Yep, excellent quotes Janet - and none of those doctor's quotes should be in any way surprising points of debate to anyone. It's not like they're proposing anything groundbreaking.
My compliment to you in this thread was exactly driven by the fact that you let common sense prevail, and that you are dedicated in trying to continue to educate people about what they can do to improve their results, during their
actively trying to lose phase.
There are a lot of people on this site, and elsewhere, whose end goal weight in 50 lbs or more, above what would be
not overweight, for their height. I think this is in large part driven by the difficulties they find either in A) progressing with their weight loss at all in general (and this is normally due to impatience with rate of loss, due to too many carbs, OR too many cals), and/or B) not ever seeing the results that would confirm to them that they can progress beyond a certain point. For the exact same reasons.
Also, I think people are sometimes not really cognizant, or at least maybe not acknowledging of the fact
even in their own minds, that it is MIGHTY easy to hit 50% fat, even with choosing
the leanest cuts of
everything.
I think people literally don't understand, because of how calorically dense very small amounts of fat are - how even 2T of fat used in cooking or on a salad can hugely skew the macros in favor of very high fat numbers. Same if you also consume eggs. And
really crazy high going on from that point, if someone IS choosing normal and varied cuts of meat and not the leanest possible. It's SO easy to be at 75% of calories from fat, without the extreme additions on top.
So adding BPC and weird large coffees made with full glasses of pure heavy cream and stuff like this (which TONS of people do)... is crazy to me. I don't judge anyone for the plans they choose.
I'm just commenting, that I think a lot of people are not listening to the voices of reason, and are instead buying into the biggest marketing hypes and fads going in the community. BPC is also popular with dedicated, heavily training athletes, and is also marketed to otherwise not necessarily otherwise LC people.
I just think some the community has really gone to the wrong extreme end of the spectrum, because as you (and the doctors quoted) all rightly point out - the fat needs of someone who is LC and at goal, are just an
entirely different animal, to the fat requirements of someone who may be trying their hardest to lose, and who may feel dwarfed in the knowledge of how far they have to go.
Again - just thanks for being you, for your contributions, and for everything you bring to this site.
And that's not to exclude everyone else, from my thanks!
Again, I think this thread is great, and very much needed. TY!