Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Daily Low-Carb Support > Paleolithic & Neanderthin
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #361   ^
Old Wed, Jan-26-11, 01:37
spiderdust's Avatar
spiderdust spiderdust is offline
~strange as angels~
Posts: 1,015
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 256/249/150 Female 5 feet 6 inches
BF:51%/49%/30%
Progress: 7%
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Default

I'm just really, really glad to see this thread is still semi-active. I love the book. Bought it 5 years ago when I 1st heard about it on here.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #362   ^
Old Wed, May-11-11, 04:34
Demi's Avatar
Demi Demi is offline
Posts: 26,755
 
Plan: Muscle Centric
Stats: 238/153/160 Female 5'10"
BF:
Progress: 109%
Location: UK
Default

Quote:
From New Scientist Online
10 May, 2011


Blue alert: The dark side of night light

by David C. Holzman

From streetlights to smartphones, our world is bathed in artificial light – but we're only just waking up to the havoc that wreaks on our health

"THESE people aren't really blind, they are lying." So stated one journal editor when confronted by an experiment whose results seemed impossible.

The experiment involved clocks. Body clocks. Our internal clocks tend to run a little fast or slow, so if we are deprived of any clues to what time it is, we soon get out of sync with the day-night cycle. It used to be thought that our everyday activities kept our clocks on time, but a series of studies in the 1980s revealed that light is the key. The clincher came in 1986, when Charles Czeisler showed that light could be used to reset people's clocks in the same way that one might reset a watch.

The findings helped explain why many blind people suffer periodic sleep disturbances. Because they cannot detect light, their body clocks go in and out of sync with the day-night cycle. But Czeisler, of Harvard Medical School, knew that the clocks of a few blind individuals ran on time. How was this possible?

Czeisler showed that their clocks were also set by light - and that their eyes were somehow detecting it even though these individuals had no conscious awareness of light. That suggested that our eyes have special light receptors that are quite separate from those we see with, and that must have been overlooked despite centuries of research. "That just blew us away," he says.

After 20 rejections over five years and numerous additional tests to rule out other explanations, Czeisler's paper was published in 1995. Other researchers soon identified the mechanism behind what he had found. We now know there are specialised light-detecting cells in the retina whose signals go to the master clock in the brain, rather than to the visual cortex. In some blind people this system remains unaffected by whatever caused their blindness, allowing their clocks to stay on time.

These discoveries are turning out to have profound implications. It is becoming clear that even dim lights can affect our body clocks, meaning simply having the lights on late at night or staring at a computer screen can disrupt our internal rhythms. What's more, it turns out that blue light has the greatest power to change our clocks, and modern lighting is getting bluer. The potential effects go far beyond the unpleasant, jet-lagged feeling that body-clock disruption can cause. There is growing evidence that continual disruption is linked in the long term to serious illnesses including cancer, heart disease and diabetes. It can even alter the wiring of our brains.

It is not all bad news. Bright light during the day has, of course, long been known to mitigate the depressive effect of long dark winters on people who suffer from seasonal affective disorder, and recent research has demonstrated more general benefits. For example, elderly nursing-home residents exposed to very bright indoor light (around 1000 lux - roughly equivalent to outdoor light on an overcast day) for an hour in the morning were less likely to show signs of depression, according to a 2008 study (Journal of the American Medical Association, vol 299, p 2642).

Part of the reason for this is that our central clocks control levels of the hormone melatonin. When it gets dark, our melatonin levels rise, making us sleepy, while bright light turns off melatonin production and makes us more alert.

So light at night actually has two distinct effects. It can reset our internal clocks, as Czeisler showed, and it can also suppress the production of melatonin. The first to suspect the suppression of melatonin could affect our health was Richard Stevens at the University of Connecticut Health Center in Farmington. During the 1980s, he was investigating the causes of breast cancer, rates of which are much higher in developed countries. Stevens came across studies that suggested that too much light could alter the development of breast tissue and suppress melatonin secretion, and that lower melatonin might boost oestrogen levels.

That all came together for him one night as a street light shone into his apartment. He realised that the introduction of bright artificial lighting was a profound change in our environment, one that could be affecting our health in many ways. The idea became known as the light-at-night hypothesis, and there is growing evidence in support of it.

Several epidemiological studies suggest there is indeed a link between light-at-night and cancer, particularly breast cancer. Perhaps the most direct evidence comes from a study by David Blask of Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, and collaborators. They implanted human breast tumours into female rats and pumped the tumours with blood from healthy women. The blood had been collected either in daylight, or at night after the women experienced 2 hours of complete darkness, or at night following 90 minutes under bright fluorescent light.

The melatonin-rich blood taken from subjects in total darkness severely slowed the tumours' growth, they found. Conversely, tumours grew much faster after receiving melatonin-depleted blood from women exposed to light (Cancer Research, vol 65, p 22274). "We can manipulate light and melatonin levels, and thus cancer growth rates, almost like a dimmer switch," says Blask.

Tumours also grow faster in mice made to follow schedules mimicking shift work or jet lag, says Steven Lockley of Harvard Medical School in Boston. The evidence implicating shift work in breast cancer is so extensive that in 2007 the World Health Organization categorised shift work as a probable cause of cancer.

If melatonin is the key, it is plausible that anything that suppresses melatonin could increase the risk of cancer. Lockley points out that totally blind women - with no functioning light receptors at all in their eyes - have a breast cancer risk half that of their sighted counterparts. "The totally blind women never have their melatonin perturbed, which may be the reason why their cancer risk is less," he says.

Besides cancer, disruption of our body clock and melatonin suppression have been linked to obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Studies show that night-shift workers have higher rates of heart attack and stroke than those on day schedules, for instance, and that the difference grows with the number of years spent doing the job.

Impaired thinking

Animal studies show that disrupted routines can even alter the wiring of the brain, impairing cognitive function, it was reported earlier this year (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol 108, p 1657). Ilia Karatsoreos of The Rockefeller University in New York found that mice kept on an unnatural cycle of 10 hours of light followed by 10 hours of darkness lost neuronal complexity in the prelimbic prefrontal cortex, an executive part of the brain. Karatsoreos thinks the results are relevant to people. "I think this study is proof in principle that disrupting the clock by changing the light cycle can result in changes in the brain, behaviour and physiology," he says.

However, imposing a 20-hour cycle is like "hitting the system over the head with a hammer", he cautions. It remains to be seen if milder disruptions also have these effects.

Meanwhile, studies have been showing that the blue wavelengths are by far the most powerful in shifting rhythms and suppressing melatonin. In 2001, George Brainard of Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and collaborators found that melatonin secretion was most powerfully suppressed when volunteers were exposed to very bright light at around 2 am, at wavelengths from 450 to 480 nanometres - squarely in the blue part of the spectrum ( Journal of Neuroscience, vol 21, p 6405).

The findings suggested that the special receptor cells in our retinas contain a light-sensitive protein distinct from those we see with, and that it responds mainly to blue light. Sure enough, the cells were shown to contain a protein called melanopsin the following year.

In similar experiments involving extended nocturnal exposure to light, Brainard, Czeisler and Lockley showed that pure blue light of 460 nm suppressed melatonin for roughly twice as long as green light of 555 nm (Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol 88, p 4502). The blue light also reset people's internal clocks by 3 hours on average, compared with just an hour and a half for green light. Resetting clocks in this way means people find it hard to get to sleep the following night, and then feel tired in the morning.

More evidence comes from a study led by Leonid Kayumov at the University of Toronto, Canada. He asked some volunteers to wear goggles designed to filter out blue light. When volunteers did simulated shift work under bright indoor light (800 lux), melatonin production was suppressed in those not using the goggles, whereas those wearing goggles had melatonin secretion profiles similar to those of subjects exposed to dim light (Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol 90, p 2755). This suggests the use of such goggles could minimise the impact on shift workers or people staying up late (see "Use light right").

While blue light is worst in terms of affecting our body clocks at night, it is also the best kind of light to have by day. Dieter Kunz of the Clinical Chronobiology Research Group at Charité University of Medicine in Berlin, Germany, waxes lyrical about the benefits of blue. "Bright blue in the morning is incredible. Throw away the pills," he jokes. Blue light also has the greatest power to keep us alert. Lockley has shown that people exposed to pure blue light responded faster in tests and made fewer mistakes than those exposed to pure green light (Sleep, vol 29, p 161).

So blue wavelengths appear to have the greatest influence on human physiology, day or night. There have been claims that full-spectrum lighting, which contains a mixture of all visible wavelengths and resembles natural daylight, is best for working environments, but the level of blue matters most as far as alertness is concerned.

These findings suggest that if light at night is a serious issue, it could be getting worse. Low-energy fluorescent bulbs and LED-based lighting usually produce much more blue light than the old-fashioned tungsten light bulbs they are replacing (see "True colours").

What's more, while most studies into the effects of night-time light have involved intense illumination over extended periods, recent studies are showing that normal home lighting and even dim light may be disruptive to human physiology. A study published earlier this year, for instance, found that for people exposed to normal room lighting in the late evening - less than 200 lux - melatonin levels rose later than in people subjected to dim lighting, and then remained high for about 90 minutes less (Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol 96, p 463). "One hundred lux gives 50 per cent of the maximal response under very bright light, and melatonin suppression can be measured at much lower light levels," says Lockley.

