Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members Calendar Mark Forums Read Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Fri, Jun-24-05, 07:08
Demi's Avatar
Demi Demi is offline
Posts: 17,668
 
Plan: LC Maintenance
Stats: 215/147/150 Female 5'10"
BF:
Progress: 105%
Location: UK
Default Guidance 'exaggerates heart risk'

Although not about low carbing, I thought that this article was interesting enough to post here:


BBC News,
London, UK
24 June, 2005

Guidance 'exaggerates heart risk'

Doctors say thresholds for "normal" blood pressure and cholesterol levels have been set so low healthy people might be put on unnecessary medication.

The European Society of Cardiology drew up guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in 2003.

However, GPs Steinar Westin and Iona Heath say under them as many as 90% of people over 50 could be labelled at risk, and end up on drugs.

The study is published in the British Medical Journal.

The GPs are concerned that many people might end up taking drugs which would be of little benefit to them, but which are expensive and associated with side effects.

However, the European Society of Cardiology said the concerns were based on a "fundamental misunderstanding" of the purpose of the guidance.

When the guidelines were applied to adults in Norway, 76% of the popultion were defined as being at risk, including half of all 24-year-olds.

This is despite the average life expectancy in Norway being 78.9 years.

The researchers say the proportions are likely to be even higher if the same thresholds are applied to the UK - where average life expectancy is 78.1 years.

Psychological impact

Not only do the drugs potentially cause physical side effects, the researchers are concerned there may be psychological effects from being labelled as vulnerable to heart disease.

Writing in the BMJ, the researchers say: "We have far too little understanding of the psychological impact and the wider health consequences of being labelled at risk."

Doctors have raised concern about too many people being labelled as being at risk before.

In 1999, more than 800 doctors, pharmacists and scientits from 42 countries signed an open letter expressing concern that World Health Organization hypertension guidelines would result in increased use of drugs at great expense and for little benefit.

The European Society of Cardiology issued a statement saying the guidance was intended to help identify people who could benefit from modifying their lifestyle to reduce risk - not to label people as sick.

The guidance did not recommend intensive therapy for people whose blood pressure and cholesterol levels were higher than the threshold levels.

"In such subjects, simple lifestyle measures are the basis of management with drugs held in reserve for only the highest risk people."

The statement also questionned the merits of the Norway study, and said other studies did not estimate that such a high number of people would be defined as being at risk.

Cathy Ross, medical spokesperson for the British Heart Foundation, said: "The limits suggested should act as guidelines in the assessment of risk and should be used in combination with lifestyle advice.

"Furthermore, it is better for patients to be made aware of their risk, and to take action to lower it, than to keep the threshold high simply to avoid an unfortunate 'label'."


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4122692.stm
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Fri, Jun-24-05, 08:00
Roma-girl's Avatar
Roma-girl Roma-girl is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 471
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 269/264/220 Female 171 cm
BF:
Progress: 10%
Location: Israel
Default

From your article:

Inserts
People 'at risk'
The guidance sets the following thresholds:
Blood pressure above 140/90 mm Hg
Serum cholesterol of 5 mmol/l


I have been on BP meds for years: beta-blockers and ACE inhibitors, I am taking magnesium tablets and have lately lost 12 kg of weight, but my BP stubbornly 'clings' on at 145/100 or 105. NOTHING seems to work!

I don't remember what it was when they first started me on all these meds!

Ways to cut heart disease risk
Take more physical exercise
Reduce saturated fat and salt in your diet
Eat at least five portions of fruit and vegetables a day


Adding salt or not adding salt seems to make very little difference in my case.

On Atkins I am eating more veggies (I have one or two portions of lettuce, broccoli, cauliflower, asparagus, etc. every day now) than I managed before, though less fruit! I used to have several bananas a day which of course now I don't. A few berries at most.

But I don't reach 5 portions and do not think I will either.

And reducing sat. fat???? No way! Now that I can finally eat that freely, I'm not going to cut it out!

But I do try to minimize trans fats!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 13:41.


Copyright © 2000-2010 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.