlier in the vitamin D treated group of patients.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25773149
Reply With Quote
  #1609   ^
Old Wed, Mar-18-15, 06:20
Zuleikaa Zuleikaa is offline
Finding the Pieces
Posts: 17,049
 
Plan: Mishmash
Stats: 365/308.0/185 Female 66
BF:
Progress: 32%
Location: Maryland, US
Default Exposure of Face and Hands Not Good Enough

Vitamin D production after UVB exposure - A comparison of exposed skin regions.
Osmancevic A1, Sandström K2, Gillstedt M2, Landin-Wilhelmsen K3, Larkö O2, Wennberg Larkö AM2, F Holick M4, Krogstad AL5.
Author information
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Cholecalciferol is an essential steroid produced in the skin by solar ultraviolet B radiation (UVB 290-315nm). Skin production of cholecalciferol depends on factors affecting UVB flux, age and exposed skin area.
PURPOSE:
Serum cholecalciferol and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 [25(OH)D3] concentrations were measured after UVB irradiation of 3 different skin areas to compare the skin capacity to produce vitamin D in different anatomic sites in the same individuals.
METHOD:
Ten voluntary Caucasians (skin photo type II & III, aged 48±12years (±SD)) were exposed to broadband UVB (280-320nm) between February and April. Hands and face, upper body and whole body were exposed to a suberythemic dose of UVB (median 101mJ/cm(2) (min 66, max 143)) (for 3 subsequent days 24h apart with a wash out period of about 3weeks (median 18days (min 11, max 25)) between the exposures of respective area. Serum concentrations of cholecalciferol and 25(OH)D3, were measured immediately before the first and 24h after the last dose of radiation.
RESULTS:
There was a significantly higher increase in serum cholecalciferol after UVB exposure of the two larger skin areas compared to face and hands, but no difference in increase was found between upper body and whole body exposures.
CONCLUSION:
Exposure of a larger skin area was superior to small areas and gave greater increase in both serum cholecalciferol and serum 25(OH)D3 concentrations. However, exposure of face and hands, i.e. only 5% of the body surface area, was capable of increasing serum concentrations of 25(OH)D3.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25594723
Reply With Quote
  #1610   ^
Old Fri, Mar-20-15, 16:41
teaser's Avatar
teaser teaser is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 15,075
 
Plan: mostly milkfat
Stats: 190/152.4/154 Male 67inches
BF:
Progress: 104%
Location: Ontario
Default

Quote:
Vitamin D prevents diabetes and clogged arteries in mice

Washington University diabetes researcher Carlos Bernal-Mizrachi, MD, shown with a mouse that lacks the ability to process vitamin D in key immune cells. Without adequate vitamin D in those cells, the animals developed diabetes and atherosclerosis.
Credit: Robert Boston

In recent years, a deficiency of vitamin D has been linked to type 2 diabetes and heart disease, two illnesses that commonly occur together and are the most common cause of illness and death in Western countries. Both disorders are rooted in chronic inflammation, which leads to insulin resistance and the buildup of artery-clogging plaque.

