Tue, Feb-15-05, 13:48
|
|
Bouncy!
Posts: 9,388
|
|
Plan: Atkins Maintenance
Stats: 297/173.3/150
BF:41%/31%/??%
Progress: 84%
Location: Burlington, ON
|
|
I looked into this a while ago. I even found one website that had the WW points formula written out and discovered that the problem with the WW points formula is that while the point value of the food is based primarily on the calorie count (approximately 1 point per 50 calories of food), you are penalized for the item being high fat. That is, for every 12 grams of fat, you have to count one more WW point. So, let's say you are trying to keep to a 1200 calorie diet. If you are eating low-fat, maybe 20% of your calories come from fat, 144 calories. At 9 calories per gram of fat, you are eating about 16 grams of fat a day. That's only about 1.33 extra WW points. However, if you are eating a low-carb but high fat diet where, say 50% of your calories are coming from fat, you are eating 600 calories in fat, 67 grams of fat and an extra 5.5 WW points. Ignoring the fiber portion (high fiber decreases the point value, but by very little) of the calculation. 1200 calories at 20% fat is about 25 points a day. 1200 calories at 50% fat is about 29-30 points a day. Big difference.
I can see the value of using the point system to control your calories, but I think you'd have to sacrifice either a lot of calories or a lot of fat to do low-carb WW.
Val
|