PDA

View Full Version : Saturated fat diet piles on pounds around organs


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums

Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!



doreen T
Tue, Apr-01-03, 11:57
Last Updated: 2003-03-31 10:00:05 -0400 (Reuters Health)

By Dana Frisch

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - People who eat a diet high in saturated fat, which is found in meat and butter, accumulate more fat around the internal organs in the abdomen than those who consume healthier polyunsaturated fats, according to new research.

Having a large amount of such "visceral fat" is associated with increased risk of heart disease, high blood pressure and diabetes, said Dr. Kerry Stewart, an associate professor of medicine at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland.

It's not clear if switching to a diet containing more unsaturated fats, like those found in vegetable oils, will reduce or prevent the accumulation of visceral fat, Stewart said.

However, there are many reasons to eat diets low in saturated fats, including lowering one's risk of heart disease and high cholesterol, according to Stewart.

"Our study would suggest that less visceral fat is another reason," Stewart said.

The research was scheduled to be presented Sunday in Chicago at the American College of Cardiology's annual meeting.

In the study, Stewart and colleagues asked 84 people between 55 and 75 years of age to record their diet over a three-day period. The participants were nonsmokers who did not have heart disease or diabetes and lived a sedentary lifestyle.

The researchers then performed abdominal scans to measure the amount of visceral fat, and measured the patients' waist circumference relative to their hip size.

The bigger the waistline in relationship to hip size -- those with potbellies, in other words -- were more likely to have high amounts of visceral fat padding organs.

And a diet higher in saturated fats with respect to unsaturated fats was associated with more visceral fat.

Visceral fat, unlike fat that accumulates just under the skin, is not visible. According to Stewart, men tend to have more visceral fat than women, even though they might have the same amount of fat in the abdomen. This might partly explain why men develop heart disease at a younger age then women, Stewart said.

This study is part of a larger one that is examining the effect of exercise on the heart health of middle-aged and older people and will also assess the effects of exercise on visceral fat levels.


http://www.reutershealth.com/archive/2003/03/31/eline/links/20030331elin003.html

Kristine
Tue, Apr-01-03, 15:17
...and how did visceral fat compare to their refined carbohydrate intake?

*yawn*

doreen T
Tue, Apr-01-03, 15:43
Originally posted by Kristine
...and how did visceral fat compare to their refined carbohydrate intake? My question exactly. However, the study hasn't been completed yet, and this particular part of the research "isn't scheduled to be released until Sunday in Chicago at the American College of Cardiology's annual meeting".

So perhaps more info. will be forthcoming after that. :read:

Doreen

seyont
Tue, Apr-01-03, 23:00
It's an astounding conclusion to reach by "asking 84 people to write down what they ate for three days". Imagine the headline Reuters would give you if you talked to 150 people. It would be huge!

Dr Stewart (http://www.jhbmc.jhu.edu/cardiology/faculty/stewart/stewart.html) did another study with 84 people showing that not exercise, but rather being overweight helped prevent osteoporosis (http://www.jhbmc.jhu.edu/cardiology/faculty/stewart/stewart.html)

MsJinx
Mon, Apr-14-03, 20:42
The first rule of conducting empirical experiements: CORRELATION DOES NOT EQUAL CAUSATION.

The sky gets dark after I eat dinner every night - if I don't eat dinner, we're in BIG TROUBLE!

Lessara
Mon, Apr-14-03, 21:23
I would really really love to see a comparison test done using low carbers vs carb eaters... My doctor, bless him, thinks that low carbing changes a person's body so what would hurt carb eaters (as I call them) might not hurt a low carber.
I've always believed that as long as you keep fat from carbs, you can be healthy.

I have a friend who is truely low fat. She keeps her fat very low but eats lots of carbs. She is losing weight.

(just an aside: My lunches are always bigger than hers, and I lose twice the weight than she does :D Shhhh.. don't tell her!)

BluesRob
Tue, Apr-15-03, 01:50
The three days amazes me even more than the 84 people.

Does this extra fat mean the people who ate saturated fat were fatter than the others, or their fat distribution was different? I assume it means their fat distribution was different and they had less subcutaneous fat.

Nothing here shows that subcutaneous fat is more or less dangerous than visceral fat. There is an association drawn between maleness and visceral fat, but it is not explained whether the males ate more saturated fat than the females or whether this correlation was independent of diet.

I don't want to bag a yet-to-be published study based on a Reuters report, but I get sick of these reports that are all headline and no information.