Now, new research in mice at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis suggests vitamin D plays a major role in preventing the inflammation that leads to type 2 diabetes and atherosclerosis. Further, the way key immune cells behave without adequate vitamin D may provide scientists with new therapeutic targets for patients with those disorders.
The study appears March 19 in the journal Cell Reports.
Studying mice that lacked the ability to process vitamin D in immune cells involved in inflammation, the researchers found that the animals made excess glucose, became resistant to insulin action and accumulated plaques in their blood vessels.
“The finding that vitamin D helps regulate glucose metabolism may explain previous epidemiological studies identifying an increased risk of diabetes in patients with vitamin D deficiency,” said senior investigator Carlos Bernal-Mizrachi, MD, associate professor of medicine and of cell biology and physiology. “In our study, inactivation of the vitamin D receptor induced diabetes and atherosclerosis, so normalizing vitamin D levels may have the opposite effect.”
In addition, he said inadequate vitamin D turned immune cells into transporters of fat. That may help researchers better understand how diabetes and atherosclerosis are linked and provide new possibilities for therapy.
For years, researchers have been studying vitamin D’s possible roles in inflammation and inflammatory diseases, such as type 2 diabetes and atherosclerosis. By engineering mice without the vitamin D receptor on important immune cells called monocytes and macrophages, the researchers were able to learn how those conditions are linked, according to Bernal-Mizrachi.
Monocytes are white blood cells made in the bone marrow that circulate in the bloodstream. After a few days, they typically move into the body’s tissues where they mature into cells called macrophages.
“Inactivating the vitamin D receptor on monocytes and macrophages promotes inflammation of the liver and in artery walls,” he said. “It also increases the ability of monocytes in the blood to adhere and migrate into blood vessel walls, where they deposit cholesterol and secrete inflammatory substances that lead to diabetes and heart disease.”
He said the findings suggest that getting enough vitamin D may reduce those properties in immune cells, decreasing inflammation and reducing the onset of a combination of heart disease and diabetes, which is often referred to as cardiometabolic disease. In addition, the researchers found that without vitamin D, monocytes carried fat to the walls of blood vessels, which is something that hadn’t been observed previously.
“We knew that when monocytes matured and became macrophages, they would eat cholesterol deposited inside the blood vessel wall,” said co-first author Amy E. Riek, MD, assistant professor of medicine. “But in these experiments, we found that when they don’t have vitamin D, the monocytes, while they’re still in circulation, also eat up cholesterol and carry it in the bloodstream.”
That’s an important discovery, Riek explained, because it’s much easier to find treatments that target something in the blood than it is to target the same cells after they move into the wall of a blood vessel.
“So that provides us, potentially, with a new target for therapy,” she said.
It also changes the way that scientists think about how lipids are carried into the blood vessel wall to cause plaques. Scientists already knew that LDL, the so-called bad cholesterol, carried fat deposits to the vessel wall. Now this study suggests that when monocytes don’t have enough vitamin D, they can do it, too.
“The monocytes were laden with fat in the absence of vitamin D receptor,” Bernal-Mizrachi said. “And they carried that fat into the artery, so that’s a new understanding of another way fat may get into blood-vessel walls in patients who are vitamin D deficient.”
Interestingly, the problem was reversible in the mice. When the animals that had developed type 2 diabetes and atherosclerosis received bone marrow transplants from mice with healthy vitamin D receptors on their monocytes and macrophages, their inflammation levels decreased, and the animals had lower blood glucose and became more sensitive to insulin.
Currently, Bernal-Mizrachi and Riek are conducting clinical studies in people who have type 2 diabetes, treating them with vitamin D to see whether it can prevent some of the complications of diabetes and inflammation in humans, too.
“As part of that study, we’re actually isolating monocytes from the blood of patients before and after vitamin D therapy,” Riek said. “So we can look at the inflammatory properties of those cells to see whether vitamin D is causing any changes.”


http://www.sciencedaily.com/release...50319123634.htm

In the related stories on the same page, from 2012;

Quote:
Vitamin D may prevent clogged arteries in diabetics


People with diabetes often develop clogged arteries that cause heart disease. New research has found that when vitamin D levels are adequate in people with diabetes, blood vessels are less likely to clog. But in patients with insufficient vitamin D, immune cells bind to blood vessels near the heart, then trap cholesterol to block those blood vessels.

People with diabetes often develop clogged arteries that cause heart disease, and new research at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis suggests that low vitamin D levels are to blame.