Besides suppressing melatonin, even relatively dim light sources such as table lamps and computer monitors can set back our internal clocks. "Our lab has shown that less than 8 lux is capable of entraining the circadian clock," says Lockely. The team speculates that this might explain the high prevalence of delayed sleep phase disorder, in which people have trouble getting to sleep and then wake up feeling tired. So how serious is this problem? "We have no idea what chronic low-light exposure does as the entire world is self-experimenting on using electric light at night," he says.

The degree of harm is likely to depend on the degree of disruption, Lockley says, but it would take a very large study to prove this. However, there is already plenty of evidence linking short sleep duration to increased risks of cardiovascular disease, stroke, high blood presssure, diabetes and depression.

It is a problem people can do something about. While researchers remain reluctant to provide specific guidelines for night-time lighting, we can get a glimpse of the latest thinking in this area from NASA. It recently reduced the upper limit of illumination in the general sleeping areas of spacecraft, where some astronauts might be active as their colleagues doze, from 20 lux to 1 lux (a lux is roughly equivalent to full moonlight). For dedicated sleeping areas, the upper limit is 0.02 lux (equivalent to a quarter moon).

Manufacturers could also help by selling lights for use at night that produce less blue. In fact, one newly launched kind of low-energy lighting, called ESL, has a spectrum more like that of incandescent bulbs.

Changing light bulbs is relatively easy. The hard part will be persuading people to turn off their TVs and put down their iPads well before they go to sleep.

Use light right

Be Alert in the day, sleep well at night

• Get lots of bright light during the day, especially in the morning. It will make you more alert and happier, and help you sleep at night.

• As you get older, you will need more light during the day. The lens of the eye lets less light through as you age: in particular, it lets through less blue light, which is most important for setting your clock.

• Dim the lights well before your bedtime. That means no bright screens, either - including televisions, computers and smartphones.

• Maintain a consistent bedtime and wake time from day to day.

• Time spent in the dark makes your body clock more sensitive to light. If you have to get up during the night, use a dim red light to minimise any disruption.

• Avoid caffeine late in the day and develop a relaxing bedtime routine.

• If, despite doing all the above, you still struggle to sleep, try wearing amber-coloured goggles in the hours before bed. They are commercially available and designed to filter out blue wavelengths.
http://www.newscientist.com/article...ight-light.html
Reply With Quote
  #363   ^
Old Tue, Jul-05-11, 02:53
Demi's Avatar
Demi Demi is offline
Posts: 26,755
 
Plan: Muscle Centric
Stats: 238/153/160 Female 5'10"
BF:
Progress: 109%
Location: UK
Default

Quote:
From The New York Times
July 5, 2011


In Eyes, a Clock Calibrated by Wavelengths of Light

Just as the ear has two purposes — hearing and telling you which way is up — so does the eye. It receives the input necessary for vision, but the retina also houses a network of sensors that detect the rise and fall of daylight. With light, the body sets its internal clock to a 24-hour cycle regulating an estimated 10 percent of our genes.

The workhorse of this system is the light-sensitive hormone melatonin, which is produced by the body every evening and during the night. Melatonin promotes sleep and alerts a variety of biological processes to the approximate hour of the day.

Light hitting the retina suppresses the production of melatonin — and there lies the rub. In this modern world, our eyes are flooded with light well after dusk, contrary to our evolutionary programming. Scientists are just beginning to understand the potential health consequences. The disruption of circadian cycles may not just be shortchanging our sleep, they have found, but also contributing to a host of diseases.

“Light works as if it’s a drug, except it’s not a drug at all,” said George Brainard, a neurologist at Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia and one of the first researchers to study light’s effects on the body’s hormones and circadian rhythms.

Any sort of light can suppress melatonin, but recent experiments have raised novel questions about one type in particular: the blue wavelengths produced by many kinds of energy-efficient light bulbs and electronic gadgets.

Dr. Brainard and other researchers have found that light composed of blue wavelengths slows the release of melatonin with particular effectiveness. Until recently, though, few studies had directly examined how blue-emitting electronics might affect the brain.

So scientists at the University of Basel in Switzerland tried a simple experiment: They asked 13 men to sit before a computer each evening for two weeks before going to bed.

During one week, for five hours every night, the volunteers sat before an old-style fluorescent monitor emitting light composed of several colors from the visible spectrum, though very little blue. Another week, the men sat at screens backlighted by light-emitting diodes, or LEDs. This screen was twice as blue.

“To our surprise, we saw huge differences,” said Christian Cajochen, who heads the Center for Chronobiology at the University of Basel. Melatonin levels in volunteers watching the LED screens took longer to rise at night, compared with when the participants were watching the fluorescent screens, and the deficit persisted throughout the evening.

The subjects also scored higher on tests of memory and cognition after exposure to blue light, Dr. Cajochen and his team reported in the May issue of The Journal of Applied Physiology. While men were able to recall pairs of words flashed across the fluorescent screen about half the time, some scores rose to almost 70 percent when they stared at the LED monitors.

The finding adds to a series of others suggesting, though certainly not proving, that exposure to blue light may keep us more awake and alert, partly by suppressing production of melatonin. An LED screen bright enough and big enough “could be giving you an alert stimulus at a time that will frustrate your body’s ability to go to sleep later,” said Dr. Brainard. “When you turn it off, it doesn’t mean that instantly the alerting effects go away. There’s an underlying biology that’s stimulated.”

Still, nobody is suggesting that we all turn off the lights at dusk and sit in the dark; research into this area is in its infancy. “We are only beginning to understand what really happens under natural conditions,” said Mark Rea of the Lighting Research Center at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in New York.

Artificial light has been around for more than 120 years. But the light emitted by older sources, like incandescent bulbs, contains more red wavelengths. The problem now, Dr. Brainard and other researchers fear, is that our world is increasingly illuminated in blue. By one estimate, 1.6 billion new computers, televisions and cellphones were sold last year alone, and incandescent lights are being replaced by more energy-efficient, and often bluer, bulbs.

In January in the journal PLoS One, the University of Basel team also compared the effects of incandescent bulbs to fluorescents modified to emit more blue light. Men exposed to the fluorescent lights produced 40 percent less melatonin than when they were exposed to incandescent bulbs, and they reported feeling more awake an hour after the lights went off.

In addition, the quantity of light necessary to affect melatonin may be much smaller than once thought. In research published in March in The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, a team at the Harvard Medical School reported that ordinary indoor lighting before bedtime suppressed melatonin in the brain, even delaying production of the hormone for 90 minutes after the lights were off, compared with people exposed to only dim light.

What do these findings mean to everyday life? Some experts believe that any kind of light too late into the evening could have broad health effects, independent of any effect on sleep. For example, a report published last year in the journal PNAS found that mice exposed to light at night gained more weight than those housed in normal light, even though both groups consumed the same number of calories.

Light at night has been examined as a contributor to breast cancer for two decades. While there is still no consensus, enough laboratory and epidemiological studies have supported the idea that in 2007, the World Health Organization declared shift work a probable carcinogen. Body clock disruptions “can alter sleep-activity patterns, suppress melatonin production and disregulate genes involved in tumor development,” the agency concluded.

Blue light’s effects might be particularly pronounced for shift workers and others who get little natural daylight, some researchers say. Consider one small trial that appears the June issue of The Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. Among 28 elderly nursing home residents, those exposed to just 30 minutes of blue light on weekdays for four weeks showed improvement in cognitive abilities, compared with patients exposed only to red.

Researchers like Dr. Brainard hope the science may lead to a new generation of lights and screens designed with wavelengths that adjust according to the hour of the day.

Among those interested are officials at NASA, who have approached the neurologist about designing light on the International Space Station in a way that promotes alertness during waking hours and encourages sleep during times of rest.

“I think we’re on the verge of a lighting revolution,” said Dr. Brainard. If the hormone-sparing lights can be made to work during spaceflight, he said, “people will use it here on the ground.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/05/health/05light.html
Reply With Quote
  #364   ^
Old Thu, Feb-23-12, 02:39
Demi's Avatar
Demi Demi is offline
Posts: 26,755
 
Plan: Muscle Centric
Stats: 238/153/160 Female 5'10"
BF:
Progress: 109%
Location: UK
Default

Came across this interesting article. T.S. Wiley talks about this awake-alert period in the book, saying that, in adults, this is now an extinct sleep state.


Quote:
From BBC News
London, UK
22 February, 2012

The myth of the eight-hour sleep

We often worry about lying awake in the middle of the night - but it could be good for you. A growing body of evidence from both science and history suggests that the eight-hour sleep may be unnatural.


In the early 1990s, psychiatrist Thomas Wehr conducted an experiment in which a group of people were plunged into darkness for 14 hours every day for a month.

It took some time for their sleep to regulate but by the fourth week the subjects settled into a very distinct sleeping pattern. They slept first for four hours, then woke for one or two hours before falling into a second four-hour sleep.

Though sleep scientists were impressed by the study, among the general public the idea that we must sleep for eight consecutive hours persists.

In 2001, historian Roger Ekirch of Virginia Tech published a seminal paper, drawn from 16 years of research, revealing a wealth of historical evidence that humans used to sleep in two distinct chunks.

His book At Day's Close: Night in Times Past, published four years later, unearths more than 500 references to a segmented sleeping pattern - in diaries, court records, medical books and literature, from Homer's Odyssey to an anthropological account of modern tribes in Nigeria.

Much like the experience of Wehr's subjects, these references describe a first sleep which began about two hours after dusk, followed by waking period of one or two hours and then a second sleep.

"It's not just the number of references - it is the way they refer to it, as if it was common knowledge," Ekirch says.

