Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Sun, Mar-05-17, 06:55
teaser's Avatar
teaser teaser is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 15,075
 
Plan: mostly milkfat
Stats: 190/152.4/154 Male 67inches
BF:
Progress: 104%
Location: Ontario
Default From mother to baby: 'Secondhand sugars' can pass through breast milk

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releas...70302115834.htm

Quote:
From mother to baby: 'Secondhand sugars' can pass through breast milk
Even a small amount of fructose in breast milk is associated with increases in a baby's body weight

Add breast milk to the list of foods and beverages that contain fructose, a sweetener linked to health issues ranging from obesity to diabetes.

A new study by researchers at the Keck School of Medicine of USC indicates that a sugar called fructose is passed from mother to infant through breast milk. The proof-of-concept study involving 25 mothers and infants provides preliminary evidence that even fructose equivalent to the weight of a grain of rice in a full day's serving of breast milk is associated with increased body weight, muscle and bone mineral content.

Found in fruit, processed food and soda, fructose is not a natural component of breast milk, which is still considered the gold standard diet for babies. The "secondhand sugar" is derived from a mom's diet, said Michael Goran, lead author of the new study published in February in the journal Nutrients.

Exposing infants and children to higher amounts of sugar during growth and development can produce problems with cognitive development and learning as well as create lifelong risk for obesity, diabetes, fatty liver disease and heart disease, said Goran, founding director of the Childhood Obesity Research Center at the Keck School of Medicine.

Frappuccinos, energy drinks, cranberry juice cocktails and fructose are examples of sources of secondhand sugars. Healthy, naturally occurring sugars in breast milk include lactose, which is beneficial to infant growth and development.

"Lactose is the main source of carbohydrate energy and breast milk is very beneficial, but it's possible that you can lose some of that beneficial effect depending on maternal diet and how that may affect the composition of breast milk," Goran said. "Other studies have shown that fructose and artificial sweeteners are particularly damaging during critical periods of growth and development in children. We are beginning to see that any amount of fructose in breast milk is risky."

Goran and his colleagues did not collect mothers' dietary data for this study, so they were unable to determine if the trace amounts of fructose found in breast milk is positively associated with habitual consumption of fructose-rich foods and drinks.

"We know very little about why some children eventually become overweight or obese," Goran said. "It's important that we study what may be taking place in the earliest times of their development to determine whether anything could be done just after birth to lower their risks."

How much is too much?

The first year of life is a critical period for building brain networks and for cementing the foundation for the metabolic system. Minute amounts of fructose may have detrimental effects on infant metabolism, said Tanya Alderete, co-author of the study and a postdoctoral research scholar at the Keck School of Medicine. Ingestion of fructose could coach pre-fat storage cells to become fat cells, raising the baby's risk of one day becoming overweight or obese.

"Early life is a period of rapid development and early nutrition is strongly linked to long-term health outcomes," Alderete said. "We know that the decision to breastfeed or bottle feed may have impacts on later health. Results from this work suggest that the composition of breast milk may be another important factor to consider in regard to infant health."

Looking at the study data, Alderete said the average breastfeeding 1-month-old baby could consume just 10 milligrams (about a grain of rice) of fructose from breast milk a day, yet he would see adverse changes in body composition during growth.

A single microgram of fructose per milliliter of breast milk -- that's 1,000 times lower than the amount of lactose found in breast milk -- is associated with a 5 to 10 percent increase in body weight and body fat for infants at six months of age, Goran said.

Still, Alderete emphasized that breastfeeding is the ideal form of infant nutrition and mothers should continue to breastfeed for as long as possible or up to one year.

Baby fat

Twenty-five mothers brought their infants to the Oklahoma Health Sciences Center when the babies were 1 month old and again when they were 6 months old. The mothers fasted for at least three hours prior to the visit.

The infants were fed breast milk, consumed less than 8 ounces of formula a week and had no solid foods, according to their mothers.

Researchers took a breast milk sample from each mom and scanned it for sugars such as lactose, glucose and fructose. They measured each baby's fat mass, muscle mass and bone mass.

Infant growth was not related to mothers' pre-pregnancy body mass index, a measure of body fat, or to any of the other breast milk components, scientists found. The researchers adjusted their results for the sex of the infant and the baby's weight at 1 month.

Researchers at the Childhood Obesity Research Center at USC are looking at how maternal food intake affects fructose levels in breast milk as well as how specific elements in breast milk can alter a baby's developing gut bacteria, which neutralizes toxic byproducts of digestion. This "gut microbiome" impacts infant growth and metabolism. Based on early study results, Goran offers some advice to pregnant women and new mothers.