In a study published Nov. 9 in the Journal of Biological Chemistry, the researchers report that blood vessels are less like to clog in people with diabetes who get adequate vitamin D. But in patients with insufficient vitamin D, immune cells bind to blood vessels near the heart, then trap cholesterol to block those blood vessels.
"About 26 million Americans now have type 2 diabetes," says principal investigator Carlos Bernal-Mizrachi, MD. "And as obesity rates rise, we expect even more people will develop diabetes. Those patients are more likely to experience heart problems due to an increase in vascular inflammation, so we have been investigating why this occurs."
In earlier research, Bernal-Mizrachi, an assistant professor of medicine and of cell biology and physiology, and his colleagues found that vitamin D appears to play a key role in heart disease. This new study takes their work a step further, suggesting that when vitamin D levels are low, a particular class of white blood cell is more likely to adhere to cells in the walls of blood vessels.
Vitamin D conspires with immune cells called macrophages either to keep arteries clear or to clog them. The macrophages begin their existence as white blood cells called monocytes that circulate in the bloodstream. But when monocytes encounter inflammation, they are transformed into macrophages, which no longer circulate.
In the new study, researchers looked at vitamin D levels in 43 people with type 2 diabetes and in 25 others who were similar in age, sex and body weight but didn't have diabetes.
They found that in diabetes patients with low vitamin D -- less than 30 nanograms per milliliter of blood -- the macrophage cells were more likely to adhere to the walls of blood vessels, which triggers cells to get loaded with cholesterol, eventually causing the vessels to stiffen and block blood flow.
"We took everything into account," says first author Amy E. Riek, MD, instructor in medicine. "We looked at blood pressure, cholesterol, diabetes control, body weight and race. But only vitamin D levels correlated to whether these cells stuck to the blood vessel wall."
Riek and Bernal-Mizrachi say what's not yet clear is whether giving vitamin D to people with diabetes will reverse their risk of developing clogged arteries, a condition called atherosclerosis. They now are treating mice with vitamin D to see whether it can prevent monocytes from adhering to the walls of blood vessels near the heart, and they also are conducting two clinical trials in patients.
In one of those studies, the researchers are giving vitamin D to people with diabetes and hypertension to see whether the treatment may lower blood pressure. In the second study, African Americans with type 2 diabetes are getting vitamin D along with their other daily medications, and the research team is evaluating whether vitamin D supplements can slow or reverse the progression of heart disease.
Sometime in the next several months, the scientists hope to determine whether vitamin D treatment can reverse some of the risk factors associated with cardiovascular disease.
"In the future, we hope to generate medications, potentially even vitamin D itself, that help prevent the deposit of cholesterol in the blood vessels," Bernal-Mizrachi explains. "Previous studies have linked vitamin D deficiency in these patients to increases in cardiovascular disease and in mortality. Other work has suggested that vitamin D may improve insulin release from the pancreas and insulin sensitivity. Our ultimate goal is to intervene in people with diabetes and to see whether vitamin D might decrease inflammation, reduce blood pressure and lessen the likelihood that they will develop atherosclerosis or other vascular complications."


I think this is an important point in the connection between atherosclerosis and blood cholesterol levels... the stuff doesn't just accidentally end up in the artery wall, there are mechanisms that actively pursue that end. Maybe at some point cholesterol could be rate-limiting, that's not the same as it being the cause of atherosclerosis.
Reply With Quote
  #1611   ^
Old Mon, Mar-23-15, 05:26
Zuleikaa Zuleikaa is offline
Finding the Pieces
Posts: 17,049
 
Plan: Mishmash
Stats: 365/308.0/185 Female 66
BF:
Progress: 32%
Location: Maryland, US
Default

Vitamin D supplements may reverse progression of low-grade prostate tumors

research presented at the 249th National Meeting & Exposition of the American Chemical Society suggests that taking vitamin D supplements may slow or reverse the progression of low-grade prostate tumors, without the need for surgery or radiation therapy.
dictionary definition of prostate cancer
Previous research found that 55% of low-grade prostate cancer patients who took vitamin D supplements for a year demonstrated decreased Gleason scores.
Within the Gleason Grading System used by pathologists, tumors with a Gleason score of 7 or above are considered to be aggressive. These tumors are likely to spread, so tumors affecting the prostate will require the prostate gland to be surgically removed.

However, prostate tumors that have a Gleason score of 6 or below are less aggressive and may not even cause symptoms or health problems for the duration of the patient's life. Despite this, some men with these tumors do decide to have an elective prostatectomy.

If a patient does decide to undergo prostatectomy to remove their low-grade tumor, they must wait 60 days from the time of biopsy before the procedure can be undertaken. This waiting period is to allow the inflammation caused by the biopsy to subside.

The researchers behind the new study, from the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston, wanted to investigate whether vitamin D supplements would have any benefit for the patient during this 60-day waiting period.

Previous research by the team had found that 55% of men with low-grade prostate cancer who took vitamin D supplements for a year demonstrated decreased Gleason scores, with some tumors even disappearing completely.

Preliminary findings from small randomized controlled trial
For the new study, the team enrolled 37 men awaiting elective prostatectomies into a randomized controlled trial where one group received vitamin D supplements each day and the other received placebos.

According to the preliminary results from the trial, many of the men who received the supplements demonstrated improved outcomes. However, the men who received a placebo either had no change to their tumors or their tumors got worse.

The researchers found dramatic changes in the levels of lipids and proteins involved in inflammation among the participants who received the vitamin D. "Cancer is associated with inflammation, especially in the prostate gland," says researcher Bruce Hollis. "Vitamin D is really fighting this inflammation within the gland."