During this waking period people were quite active. They often got up, went to the toilet or smoked tobacco and some even visited neighbours. Most people stayed in bed, read, wrote and often prayed. Countless prayer manuals from the late 15th Century offered special prayers for the hours in between sleeps.

And these hours weren't entirely solitary - people often chatted to bed-fellows or had sex.

A doctor's manual from 16th Century France even advised couples that the best time to conceive was not at the end of a long day's labour but "after the first sleep", when "they have more enjoyment" and "do it better".

Ekirch found that references to the first and second sleep started to disappear during the late 17th Century. This started among the urban upper classes in northern Europe and over the course of the next 200 years filtered down to the rest of Western society.

By the 1920s the idea of a first and second sleep had receded entirely from our social consciousness.

He attributes the initial shift to improvements in street lighting, domestic lighting and a surge in coffee houses - which were sometimes open all night. As the night became a place for legitimate activity and as that activity increased, the length of time people could dedicate to rest dwindled.

In his new book, Evening's Empire, historian Craig Koslofsky puts forward an account of how this happened.

"Associations with night before the 17th Century were not good," he says. The night was a place populated by people of disrepute - criminals, prostitutes and drunks.

"Even the wealthy, who could afford candlelight, had better things to spend their money on. There was no prestige or social value associated with staying up all night."

That changed in the wake of the Reformation and the counter-Reformation. Protestants and Catholics became accustomed to holding secret services at night, during periods of persecution. If earlier the night had belonged to reprobates, now respectable people became accustomed to exploiting the hours of darkness.

This trend migrated to the social sphere too, but only for those who could afford to live by candlelight. With the advent of street lighting, however, socialising at night began to filter down through the classes.

In 1667, Paris became the first city in the world to light its streets, using wax candles in glass lamps. It was followed by Lille in the same year and Amsterdam two years later, where a much more efficient oil-powered lamp was developed.

London didn't join their ranks until 1684 but by the end of the century, more than 50 of Europe's major towns and cities were lit at night.

Night became fashionable and spending hours lying in bed was considered a waste of time.

"People were becoming increasingly time-conscious and sensitive to efficiency, certainly before the 19th Century," says Roger Ekirch. "But the industrial revolution intensified that attitude by leaps and bounds."

Strong evidence of this shifting attitude is contained in a medical journal from 1829 which urged parents to force their children out of a pattern of first and second sleep.

"If no disease or accident there intervene, they will need no further repose than that obtained in their first sleep, which custom will have caused to terminate by itself just at the usual hour.

"And then, if they turn upon their ear to take a second nap, they will be taught to look upon it as an intemperance not at all redounding to their credit."

Today, most people seem to have adapted quite well to the eight-hour sleep, but Ekirch believes many sleeping problems may have roots in the human body's natural preference for segmented sleep as well as the ubiquity of artificial light.

This could be the root of a condition called sleep maintenance insomnia, where people wake during the night and have trouble getting back to sleep, he suggests.

The condition first appears in literature at the end of the 19th Century, at the same time as accounts of segmented sleep disappear.

"For most of evolution we slept a certain way," says sleep psychologist Gregg Jacobs. "Waking up during the night is part of normal human physiology."

The idea that we must sleep in a consolidated block could be damaging, he says, if it makes people who wake up at night anxious, as this anxiety can itself prohibit sleeps and is likely to seep into waking life too.

Russell Foster, a professor of circadian [body clock] neuroscience at Oxford, shares this point of view.

"Many people wake up at night and panic," he says. "I tell them that what they are experiencing is a throwback to the bi-modal sleep pattern."

But the majority of doctors still fail to acknowledge that a consolidated eight-hour sleep may be unnatural.

"Over 30% of the medical problems that doctors are faced with stem directly or indirectly from sleep. But sleep has been ignored in medical training and there are very few centres where sleep is studied," he says.

Jacobs suggests that the waking period between sleeps, when people were forced into periods of rest and relaxation, could have played an important part in the human capacity to regulate stress naturally.

In many historic accounts, Ekirch found that people used the time to meditate on their dreams.

"Today we spend less time doing those things," says Dr Jacobs. "It's not a coincidence that, in modern life, the number of people who report anxiety, stress, depression, alcoholism and drug abuse has gone up."

So the next time you wake up in the middle of the night, think of your pre-industrial ancestors and relax. Lying awake could be good for you.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-16964783

Craig Koslofsky and Russell Foster appeared on The Forum from the BBC World Service. Listen to the programme by clicking on the link below:

Quote:
From The BBC World Service:

The Forum

Night: friend or foe?


Do we manipulate the darkness, or does it manipulate us?

Oxford Professor of Circadian Neuroscience, Russell Foster, explains his research which shows how the blue-tinged sky of dusk is a trigger that tells our bodies it's time to prepare for bed.

And why it would be good for us to go back to rising with the dawn and going to bed at sundown.

Rut Blees Luxemburg finds surprising richness of night-time colours in her photographs, and historian Craig Koslofsky shows how early modern Europeans first colonised the night by introducing street lighting.

Oxford neuroscientist Russell Foster argues that too much time awake at night permanently de-synchronises our biological clocks: even after 20 years of nightshifts our bodies can’t adapt to a new circadian rhythm and we end up with permanent jetlag as well as increased risk of cancer, diabetes, and heart disease. Foster’s latest research is bringing new insights into sleep disruption and mental health..

German photographer Rut Blees Luxemburg says that the long exposures she uses during the night allow her to find a vibrant palette in the darkest of hours. Composing nocturnal landscapes in the city, she finds the hours after dark full of creativity and poetry.

How do you separate darkness from the night? Historian at the University of Illinois, Craig Koslofsky, argues that the installation of street lighting in 17th Century Europe not only restructured daily lives of city dwellers but also turned night into a time for respectable work and entertainment.

Sixty Second Idea to Change the World
Time to get up or an extra five minutes’ snooze? Russell Foster says there are biological reasons for teenagers to have a lie in: it’s not laziness that keeps them in bed but their circadian rhythms. He suggests that secondary school should start at 10am; this has already been tried in the north of England, bringing exam results up and truancy down.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00ngb4r
Reply With Quote
  #365   ^
Old Thu, Feb-23-12, 13:36
bike2work bike2work is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 4,536
 
Plan: Fung-inspired fasting
Stats: 336/000/160 Female 5' 9"
BF:
Progress: 191%
Location: Seattle metro area
Default

Thank you so much for posting that Demi. I think I've been fighting this tendency, not realizing that it's something natural. After dinner I often want to snooze but fight to stay awake so that I can sleep through the night uninterrupted. When I wake up in the middle of the night I always worry that I'll be a wreck the next day, but maybe it's not really a problem.

My grandmother used to do that -- fall asleep after dinner, sleep for several hours, get up in the wee hours of the morning to read for a couple hours, and then went back to sleep till morning. It never occurred to me that this might be a good idea.
Reply With Quote
  #366   ^
Old Sun, Mar-04-12, 01:30
Demi's Avatar
Demi Demi is offline
Posts: 26,755
 
Plan: Muscle Centric
Stats: 238/153/160 Female 5'10"
BF:
Progress: 109%
Location: UK
Default

Further to the article on the myth of the eight hour sleep:

Quote:
Segmented sleep: Ten strange things people do at night

Most people, when they go to bed, aim to sleep until the morning - but some wake up and are active in the middle of the night.

Last week, we published a story about the myth that an eight-hour sleep is necessary for good health. In response, 10 people told us how they sleep in two separate chunks - and what they do in between.

Brennan Wenck-Reilly, 36, San Francisco, US
I spent two years living high in the Andes in a town that had no electricity where I went to sleep and rose with the sun. Now I naturally wake around 01:00 or 02:00 and then become tired again around 03:00 and sleep until 07:00 or so.

My friends have always made fun of my sleep pattern and my wife used to force me to get out of bed as my lying there would disturb her.

I've decided to use this time creatively and run around San Francisco taking pictures in the night. We just had a small storm pass through the city, so there are some cool clouds in the sky. I have been itching to go out.

Annelieke Dirks, 33, Haarlem, The Netherlands

I wake up at about 04:00 every night to practise yoga.

Most of the time I do it at home, but once a week I drive to a yoga studio in Amsterdam where I practise with about 20 other people.

I teach and practise kundalini yoga, which has followers all over the world who live in a similar rhythm.

I go back to sleep but some people don't. I find a lot of yogis don't sleep very much.

Sometimes, my partner joins me, if he's having trouble sleeping, but mostly he just sleeps through it.

I used to sleep eight or nine hours a night and still always felt tired. But I've never felt so good in my life as I do now.

Carolyn Cornell, 78, Austin, Texas, US

As an artist, many of my paintings have come directly from my dreams.

I usually wake up around 03:00 and sometimes I have such a strong image in my head that I have to grab a piece of paper and draw it immediately.

I trained as an art therapist and used to work with a young boy called Jonathan who had cancer. He was writing a cartoon story and we were working to put it together when he had a bad relapse and died.

Afterwards I dreamt about him and one night I woke up with a vivid picture of his face. Above it was a speech bubble filled with different colours.

I drew the image immediately and later made this painting of him.

Reham Samir, 25, Cairo, Egypt

As a Muslim, I get up to pray in the middle of the night.

We are advised to sleep and then wake up in the third stage of the night before sunrise, though this night-time prayer is voluntary. It's called Tahajjud, the Arabic word for night prayer.

I usually get up and pray alone rather than going to the mosque. We also have a dawn prayer, which is obligatory, so sometimes I stay up until dawn and then go back to sleep.

