Sat, Oct-17-09, 08:03
|
|
Registered Member
Posts: 74
|
|
Plan: My plan
Stats: 150/145/145
BF:
Progress:
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Valtor
Ok here we go again. It's not a question of CI/CO being valid are not, it's a question of CI/CO being the CAUSE of excess weight gain or not.
|
Some in this thread appear to be questioning CI/CO's validity. :-)
I don't disagree with anything you've said. I'm a believer in the general LC/metabolism/insulin theories, and as such I've been eating LC for 2 years for general health purposes. I'm certainly not here to try and be a debunker -- there's a whole crew in the war zone playing that role ad infinitum. All I've been attempting to say in this thread is that none of these things invalidate the fact that weight change or maintenance comes down to CI/CO. |