Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Sun, Jul-13-03, 12:21
gotbeer's Avatar
gotbeer gotbeer is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 2,889
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 280/203/200 Male 69 inches
BF:
Progress: 96%
Location: Dallas, TX, USA
Default "Endurance athletes get the racer's edge with nutrition fundamentals, not fads"

STEADY DIET

Endurance athletes get the racer's edge with nutrition fundamentals, not fads

By GREG CONNORS, News Sports Reporter

7/13/2003


link to article

"Good carbohydrates are complex, unrefined carbohydrates like multigrain bread, real oatmeal...fruit, vegetables, even pasta's not bad compared to things like bread and potatoes." Dr. john Leddy, associate director of UB's Sports Medicine Institute.

The best-seller lists are filled with diet plans that promise to teach us how to combine foods or time our meals, to almost fool our bodies into losing weight: Barry Sears leads us into "the Zone;" the late Dr. Robert Atkins took away our bread and pasta; we've had our sugar busted and our tummies "Somersized."
When you talk to endurance athletes, however - people who need their bodies to be at their best - you'll find few takers for these seemingly magical formulas. Whether you are a marathon runner, an Olympic cyclist or a weekend softball player, adhering to nutrition fundamentals - with a little tweaking made possible by scientific research - is still the best bet.

In discussions with leading sports nutritionists, with runners and with cyclists who spend a significant amount of time each week in training, three clear findings emerge:

• While there is debate over what percentage of an athlete's diet should be devoted to carbohydrates, carbohydrates are not the enemy of healthful nutrition, despite what some best-selling diet books claim.

• Few athletes would indulge in the high-fat type of diet advocated by Atkins, but many, if not most runners would benefit from a modest increase in the amount of fat they eat.

• An athlete's baseline diet - what he or she consumes over the long term - is more important than short-term adjustments, such as carbo-loading before a race or pounding an energy bar during competition.

George Carlin has a comedy routine about the slogans on license plates issued in various states. New Hampshire's tags say "Live free or die." Idaho's plates say simply "Famous potatoes."

"Hmm," Carlin muses, "live free or die . . . famous potatoes. I suspect the truth lies somewhere in between."

That's a pretty good description of where the truth is found concerning carbohydrates - "in between." When Nancy Clark, a nationally known sports nutritionist, author and columnist who works in Boston, wrote a column last year criticizing the carbohydrate-bashing diet doctors, some of her readers were all over her like white on rice.

"Dr. Atkins' fans turned out in force to bash carbohydrates and praise protein," she wrote.

Clark disagrees with Atkins' premise that fat doesn't make a person fat, carbohydrates do.

"Some athletes eat too few carbohydrates because they believe them to be fattening," Clark writes in her best-selling "Sports Nutrition Guidebook."

"The inaccurate advice from diet gurus of years past still lingers among dieters who fear bread as being fattening. Carbohydrates are not fattening! Excess fats are fattening - butter on bread, oil on pasta, mayonnaise in sandwiches, cheese on crackers. . . . The conversion of excess carbohydrates into body fat is limited because you burn the carbs when you exercise."

On the other hand, many experts do agree with the premise of the late Dr. Atkins (who died this past winter after slipping on ice and hitting his head) that in the last 20 years or so, many Americans, in their belief that fat is bad and carbohydrates are good, overreacted by gorging themselves on what are called simple carbohydrates.

Simple carbohydrates, found in foods such as sugar, rice, potatoes and white bread, are absorbed very quickly into the bloodstream, which triggers a rapid release of insulin. This causes a roller-coaster effect on one's blood sugar, which can feel like a sudden surge in energy followed several minutes later by the urge to take to one's recliner and see what's on The History Channel - or what's in the refrigerator.

This effect in foods is measured by the Glycemic Index. White rice, for example, has a higher Glycemic Index number than table sugar. That means, at the risk of oversimplifying, that a diabetic - for whom blood-sugar control is critical - might have more to worry about from a bowl of Uncle Ben's than from a Baby Ruth.

Look for Mr. Good Carb

Dr. John Leddy is associate director of the University at Buffalo's Sports Medicine Institute. He also gives presentations on nutrition issues in the institute's annual Runners' Medical Forum, where he educates runners about eating "good" carbohydrates, among other things.

