I can no longer read Guyenet, as his arguments are definitely circuitous and seem to be leading me down a rabbit hole. He's a prodigious writer, and I'm sensing the presence of an agenda, either from him or me! I might accept some of his contentions if they were presented in a clear, concise manner. While I agree that the topic of metabolism is very complex, I don't think eating for good nutritional value needs to be anything but simple.