In particular, a protein called growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) was strongly induced by the vitamin D. GDF15 has been found by previous studies to "dial down" inflammation and scientists know that aggressive prostate cancers make very little of this protein.

The preliminary findings, therefore, imply that the mechanism driving the association between Gleason score improvements and vitamin D is a reduction in inflammation conferred by the supplements.

"We don't know yet whether vitamin D treats or prevents prostate cancer," cautions Hollis. "At the minimum, what it may do is keep lower-grade prostate cancers from going ballistic."

The participants in the study received levels of vitamin D in their supplements that were well below the equivalents of vitamin D produced within the human body from daily sun exposure. As Hollis says:

"We're treating these guys with normal body levels of vitamin D. We haven't even moved into the pharmacological levels yet."

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/291254.php
Reply With Quote
  #1612   ^
Old Mon, Mar-23-15, 05:54
Zuleikaa Zuleikaa is offline
Finding the Pieces
Posts: 17,049
 
Plan: Mishmash
Stats: 365/308.0/185 Female 66
BF:
Progress: 32%
Location: Maryland, US
Default

And it only took 10 years for them to test/prove it. I guess big pharma didn't want to pay for such a study.

Clin Exp Metastasis. 2005;22(3):275-84.
Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) inhibits growth and invasion by up-regulating nuclear receptors and 25-hydroxylase (CYP27A1) in human prostate cancer cells.
Tokar EJ1, Webber MM.
Author information
Abstract
Epidemiological evidence suggests an inverse relationship between prostate cancer and serum vitamin D levels. We examined the ability of cholecalciferol (vitamin D(3)), a calcitriol precursor, to inhibit or reverse cellular changes associated with malignant transformation and invasion and explored its mechanisms of action. The RWPE2-W99 human prostate epithelial cell line, which forms slow-growing tumors in nude mice, was used because it mimics the behavior of the majority of primary human prostate cancers. Cholecalciferol, at physiological levels: (i) inhibited anchorage-dependent and -independent growth; (ii) induced differentiation by decreasing vimentin expression with a concomitant decrease in motility/chemotaxis; (iii) decreased MMP-9 and MMP-2 activity with concomitant decrease in invasion; and (iv) exerted its effects by up-regulating vitamin D receptor (VDR), retinoid-X receptor-alpha (RXR-alpha), and androgen receptor (AR) in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, we found that RWPE2-W99 prostate cancer cells, similar to RWPE-1 cells (Tokar and Webber. Clin Exp Metast 2005; 22: 265-73), constitutively express the enzyme 25-hydroxylase CYP27A1 which is markedly up-regulated by cholecalciferol. Cholecalciferol has effects similar to those of calcitriol on growth, MMP activity, and VDR. The ability of CYP27A1 to catalyze the conversion of cholecalciferol to 25(OH)D(3) and of 25(OH)D(3) to calcitriol has been reported. RWPE2-W99 cells, similar to RWPE-1 cells, appear to have the rare ability to locally convert cholecalciferol to the active hormone calcitriol. Because it can inhibit cellular changes associated with malignant transformation and invasion, we propose that cholecalciferol may be an effective agent for the treatment of prostate cancer.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16158255
Reply With Quote
  #1613   ^
Old Fri, Jul-24-15, 20:48
Iceberg Iceberg is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 323
 
Plan: DDF, P:E
Stats: 237.5/179.4/150 Female 64
BF:55.7%/47.5%/?
Progress: 66%
Location: WA
Default

Glad I found this thread. Need to go back to page 1 and read all this. Three years ago I discovered I'm deficient (18) but have not been able to get my numbers up. Think I have a MG issue maybe. Hopefully I'll find some answers in this thread.
Reply With Quote
  #1614   ^
Old Mon, Aug-03-15, 01:36
Demi's Avatar
Demi Demi is offline
Posts: 26,727
 
Plan: Muscle Centric
Stats: 238/153/160 Female 5'10"
BF:
Progress: 109%
Location: UK
Default Sun-deprived Britons lack vitamin D, say health experts

In the British media this weekend:

Quote:
The Independent
London, UK
2 August, 2015

Sun-deprived Britons lack vitamin D, say health experts


People across the UK should increase their daily intake of vitamin D because gloomy British winters do not provide enough sunshine to maintain healthy levels throughout the year, government health advisers have recommended.



