View Single Post
  #71   ^
Old Sun, Jan-29-17, 14:55
SabreCat50 SabreCat50 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 162
 
Plan: modified Atkins
Stats: 220/188/170 Male 6 ft 1 in
BF:
Progress: 64%
Location: Oakland, Florida, USA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JEY100
The Calcium Score is "A number reflecting the degree and extent of calcium deposits in the walls of the coronary arteries, as demonstrated by cardiac computed tomography." So yes, an actual area in your LAD.

(CT imaging is sometimes compared to looking into a loaf of bread by cutting the loaf into thin slices. When the image slices are reassembled by computer software, the result is a very detailed multidimensional view of the body's interior.)

http://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/inf...g=ct_calscoring

With my usual critical eye to medical procedures, I do wonder how the skill of the radiologist may impact the score, but also know that many image tests are now first "read" by a computer. When calcium is detected in a slice, likely its size, location and thickness is measured by computer for its degree and extent. The radiologist will then recheck those areas of calcium, but as you can see in samples, it appears those bright white spots would be hard to miss and simple to measure accurately by computer. Compare these to the 3D computer assisted diagnostic mammograms I discuss yearly with a chief radiologist....these seem easier to read to my completely untrained eye.


Thanks for the response. I too wonder how the skill of the radiologist player s into this. Also does the CT scanner (old, new, software version, etc) have an affect?

If the score is proportional to an area, then what is the maximum score? Surely the size of a given artery must vary for different individuals.

The upshot is that I want to know how much of my proximal LAD is blocked? I doubt my GP is up on the test to know.

As always, thanks.
Reply With Quote