"New moms can prevent passing secondhand sugars to their children by eating and drinking less sugars while pregnant or breastfeeding," Goran said. "Caregivers can shield babies and children from harmful effects of sugars by carefully choosing infant formula, baby foods and snacks without added sugars or sweeteners."



I don't really buy that the researchers think that the fructose in the breastmilk is causing much of anything here--the fructose in the milk just says something about the mother's diet, or possibly her metabolism--a liver less effective at clearing fructose from the blood stream etc. could be a factor.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Tue, Mar-07-17, 13:06
WereBear's Avatar
WereBear WereBear is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 14,675
 
Plan: EpiPaleo/Primal/LowOx
Stats: 220/130/150 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 129%
Location: USA
Default

I've known women who had to skip the garlic for a while, because the baby didn't like it

So mom's diet affecting the breast milk is not that radical a statement anyway?
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Tue, Mar-07-17, 13:46
teaser's Avatar
teaser teaser is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 15,075
 
Plan: mostly milkfat
Stats: 190/152.4/154 Male 67inches
BF:
Progress: 104%
Location: Ontario
Default

No, not that radical. I find it interesting that they seem to be willing to, I don't want to say mislead people, but probably mislead people into thinking that the tiny amount of fructose that actually makes it into the milk is likely in and of itself to make much of a difference to the baby.

A thousandth as much fructose as lactose, they say. On a 2000 calorie diet (yes, that's a big baby), since breast milk is something like half the calories from sugars, that's 1000th of 1000 calories, a quarter gram of fructose.

Garlic in the breast milk--that's just the thing. It's not enough fructose to plausibly make a difference, it's just not. But it might be a marker for a diet that's low in various carotenoids, vitamins, etc., things that do pass through to the milk in amounts that could be reasonably hypothesized to make a difference.
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Tue, Mar-07-17, 13:50
Baylor1's Avatar
Baylor1 Baylor1 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 137
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 000/000/000 Female 66 inches
BF:
Progress:
Default

What bothers me more is the adjustments that women could make to diets that hinder babies getting nutrition.

Sometimes people just need to stop looking for issues.
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Tue, Mar-07-17, 15:03
deirdra's Avatar
deirdra deirdra is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 4,328
 
Plan: vLC/GF,CF,SF
Stats: 197/136/150 Female 66 inches
BF:
Progress: 130%
Location: Alberta
Default

I doubt the amount of fructose in the breast milk of a mother who eats a variety of real foods is a problem. But there are a lot of young, poor or clueless mothers out there who live on junkfood and have babies like Honey Boo Boo.
Reply With Quote
  #6   ^
Old Wed, Mar-08-17, 04:26
Calianna's Avatar
Calianna Calianna is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,891
 
Plan: Atkins-ish (hypoglycemia)
Stats: 000/000/000 Female 63
BF:
Progress: 50%
Default

If it's fructose that's the problem, then not only would they need to eliminate about 90% of the prepared foods out there (which would be a good thing), they'd also need to avoid the produce aisle, because all fruit has fructose in it, and veggies have a fairly high fructose to glucose ratio too.

For instance, this is the carb breakdown for 1 cup of raw broccoli:

Quote:
Carbohydrates
Amounts Per Selected Serving
%DV
Total Carbohydrate
6.0
g
2%
Dietary Fiber
2.4
g
9%
Starch
0.0
g

Sugars
1.5
g

Sucrose
91.0
mg

Glucose
446
mg

Fructose
619
mg


Lactose
191
mg

Maltose
191
mg

Galactose
0.0
mg


1 cup raw spinach:
Quote:
Amounts Per Selected Serving
%DV
Total Carbohydrate
1.1
g
0%

Dietary Fiber
0.7
g
3%

Starch
~



Sugars
0.1
g


Sucrose
21.0
mg


Glucose
33.0
mg


Fructose
45.0
mg


Lactose
0.0
mg


Maltose
0.0
mg


Galactose
30.0
mg








1 cup raw asparagus:
Quote:
Carbohydrates
Amounts Per Selected Serving
%DV
Total Carbohydrate
5.3
g
2%

Dietary Fiber
2.8
g
11%

Starch
0.0
g


Sugars
2.5
g


Sucrose
308
mg


Glucose
871
mg


Fructose
1340
mg



Lactose
0.0
mg


Maltose
0.0
mg


Galactose
0.0
mg







Somehow, I don't think that putting nursing mothers off the produce aisle is quite the effect they're going for.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 15:31.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.