According to the Koran, Muhammad slept in this way. So segmented sleep is quite normal in the Muslim tradition.

Iain Wilson, 37, Papua, Indonesia

I grew up among the Yali people in Papua, Indonesia. When I was born, my parents lived in a remote area. My mother was a medical worker and my father was an anthropologist. We lived there until I was 16, and as a child I used to camp and go hunting with my friends in the Yali tribe.

When I stayed with them, we would go to bed more or less after sunset and people would always wake up during the night.

I would hear them talking and someone would start a fire. Sometimes we would eat some sweet potato before going back to sleep until 05:30 or 06:00.

At home with my parents, I would get a regular eight-hour sleep, but when I was with my friends, I slept like they did.

Candra Caballero, 36, Daytona Beach, Florida, US

My husband is a sous-chef in a restaurant and gets home around midnight. We eat together, catch up and might watch a quick show on TV, until about 03:00.

Everyone I know tries to discourage me, saying my sleeping habits are unhealthy, but I feel great.

I work a normal eight-hour day and as soon as I get home, my body starts shutting down. I go to bed for about four hours, then get up and start doing chores and preparing dinner.

We've been doing this for about two years. Before then, I used to try to stay up until midnight and get eight hours' sleep, but I used to wake during the night and start to panic.

Karen Rochon, 69, Sequim, Washington, US

Ever since I was a toddler, I have woken up at night. I used to hop into the cot with my brother. It didn't become a problem until I was a student, when I had to get up early to go to classes.

I would try to force myself to get back to sleep but would end up lying there, thinking and getting very frustrated. That went on for eight years until I became a nurse and started working the night shift.

Now I am retired and I get up and watch Korean dramas on TV - I don't speak Korean but they are subtitled. It's quiet and I can watch them for two or three hours undisturbed. I've watched more than 70 series now.

The Korean people have really strong morals. Unlike on American TV, there is very little violence and adultery, the actors are great and they've got great singers too.

Bernie O'Leary, 55, Cirencester, UK

Most nights I wake up in the middle of the night and I feel great, full of beans. I could get up and do some chores or walk my dogs but I know it is better to stay in bed. I lie there and look forward to my dreams.
When I was a full-time teacher and had a busy workload in the morning, I used to get anxious that I wouldn't fall back to sleep.

Now I have the luxury of knowing that I have at least two hours of wonderful sleep to come with brilliant dreaming. It is like having your very own home cinema to look forward to every night: the sheer expectation sends me to sleep again.

My dreams always reflect what I was thinking that day. Through them, I reconcile issues from the day and solve problems.

Theresa Laturnus, 58, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada

I haven't been able to sleep through the night since I was pregnant with my first child, 24 years ago. Also, my husband snores like a Harley Davidson motorcycle, so I used to go sleep on the sofa in the living room.

Recently he has been having trouble sleeping and wakes in the night too. We have decided to go to bed early on a Saturday night and get up around 02:30 to go meditate at our church.

It is a Catholic church where they have a chapel that is open all night for special prayers called 24-hour adoration. According to these prayers, someone has to be there 24 hours a day so we relieve the person who lets us in and we stay until someone else shows up.

That hour usually flies by. We come home relaxed, go back to bed and sleep again until the morning.

Jiri Janata, 72 Atlanta, Georgia, US

I didn't always wake up at night; it is something that developed with age. At first I would stay in bed and worry, but now I listen to music to pass the time.

I sneak out of my room, so as not to wake my wife, and go to my study where I turn on the NPR programme Music Through the Night.

After that, I go back to sleep for another two hours. It is wonderful - the anxieties that I used to experience when staying awake in bed worrying are gone. Music is the answer.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-17193783
Reply With Quote
  #367   ^
Old Tue, Mar-20-12, 02:37
Demi's Avatar
Demi Demi is offline
Posts: 26,755
 
Plan: Muscle Centric
Stats: 238/153/160 Female 5'10"
BF:
Progress: 109%
Location: UK
Default

Quote:
Circadian Rhythms Have Profound Influence On Metabolic Output

ScienceDaily (Mar. 19, 2012) — By analyzing the hundreds of metabolic products present in the liver, researchers with the UC Irvine Center for Epigenetics & Metabolism have discovered that circadian rhythms -- our own body clock -- greatly control the production of such key building blocks as amino acids, carbohydrates and lipids.

They identified more than 600 liver-originated metabolites, which are the chemical substances created by metabolism that sustain and promote cell health and growth. Approximately 60 percent of these metabolites were found to be dependent on the endogenous circadian clock -- many more than expected, as only about 15 percent of the body's genes are regulated by it.

Circadian rhythms over 24 hours govern fundamental biological and physiological processes in almost all organisms. They anticipate environmental changes and adapt certain bodily functions to the appropriate time of day. Disruption of these cycles can seriously affect human health.

Center for Epigenetics & Metabolism director Paolo Sassone-Corsi, lead author on the study and one of the world's preeminent researchers on circadian rhythms, said the liver metabolites reveal how the body clock -- through the main circadian gene, CLOCK -- orchestrates the interplay between metabolites and signaling proteins in much the same way a conductor leads a symphony.

"Metabolites and signaling proteins -- like the horns and strings in an orchestra -- need to be perfectly coordinated, and we've found that CLOCK provides that direction," he said.

Since external cues such as day-night lighting patterns and nutrition influence the circadian machinery, metabolites and their relationship to signaling proteins in cells seem to be acutely tied to circadian disruptions. This may help explain, Sassone-Corsi added, some of the primary physiological factors underlying obesity, high cholesterol and metabolic-based diseases like diabetes.

"This interplay has far-reaching implications for human illness and aging, and it is likely vital for proper metabolism," he said. Study results appear this week in the early online edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

"By identifying the relationship between metabolites and the body clock, we have taken a first step toward a better understanding of how nutrients interact with our metabolism, giving researchers a new opportunity to spot the optimal times for us to get the fullest benefits from the foods we eat and the medications we take," added Kristin Eckel-Mahan, a UCI postdoctoral researcher in biological chemistry and study co-author.

Working with Metabolon Inc., Sassone-Corsi and Eckel-Mahan created the first liver metabolome -- the full set of metabolites. With this information, they partnered with Pierre Baldi, director of UCI's Institute for Genomics & Bioinformatics, and his graduate student Vishal Patel to analyze the data and build CircadiOmics, a Web-based data system that provides detailed profiles of the metabolites and related genes in the liver and the underlying networks through which they interact.

"Within CircadiOmics, we were able to integrate this circadian metabolite data with multiple other data sources to generate the first comprehensive map of the liver metabolome and its circadian oscillations and develop regulatory hypotheses that have been confirmed in the laboratory," said Baldi, Chancellor's Professor of computer science. "CircadiOmics is being expanded with metabolic data about other tissues and conditions and will be invaluable to further our understanding of the interplay between metabolism and circadian rhythms in healthy and diseased states."

Robert Mohney and Katie Vignola of Metabolon, in Durham, N.C., contributed to the study, which received National Institutes of Health and National Science Foundation support.

Journal Reference:

Kristin L. Eckel-Mahan, Vishal R. Patel, Robert P. Mohney, Katie S. Vignola, Pierre Baldi, and Paolo Sassone-Corsi. Coordination of the transcriptome and metabolome by the circadian clock. PNAS, March 19, 2012 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1118726109
http://www.sciencedaily.com/release...20319163803.htm
Reply With Quote
  #368   ^
Old Fri, Mar-23-12, 03:14
Demi's Avatar
Demi Demi is offline
Posts: 26,755
 
Plan: Muscle Centric
Stats: 238/153/160 Female 5'10"
BF:
Progress: 109%
Location: UK
Default

Quote:
23 March, 2012

Clock change: bright lights will help you adjust

How a sunny weekend will help us adjust to the clock change and why babies should nap with the curtains open - exposure to daylight profoundly affects our sleep.

By Professor Jim Horne, Sleep Research Centre at Loughborough University


Daylight has a powerful effect on our 24 hour body-clock, especially sunrise, our natural alarm clock.

Enabling the early birds amongst us to ‘catch the worm’, sunrise also ensured that we were awake and not ‘the worm’ when predators were up and about.

An extreme example of the effects of daylight on when and for how long we sleep, are the Inuit, in northern Canada who, until recently, only depended on oil-lamps at night.

They would sleep and doze for around fourteen hours a day during the perpetual darkness of the winter, whereas under the continuous daylight of the summer this fell to about six hours daily.

Despite having eight fewer hours sleep, there was no increase in daytime sleepiness - it seems that the extra sleep in the winter was superfluous.

Our modern living routines together with the electric light, result in little by way of seasonal changes to our sleep, despite the roughly eight hour seasonal difference in daylight in the UK.

Nevertheless, we still have the ability gradually to extend our night-time sleep, not as much as the Inuit, but by about one to two hours, or even slowly reduce it to about six hours, given the time and inclination to do so, and without noticeable changes to daytime alertness.

On the other hand, a sudden loss of an hour’s sleep as when clocks go forward, for example, can lead to more sleepiness, for a day or two until sleep has re-adjusted.

Much of the effect of daylight on sleep is via the brain’s pineal gland secreting melatonin, also known as the ‘hormone of the night’.

It is not really a sleep-inducer as it is also found at night in nocturnal animals. Instead, it tells us when to sleep and when to wake up, rather than how to sleep.

Melatonin is knocked out by daylight and indoor bright light, especially by light with a slightly blue tinge.