If the advice, contained in a draft report published by the Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (SACN), is adopted by the Government, it would be the first time that a recommended daily intake of vitamin D was set across the UK. Important for strong bones, vitamin D is also believed to carry other health benefits.

People between 11 and 64 should ensure they reach 10 micrograms of vitamin D every day, the SACN said. It was previously assumed that exposure to sunlight would enable most people to reach this target, but new scientific evidence shows “this is not the case”, it added.

Experts said that the report marked a “sea change” in thinking about vitamin D and was likely to lead to a spike in the sales of supplements, as well as the creation of specially enriched foods. Most people currently get less than 5mg of vitamin D daily from their diets.

The SACN report said the new recommended intake should apply throughout the year “as a precautionary measure” to cover those who do not get much sun, such as those who are housebound or cover their skin for cultural or religious reasons. It would ensure that 97.5 per cent of the population reached healthy levels of vitamin D.

The report is subject to a nine-week consultation period which is due to conclude in September. The final version will be published early next year, after which its recommendations are expected to be adopted as official health guidance.

Dr Adrian Martineau, an expert on vitamin D’s effect on health at Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, said that a daily intake of 10mg would “significantly improve public health in the UK” and the new advice marked a “sea change” in thinking. “Before this, the general assumption was that adults were able to make all the vitamin D they needed from sunshine, and didn’t need to have any dietary or supplementary intake,” he said.

“The action of sunlight on the skin in the UK is highly variable for different populations depending on the time of year and the latitude – you’ll get more UVB in Brighton than in John O’Groats – and finally, how much skin is exposed and the colour of skin. SACN was right to say that we can’t rely on sunshine in the UK to meet the vitamin D requirements. That’s a major and important change. It’s a big step forward that this is now officially recognised.”

He predicted that, were everyone in the UK to reach the recommended 10mg, it could lead to the “elimination” of rickets and hypocalcemic seizures – rare manifestations of severe vitamin D deficiency that have nevertheless been on the rise in the UK in recent years.

If elderly people were to take more vitamin D, they would be likely to see improvements in muscle strength, which could lead to fewer fractures caused by falls, he added.

The average British diet is not conducive to a high intake of vitamin D, which can be obtained from relatively few food sources including oily fish, red meat, certain mushrooms and, to a lesser extent, from eggs.

“Given current intake levels of vitamin D from foods, at less than 5mg per day, the draft recommendation of 10mg is unlikely to be achievable from these foods alone, particularly for groups where there is advice to limit oily fish consumption to two servings a week, such as girls and pregnant women,” said Helena Gibson-Moore, a scientist at the British Nutrition Foundation. “Taking some exercise in the sunshine, while avoiding sunburn, is sound advice for all.”

Dr Martineau said that it was unlikely that the entire population would be willing to take supplements to fill its vitamin D deficit, so the best solution would likely be the routine fortification of food and drink, something which already occurs in other countries.

“We’re already starting to see manufacturers fortifying food and drink products with vitamin D,” said Laura Jones, a global food science analyst at the market research agency Mintel. “The use of vitamin D supplements is likely to go up as well, but most consumers prefer to get their vitamins and minerals from food and drink products.”

Marks & Spencer recently became the first retailer in the UK to add vitamin D to its entire range of packaged bread products, by using a special type of yeast which naturally boosts vitamin D content. Britain’s main supermarkets are likely to follow suit.

Professor Hilary Powers, chair of the SACN Vitamin D working group, said: “It is important to remember that this vitamin D report is draft so the recommendations may change after the consultation period. SACN will be publishing its final recommendations in early 2016 and until then the Government’s current advice on vitamin D remains in place.”

Once the consultation is complete, the Department of Health has committed to looking again at the advice on vitamin D. “There is clear evidence that low levels of vitamin D in the body increases the risk of rickets in children and osteomalacia in adults,” a spokesperson said. “Supplements are already available to pregnant women and children under four from low-income families through the Healthy Start scheme."

A catalyst for stronger bones

We need vitamin D to help us to absorb calcium and phosphorus from our diet – two minerals which are essential for healthy bones. There is also evidence that vitamin D plays a role in the prevention of respiratory infections.

Links have also been drawn between vitamin D and the prevention of cancer, multiple sclerosis, asthma, and Type 2 diabetes – but these are inconclusive.

