I was about to write something smart, then a red flag popped up. The site does not date the texts. The report itself is not dated. To illustrate, this page: http://www.fcrn.org.uk/fcrn-news/up...-launched-today

No date to indicate which "today" it refers to. No date for the news release itself. I'm not sure why it's a red flag to me. Maybe it's because it's like anonimity. Maybe it's because from an archiving point of view, it's impossible to fix it in a timeline. Maybe it's because it evokes a sense of uncertainty, not from the text itself, but from my own reaction to it.

Ima ignore everything from that group. I guess that's the only way for me to create certainty out of it.