Bright light at night is also useful as a ‘quick fix’ for sleepiness, especially for shiftworkers.

However, this alerting effect is not only due to the suppression of melatonin, but to other, more rapid, temporary action on other brain mechanisms.

For dealing with ‘jet lag’ the judicious use of light is just as effective as melatonin tablets, especially as the tablets are useless in daylight.

Another useful trick with light, but for babies, is for their daytime naps to be in the light, not in a darkened room.

This naturally shortens their daytime sleep, leading to longer and better sleep at night.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/h...you-adjust.html
Reply With Quote
  #369   ^
Old Sat, Jun-02-12, 03:16
Demi's Avatar
Demi Demi is offline
Posts: 26,755
 
Plan: Muscle Centric
Stats: 238/153/160 Female 5'10"
BF:
Progress: 109%
Location: UK
Default

Quote:
Are you feeling sleepy? Here’s why...

The pace of modern life forces us to ignore one of the most powerful parts of our brain – the body clock. But at what cost?


Inside your head, located somewhere between the eyes, is a tiny piece of brain tissue made up of no more than 20,000 cells. If the brain was the size of the UK, the body clock, or suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN for short), would be the size of a small village in Derbyshire. But don’t let its size fool you: this mysterious internal mechanism controls… well, pretty much everything. It regulates our sleep cycles, our hormones, the performance of our organs, and even our cognitive processes.

Professor Till Roenneberg, who works at the Institute of Medical Psychology at the Ludwig-Maximilians University in Munich, has dedicated himself to discovering how the body clock works. He found that it responds to the light of the sun. In his new book, Internal Time, Roenneberg describes experiments in which people are locked in underground bunkers, deprived of sunlight. Their body clocks go haywire; they begin to imagine that their days are much longer than they actually are; they stay awake several hours more than usual, and then sleep for ages. Interestingly, most blind people have functioning body clocks, because the eye can send information about light to the body clock, even if it can’t see it. As Roenneberg points out, people without eyes are in the same position as those locked in bunkers.

But Roenneberg, who might be the world’s foremost authority on body clocks, is very worried that a terrible thing is happening to them. The modern world is sending them out of whack. In fact, he explains, we are torn between two types of clocks – the real clocks in our brains, and the clocks we put on our wrists, on our walls, in our pockets, and on our bedside tables. These are not so real. Roenneberg calls them “social clocks”. And in the battle between the clocks, the fake clocks are winning.

And not only that, the world that depends on fake clocks is tampering with the mechanism of the real clock, and doing serious damage to the human race.

You can see Roenneberg present his case on the internet. He’s a 59-year-old German who speaks English with Teutonic precision. He has dedicated his life to the study of body clocks, and knows about the internal timekeeping of everything from bacteria to humans. He speaks very exactly, as if his own mind is governed by a high-quality timepiece. “The difference between what the social clock wants and what the body clock wants,” he says, “we call ‘social jet lag’.” When you suffer from social jet lag, you live a life that is permanently out of time. Bad things follow. Social jet lag sufferers are more likely to smoke. They are more likely to drink too much. They crave caffeine.

They are more likely to have hormonal imbalances, mood swings and trouble concentrating at work. Oh, and they are more likely to get fat, too.

“If you are already a little chubby, and not very thin,” Roenneberg tells me, “it is very likely that living against the body clock makes you obese.” And how many of us are living these mistimed lives?

“Two thirds of our society are woken up in the middle of our biological night,” says Roenneberg.

The way we live today, he says, is turning more and more of us into late sleepers, which makes the problem worse; increasingly, our body clocks want us to be owls (late to bed, late to rise), while our social clocks want us to be larks (up and ready at 6am). I’ll come to that. But first, let’s consider jet lag. Roenneberg is telling us that, these days, many of us have jet lag, even when we stay in the same time zone. We have jet lag when we wake up, we have jet lag when we potter about in our houses – and, importantly, we have jet lag at work, which has serious economic consequences.

I know about jet lag. For decades, I’ve regularly travelled through time zones, finding myself in the middle of somebody else’s day or night. I remember the first time it hit me really badly. Over the space of five days, I became increasingly unlike myself, sometimes inappropriately sleepy, sometimes full of manic energy. I’d flown for eight hours in a south-westerly direction, crossing several time zones. When I arrived, it should have been the middle of the evening, but it wasn’t – it was early afternoon. So far, I thought, so good.

By the evening I was sleepy. At dinner, I should have been in bed, entering my second sleep cycle. I fought this fatigue with cocktails.

Finally, I went to bed and crashed out at midnight. But my body thought it was five o’clock in the morning. Two hours later, I woke up, wracked with tiredness, but unable to sleep. So I sat up in bed, reading and drinking coffee, for five hours. I got through a whole thriller. Full of caffeine, eye-poppingly awake but bone-tired, edgy and sludgy, I went to breakfast. I felt the ghost of last night’s hunger, but didn’t want to eat. “Coffee?” asked the waitress. I didn’t really want it. But I drank it anyway. And towards the end of this time, something very embarrassing happened.

In Internal Time, a brilliant book full of hard science, Roenneberg describes the many things that happen when you get jet lag. Of course, you get tired. “We are expected to be active when our body clock is on its way to bed, and we have to try and catch up on sleep when our internal alarm clock ‘announces’ that it is time to get up.” Also, we suffer “reduced alertness, poor motor co-ordination, and reduced cognitive skills”. Our digestive hormones are released at the wrong time. When food is put in front of us, we’re not ready for it. Our organs no longer work in synchronicity. The system misfires. You are out of whack – or, more literally, zoned out. During the day, mania tries to get the upper hand over torpor; at night, it’s the other way around. In the end, you can’t tell the difference.

Starting with bacteria, says Roenneberg, every living organism evolved to have an internal clock, in order to find a workable niche. When cold-blooded reptiles roamed the Earth, they fed during the day, and huddled up at night, to get away from the cold. Mammals evolved in the opposite way; their niche was the night, although, as warm-blooded creatures, they were more adaptable.

When humans evolved, fire was a big factor; we could sleep at night, protected by campfires, and forage during the day. It was important for some of us to be owls, and others larks, so that somebody was always alert enough to keep watch while other members of the tribe slept. It was an advantage for young adults to be late sleepers, so they, the best athletes, could hunt at night. In fact, young adults still tend to be late sleepers. But these days, society often thinks of them as lazy teenagers and students. They sit up late, hunting – not for animals, but for alcohol. Their lessons and lectures start early, when their cognitive function tends to be at its worst – which, says Roenneberg, is one of our society’s big mistakes. He has argued in favour of later start times for German schools, even if this means rearranging the schedules of school buses. “Education is a nation’s investment in its future,” he writes. “If there is a chance to increase the quality of such an important investment, then logistical problems, such as busing, have to be solved on the long view – even if this is difficult.”

Roenneberg points us towards experiments conducted by Mary Carskadon of the Brown University School of Medicine. She has taken students into a sleep laboratory in the morning, when they are supposed to be at school, and found that many of them “show the signs of a major sleep disorder – narcolepsy.” In the lab they fall asleep, and enter REM, a sleep cycle “more typical of the end of sleep than its onset, showing that these students are physiologically still asleep, despite having gotten up in the morning.” In the light of this information, a Danish school has recently cut out timetables; students were allowed to dictate their own start time. Roenneberg says he’s keen to see the results of this project. Meanwhile, he is organising a huge survey “that aims to generate a world map for sleep-wake behaviour.”

Of course, nobody had heard of jet lag until the arrival of jets – if you sail across the Atlantic, your body clock has time to adjust. Still, nobody worried about the concept of time zones until the invention of trains. Before that, everybody set their clocks by the sun. But when you travelled by train, you had to keep resetting your watch. So in 1884, everybody agreed to divide the world into 24 time zones. Since then, our internal clocks have been at the mercy of the onward march of our external clocks; our relationship with the sun is getting weaker all the time. But it still persists; in a survey conducted by Roenneberg himself, Germans were studied according to “chronotype” – whether they were early or late sleepers. Every morning, it takes the sun 36 minutes to pass over Germany – four minutes for every line of latitude. It turned out that the further west a German lives, the more likely he or she is to be a late sleeper – even though Germany is contained within a single time zone. Which tells us an interesting thing: our bodies want to live according to the sun, rather than the alarm clock.

What Roenneberg is really saying is that we should think much more about our body clocks, because it’s not just what we do that’s important, but when we do it. Timing our sleep is key. When I track Roenneberg down, he’s in Pensacola, Florida, at a body clock conference. “Modern society regards sleep as superfluous – something we should get rid of,” he says, in his calm, precise German voice. “As if we need a cure for sleep.” And the thing is, sleep is not one state – it’s many different states. “Sleep is as heterogeneous in its functions as the wake state, but we are not aware of it,”

he says. If you get the right amount of sleep, he says – in other words, if you go to sleep and wake up according to your own body clock – “which hardly anybody can, you would realise that the quality of the other 16 hours is increased enormously”.

Roenneberg himself likes a good eight hours – although, at 58, he says he sometimes wakes up and reads. I ask him if he sleeps alone. “I don’t think that’s any of your business,” he says. Then he adds: “That was cheeky; it wasn’t meant sternly.” He doesn’t want to say whether he’s a lark or an owl, so his readers don’t think he’s biased towards one type or the other.

