Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Fri, Apr-16-10, 00:27
Demi's Avatar
Demi Demi is offline
Posts: 26,971
 
Plan: Muscle Centric
Stats: 238/153/160 Female 5'10"
BF:
Progress: 109%
Location: UK
Default Training cuts student medics 'anti-fat' prejudice

Quote:
From BBC News Online
London, UK
16 April, 2010


Training cuts student medics 'anti-fat' prejudice

Students training to enter the health service need better teaching in order to prevent discrimination against obese patients, a study suggests.


Researchers said previous work had found high levels of "anti-fat prejudice" among health professionals.

But a trial of 159 students, reported in the Obesity journal, found this prejudice could easily be influenced.

Teaching about the effect of genes and the environment on obesity was key to cutting discrimination, it reported.

Over the past decade, prejudice among the public towards overweight people has increased by 66%, the international team of researchers said.

Some studies have shown that among those working in the health professions, including doctors and nurses, the rate of prejudice is even higher than in the general population.

In the latest study, 159 students taking a seven-week course on public health, some of whom were training to be nurses, were split into three groups.

One was taught solely about diet and exercise being the main cause and treatment for obesity.

And another group was taught about uncontrollable reasons for obesity - such as genetics and environmental factors such as junk-food advertising.

The third "control" group was taught about alcohol.

Subconscious prejudice

They then underwent a series of tests to measure subconscious or "implicit" prejudice about obesity, as well as outspoken or "explicit" views.

The results showed that those who had been taught a standard obesity programme based on diet and exercise scored 27% higher on implicit or subconscious measures of prejudice.

But those taught about genetic and environmental causes scored 27% lower on a test of implicit prejudice and there was a drop in scores on the explicit discrimination tests.

Study leader Dr Kerry O'Brien, a lecturer at the University of Manchester, said being taught solely about diet and exercise implied that obese people were just lazy and gluttonous, but to a large extent weight status is inherited and health professionals needed to be aware of other influences.

He said "blaming the individual" was not always obvious but could mean doctors or nurses spent less time with obese patients or did not take their problems as seriously.

"The key is not to be stigmatising these patients.

"Making people feel bad about their condition is not going to help."

He added: "Obese people are constantly fighting their physiology and environment.

"If professionals keep this in mind it may help in not stigmatising their clients."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8622751.stm
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Fri, Apr-16-10, 02:18
Bexicon Bexicon is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 383
 
Plan: my own
Stats: 125/125/125 Female 5'7"
BF:
Progress:
Location: Toronto
Default

Well here are some of those "implicit prejudice" tests if anyone wants to see if they make sense

https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Fri, Apr-16-10, 06:57
Merpig's Avatar
Merpig Merpig is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 7,582
 
Plan: EF/Fung IDM/keto
Stats: 375/225.4/175 Female 66.5 inches
BF:
Progress: 75%
Location: NE Florida
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bexicon
Well here are some of those "implicit prejudice" tests if anyone wants to see if they make sense
https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/
Well I am always such a sucker for taking tests like that, so I went ahead and took it. I *hate* tests where they stress that it's a speed test and you have to do it as fast as possible, . I get all flustered and nervous over that. But I did the test and it wasn't as bad (speedwise) as I had feared. My result was:
Quote:
Your data suggest little to no automatic preference between Fat People and Thin People.
which is what I would have said about it if speaking just with my conscious mind.
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Fri, Apr-16-10, 08:42
costello22's Avatar
costello22 costello22 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,544
 
Plan: VLC
Stats: 265.4/238.8/199 Female 5'5.5"
BF:
Progress: 40%
Default

Interesting. My result:

"Your data suggest a slight automatic preference for Fat People compared to Thin People."
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Fri, Apr-16-10, 09:17
Sue333 Sue333 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 924
 
Plan: Paleo/Primal
Stats: 226/181.5/150 Female 5'7"
BF:Why yes it is!
Progress: 59%
Location: Saskatoon Saskatchewan
Default

I did two of the demo tests, and found them quite interesting. I had ended up with a slight preference for thin people compared to fat people. I was intrigued by the part of the test that had Thin/Bad on the left side, and Fat/Good on the right side. I found I had to slow right down in my responses. This test said a bit more about me than I liked. Eye opening.
Reply With Quote
  #6   ^
Old Fri, Apr-16-10, 09:44
costello22's Avatar
costello22 costello22 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,544
 
Plan: VLC
Stats: 265.4/238.8/199 Female 5'5.5"
BF:
Progress: 40%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sue333
I did two of the demo tests, ...


