Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members Calendar Mark Forums Read Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Tue, Jan-18-05, 07:25
doreen T's Avatar
doreen T doreen T is offline
Forum Founder
Posts: 28,952
 
Plan: VLC
Stats: 230/197.2/140 Female 5'5½"
BF:yes
Progress: 36%
Location: ONT Canada
Default Experts Dissatisfied With School Phys.Ed. Programs

Experts Dissatisfied With P.E. Classes

Mon Jan 17, 8:30 PM ET


By COLIN FLY, Associated Press Writer

NASHVILLE, Tenn.
- As American children grow fatter and more out of shape, physical education classes are being found wanting. Experts say there's little accountability for P.E. teachers in most schools. They say the classes are often poorly run, and students don't spend much time in them anyway.

Lisa Lewis, a health professor, heard her two sons talk about how bad their high school P.E. class was, so she went to see for herself.

"It's been terrible," she said. The teacher was a basketball coach, and "that's basically all they did — play basketball between 40 and 50 kids." Many students, especially those who weren't athletic, just stood on the sidelines of the disorganized game.

Nearly one-fifth of all high school P.E. teachers don't have a major and certification in physical education, according to the most recent numbers from the National Center for Education Statistics.

Often the instructor is a coach more interested in winning games than in producing healthy students, experts say.

"That stigma that a coach cares more about the team than his physical education class does exist," said George Graham, professor of kinesiology at Penn State University.

"When a teacher or coach is doing that, it's really up to the principal to get in there and say, 'We want to win ball games, but the kids in P.E. deserve a good education too.'"

The lack of respect for P.E. also appears in the number of students required to take it.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (news - web sites) reports that in 2003, only 28 percent of high school students nationwide attended a daily P.E. class, but 38 percent watched television for three hours or more each school night.

While 71 percent of the nation's freshmen were in P.E. at least one day a week — hardly enough to be effective, experts say — those numbers drop to 40 percent by the students' senior year.

But participation varies widely by state. In Tennessee, for instance, only 18 percent of seniors were enrolled in a P.E. class, while New York has better than 90 percent participation.

The National Association for Sport and Physical Education says Illinois is the only state that requires daily physical education K-12, while Alabama requires it for K-8.

In California, Kentucky, Maine, Missouri, New York, South Carolina and Vermont, accountability standards are being developed for health and physical education programs.

"Unless we hold physical education teachers accountable for the fitness of the student ... there's no way to evaluate who is good or who is bad because we're more concerned with math and reading," Lewis said. "There needs to be some sort of minimal national fitness standard — that would be a very easy thing to establish."

Some schools have done just that — like the Victor Central School District just outside Rochester in Victor, N.Y.

Superintendent Timothy J. McElheran said his teachers are held to specific goals and judged like any math or science teacher would be.

"It's no longer the coach with the whistle around his neck," he said. "Our physical education teachers are highly trained professionals."

Victor's nationally recognized program includes rock-climbing, kayaking, cross-country skiing, archery and aerobic dance as options for students.

"They take what they're doing very seriously," he said.

But not all do, and a new federal education law doesn't give schools much incentive.

"The thought in some schools is, 'If we eliminate P.E., then they will have more time to do better educationally,' but there's nothing to suggest that's the case," Graham said.

"Kids — just like adults at work — need breaks and they need time on their own."

Lewis has seen the poor state of physical education not only in her sons' school, but also at Middle Tennessee State University where she works. The school recently dropped requirements for health and P.E. from the core curriculum.

MTSU general education director Bill Badley said the P.E. requirement went from four hours to zero when the school decided to add classes to the core curriculum while lowering the total number of classes needed to graduate.

Lewis wasn't able to stop the changes at MTSU, but she was able to make a difference at her sons' school.

"I went to the class and actually helped the physical educator," Lewis said. "The non-athletes, they're the ones who need it most."

NASPE president Dolly Lambdin said the cuts in secondary schools and colleges intensify the problem that begins at a young age.

"Whatever belief we teach (children) in elementary school, middle school and high school, those beliefs will carry over in college," she said. "We can't continue the model (that) we have to fix things later. It doesn't work on your car and it doesn't work on your body. Physical maintenance is the key."


http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tm...fit_pitiful_p_e

.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Wed, Jan-19-05, 02:18
cc48510 cc48510 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,018
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 320/220/195 Male 6'0"
BF:
Progress: 80%
Location: Pensacola, FL
Default

That sounds nothing like Gym when I was in HS [which was only 7 years ago]: 1/4 mile runs, 1 mile runs, push-ups, sit-ups, chin-ups, climbing the rope (Unfortunately, I missed that day as it was one of the few activities I was good at.) I don't remember ever doing any sports in HS Gym.

Now, in Middle School, that was another matter. Most of Middle School Gym was focused on sports. We did Basketball, Soccer, Touch Football, Volleyball, etc...The downside was that you didn't get enough time to have an actual full game. We got 50 minutes for a class, but we had to change into and out of our gym clothes during that time. So, at most we got 30 minutes, more likely 20 minutes due to the time it took to set pretty much anything other than basketball up.

As for what is better. Personally, I think sports is better than useless activities such as running, push-ups, etc...For starters, running 1 mile or doing push-ups for a couple minutes doesn't burn all that much. Let's say you are one of the few [Athletes] who can actually a 6-7 minute mile, that still only burns ONE soda. Hell, I probably drank 2 or 3 just to replenish my lost fluids. A couple minutes of push-ups burns 1 cup of Broccoli.

By comparison, if they used that 50 minutes to its full potential, meaning dropping the uniform requirements, and having everything setup before hand, they could play a competitve sports game for the entire period, which could burn off half a normal sized meal.

Personally, I think they ought to just give the students something like 2 hours and free use of any of the facilities: Basketball court, Football field, Baseball diamond, Tennis Court (our HS had one, but I have no idea what for since we never used it and as far as I'm aware we didn't have a Tennis "team",) Raquetball court (which in MS was typically used by jocks to throw balls at nerds and fat kids,) etc...But, they have to do something. Let them chose which activity they want to do and give 'em plenty of time to actually burn some Calories.

I burn the most Calories on days when I'm doing stuff I don't even think of as exercise. I went to the county fair a few months back. I walked around for the entire night. I climbed the rock wall 3 or 4 times, rode the mechanical bull twice, and did all kinds of other stuff. According to Fitday, I burned more Calories each of those nights than I do in trip to the Gym. The only trick is to avoid the Cotton Candy, Fried Oreos, Fried Snickers, Fried Twinkies, Ice Cream, etc...Strangely enough, they had a stand selling LC Wraps and alot of folks selling Turkey Legs.

One weekend I flew out to Texas to attend a shoot that lasted 4 days. It had rained the night before and the entire place had turned to mud so thick, it was like lifting bricks with your legs. I think I lost 2-3" off my waist that weekend alone, just from trudging around through the mud [and walking around Houston-Bush Intercontinental Airport during a SIX hour layover each way.] Other than the pain in my legs afterwards, it was actually pretty fun...You didn't notice the amount of exercise you were getting. Students are going to burn more Calories doing something they want to do versus being forced to do push-ups by some Drill Instructor wannabe.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 14:34.


Copyright © 2000-2010 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.