Short-sleeping larks, he says, have an advantage when it comes to making money. The commercial world wants you to wake up early, and it’s an advantage not to need too much sleep. But the problem is that more and more of us are becoming owls. The world we live in is making us want to sleep later and later – hence the prevalence of alarm clocks, and the increase in social jet lag. But why is this?

It is, he says, because the modern world – the world of alarm clocks and offices – puts us out of touch with the Earth’s rotation. We spend our days indoors, under weak lights, and at least part of our nights in similar conditions. Relatively speaking, the modern world is a world of dim days and bright nights. This is nothing like the natural world. “The differences are huge,” says Roenneberg. In the fake, modern world we don’t get enough light to tell us that the day has truly happened, and the nights aren’t dark enough to send us to sleep.

“Our body clocks are not getting a clear signal any more,” he says. “For all the functions within the body, the clock on the wall is absolutely meaningless.”

And that’s why we get jet lag. That’s why the embarrassing thing happened to me on the fifth day of my trip. I was having lunch on a terrace outside a restaurant. I nodded off. When I woke, I didn’t know how long I’d been asleep. But then I had an overwhelming urge to fall asleep again. I made a hasty plan. I would escape. My cognitive processes were awry. I walked away from the table, hoping I could get out of sight before I collapsed. I only managed to get a few yards. I lay down under a tree, and blacked out. When I was woken up, two minutes later, I had no idea where I was. In the battle between the clock on the wall and the one in my head, my internal clock won hands down.

Professor Till Roenneberg will be talking about his book and research at the Cheltenham Science Festival on the June 12. http://www.cheltenhamfestivals.com/...-power-of-sleep

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/h...res-why....html
Reply With Quote
  #370   ^
Old Sat, Jun-02-12, 18:02
freckles's Avatar
freckles freckles is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 8,730
 
Plan: Atkins Maintenance
Stats: 213/141/150 Female 5'4 1/2"
BF:
Progress: 114%
Location: Dallas, TX
Default

This is a highly interesting thread (even taking into consideration the hugely off topic posts).

I was curious to read it because of my own sleep patterns causing conflict with my dh. I am a night owl. I've always been. Dh is an early bird. He's always been. The older he gets the later he stays up and gets up....and me too. Problem is my late has gone from midnight-ish to 3-ish. And I usually end up sleeping until 10 or 12. So, yeah, I lose half my day to sleep and as one of the articles pointed out, my activity during those evening hours when I should be sleeping is most often not very productive.

I have tried over the years changing the pattern by setting an earlier time to go to bed and getting up at an earlier time regardless of when I went to bed. Sometimes I can make a change for a couple of weeks, but then slowly over time my habits revert back.

This thread has given me several ideas to try, but honestly I'm not very hopeful.
Reply With Quote
  #371   ^
Old Sat, Jul-07-12, 03:08
Demi's Avatar
Demi Demi is offline
Posts: 26,755
 
Plan: Muscle Centric
Stats: 238/153/160 Female 5'10"
BF:
Progress: 109%
Location: UK
Default

Quote:
From The New Scientist
6 July, 2012

Better than sunshine: See life in an improved light

by Jeff Hecht

Artificial lighting is making us sick – but a new generation of LEDs could give you the right light to keep you rested, alert and happy

AT FIRST blush, Prometheus's punishment might seem like an overreaction. For the minor crime of giving humanity a bit of fire to kick-start civilisation, he was sentenced to an eternity of getting his liver pecked out by an angry bird.

But maybe the Greeks were on to something with their punishment for messing with the natural order of light and dark. With night-time now optional and our metropolises growing ever brighter, we've begun to realise that a 24/7 society has consequences. It affects sleep patterns, creates health problems and just generally alters performance and mood in a bad way.

The levels of artificial light in our society show no signs of abating, yet they may not need to. The latest research is showing that if we could just change the type of light, we could restore our natural sleep cycles and reverse artificial light's negative effects. We might even be able to improve on what nature gave us.

Fire aside, the modern-day lighting revolution began with the 20th century and Thomas Edison's incandescent bulb. In terms of the light they give out, bulbs have not changed much since then. All the work has essentially gone into making bulbs more efficient, something the compact fluorescent bulb certainly is. But light from these bulbs does not so much illuminate our surroundings as irradiate them with their harsh, blueish glare. Plus their mercury content has raised questions about how to dispose of them safely.

So the past few years has seen the rise of the light-emitting diode (LED) bulb. Because they emit light only in a very narrow part of the electromagnetic spectrum, LEDs lose far less energy to heat than incandescents do. Yet they have some sleep researchers worried, because the spectrum of light from white LEDs contains a strong peak of blue light (see illustration). "Blue light is bad at night," says Abraham Haim at the University of Haifa, Israel, who studies the effects of artificial light.

That's because light does far more than simply enable us to see the world: it also helps regulate hormone levels and circadian rhythms. Vision evolved because of the need to know if it was day or night, says Steven Lockley, a sleep researcher at Harvard Medical School in Boston. To differentiate night from day, light-sensitive melanopsin receptors in our eyes tune our sleep-wake cycle to match the 24-hour day. These receptors respond to all visible light, but they're most sensitive to blue, which peaks in natural sunlight at midday.

When it detects this blue-tinged light, the body responds by suppressing production of the sleep-inducing hormone melatonin, and that makes us feel alert. We are highly sensitive to blue, and although these receptors are in the eyes, they respond even if you can't actually "see" blue. From midday to dusk, the blue in natural light fades, to be replaced by a reddish tint that stops the suppression of melatonin, reduces our alertness and allows us to get ready for sleep.

At least, this is the cycle we have evolved to follow. But in a 24/7 society saturated in artificial light, our natural systems go adrift. Constant, unchanging light - including blue light at night - prevents the melatonin system from sensing the darkness it needs to promote sleep. This leaves us sleep-deprived and that has health effects, which show up most clearly in night-shift workers. "Good epidemiology shows that women with night shifts have a 50 per cent increase in breast cancer," says Lockley. "Light at night might be a risk factor," because it reduces melatonin, which can suppress tumours (see New Scientist, 7 May 2011, p 44).

Shift workers are worst affected, but most of us are exposed to artificial lighting long after the sun has set. "As a consequence, in society, we are chronically sleep-deprived," says Lockley. There is evidence that disrupted melatonin production can cause a lot of problems. "You are more likely to be prone to cardiovascular disease, obesity, cancer and gastrointestinal problems," says Mariana Figueiro of the Lighting Research Center at the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, New York. "Both fixed white LEDs and fluorescent lighting are bad," says Haim. "Using them at night is polluting our environment." And it's not just humans who suffer from the disruptive effects of artificial light - some alarming effects have been seen in animals too (see "In a Bad Light" below).

However, where some see a problem, others have begun to see an opportunity. So far, artificial light has been designed according to a one-size-fits-all paradigm, only emitting one constant white light. Simply using LEDs to simulate earlier types of light misses the point, says Fred Schubert, also at Rensselaer. Instead, he thinks we should use LEDs to design light sources "that have not been considered possible" before. Do that, and LEDs offer the opportunity to eliminate the problems with artificial lighting.

LEDs to the rescue

Instead of fighting our body's response to different colours of light, we can use LEDs to take full advantage of it. The ideal is a tunable white light created from a combination of red, green and blue LEDs, Lockley says. The different hues can be amplified and suppressed over the course of the day to mimic the natural variations in sunlight, thereby keeping our circadian clocks in sync. That kind of colour flexibility, he says, "will let us do things therapeutically with LEDs that we never could do with their predecessors".

NASA has already started to investigate this possibility, since it has a particular interest in its employees' circadian rhythms. Astronauts, after all, are the ultimate shift workers. They float around in a world where the sun rises and sets every 90 minutes as the International Space Station orbits the Earth. Space offers no margin for error, so they must be at peak performance every moment they are awake. However, the combination of erratic natural light and steady fluorescent light they receive on the space station means that they often struggle to get 6 hours of sleep in 24, never mind the recommended 8 (Acta Astronautica, in press).

Worried that woozy astronauts could make dangerous mistakes, NASA wants to get their sleep back on track. That's why George Brainard, a sleep specialist at Jefferson Medical College in Philadelphia, is testing colour-tuned LED lighting in lab replicas of the four sleeping compartments on the space station. "We can dial in thousands of colour combinations," he says, to assess what blends and schedules are best for helping astronauts perfect their sleep patterns.

For example, a red-rich mode should help them prepare for sleep as they do personal chores and relax. A yellow-tinged morning light will help them wake. A third setting would provide blue-tinged, alertness-boosting lighting during work periods. NASA plans for the lights to replace the fluorescent ones now in their sleep quarters in 2015.

"Having a single light source with multiple settings and tunable colour is a new thing. This is early days, and it's going to get more sophisticated," Brainard says. But he is already looking further ahead, and expects LEDs to drive a "revolution in architectural lighting" in the next 10 to 20 years.

Because if we have the technology to mimic the subtle variations of sunlight, why stop there? We could go one better than nature and create artificial light purpose-built to optimise mood and performance.

Blue light, for example, is bad at night, but at other times it can cheer you up. "Blue light is good in the day," says Haim. "We need to suppress melatonin or we would be depressive." Indeed, people with seasonal affective depression are effectively treated with therapeutic doses of exactly the blue-rich bright light that mimics the midday sun. Blue is what's important, though, according to researchers in the Netherlands, who recently found that just ramping up the blue content of an ordinary white light had the same mood-boosting effects, but they happened faster (BMC Psychiatry, vol 11, p 17).

