View Single Post
  #8   ^
Old Sat, Apr-17-10, 08:59
cnmLisa's Avatar
cnmLisa cnmLisa is offline
Every day is day one
Posts: 7,776
 
Plan: AtkinsMaintenance/IF
Stats: 185/145/155 Female 5'5
BF:
Progress: 133%
Location: Oregon Coast
Default

Quote:
IMO it is better to err on the side of safety and in this case adopting the 25(OH)D level our DNA evolved to function best appears safer than the levels currently achieved by most people.


I totally agree.

Funny (or not so funny) I have a bit of a difficult time with my collegues who think that I'm "over testing" for Vit D levels. I have not yet tested one person whose VitD levels are 50. The lowest was 9

The only person who I know who was tested who had adequate levels was my mom (but she doesn't count). She and I have the same doc--he told her "I can see Lisa's hand in this" She takes 4000/day. My doc is great--he basically does what I want him to

Progress not perfection.

Lisa
Reply With Quote