A lot of the vitamin D in our bodies comes from sunlight, produced by the reaction of ultraviolet-B light with molecules in our skin called dehydrocholesterol. The stronger the sunlight, the paler the skin and the more skin that is exposed, the more vitamin D we can produce.

However, we can also absorb it from our diet. The best source is oily fish, and it is also present in smaller amounts in red meat and eggs.

Many people get their vitamin D from supplements. These usually contain about 10 micrograms. The Government already recommends them for all pregnant women, as well as people over the age of 65. Supplements are also recommended for people who don’t get much sun, either because they are housebound, or because they usually wear clothes that cover most or all of their skin – for example, women who wear a burqa or niqab.

Babies and children aged six months to five years are also recommended to take a daily supplement with a slightly lower dose.


http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...s-10432845.html
Reply With Quote
  #1615   ^
Old Mon, Aug-03-15, 06:46
leemack's Avatar
leemack leemack is offline
NEVER GIVING UP!
Posts: 5,030
 
Plan: no sugar/grains LCHF IF
Stats: 478/354/200 Female 5' 9"
BF:excessive!!
Progress: 45%
Location: UK
Default

The journalist appears to have some confusion between micrograms and mg, they should correct that as 10 mg of vitamin d is rather too much!
Reply With Quote
  #1616   ^
Old Sat, Apr-09-16, 07:37
Zuleikaa Zuleikaa is offline
Finding the Pieces
Posts: 17,049
 
Plan: Mishmash
Stats: 365/308.0/185 Female 66
BF:
Progress: 32%
Location: Maryland, US
Default Vitamin D & Colorectal Cancer

Vitamin D & Colorectal Cancer

The new prescription for colon cancer prevention may soon include an afternoon in the sun followed by a tall glass of milk. Several new studies in the past year have shown that by maintaining adequate serum Vitamin D levels, individuals may successfully prevent colon cancer as well as several other internal cancers. Vitamin D is a fat soluble vitamin that is


found in some foods and can also be made by your body during exposure to ultraviolet UV light from the sun. Since there are only a few commonly consumed foods that are good sources of vitamin D (see accompanying table), sunlight is perhaps the most important source of Vitamin D. UV rays from the sun initiate vitamin D synthesis in the skin. The extent of sunlight derived Vitamin D is impacted directly by factors that affect UV ray exposure including, season, geography, time of day, cloud cover, and sunscreen.


Over two decades ago, researchers first recognized the importance of vitamin D from sunlight in preventing colorectal cancer. They observed significantly higher mortality rates from colorectal cancer in the northern and northeastern United States, compared to the southwest, Hawaii and Florida, which correlated directly with an individual’s vitamin D status. They showed that people who had higher levels of serum vitamin D, had lower rates of colon cancer. Since then several observational and laboratory studies have investigated the association of serum vitamin D levels and colorectal cancer risk.

Common Sources
of Vitamin D

Salmon
Fresh, wild (3.5 oz)
600-1000 IU
Fresh, farmed (3.5 oz)
100-250 IU

Shiitake Mushroms
Fresh (3.5 oz)
100 IU
Sun-dried (3.5 oz)
1600 IU
Sardines, canned (3.5 oz)
300-600 IU

Mackeral, canned (3.5 oz)
250 IU

Cod Liver Oil (1tsp)
400-900 IU
Tuna, Canned (3.6 oz)
230 IU
Egg yolk
20 IU
Fortified Milk (8 oz)
100 IU
Fortified Cheese (3.5 oz)
100 IU
Sunlight Exposure (5-10 minutes)
3000 IU
A new study using a sophisticated analytical technique known as a meta-analysis*, examined the data from five previous observational studies, each of which examined vitamin D and colorectal cancer risk with a follow-up of 25 years. The results of the meta-analysis revealed that by raising the serum level of vitamin D to 34 ng/ml, the incidence rates of colorectal cancer could be reduced by half. Even higher levels of serum Vitamin D further reduced colorectal cancer risk, as head researcher Edward Gorham, Ph.D. reported, “We project a two-thirds reduction in incidence with serum levels of 46 ng/ml, which corresponds to a daily intake of 2,000 IU of vitamin D3. This would be best achieved with a combination of diet, supplements and 10 to 15 minutes per day in the sun.”


