Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members Calendar Mark Forums Read Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Tue, Feb-27-07, 03:20
Demi's Avatar
Demi Demi is offline
Posts: 17,667
 
Plan: LC Maintenance
Stats: 215/147/150 Female 5'10"
BF:
Progress: 105%
Location: UK
Default Public want food 'traffic lights'

BBC News
London, UK
27 February, 2007



Public want food 'traffic lights'

The public (in the UK) overwhelmingly support 'traffic light' food-labelling rather than the system adopted by much of the food industry, a survey suggests.

The Netmums website surveyed more than 17,000 parents, and found 80% backed 'traffic lights'.

This offers a simple red, amber and green guide to nutrition.


There are claims that the traffic
light system is easier to use


But many in the food industry prefer giving percentage figures of guideline daily amounts (GDA) for things like calories, sugars and fat.

The findings come as the British Medical Association announced its backing for the traffic light idea.

The National Heart Forum also says that GDA markings are complex and misleading.

GDA labelling supporters say their system provides people with more detailed information.

They argue that the traffic lights are too crude and simplistic. Both sides reckon their schemes encourage healthy eating.

Cathy Court, a director of Netmums, said the strength of the traffic lights scheme was its simplicity.

Child friendly

She said some of the parents who responded to the survey stressed that the easy-to-use nature of the scheme made it ideal to use with their children.

She said: "An important thing nowadays is to get your children to understand what healthy food is.

"People could actually use it to teach their children about healthy food, and work out healthy options together."

Claire Perera, a mother of two, is convinced that traffic light labelling is best.

She said: "My priority isn't whether I can get a good cereal or a bad cereal. It's making sure I don't lose Luis.

"So to be able to look at the box straight away, know that it's all green and just grab it, is really good for young mums with very young children who want to run away!"

Dr Vivienne Nathanson, BMA head of science and ethics, said: "It is absolutely essential that it is simple, that you don't need to sit down and start trying to work out what that percentage means.

"And the traffic lights system is something you can even see from a distance, so you can start to hone in on the foods that are predominantly green or green and amber, and just cut down on the foods that are marked red."

Not scared of red marks

The independent watchdog the Food Standards Agency also wants the wider industry to adopt traffic light labelling.

Rosemary Hignett, FSA head of nutrition, said the evidence so far was that consumers are not running scared of red markers - as feared by critics of the traffic light scheme.

"They are using the information to balance their shop. They are not interpreting the red as "don't buy".

"They are interpreting it as "high in fat, salt or sugar - therefore don't eat too much of this product.

"So they are using it in a very sensible way, in fact."

Tesco insist they are not seeking any competitive advantage by sticking with GDAs.

The company said it was convinced its approach was better for working out a balanced diet through the day.

It also said traffic light labelling might appear simpler at first, but the GDA approach was more likely to change customer behaviour, and encourage a switch to healthy products.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6397187.stm
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Tue, Feb-27-07, 03:29
unitydkn's Avatar
unitydkn unitydkn is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,207
 
Plan: no fake foods lo-0 carbs
Stats: 200/179/130 Female 5'2"
BF:goal 25%
Progress: 30%
Location: Wa
Default

this might make companies lower there sugar...now they can right " heart healthy " or "low fat" and get busy people to but it...if they can glance at it and see high sugar they will be less likely to buy it for there hyper boys...and girls
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Tue, Feb-27-07, 04:23
ojoj's Avatar
ojoj ojoj is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,200
 
Plan: atkins
Stats: 210/127/140 Female 5ft 7in
BF:
Progress: 119%
Location: British living in Spain
Default

Why isnt there a "light" for carbs???
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Tue, Feb-27-07, 06:36
ReginaW's Avatar
ReginaW ReginaW is offline
Contrarian
Posts: 2,776
 
Plan: Atkins/Controlled Carb
Stats: 275/190/190 Female 72
BF:Not a clue!
Progress: 100%
Location: Missouri
Default

"Saturates" really needs to be "TRANS-FATS"
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Tue, Feb-27-07, 10:40
Calianna's Avatar
Calianna Calianna is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 952
 
Plan: Atkins-ish (hypoglycemia)
Stats: 280/223/140 Female 63
BF:
Progress: 41%
Default

The whole traffic light system will be pointless for someone with severe red-green color blindness - Red and green look exactly the same to them, and the only reason they can tell the difference between the red light and the green light when driving is that the lights are almost always arranged in a particular order.

Bet they weren't thinking about that when they came up with this "simple" sytem, were they?

Ok, I admit they'll be able to figure out which products have the yellow light, since they can distinguish yellow from the red and green. And yes, people with such severe color blindness are a very small percentage of the population... but still. Not exactly the universally recognizable code they were hoping for.
Reply With Quote
  #6   ^
Old Tue, Feb-27-07, 10:50
ReginaW's Avatar
ReginaW ReginaW is offline
Contrarian
Posts: 2,776
 
Plan: Atkins/Controlled Carb
Stats: 275/190/190 Female 72
BF:Not a clue!
Progress: 100%
Location: Missouri
Default

Personally, I don't think the government has any business qualifying any processed, packaged foods as "healthy" or not, and that's what this scheme does - it takes crappy processed, packaged, refined foods and labels it with a green light for conforming to poor science and dogma, giving an unsuspecting public the idea it's good to eat. The food industry doesn't need any help convincing us or those in the UK to eat their junk!
Reply With Quote
  #7   ^
Old Tue, Feb-27-07, 11:06
KvonM's Avatar
KvonM KvonM is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 5,315
 
Plan: food? what's food?
Stats: 234/185/165 Female 62 inches
BF:nothin' but wobble
Progress: 71%
Location: YAY! trees and grass!
Default

i want numbers, not colors. when i look at a nutritional label, i want to know the amount of calories, fat grams, carb grams (and their respective breakdown), protein grams, sodium milligrams, etc., that are in that particular food. "low" and "high" are relative terms based solely on one set of standards. we already know that most of the foods that system deems "green" we would consider "red" and run screaming.

i'm smart enough to know what numbers mean. i'll leave the color coding to my filing system, thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #8   ^
Old Tue, Feb-27-07, 11:15
Cissie_12's Avatar
Cissie_12 Cissie_12 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,193
 
Plan: 20 or less daily
Stats: 230.6/179.4/169 Female 68
BF:
Progress: 83%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ojoj
Why isnt there a "light" for carbs???



Cause the carb phase is out, don't cha' know!?? lol (teasing)

Seriously I wish the would.
Reply With Quote
  #9   ^
Old Tue, Feb-27-07, 11:58
Dodger's Avatar
Dodger Dodger is offline
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7,318
 
Plan: Atkins/ Protein Power
Stats: 225/176.5/175 Male 71.5 inches
BF:18%
Progress: 97%
Location: Longmont, Colorado
Default

I want a red light on anything that contains grains.
Reply With Quote
  #10   ^
Old Tue, Feb-27-07, 12:11
Calianna's Avatar
Calianna Calianna is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 952
 
Plan: Atkins-ish (hypoglycemia)
Stats: 280/223/140 Female 63
BF:
Progress: 41%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dodger
I want a red light on anything that contains grains.


And added sugars of any kind, no matter how "innocent" they try to make them sound ("evaporated cane juice", anyone?)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:26.


Copyright © 2000-2010 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.