"The good carbohydrates are these complex, unrefined carbohydrates like multigrain bread, real oatmeal - not the instant stuff - fruit, vegetables, even pasta's not bad compared with things like bread and potatoes," Leddy said during an interview in his office on UB's South Campus.

"Those foods are high in fiber and complex carbohydrates and those foods are absorbed more slowly over time so you don't get the rapidly rising insulin levels in your blood after a meal."

The Atkins diet program, based on eliminating nearly all carbohydrates other than vegetables and eating lots of high-fat, high-protein foods, reached its highest peaks of popularity in the past year.

Critics, such as Leddy, find the Atkins approach to be an over-reaction. A high-fat diet is risky for athletes or anyone else trying to control their weight, Leddy said, because it means consuming a large amount of calories.

"If you consume too many calories as fat, you will gain weight," he said. "If you consume too many calories as carbohydrate, you'll still gain the same amount of weight. It doesn't matter where the calories are coming from, the problem is you're out of balance, your intake exceeds your expenditure."

The basic equation

Lauren Lorek of Cheektowaga is living proof that bringing one's life into caloric balance - through exercise and smart eating choices - can produce dramatic results.

Lorek, now 32, decided in her late 20s that she had spent too many years being overweight.

"One day I was watching Oprah and she had on a lady who was determined to lose 41 pounds by her 41st birthday," Lorek said. "I was 28 and figured I could lose 29 pounds by the time I was 29."

Lorek began by exercising to "tae bo" tapes in her home. Then a friend helped her get started in running. Since then, Lorek figures she has lost 107 pounds.

"I love when people ask me how I did it," she said. "It was all through diet and exercise - no diet pills or protein formulas."

Lorek runs 25 to 35 miles per week. She doesn't consider herself an elite runner, but she has completed one marathon, last year's Valley of the Sun Marathon in Mesa, Ariz."

"I belong to Checker's (Athletic Club), and I do some of their speed workouts; I take them off the Internet, but I usually do them on my own," Lorek said.

Lorek, who works as a chef in a Wegmans' store, said she follows a strict low-fat diet. She always packs a lunch to bring to work. She leaves cases of bottled water in her car to remind herself to drink enough.

Lorek has no interest in the high-protein fads - "those diets scare me," she said. She also focuses on eating good-quality carbohydrates and staying away from the bad ones.

"I love my simple sugars, like anybody else," she said. "Those are my downfalls if I don't avoid them."

Fine-tuning your fats

Just as there are good carbohydrates, there also are useful fats, Leddy points out.

" . . . The liquid fats, the oils, the vegetable fats like olives, avocados, nuts, the fats in fish, even the fat in lean meats is fine," he said.

"All this fat is good and will help you - if you are a training athlete with a high caloric expenditure - to maintain your caloric intake and would not be detrimental to your cholesterol."

Leddy added that consuming these types of fats is more beneficial than eating a high-carbohydrate diet, which has been shown in studies to decrease a person's level of HDL - or "good cholesterol" - and increase the level of triglycerides, which is linked to clogging of the arteries.

Most people, athletes or not, can afford to add some fat into their diets as long as they choose the "good" fats and don't take in more calories than they are expending. That can actually improve their "lipid profile," Leddy said, meaning the risk factors in their blood that are associated with heart disease and stroke.

Runners have even more to gain from adding some good fats to their diets, according to Leddy. In his suggested plan for men and women who run at least 30 miles per week, Leddy advises a diet of 50 percent carbohydrates (high-fiber, low-Glycemic Index), 15 percent protein (nuts, legumes, soy, poultry, fish and lean meat), and 35 percent "good" fat.

The diet still must contain a sufficient amount of complex carbohydrates to maintain muscle glycogen stores, Leddy said. Glycogen is a key fuel that the body makes from carbohydrates.

Clark, the sports nutrition author, advises most athletes to eat at least 60 percent carbohydrates, or 65 to 75 percent before an endurance event. She recommends 15 percent protein and 25 percent fat.

