View Single Post
  #2   ^
Old Wed, Jun-14-17, 06:45
GRB5111's Avatar
GRB5111 GRB5111 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 4,044
 
Plan: Very LC, Higher Protein
Stats: 227/186/185 Male 6' 0"
BF:
Progress: 98%
Location: Herndon, VA
Default

A low-glycemic approach is likely to have varying degrees of success based on the individual, as you point out. My issue with low-glycemic is that it never completely eliminated my tendency to have cravings for certain foods, as, for me, it was a really weak way to control the impact of carbs, glucose levels, and the inevitable insulin release that would accompany the feeding. Not until I went strict low carb and ignored the glycemic index completely did I realize the ability to make a LC WOE a long term proposition.

This 6-month study is notable for the reduction in weight for those experiencing high BG after fasting, and the percentage of subjects experiencing a greater weight loss with higher fasting BG is notable, I'm wondering how this would look over 1-2 years. Would a consistent reduction in weight continue, could the low-glycemic approach be sustained over a longer time period, and as the subjects got closer to a target weight, would this dynamic continue? Much to explore here, but for me, low glycemic is just another higher carb diet that is difficult to manage and achieve success.
Reply With Quote