Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16   ^
Old Thu, Sep-12-13, 12:15
CMCM's Avatar
CMCM CMCM is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 4,287
 
Plan: Keto / Atkins VLC
Stats: 173/148.8/135 Female 5'6"
BF:23.9
Progress: 64%
Location: N. Calif. Sierra Nevadas
Default

Well, people can defend carbs until they turn blue in the face, but I'm afraid I'm going to go by what my own long term self observation has clearly shown me: strictly controlling carbs enables me to lose weight, and eating carbs sets me on a road to slow but steady gain and out of control eating. At this point in my life I cannot lose weight if I'm eating many carbs. Period. You'll not convince me otherwise, I know what I experience no matter what any "expert" may say.

Perhaps caloric intake plays somewhat of a role somewhere: when I'm eating under 20g carbs per day, my appetite is very muted and I naturally keep calories fairly low. That said, in the past I ate low calories with carbs included and I was hungry all the time, didn't lose easily, and felt horrible. So obviously, it's not all about calories.

I once acquired a severely underweight horse. To help her gain, in addition to her usual hay I gave her what seemed like a very modest amount of oats with a bit of molasses on them, maybe a couple of 1-cup scoops per day, and mind you, this was for a 1,000 pound horse so that amount really was quite small relatively speaking. She put weight back at an astounding rate, probably within a few weeks she was back to a normal weight.

I know humans aren't horses, but dang, in addition to sugars, those grain based foods do the same to me. Eating them, I gain at a fairly good clip. The connection is too stark to not believe.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #17   ^
Old Thu, Sep-12-13, 13:09
s-piper s-piper is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 694
 
Plan: LC Primal
Stats: 290/270/160 Female 5'7
BF:
Progress: 15%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CMCM
I know humans aren't horses, but dang, in addition to sugars, those grain based foods do the same to me. .


Actually, that's even more convincing. In terms of anatomy and natural history, horses are undoubtedly herbivores. There's arguments about humans, but, whether you believe meat is bad for us or not or we're meant to eat it or not, we're undoubtedly more capable of handling it (even if we 'aren't supposed to') than a horse.
AND a horse, as a grazing animal, is undoubtedly more likely to have subsisted on wild grains than pre-historic humans did.


So if sugar and grains can make an underweight horse gain weight, is it any wonder they can easily make humans fat?

Not to mention, as you said, if 1 cup of oatmeal with molasses affects a 1000lb horse that way it should be a clue that "moderation" of sugar means a much smaller amount that most people think since, you'd think 1 cup of oats and molasses to a horse would feel like 1 Jolly Rancher to a 150 lb person.

Last edited by s-piper : Thu, Sep-12-13 at 13:15.
Reply With Quote
  #18   ^
Old Fri, Sep-13-13, 04:34
WereBear's Avatar
WereBear WereBear is online now
Senior Member
Posts: 14,682
 
Plan: EpiPaleo/Primal/LowOx
Stats: 220/130/150 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 129%
Location: USA
Default

When I was an omnivorously reading child, it was established FACT that early humans worked hard for their meat, and ate as much as they could get. We evolved our large brains because we upped our protein, which made us better hunters. In fact, giant mammals became extinct because humans got so good at eating them!

So I'm sure the "we weren't meant to eat meat" stuff I hear is simply "propaganda from the birdseed brigade" as Gnolls.org has it.
Reply With Quote
  #19   ^
Old Fri, Sep-13-13, 06:38
s-piper s-piper is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 694
 
Plan: LC Primal
Stats: 290/270/160 Female 5'7
BF:
Progress: 15%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WereBear
When I was an omnivorously reading child, it was established FACT that early humans worked hard for their meat, and ate as much as they could get. We evolved our large brains because we upped our protein, which made us better hunters. In fact, giant mammals became extinct because humans got so good at eating them!

So I'm sure the "we weren't meant to eat meat" stuff I hear is simply "propaganda from the birdseed brigade" as Gnolls.org has it.


Yes, I know that. It's total BS, but as someone who is a scientist herself I can tell you from observational study (aka: my life) that there are a lot of people who really don't give a crap about facts.
So I've gotten to where I'm more non-comittal about it unless I'm in the mood for an argument. Notice I said there's arguments about it, not that they were convincing or widely accepted.
It's like saying there's arguments about whether evolution is real. There are arguments. Depressing fact: an estimated 50% of Americans don't believe in evolution., but among scientists there's really no debate.
What can I say? I'm a little jaded.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:24.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.