The rest of us can benefit, too. In one recent US military study, soldiers were instructed to do a series of tasks under four different workplace lighting conditions. After a few hours under a dim fluorescent light, their mood was depressed and their performance slipped. Under an LED bulb tuned to mimic the blue hue of midday sun, however, their mood improved significantly and they did better on the tasks (International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol 42, p 12).

And there's no reason to stay in nature's schema. Some intriguing effects are starting to show up, including the suggestion that bright red light also boosts mood (Lighting Research and Technology, vol 42, p 449).

Some industries could benefit enormously from influencing the mood of their customers, one of them being airlines. Boeing's new 787 Dreamliner jet is designed for long-haul flights, and in an attempt to provide a more pleasant experience, the company has chosen a special kind of LED light. Instead of the standard white LED, which is actually a blue LED covered with a phosphor layer that converts part of the blue to yellow, it will be using expensive lights that combine red, green and blue light and can be tuned to emit different quantities of each. The cabin will have a "warm reddish" tint, so that "people will arrive at their destination feeling more refreshed", says Blake Emery, a director at Boeing.

However, these lights are far too expensive at the moment for home lighting, mostly because green LEDs are much less efficient than their blue and red counterparts. Each type of light comes from combining different metals and semiconducting materials, and with the combination needed to produce green light the more power it receives, the less green light comes out. This effect is called droop, and for a long time no one understood why it happened, but it seems that Schubert and his colleagues at Rensselaer have now found out why (Applied Physics Letters, vol 100, p 161106). They identified how the electrons leak out of the thin layer of semiconductor when they should be releasing their energy as light. This causes the strong currents that would otherwise produce intense light to eject electrons from the critical layer before they can generate photons. If manufacturers can redesign their LED structures to plug that leak, a solution is just around the corner, and RGB lights will be commercially available in the not-too-distant future, not just for homes but also for streets and offices.

"You ultimately want a smart lighting system," Brainard says. "You walk into your house, the sensor system detects who you are and what you need, and adjusts the lights accordingly." Your alarm clock could turn on your bedroom light in yellow wake-up mode in the morning. Night workers, on the other hand, could come home to melatonin-releasing red. We'd all get enough sleep, but you could change the settings if you needed to work late or were throwing a party.

Your new lights will do far more than Thomas Edison could have imagined, and with them a modern Prometheus could create a more civilised human civilisation. Perhaps the solution to the problem of artificial light is to make light not less artificial but more so.

Quote:
In a Bad Light

Joe Ritter didn't care about turtles at first. He cared about stars. So he was worried about the white LEDs that were replacing the old, orange-yellow sodium street lamps all over the US. Install these brighter lights on Maui, the Hawaiian island where he works and it would "devastate astronomy" in one of the world's most important research sites.

But when Ritter, a physicist at the University of Hawaii Institute for Astronomy, started investigating solutions, he found something much more alarming: the artificial light was devastating wildlife. Endangered Hawaiian seabirds like the Newell's shearwater and the dark-rumped petrel were dropping dead in their hundreds. Upon leaving the nest for their first flight, baby birds are supposed to head towards the bright reflection of light on water. But with street lights shining brightly too, the fledglings get confused. They fly towards the lamps and end up circling them until they drop from exhaustion or collide with buildings.

Baby green sea turtles are also drawn to the artificial light, after hatching on the beach. Heading in the opposite direction from the sea, the turtles become easy prey for predators or get killed as they cross busy roads.

And cute baby animals aren't the only kind that are affected. A recent study showed that intensely bright street lights have increased the population of woodlice, harvestmen, ants and beetles, even during the day. (Biology Letters, in press). Both of these problems are worse under the blue glare of LED lamps than they were under the orange glow of sodium lamps.

And for all the damage they do, Ritter says, they don't even help us see any better. The intense blue does more to regulate mammalian circadian rhythms than it does to aid visual acuity (see main story).

To solve the problem, Ritter has developed a light with a unique spectral mix that drastically reduces the blue light content. The lights have been in production for six years and are now installed in Hawaii, where they lessen the effects of light pollution on animals. "If we can save the turtles and save astronomy - that's a win," says Ritter.

Anne-Marie Corley

Jeff Hecht is a New Scientist consultant
http://www.newscientist.com/article...oved-light.html
Reply With Quote
  #372   ^
Old Thu, Jul-26-12, 04:42
Demi's Avatar
Demi Demi is offline
Posts: 26,755
 
Plan: Muscle Centric
Stats: 238/153/160 Female 5'10"
BF:
Progress: 109%
Location: UK
Default

Quote:
From The LATimes
July 25, 2012


Exposure to light at night may contribute to depression, study says

TV sets, laptops, iPads and iPhones are modern society’s instruments for increased productivity, social connectedness and entertainment after a long day’s work. Ironically, a new study published in Molecular Psychiatry shows that these devices also contribute to an increase of major depressive disorder.

The 24-hour society made possible by the advent of the electric light bulb has come at a significant biological cost. Light at night disrupts the body’s natural circadian rhythms and has been linked to breast cancer, heart disease and obesity.

The new experiment, led by Tracy Bedrosian, a doctoral student in neuroscience at Ohio State University, analyzed the relationship between exposure to artificial light at night and mood disorder. The subjects of the study were adult female hamsters, since females — both rodent and human — are twice as likely as males to develop major depressive disorder. One group of hamsters was kept on a cycle of 16 hours of normal light and eight hours of dim light, which was five times brighter than the maximum light power of a full moon and comparable to light pollution in urban centers. The control group of hamsters was on a schedule of 16 hours of daylight and eight hours of darkness.

The researchers tested the hamsters in the nighttime light group for signs of depression. After four weeks of sleeping with light at night, the hamsters lost some of their appetite for sugar. In addition, when forced to swim, the animals spent more time immobile in the water and less time trying to reach safety.

According to the research team, the results show that there was some physiological change in the hamsters’ brains when they were exposed to light at night.

For instance, they produced more of a protein called TNF, or tumor necrosis factor. This is one of a family of proteins called cytokines — chemical messengers in the body that are released in response to injury or inflammation. If they are released constantly — such as during exposure to light at night — damage occurs that could result in depression. In the brain, the hippocampus is extremely vulnerable because it has many receptors for these cytokines. The hippocampus plays a critical role in major depressive disorder.

Furthermore, the amount of nighttime light used in the study is enough to suppress the release of melatonin, which is linked to depressive effects. Melatonin is a hormone secreted during the dark, and when that doesn’t happen, the body’s time-of-day information is distorted. In rodents, melatonin prevents stress-induced, depression-like behaviors.

The study authors noted that 99% of people in the United States and Europe deal with light pollution on a nightly basis. This could account for some of the increase in the incidence of major depression over the last few decades, they wrote, adding that further research is necessary to explore the extent of the link.

There was some good news: The negative effects of exposure to light at night are reversible if that exposure is decreased. Within two weeks of returning the hamsters to a standard light/dark cycle, the hamsters regained their taste for sugar and were more willing to swim, the researchers reported. Also, hamsters that were forced to endure the nighttime light but allowed to take a drug that inhibited their production of TNF swam just as much as the control hamsters on the normal light/dark schedule.

You can read a summary of the study online here.
http://www.latimes.com/news/science...0,7482402.story
Reply With Quote
  #373   ^
Old Tue, Aug-07-12, 01:53
Demi's Avatar
Demi Demi is offline
Posts: 26,755
 
Plan: Muscle Centric
Stats: 238/153/160 Female 5'10"
BF:
Progress: 109%
Location: UK
Default

Quote:
From The WSJournal
August 3, 2012

Decoding the Science of Sleep

In today's always-on economy, we're tired like never before. Caffeine and sleeping pills only do so much. How did we get this far away from our most basic, ancient habits? And how can we get back on track?


By DAVID K. RANDALL

Zlatko Glusica was the captain of an Air India Express plane carrying 166 passengers from Dubai to Mangalore, a bustling port city on India's southern coast. As his Boeing 737 approached the city, Mr. Glusica woke up from a nap in the cockpit and took over the controls. His co-pilot warned him repeatedly that he was coming in at the wrong angle and that he should pull up and try again. The last sound on the cockpit recorder was the co-pilot screaming that they didn't have any runway left. The plane overshot the landing and burst into flames. Only eight people survived. An investigation found that the captain was suffering from "sleep inertia."

The accident was a fatal reminder of the power of something prosaic that most of us typically don't give much thought: sleep. Yet it's a lesson that is habitually forgotten. Since that 2010 Air India flight, sleepy pilots have been at the center of several near-accidents, including two this year. In April, 16 passengers of an Air Canada flight were injured after the plane's pilot went into a sudden dive after he mistook the planet Venus for an oncoming plane. And in July, a Texas judge found that a JetBlue pilot's bizarre ranting in the cabin was a psychotic breakdown that may have been caused by a lack of sleep.

It isn't just the airline industry. Some 20% of automobile accidents come as the result of drowsy drivers, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. U.S. military researchers, meanwhile, have concluded that sleeplessness is one of the leading causes of friendly fire.

Sleep wasn't something we were supposed to worry about in the early years of the 21st century. Technology was making the world smaller by the day; the global economy blurred the lines between one day and the next, and things like time and place were supposed to be growing ever less important in the always-on workplace. Most of us never gave sleep much thought—considering it nothing more than an elegant on-off switch, like the ones on our smartphones, that the body flips when it needs to take a break from its overscheduled life. Sure, we'd like to get a bit more of it. But, beyond that, sleep likely hovers somewhere near flossing in most of our lives: something we are supposed to do more—but don't.