Researchers in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute also reported on the protective effect of vitamin D in preventing colorectal cancer mortality. After following the vitamin D status of 16,818 participants for 12 years, researchers determined that vitamin D exhibited a strong protective effect against colorectal cancer, with levels of 32 ng/ml or higher having a 72% risk reduction on colorectal cancer mortality. In further support of Vitamin D, a recently completed epidemiological study of over 190,000 individuals, showed that both calcium and vitamin D from (from food and supplements) were protective against colorectal cancer. Though researchers reported mixed results for men and women, “Total vitamin D intake was inversely associated with colorectal cancer risk in men but not in women.” In yet another study from 2007, researchers in Japan suggest that a low level of plasma vitamin D may decrease the risk of rectal cancer, yet have little effect on colon cancer. The researchers suggest that the reason for the distinction in its protective effect in the rectum but not the colon may derive from differences in the vitamin D receptor in these tissues.


http://www.hopkinscoloncancercenter...12-BA3959A6F3F5
Reply With Quote
  #1617   ^
Old Sat, Apr-09-16, 07:43
Zuleikaa Zuleikaa is offline
Finding the Pieces
Posts: 17,049
 
Plan: Mishmash
Stats: 365/308.0/185 Female 66
BF:
Progress: 32%
Location: Maryland, US
Default Vitamin D and kidney cancer.

Predicted plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D and risk of renal cell cancer.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Although the kidney is a primary organ for vitamin D metabolism, the association between vitamin D and renal cell cancer (RCC) remains unclear.
METHODS:
We prospectively evaluated the association between predicted plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and RCC risk among 72,051 women and 46,380 men in the period from 1986 to 2008. Predicted plasma 25(OH)D scores were computed using validated regression models that included major determinants of vitamin D status (race, ultraviolet B flux, physical activity, body mass index, estimated vitamin D intake, alcohol consumption, and postmenopausal hormone use in women). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS:
During 22 years of follow-up, we documented 201 cases of incident RCC in women and 207 cases in men. The multivariable hazard ratios between extreme quintiles of predicted 25(OH)D score were 0.50 (95% CI = 0.32 to 0.80) in women, 0.59 (95% CI = 0.37 to 0.94) in men, and 0.54 (95% CI = 0.39 to 0.75; P trend < .001) in the pooled cohorts. An increment of 10 ng/mL in predicted 25(OH)D score was associated with a 44% lower incidence of RCC (pooled HR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.42 to 0.74). We found no statistically significant association between vitamin D intake estimated from food-frequency questionnaires and RCC incidence.
CONCLUSION:
Higher predicted plasma 25(OH)D levels were associated with a statistically significantly lower risk of RCC in men and women. Our findings need to be confirmed by other prospective studies using valid markers of long-term vitamin D status.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23568327

Last edited by Zuleikaa : Sat, Apr-09-16 at 07:57.
Reply With Quote
  #1618   ^
Old Sat, Apr-09-16, 07:49
Zuleikaa Zuleikaa is offline
Finding the Pieces
Posts: 17,049
 
Plan: Mishmash
Stats: 365/308.0/185 Female 66
BF:
Progress: 32%
Location: Maryland, US
Default Vitamin D Deficiency and Skin Cancer

Vitamin D Deficiency at Melanoma Diagnosis Is Associated with Higher Breslow Thickness

Abstract

Background

Epidemiological evidence shows that people with thicker, or higher stage, melanomas have lower vitamin D status compared to those with thinner tumours. Evidence from experimental studies is inconsistent, but some suggest that administration of vitamin D metabolites can decrease tumour aggressiveness.

Objectives

Determine the relationship between vitamin D status at diagnosis and melanoma thickness (as an indicator of prognosis), in a subtropical setting with high melanoma incidence.

Methods

We recruited 100 melanoma patients in Brisbane, Australia within days of their diagnosis. Data on factors previously associated with melanoma risk or prognosis were collected by questionnaire and physical examination. Serum for 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 [25(OH)D] levels was collected prior to wider excision biopsy; histological indicators of prognosis were obtained from pathology reports. We used multivariable logistic regression models to analyse the association between Breslow thickness (≥0.75 mm compared to <0.75 mm), Clark level (2–5 compared to 1) and presence of mitoses, and vitamin D status.

Results

Serum 25(OH)D <50 nmol/L (versus ≥50 nmol/L) was associated with a nearly four-fold increase in risk of having a thicker tumour (Adjusted OR = 3.82, 95% CI: 1.03, 14.14; p = 0.04, adjusted for age, sex, skin phototype, body mass index and season at diagnosis). There was no significant association with Clark level or presence of mitosis. Serum 25(OH)D levels in the highest quartile (≥69.8 nmol/L) were not associated with a more favourable prognosis.