"I disagree with (Clark) on this," Leddy said. "If a runner is maintaining (caloric) intake equal to expenditure, they can consume higher-fat diets with no problems on their blood lipid or cholesterol numbers.

"Also, once you get to be a well-trained runner you use fat as an energy source in your muscles much better than someone who's not trained. It would actually become a fuel that helps you to spare your muscle glycogen, so you use up your muscle glycogen much less rapidly. Trained runners adapt to higher fat in their diet."

Studies are firm about fat

Leddy, who is 43 and lean from running 5-10 miles a week, doesn't have any personal fondness for dietary fat. His recommendations are based on medical studies on the subject, including a major one in which Leddy participated in the mid-1990s at UB.

In one report on the study, published in the journal Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, researchers measured the effects of high- and low-fat diets on a group of male and female runners from Western New York who trained at least 35 miles per week. The six men and six women who were put on a 42 percent fat diet showed no adverse affects in their cardiovascular health risk factors. The subjects who were restricted to 16 percent fat in their diets had less desirable cholesterol levels than those eating higher fat.

Another component of the study was athletic performance. Testing found that runners who increased their fat intake to 30 to 42 percent of their calories, so long as their calorie consumption kept up with their expenditure, improved their endurance performance at a high percentage of their V02 max - a popular test of aerobic performance.

Also, a study just recently completed at UB showed that female runners consuming less than 30 percent of their daily calories as fat had a significantly greater rate of "overuse" injury over one year than those female runners who consumed more than 30 percent of daily calories as dietary fat.

" . . . Women runners in particular . . . tend not to take in enough calories for their training," Leddy said. "This can lead to inadequate training. They don't have enough fuel to train right, and also they don't take in enough nutrients."

Quality eating

Leddy stressed that for all athletes, eating a healthful diet over the long term is more important than what is eaten on any given day.

Learning that lesson is part of the education of a cyclist, who competes in a sport in which carbo-loading, nutrition bars and a gel named "goo" are part of the ritual.

"Power Bars were originally developed for cyclists riding in the Tour De France," said 36-year-old Alan Cote of East Aurora, who has been a competitive cyclist for 21 years.

"That whole category of products (including sports nutrition bars and gels) sprouted from the needs of cyclists."

Bicycle racers at the elite level often face what seems like a nice problem to have - they fret about how to consume enough calories.

"At the real extremes of the sport, like the Tour de France, those riders are burning 5,000 to 6,000 calories a day. It's at that level when you're worried about keeping enough food in you," said Cote, who makes a living writing about cycling for Bicycling and Outside magazines, among others.

Kate Farrell-Gray is a friend of Cote and, like him, is a "category 2" cyclist, the second-highest ranking in the sport. Farrell-Gray, 26, rode for a professional team for two years and progressed all the way to the Olympic trials in 2000. Last year she cut back on her racing schedule ("It was kind of a rest year"), yet she made only slight changes to her diet when not training heavily.

"I found that I ate less synthetic food (such as gels or nutrition bars) when I wasn't racing," said Farrell-Gray, who teaches physics at Amherst High School. "But good nutrition has always been important to me, that never changes."

Farrell-Gray most feels the effect of her diet during a multiday (stage race), such as the format used in the Tour de France.

"Alan (Cote) and I have a favorite saying you feel like tissue paper in a blast furnace (in a multiday race)," she said. "When you are racing three, four or five consecutive days you can't eat enough.

"It is very important that it be nutritious foods, not empty calories. You need good carbohydrates, enough protein and not a lot of fat."

e-mail: gconnors~buffnews.com
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Sun, Jul-13-03, 15:44
cc48510 cc48510 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,018
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 320/220/195 Male 6'0"
BF:
Progress: 80%
Location: Pensacola, FL
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gotbeer
"The inaccurate advice from diet gurus of years past still lingers among dieters who fear bread as being fattening. Carbohydrates are not fattening! Excess fats are fattening - butter on bread, oil on pasta, mayonnaise in sandwiches, cheese on crackers. . . . The conversion of excess carbohydrates into body fat is limited because you burn the carbs when you exercise."