Americans, however, are starting to wake up about sleep. Endless ads for dubious energy drinks and an equal number of much slicker ads for prescription sleep aids reveal a culture in 2012 that is wired and tired. Lack of sleep, it seems, has become one of the signature ailments of our modern age.

Nearly a third of working adults in America—roughly 41 million people—get less than six hours of sleep a night, according to a recent CDC report. That number of sleep-deprived people is up about 25% from 1990. About 27% of workers in the financial and insurance industries are sleep-deprived, according to the CDC, while nearly 42% of workers in the mining industry share the same complaint. A 2011 study published in the journal Sleep found that insomnia costs $2,280 per worker in lost productivity, adding up to $63.2 billion nationwide.

This skyrocketing sleeplessness has given rise to a large and growing industry: Americans now spend tens of billions of dollars on prescriptions, at sleep labs, on mattresses and for medical devices in our quest for some simple shuteye, according to Marketdata Enterprises, a market research firm based in Tampa, Fla. "Fatigue management consultants," meanwhile, now work with more than half of the current Fortune 500 companies, law-enforcement groups and even Super Bowl-winning teams on ways to maintain a consistently high-performing workforce and prevent accidents.

So why is sleep, which seems so simple, becoming so problematic? Much of the problem can be traced to the revolutionary device that's probably hanging above your head right now: the light bulb. Before this electrically illuminated age, our ancestors slept in two distinct chunks each night. The so-called first sleep took place not long after the sun went down and lasted until a little after midnight. A person would then wake up for an hour or so before heading back to the so-called second sleep.

It was a fact of life that was once as common as breakfast—and one which might have remained forgotten had it not been for the research of a Virginia Tech history professor named A. Roger Ekirch, who spent nearly 20 years in the 1980s and '90s investigating the history of the night. As Prof. Ekirch leafed through documents ranging from property records to primers on how to spot a ghost, he kept noticing strange references to sleep. In "The Canterbury Tales," for instance, one of the characters in "The Squire's Tale" wakes up in the early morning following her "first sleep" and then goes back to bed. A 15th-century medical book, meanwhile, advised readers to spend their "first sleep" on the right side and after that to lie on their left. A cleric in England wrote that the time between the first and second sleep was the best time for serious study.

The time between the two bouts of sleep was a natural and expected part of the night, and depending on your needs, was spent praying, reading, contemplating your dreams or having sex. The last one was perhaps the most popular. A noted 16th-century French physician named Laurent Joubert concluded that plowmen, artisans and others who worked with their hands were able to conceive more children because they waited until after their first sleep, when their energy was replenished, to make love.

Studies show that this type of sleep is so ingrained in our nature that it will reappear if given a chance. Experimental subjects sequestered from artificial lights have tended to ease into this rhythm. What's more, cultures without artificial light still sleep this way. In the 1960s, anthropologists studying the Tiv culture in central Nigeria found that group members not only practiced segmented sleep, but also used roughly the same terms to describe it.

That natural cycle was forever changed by Thomas Edison (whose contributions to our sleepless nights also extend to his work on the phonograph and the motion picture). Soon, sunset no longer meant the end of your social life, but the beginning of it. Night became the time when all the good stuff happens. And, for businesses, it meant that darkness no longer got in the way of production. Factories soon began running all night long. By the 1920s, the idea of a first and second sleep had entirely disappeared from our daily rhythms, completing a process that had begun 200 years earlier with the introduction of the first gas lamps and the surge in the number of coffee houses in Northern Europe. Now we have so much artificial light that after a 1994 earthquake knocked out power, some concerned residents of Los Angeles called the police to report a "giant, silvery cloud" in the sky above them. It was the Milky Way. They had never seen it before.

None of us wants to go back to a time before electric lights, of course. Yet our attempts at blending our natural sleep rhythms with the modern world look to be failing—especially as the electric light has migrated from the ceiling to the palms of our hands, where smartphones and other devices now rarely leave our side.

The consequences of this change in lifestyle are far more dire than a simple loss of connection to the natural world. Researchers are increasingly finding that lack of sleep is terrible for our health. Sleeplessness has been linked to increased rates of heart disease, obesity, stroke and even certain cancers. The exact reasons for these effects are still largely unknown, but give support to the theory that sleep is the time when our bodies naturally repair themselves on a cellular level.

Recently, researchers have also found how important these overlooked hours are to our mental performance. Sleep, or the lack of it, is now thought to be a complex process that underpins everything from our ability to learn a new skill to how likely we are to find a novel solution to a problem. It is also considered a vital part of happiness and one of the best forms of preventative medicine.

Many of us try to mitigate our lack of sleep with coffee and sleeping pills, but it just doesn't work. Caffeine may work in the short-term, but it isn't a long-term solution for the average person because the body begins to build up a tolerance to it. Soon, higher and higher doses are required to get the same effect. Strong doses of caffeine tend to make the body jittery and, once the caffeine wears off, lead to crashing in exhaustion.

And no amount of caffeine can alleviate the need for sleep. When that time comes, many adults turn to sleeping pills for help. About 60 million prescriptions for sleeping pills were filled in the U.S. last year, according to IMS Health, a data and analytics firm in Parsippany, N.J. That number is up from 48 million in 2006. Yet a number of studies have shown that drugs like Ambien and Lunesta offer no significant improvements in the quality of users' sleep.

And they only give you the tiniest bit more in the quantity department. In one meta-analysis of sleeping pill studies sponsored by the National Institutes of Health and published in 2007, patients taking popular prescription sleeping pills fell asleep just 13 minutes faster than those given a sugar pill. They slept for a grand total of 11 minutes longer. People seem to overestimate the effectiveness of sleeping pills, partly because of the placebo effect, and partly because some of these pills cause short-term memory loss that leaves people believing they got better sleep than they actually did—they just don't remember all their tossing and turning.

So why don't we put more effort into dealing with our sleep problems? While we'll spend thousands on lavish vacations to unwind, grind away hours exercising and pay exorbitant amounts for organic food, sleep remains ingrained in our cultural ethos as something that can be put off, dosed or ignored. We can't look at sleep as an investment in our health because—after all—it's just sleep. It is hard to feel like you're taking an active step to improve your life with your head on a pillow.

Nonetheless, there are steps we can take to adapt the way we approach sleep to be more effective for modern life. In a new branch of sleep medicine, scientists have identified how to get a good night's sleep naturally. Most of the suggestions come down to changing your behavior. One thing you can do is go to bed at the same time every night. Also, studies have shown that people should avoid the bluish light from computer screens, TVs and smartphones—which our brains interpret as sunlight—for at least an hour before bed. And, by doing yoga or other relaxation techniques that put the mind at ease, subjects in studies have dramatically improved both their sleep quality and quantity.

Poor sleep habits can also be a data problem. With nothing more than hazy memories of the night to go on, most of us have only rough estimates of when, exactly, we fell asleep—and whether we spent the night tossing and turning. New consumer devices, like headbands that measure brain waves during the night and pedometer-like devices that measure movement, can give the home user data rivaling what they might get in a sleep lab. Such data can allow people to pinpoint the real effects of each day's choices on their night's sleep.

Such tracking and behavioral adjustment isn't that far removed from the work that fatigue-management consultants do. Their work often consists of combing accident reports and comparing them with work schedules to find out how long employees on duty had been awake. By charting the outcomes, fatigue-management consultants are often able to prove that a greater respect for sleep can lead to better results at the office, whether that office is a multinational corporation or a local fire department.

The secret to a good night's sleep may very well be acknowledging that it takes work. And that the work is worth it. Health, mental sharpness, sex, relationships, creativity, memories—all of these things that make us who we are depend on the hours we spend each night with our eyes closed.

As Heraclitus wrote 2,500 years ago: "Even a soul submerged in sleep is hard at work and helps make something of the world."


—Mr. Randall is a senior reporter at Reuters and the author of "Dreamland: Adventures in the Strange Science of Sleep," to be published Aug. 13 by W.W. Norton.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100...1327694346.html
Reply With Quote
  #374   ^
Old Fri, Aug-31-12, 02:32
Demi's Avatar
Demi Demi is offline
Posts: 26,755
 
Plan: Muscle Centric
Stats: 238/153/160 Female 5'10"
BF:
Progress: 109%
Location: UK
Default

Artificial light and obesity epidemic: Is there a link?

http://forum.lowcarber.org/showthread.php?t=445979
Reply With Quote
  #375   ^
Old Wed, Oct-30-13, 09:38
RobLL RobLL is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,648
 
Plan: generalized low carb
Stats: 205/180/185 Male 67
BF:31%/14?%/12%
Progress: 125%
Location: Pacific Northwest
Default

Whole Health Source also discusses this. Here is what I have done for years.

During the evening we use incandescent lights, they are on dimmers, almost no blue light.

No smoke detector in bedroom, it blinked blue green light at me. Radio alarm has only red LEDs.

Window shades, black fabric liners with a heavy upholstery type fabric. It takes two layers to really black out a window. In a condo with rules against black liners we just added another layer of light tan material. It blocks out two intensive street and sidewalk lights. Black plastic works well, a little ugly.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Cluster Buster: Might a simple sugar derail Huntington's?" gotbeer LC Research/Media 1 Mon, Jan-26-04 12:18
"Nutrition: Food Cravings" (WaPo interview with Dr. Neal Barnard) gotbeer LC Research/Media 1 Mon, Aug-11-03 13:59


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 16:08.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.