analysis of the Seven Country Study by Dr Zoe Harcombe
http://www.zoeharcombe.com/2017/08/...s-study-part-1/
Part One of a long analysis of the Seven Country Study by Dr Zoe Harcombe: Quote:
https://www.dietdoctor.com/ancel-ke...ries-study-part Was Ancel Keys a Fraud? Dr. Harcombe on the Seven Countries Study, Part I Quote:
|
Zoe Harcombe always provides a very careful analysis of the evidence but, as she says,
Quote:
so facts have little to do with the conclusions reached by most vegan/vegetarian enthusiasts. Jean |
http://www.truehealthinitiative.org...THI_.8-1-17.pdf
I find this part of the White paper baffling, seeing that it's supposed to support the objectivity of the whole pursuit; Quote:
The defense against the charge of cherry-picking countries here looks a lot like a description of how countries were cherry-picked. Also Zoe highlights this; Quote:
If you noticed this; Quote:
There's a reason why France might not have been interested in a study looking at the possibility of a connection between saturated fat and heart disease. Japan and Greece had "yay, team" going for them, let's see what's so wonderful about out diet. Places with high heart disease had good reason to participate. "French Paradox" might not have been in use yet, but might have kept France--and other "paradox" countries from seeing any point in participating. |
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:55. |
Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.