Could Dr Atkins have the answer?
(Filed: 19/07/2005)
In the final extract from his new book, William Leith meets a diet guru and decides to give his low-carbohydrate regime a go
The large waiting room of the Atkins Centre in New York is about the size of two squash courts, and exudes the bright, hopeful air of the Seventies. High ceilings, low furniture, white walls. The paintings on the walls are the sort of thing a rock star might buy - huge canvases encrusted with jagged clumps of paint. Walking towards the reception desk I'm apprehensive, wondering if I look fat, wondering if people will think I've come to see Dr Atkins because I'm fat.
William Leith: Atkins-inspired
A woman arrives, introduces herself, and tells me that she will introduce me to Dr Atkins, and for a moment it doesn't occur to me that the unobtrusive, ghostly presence hovering just behind her might actually be the doctor, so I nod and back away, distracted.
''This is Dr Atkins,'' she says.
''Oh,'' I say.
We shake hands.
Atkins is a pleasant looking, 72-year-old man, the sort of old guy who would be the decent grandfather in a heart-warming movie. He is calm, benign, possibly a little frail. He does not look like a diet guru. He wears a black tie and a stiff dark tweed jacket with long, broad lapels and a single button at the waist, the style popular a dozen years ago. The jowls around his neck and chin are fairly minimal, signs of age rather than excess weight.
He points me towards the lift, and tells me we'll do the interview in his office upstairs. We walk across the Seventies-looking room, which reminds me that Dr Atkins was originally a phenomenon of the early Seventies, the era when people wanted to believe in hedonism without consequences - Atkins's original ''no hunger'' Diet Revolution was a counterpart to Timothy Leary's saying that LSD was good for us. What Atkins said was that, if you avoided carbohydrates, you could eat more or less what you wanted.
Since then, he's fallen into disrepute, and been reincarnated. Over the years, the Atkins diet has been radical, trendy, wildly popular, disapproved of, reviled, buried, resurrected, again radical, and again trendy. But on the day of our interview, in January 2003, it's wildly popular again.
How long will this mood last? Perhaps the backlash is already beginning. Some people are starting to say that Atkins is a fad - that it will come and go, to be replaced by something else, possibly the avoidance of another food group.
Naturally, Atkins himself does not think that Atkins is a fad. He thinks that low-fat diets - the diets that presided through the Eighties and Nineties - were the fad. His scientific reasoning is that low-fat diets don't work - it was during the low-fat decades that we got so very fat.
Like me, it turns out, Atkins hasn't had lunch, even though it's early afternoon. ''I sometimes just eat some macadamia nuts when I'm working,'' he tells me. ''That's just something to tide me over until dinner.'' Macadamias are highly calorific - a handful can contain 250 calories, as much as a handful of chocolate drops. But that's fine according to Atkins, because they're very low in carbs.
We sit down on either side of his desk. For breakfast, he tells me, he ate: ''Ham and eggs. And onions. Very dark fried onions.'' Sometimes, he has an omelette, sometimes bacon and eggs.
Atkins begins by telling me about his struggles over the decades. He has followed the Atkins diet since November 1963, more than 39 years. He sounds embattled, and a touch weary. But the tide, he points out, seems to be turning his way. ''Now,'' he says, ''the evidence confirms what I had noticed in studies that were done 50 years ago. Which is that there's a metabolic advantage to a low-carbohydrate diet." Listening to this elderly man, looking at his pleasant face with the crinkly smile, I can feel something nagging at me.
He tells me the story of his own weight loss. It is the familiar diet guru narrative - weight gain, followed by despair, the despair obliterated by a simple, miraculous insight.
He was 6 ft tall and weighed 225 lb. As a man with a big appetite, Atkins knew he would not last on a traditional low-calorie or low-fat diet. But he'd just read an article in the journal of the American Medical Association about a low-carbohydrate diet. He says: ''It was so simple! I hadn't tried a diet before that. It was the only diet that looked like I'd enjoy being on it. I ate a lot of meat, and a lot of shrimp, and a lot of duck, and a lot of fish. And omelettes in the morning, and salad vegetables.''
The diet worked a treat. The pounds fell off rapidly, and, significantly, Atkins did not feel hungry. His cravings for buns and rolls had gone.
Atkins looks across his desk at me and says: ''I knew I had something wonderful.''
As I nod along with what Atkins is saying, I realise what it is that's been nagging at me. It's that I want to believe in him. I want this because, if he is right, I will lose weight. If he's right, I won't have to be hungry. I'll be able to get a haircut and have a shave and wear a suit without looking like a fat nerd.
Atkins and I move on to the subject of hyperinsulinism. The pancreas produces insulin in response to carbohydrates, but if you repeatedly overeat carbohydrates, you reach a crucial tipping point, after which your pancreas produces far, far too much - a veritable deluge of insulin, which causes a corresponding low tide of blood sugar, which triggers a cacophony of craving, which leads to an exponential population curve of obesity.