That is so patently ridiculous...I can't even think what to say other than that she is an idiot. I ate LF/HC for three years before I went on Atkins. I gained over 100 pounds eating < 5% 6 out of 7 days of the week and 25% fat on the 7th day. On top of that, my blood pressure went through the roof.

butter on bread: Nope. Almost never buttered my bread.
oil on pasta: Never used oil on my pasta.
mayonnaise in sandwiches: I hate mayonnaise, so that's not it.
cheese on crackers: Nope. Rarely did that (Very rarely).

Hmm, so how can it be that I gained 100 pounds if carbs don't make you fat ??? Especially since my diet was 5% Fat/85% Carbs/10% Protein. Also, if fat makes you so fat and carbs keep you skinny...why is it that once I went from eating 5% Fat/85% Carbs/10% Protein to 65% Fat/5% Carbs/30% Protein that I lost alot of weight and normalized my blood pressure ???

Quote:
Simple carbohydrates, found in foods such as sugar, rice, potatoes and white bread, are absorbed very quickly into the bloodstream, which triggers a rapid release of insulin. This causes a roller-coaster effect on one's blood sugar, which can feel like a sudden surge in energy followed several minutes later by the urge to take to one's recliner and see what's on The History Channel - or what's in the refrigerator.


This contradicts her claim. It shows that carbs make you sedentary. That is the last thing someone who needs to lose weight should have to deal with...and is definitely not something an athlete would want.

Quote:
Critics, such as Leddy, find the Atkins approach to be an over-reaction. A high-fat diet is risky for athletes or anyone else trying to control their weight, Leddy said, because it means consuming a large amount of calories.


This is where the true ignorance shines. Carbs make you hungry. That is why you are hungry an hour after eating Chineese. Meat satiates you. If you eat mostly fat and protein, you will probably be full sooner and eat LESS calories than if you load up on Carbohydrates. Fat is not the evil fattening food these people make it out to be.

Quote:
"If you consume too many calories as fat, you will gain weight," he said. "If you consume too many calories as carbohydrate, you'll still gain the same amount of weight. It doesn't matter where the calories are coming from, the problem is you're out of balance, your intake exceeds your expenditure."


This contradicts his last statement. He slammed fat as putting athletes at risk of getting fat. But, here he says carbs are just as fattening as fat.

Quote:
Lorek has no interest in the high-protein fads - "those diets scare me," she said.


Here is the problem...the Low-Fat liars have brainwashed people like her into being scared of the best foods for us.

Quote:
Just as there are good carbohydrates, there also are useful fats, Leddy points out.

" . . . The liquid fats, the oils, the vegetable fats like olives, avocados, nuts, the fats in fish, even the fat in lean meats is fine," he said.


This is something I've never quite understood. The AHA/USDA outright admit that Unsaturated Fat lowers Cholesterol and decreases the risk of several diseases. Yet, they still ardently push < 30% Total Fat (including both Poly- and Monounsaturated Fats). If these fats are as good as they say, why are they limiting them ???

Quote:
Leddy added that consuming these types of fats is more beneficial than eating a high-carbohydrate diet, which has been shown in studies to decrease a person's level of HDL - or "good cholesterol" - and increase the level of triglycerides, which is linked to clogging of the arteries.


BINGO !!! This is the crux of the problem. The LF liars admit that Hi-carb lowers Good Cholesterol and Raises triglycerides, which clogs your arteries...But, they continue to push a diet high in carbs and low in Cholesterol reducing Unsaturated Fats. If you know A is bad for you and B is good for you, why would you tell people to eat lots of A and avoid B like its the plague ??? Unless, of course your goal was to hurt people's health.

Quote:
The diet still must contain a sufficient amount of complex carbohydrates to maintain muscle glycogen stores, Leddy said. Glycogen is a key fuel that the body makes from carbohydrates.


For runners, maybe...But, a person who needs to lose weight should NOT be trying to maintain their Glycogen. Very simply put...you will NOT burn any fat until you deplete your Glycogen. If you insist on keeping your Glycogen full, you will not lose weight. Not only that, you will GAIN weight...because dietary fat cannot be burned until Glycogen is depleted...and because the level of carbs needed (to be eaten) to maintain a full store of Glycogen is high enough to trigger a massive insulin release. Fat not Burned + Massive Insulin Release = VERY BAD for the Waistline. The only way to keep your Glycogen full 24/7 and not gain weight is to eat ZERO fat. But, your body needs a certain amount of Fat and Protein to function properly. No natural food is 100% fat-free for this very reason. If you were to consume only synthetic ZERO Fat foods, you would die very quickly...because your body would be deprived of the fat it needs to survive.

