Vitamin D supplementation in cutaneous malignant melanoma outcome (ViDMe): a randomized controlled trial.
De Smedt J1,2, Van Kelst S3,4, Boecxstaens V5,6, Stas M5,6, Bogaerts K7,8, Vanderschueren D9,10, Aura C11,12, Vandenberghe K13, Lambrechts D14,15, Wolter P16, Bechter O17,18, Nikkels A19, Strobbe T20, Emri G21, Marasigan V3,4, Garmyn M3,4.
Author information
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Previous studies have investigated the protective effect of vitamin D serum levels, at diagnosis and during the follow-up period after treatment, on melanoma outcome. In the present study we assess whether vitamin D supplementation, in the follow-up period after diagnosis and surgical resection of the primary tumor, has a protective effect on relapse of cutaneous malignant melanoma and whether this protective effect correlates with vitamin D levels in serum and Vitamin D Receptor immunoreactivity in the primary tumor.
METHODS/DESIGN:
This study is a multicenter randomized double blind placebo- controlled phase III trial. Patients between the age of 18 and 80~years diagnosed and treated surgically for a melanoma stage IB-III are eligible for randomization in a 1:1 ratio to active treatment or placebo. The study drug is taken each month and consists of either 100,000 International Unit cholecalciferol or arachidis oleum raffinatum used as a placebo. The primary endpoint is relapse free survival. The secondary endpoints are 25 hydroxyvitamin D3 serum levels at diagnosis and at 6~month intervals, melanoma subtype, melanoma site and stage of melanoma at diagnosis according to the 2009 American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging and classification. At randomization a bloodsample is taken for DNA analysis. The study is approved by the local Ethics Committees.
DISCUSSION:
If we can confirm our hypothesis that vitamin D supplementation after removal of the tumor has a protective effect on relapse of cutaneous malignant melanoma we may reduce the burden of CMM at several levels. Patients, diagnosed with melanoma may have a better clinical outcome and improved quality of life. There will be a decrease in health care costs related to treatment of metastatic disease and there will be a decrease in loss of professional years, which will markedly reduce the economic burden of the disease.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28835228