Conclusions

Vitamin D deficiency at the time of melanoma diagnosis is associated with thicker tumours that are likely to have a poorer prognosis. Ensuring vitamin D levels of 50 nmol/L or higher in this population could potentially result in 18% of melanomas having Breslow thickness of <0.75 mm rather than ≥0.75 mm.

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/ar...al.pone.0126394

Last edited by Zuleikaa : Sat, Apr-09-16 at 07:58.
Reply With Quote
  #1619   ^
Old Sat, Apr-09-16, 08:02
Zuleikaa Zuleikaa is offline
Finding the Pieces
Posts: 17,049
 
Plan: Mishmash
Stats: 365/308.0/185 Female 66
BF:
Progress: 32%
Location: Maryland, US
Default Vitamin D and Prostate Cancer

Low vitamin D tied to aggressive prostate cancer

By Charlie Schmidt

As a nutrient, vitamin D is surely essential—without it, we couldn’t absorb the calcium and phosphorus we need for healthy bones. But research increasingly points to other benefits from vitamin D. One of these is possible protection against cancer. Scientists are finding that vitamin D can slow the growth of abnormal cells. It might also starve tumors by making it difficult for them to sprout new blood vessels.

New findings suggest that prostate tumors in particular can become highly aggressive when a man’s vitamin D levels are too low. A report in the journal Clinical Cancer Research showed that the lower the vitamin D level, the more aggressive the prostate cancer.

Sunshine Vitamin D

“This study adds to the growing body of sound information that vitamin D may be important to several areas of health, cancer being one of them,” says prostate cancer expert Dr. Marc Garnick, the Gorman Brothers Professor of Medicine at Harvard-affiliated Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and editor in chief of Harvard’s Annual Report on Prostate Diseases. “In my practice, vitamin D, and if necessary, supplemental calcium in appropriate doses is generally a sound recommendation to consider.”

During the study, investigators measured blood levels of vitamin D in nearly 700 men who had first prostate biopsies at one of several Chicago-area urology clinics. Half the men were of European descent, while the other half were of African American descent.

Low vitamin D levels were associated with high-grade, more advanced tumors in both groups. In addition, among African American men low vitamin D was also linked to a higher risk of developing prostate cancer. That wasn’t true among European American men, for whom low vitamin D was linked only to more aggressive tumors.

A few foods contain vitamin D, especially some types of fatty fish, eggs, some types of mushroom, and foods fortified with the vitamin, like milk and other dairy foods. Another way to get vitamin D is to make it yourself by getting some sunlight.

Men with dark skin absorb less ultraviolet light from the sun than men of a lighter complexion, and so tend to make less vitamin D. This could explain why they’re also at greater risk of prostate cancer, the investigators speculated. Indeed, prostate cancer is more common among African American men, and their death rates from the disease are also higher.

The new study has some shortcomings, including that a one-time vitamin D measure may not reflect a chronic deficiency of the vitamin. But the findings add to mounting evidence that vitamin D helps protect against prostate cancer, and that a healthy lifestyle that includes safe sun exposure is a good way to lower the chance of developing it.

National guidelines recommend a daily vitamin D intake of 600 international units for men up to age 70, and 800 international units thereafter.

http://www.harvardprostateknowledge...prostate-cancer
Reply With Quote
  #1620   ^
Old Sat, Apr-09-16, 08:16
Zuleikaa Zuleikaa is offline
Finding the Pieces
Posts: 17,049
 
Plan: Mishmash
Stats: 365/308.0/185 Female 66
BF:
Progress: 32%
Location: Maryland, US
Default Vitamin D and Autism

Relationship between vitamin D and autism spectrum disorder.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23965890

Autism and Vitamin D
https://www.vitamindcouncil.org/hea...ditions/autism/

Swedish Study Suggests Low Vitamin D at Birth May Increase Autism Risk
https://www.autismspeaks.org/scienc...ase-autism-risk

Core symptoms of autism improved after vitamin D supplementation.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25511123

Autism and Vitamin D
http://www.lifeextension.com/magazi...tamin-d/page-01

Autism symptoms dramatically improved after treatment with Vitamin D
http://www.zmescience.com/medicine/...itamin-d-06545/
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:59.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.