Quote:
In one report on the study, published in the journal Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, researchers measured the effects of high- and low-fat diets on a group of male and female runners from Western New York who trained at least 35 miles per week. The six men and six women who were put on a 42 percent fat diet showed no adverse affects in their cardiovascular health risk factors. The subjects who were restricted to 16 percent fat in their diets had less desirable cholesterol levels than those eating higher fat.


Here again, they prove themselves wrong. If the 34-38% total fat in the Average American diet is what gives us heart disease...then how could someone eating 42% fat possibly improve their cholesterol. I think the problem is out fat is too low and from of the wrong kind (trans-fat). 100 years ago, people ate alot more fat than they do now, with almost no Trans-Fat...and you know what ??? They had very little heart disease and low obesity rates.

Quote:
Another component of the study was athletic performance. Testing found that runners who increased their fat intake to 30 to 42 percent of their calories, so long as their calorie consumption kept up with their expenditure, improved their endurance performance at a high percentage of their V02 max - a popular test of aerobic performance.


This again proves we should NOT be loading up on carbs and avoiding fat like the plague.

Quote:
Also, a study just recently completed at UB showed that female runners consuming less than 30 percent of their daily calories as fat had a significantly greater rate of "overuse" injury over one year than those female runners who consumed more than 30 percent of daily calories as dietary fat.


This paragraph speaks for itself.
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Sun, Jul-13-03, 23:35
dannysk dannysk is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 165
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 297/235/190
BF:
Progress: 58%
Location: Israel
Default

CC48510,
May I call you CC ?
There was only one problem with what you wrote. There are two kinds of glycogen, that stored in the liver and that stored in the muscle, low-carbing only uses up the glycogen stored in the liver. You use up the glycogen in your muscle by using the muscle. Muscle glycogen gets refilled first, so that is where our 20+ grams of carbs go. You do burn fat when your liver glycogen gets used up even though you still have muscle glycogen.

<<< Also, once you get to be a well-trained runner you use fat as an energy source in your muscles much better than someone who's not trained. It would actually become a fuel that helps you to spare your muscle glycogen, so you use up your muscle glycogen much less rapidly.>>>

This is the whole story. Trained athletes (endurance) use fat for fuel. Carbs become fat, hence trained atheletes need carbs to create fat for fuel.

danny
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Mon, Jul-14-03, 08:33
cc48510 cc48510 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,018
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 320/220/195 Male 6'0"
BF:
Progress: 80%
Location: Pensacola, FL
Default

Liver glycogen was what I was referring to. I should have been a little more specific.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dannysk
CC48510,
May I call you CC ?
There was only one problem with what you wrote. There are two kinds of glycogen, that stored in the liver and that stored in the muscle, low-carbing only uses up the glycogen stored in the liver. You use up the glycogen in your muscle by using the muscle. Muscle glycogen gets refilled first, so that is where our 20+ grams of carbs go. You do burn fat when your liver glycogen gets used up even though you still have muscle glycogen.

<<< Also, once you get to be a well-trained runner you use fat as an energy source in your muscles much better than someone who's not trained. It would actually become a fuel that helps you to spare your muscle glycogen, so you use up your muscle glycogen much less rapidly.>>>

This is the whole story. Trained athletes (endurance) use fat for fuel. Carbs become fat, hence trained atheletes need carbs to create fat for fuel.

danny
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
124 Ways Sugar Can Ruin Your Health BuffaloSue LC Research/Media 9 Tue, Sep-21-04 12:44
Advant Edge Nutrition Bars jasonb Newbies' Questions 13 Mon, Aug-04-03 17:36
Nutrition Powders & Drinks More Accurately Labeled Than Nutrition Bars tamarian LC Research/Media 0 Tue, Mar-05-02 18:12


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:52.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.