Wed, Feb-01-17, 10:08
|
 |
Senior Member
Posts: 4,328
|
|
Plan: vLC/GF,CF,SF
Stats: 197/136/150
BF:
Progress: 130%
Location: Alberta
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GRB5111
I can no longer read Guyenet, as his arguments are definitely circuitous and seem to be leading me down a rabbit hole. He's a prodigious writer, and I'm sensing the presence of an agenda, either from him or me! I might accept some of his contentions if they were presented in a clear, concise manner. While I agree that the topic of metabolism is very complex, I don't think eating for good nutritional value needs to be anything but simple.
|
I can no longer read Guyenet either. When he was a grad student he was open minded and posted a lot of interesting stuff. But he seems to want to be known as the expert on something, and chose palatability as the cause of all metabolic problems. He is guilty of exactly the same blinders-on closed-mind pursuit that he accuses Taubes (sugar/insulin) and Keys (fat) of, but worse. |