What a tempting analysis. The problem is carbohydrates! As Atkins says in his book: ''Many carbohydrate addicts could no more walk past a refrigerator without opening it than Venus or Serena Williams could let a short lob drift overhead without smashing it.''
That's why I want to believe Atkins. If Atkins is right, the problem is not us. There isn't something essentially wrong with me. I'm just eating wrong, that's all.
We leave the office and walk down the stairs. Atkins walks east, towards his apartment. The last I see of him he is on the sidewalk, walking past the spot where, in 45 days' time, he will lose his footing on the ice, bang his head and die.
I walk to a restaurant and order a large steak with spinach and no fries. On the plane, I don't eat a bag of pretzels or a second bag of pretzels, and when the stewardess serves me my dinner - beef and vegetables and potatoes - I eat the beef and vegetables, but not the potatoes. I get home and later I buy some bacon and eggs and tomatoes and broccoli, and for dinner I eat another steak and a tomato salad, and go to sleep feeling less bloated than usual, and when I wake up I feel hungry, but not so desperate as before. It was the food. The food was the problem.
The first week is fine. In the mornings, I have bacon and eggs, or maybe an omelette, and for lunch I have an omelette, and for dinner I have steak and salad, or fish and salad, or maybe an omelette with salad. I get better and better at making omelettes. I put three eggs in a bowl, and add some grated cheese, and fry onions and tomatoes, and pour the eggs into the pan, and after a few minutes I put my plate over the pan, and flip the omelette into the plate, and slide the omelette back into the pan, to cook the other side.
My hunger subsides. After a couple of days, I stop thinking about food all the time. After a week, I think about food only a couple of hours a day, at mealtimes. And I must say, not being hungry all the time is a strange feeling, strange and slightly disconcerting. As I get less hungry, I find myself with more time on my hands. One day, after about a week, I'm sitting at home, trying to write something, and I get up to take a snack break. I walk into the kitchen, and something is amiss - I'm not hungry. Temporarily, I am without a purpose. So I pour myself a glass of water from the tap, and drink half of it, and sit back down again at my desk, suffused with a creeping sense of dread.
Maybe I should have some macadamia nuts. No, I've run out of macadamia nuts.
Maybe I should have some bacon and eggs. But I don't want bacon and eggs. I'm not hungry. And I realise there's something I miss, more than bread or pasta. Don't get me wrong - I do miss these things. I miss the rush of blood sugar I used to get after eating a few slices of toast. I miss the crispy outsides of fries and the starchy, comforting gravy-sponge of mashed potatoes. Most of all, though, I miss being hungry.
Leith still misses cakes
Still, I'm losing weight. I lose about 3 lb in the first week and 3 lb in the second week, and I definitely feel less puffy, less tight around the face and neck. My clothes are slacker. After two weeks, I look in the mirror, and there it is - my jacket no longer hangs like the skin of a snake. It's beginning to hang like a jacket.
And, as the weeks go by, I stop craving carbohydrates. In restaurants, it's easy - I just have a salad instead of the fries, or the mash, or whatever. When I want a snack, I eat macadamia nuts. I keep buying these packs of macadamia nuts, 75 grams, which is slightly too much for a quick snack, but I pour them all into my mouth, and I love them, and they hardly make me feel sick at all.
I keep having to explain to people how a low-carb diet works. I explain about the blood sugar. How carbs make you hungry. The addiction angle.
And sometimes people get testy with me. ''But what about bread? Huh? Are you telling me I shouldn't eat bread?''
''I'm not telling you you shouldn't eat anything.''
I have a lot of conversations like this. I'm always making the same point, which is that, conducted properly, a low-carb diet is not about eating more meat, or more fat, or more cheese, or more cream - it's about eating less carbohydrate. It''s about taking away something bad.
It happens on a Saturday evening in March, and I've lost something like 20lb. I'm wearing a brown corduroy jacket, blue jeans, brown shoes, a blue shirt, and the jacket is hanging just so, or rather not quite just so, but almost just so. I'm walking differently, picking my feet up, I've lost my apologetic slouch, and my knees hurt less when I go downstairs. Soon I'll be able to do normal things, such as run, and I'm standing in a doorway at a party, holding a bottle of San Pellegrino. I wish I could say San Pellegrino 1996 or whatever, but they don't put the year on the bottle, with water the year is immaterial, and someone I know spots me and nods, and that's when it happens.
He says: ''Hi, fatboy.''
Finally. I'm getting somewhere.
I have, I believe, located my central problem. My problem is carbohydrates. I'm a recovering carbohydrate addict. I eat meat, vegetables, eggs and nuts. I am planning to reintroduce fruit into my diet, and I'm still not drinking alcohol, and I'm happy, I think I'm happy, and I'm losing weight, and of course I'm not entirely happy because I want...
I'm not quite sure what I want.
Extracted from 'The Hungry Years: Confessions of a Food Addict' by William Leith (Bloomsbury). To order a copy from Telegraph Books Direct for £10.99 plus £2.25, call 0870 155 7222
18 July 2005: Let me eat cake [first extract]
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/m...9/hatkins19.xml