Which other one did you do? I took the Race one - with some trepidation, fearing I might be a subconscious racist. According to this test I have "little to no automatic preference between African American and European American."
Reply With Quote
  #7   ^
Old Fri, Apr-16-10, 12:22
katmeyster's Avatar
katmeyster katmeyster is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 918
 
Plan: Keto (LCHFMP) + IF
Stats: 265/188/150 Female 61 inches
BF:Highest weight 290
Progress: 67%
Location: Las Cruces, New Mexico
Default

Funny, when I read the headline I thought the students were going to learn about the benefits of dietary fat.
Reply With Quote
  #8   ^
Old Fri, Apr-16-10, 12:39
aj_cohn's Avatar
aj_cohn aj_cohn is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 3,948
 
Plan: Protein Power
Stats: 213/167/165 Male 65 in.
BF:35%/23%/20%
Progress: 96%
Location: United States
Default

Well, I'm relieved. My assessment was
Quote:
Your data suggest little to no automatic preference between Fat People and Thin People.
Perhaps being in OA has taught me better than I realized.
Reply With Quote
  #9   ^
Old Fri, Apr-16-10, 16:04
Nancy LC's Avatar
Nancy LC Nancy LC is offline
Experimenter
Posts: 25,895
 
Plan: DDF
Stats: 202/185.4/179 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 72%
Location: San Diego, CA
Default

Our subconscious is primed by the images we see. If we see large people, other marginalized portion of society, portrayed poorly then it primes our subconscious to make those associations. It's involuntary. It's so insidious that even people sharing the trait will have poor outcomes to their own race (or group), I'd imagine fat people would too. But I've heard a couple of weeks of positive imagery is enough to turn it around.

How often do we see positive things about fat people in the media? Pretty rarely! We're always being shown a sea of fat bellies walking down the street whenever they've got some sort of news about obesity.
Reply With Quote
  #10   ^
Old Fri, Apr-16-10, 16:08
rightnow's Avatar
rightnow rightnow is offline
Every moment is NOW.
Posts: 23,064
 
Plan: LC (ketogenic)
Stats: 520/381/280 Female 66 inches
BF: Why yes it is.
Progress: 58%
Location: Ozarks USA
Default

I think when you grow up entrained to be prejudiced about a given group of people -- and they are the most common thing made fun of horribly in movies, stand-up, etc. -- and you get older and it's enforced by the alleged-education about nutrition in school telling you that only totally lazy gluttons get fat basically -- it's no wonder society at large is pretty hideously biased against fat people and obesity in general.
Reply With Quote
  #11   ^
Old Fri, Apr-16-10, 16:08
Valtor's Avatar
Valtor Valtor is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,036
 
Plan: VLC 4 days a week
Stats: 337/258/200 Male 6' 1"
BF:
Progress: 58%
Location: Québec, Canada
Default

This test was difficult for me, since English is not my first language. But here is my very surprising (to me) result anyway.

"Your data suggest a strong automatic preference for Thin People compared to Fat People.

The interpretation is described as 'automatic preference for Thin People' if you responded faster when Thin faces and Good words were classified with the same key than when Fat faces and Good words were classified with the same key. Depending on the magnitude of your result, your automatic preference may be described as 'slight', 'moderate', 'strong', or 'little to no preference'. Alternatively, you may have received feedback that 'there were too many errors to determine a result'."

Oh well ! I don't know what to think of this.

Patrick
Reply With Quote
  #12   ^
Old Fri, Apr-16-10, 16:31
Nancy LC's Avatar
Nancy LC Nancy LC is offline
Experimenter
Posts: 25,895
 
Plan: DDF
Stats: 202/185.4/179 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 72%
Location: San Diego, CA
Default

Read "Blink", you'll understand why.
Reply With Quote
  #13   ^
Old Fri, Apr-16-10, 21:07
avocado's Avatar
avocado avocado is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 445
 
Plan: loosely PB
Stats: 197/135/000 Female 5'7"
BF:
Progress: 31%
Location: California
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by katmeyster
Funny, when I read the headline I thought the students were going to learn about the benefits of dietary fat.


LOL, that's just what I was going to say!
Reply With Quote
  #14   ^
Old Sat, Apr-17-10, 10:08
Valtor's Avatar
Valtor Valtor is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,036
 
Plan: VLC 4 days a week
Stats: 337/258/200 Male 6' 1"
BF:
Progress: 58%
Location: Québec, Canada
Default

It's true that my girlfriend and the ones before her are all very thin.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nancy LC
Read "Blink", you'll understand why.
Quote:
Originally Posted by From a Blink review
Did you know that after watching a couple talk for 15 minutes, someone with a little training can predict with 90% accuracy whether they'll still be married or not in the next 15 years?

Hey thanks ! I added this book to my reading list.

Patrick
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:11.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.