Thread: Time:The Low-Fat vs. Low-Carb Diet Debate Has a New Answer
View Single Post
  #5   ^
Old Tue, Aug-29-17, 12:54
cotonpal's Avatar
cotonpal cotonpal is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 5,312
  
Plan: very low carb real food
Stats: 245/125/135 Female 62
BF:
Progress: 109%
Location: Vermont
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by JEY100
This study is being torn apart by every side of the debate. 60 % carbs is defined as the high-carb risk, but 55% is OK? Really?

Low Fat proponents are unhappy with the headlines (Low fat diets could kill you!) low carbers read this study as not LC enough

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...et-study-finds/

http://www.cbc.ca/beta/news/health/...ancet-1.4266130


Which goes to show that unless you clearly define your terms there is no way of knowing what this all means. Language can be used to obfuscate rather than elucidate.

Jean
Reply With Quote