Fri, Aug-18-17, 12:41
|
 |
Senior Member
Posts: 15,075
|
|
Plan: mostly milkfat
Stats: 190/152.4/154
BF:
Progress: 104%
Location: Ontario
|
|
Quote:
|
Even after adjusting for a wide range of factors; personal (e.g. age, gender, education levels, ethnicity, immigrant status, marital status), health conditions (e.g. diabetes, arthritis, hypertension, mood and anxiety disorders), health behaviour (e.g. smoking, drinking, body mass index, exercise) and work (e.g. physical demands, shift schedule)
|
I remember years ago there was a study posted on the forum where high intake of omega 6 fatty acids was associated with 6 times as much glaucoma as low intake was. After adjustments for confounding variables. 6 times--but before adjustment, they had very little "effect.' Adjusting for more variables doesn't give you better data, it just smears some vasoline on the lens, lowers resolution. These people are frankly delusional that this is any sort of way to figure anything out. |