"Tens of thousands"? Even conservatively, that's 200 studies per year for the past 100 years, for a single phenomenon. Nah, Imma say there's probably about a dozen studies on this, and only in recent decades since the development of the cell phone, and only observational in humans. Even if the effect is real, it's certainly not as powerful as a high-carb diet, for basically any particular effect we're looking at. Let's see. Stop using everything that emits RF/MW for a year, see if there's any effect as strong as going low-carb for a year, like with the A-TO-Z experiment for example. Or the other way, if the effect was really that strong, going low-carb wouldn't produce such dramatic and positive results, ya?

Imagine that same website was showing off the multitude benefits of going low-carb, then comparing that to going RF/MW-free. I wonder if it would maintain its credibility about RF/MW. That website reminds of the street lamp and the guy looking for his keys. Except this time, the guy sniped all the other street lights with his BB gun to make sure there was only one spot he could see. A paper cut is the most painful thing when you aren't giving birth, or something like that, see what I mean?