View Full Version : Wondering about aluminum pans, pots, and utensils
Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!
Scott T. J
Wed, Mar-05-03, 16:59
Been hearing about the risks of aluminum, namely how it might
be linked to Alzheimer's Disease. All my pans, pots, and
silverware are made out of aluminum. Do I have anything to be
concerned about? Will this be viewed by our descendents like
how lead jugs, cups, water pipe systems, etc. of ancient Rome
is viewed by us today?
Scott Jensen
--
Like a cure for A.I.D.S, Alzheimer, Parkinson, & Mad Cow
Disease? Volunteer your computer for folding-protein research
for when it's idle. Go to http://www.distributedfolding.org/
to sign up your computer.
Alf Christ
Wed, Mar-05-03, 16:59
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 13:33:31 -0600, "Scott T. Jensen"
<stj@charter.net> wrote:
>Been hearing about the risks of aluminum, namely how it might
>be linked to Alzheimer's Disease. All my pans, pots, and
>silverware are made out of aluminum. Do I have anything to be
>concerned about? Will this be viewed by our descendents like
>how lead jugs, cups, water pipe systems, etc. of ancient Rome
>is viewed by us today?
If dangerous, only antacid preparats would be of any danger.
These are pure aluminium salt preparates. Pans etc. has a
layer of alimunium oxide outmost and this is very tough
against chemical attacks, but pure, metallic Hg may displace
the layer and expose pure Al against water, which make a noisy
reaction possible :-) (nonoxidized Al is very reactive towards
water and form Al(OH)3 easily, if it wasn't that it within
nanoseconds reacts with O2 to form the oxide instead. Also
extreme heating of pan can expose pure Al if you heat a pan
until glowing and then pour water in it, the water (in
addition to the instant vaporisation due to the heat) will
react fiercely with the Al to form Al(OH)3
Al theory as reason for Alzheimer has been disproven by the
way.
Ben Fuller
Thu, Mar-06-03, 04:58
Alf Christophersen (alf.christophersen@basalmed.uio.no) wrote:
: On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 13:33:31 -0600, "Scott T. Jensen"
: <stj@charter.net> wrote:
: >Been hearing about the risks of aluminum, namely how it
: >might be linked to Alzheimer's Disease. All my pans, pots,
: >and silverware are made out of aluminum. Do I have anything
: >to be concerned about? Will this be viewed by our
: >descendents like how lead jugs, cups, water pipe systems,
: >etc. of ancient Rome is viewed by us today?
: If dangerous, only antacid preparats would be of any danger.
: These are pure aluminium salt preparates. Pans etc. has a
: layer of alimunium oxide outmost and this is very tough
: against chemical attacks, but pure, metallic Hg may displace
: the layer and expose pure Al against water, which make a
: noisy reaction possible :-) (nonoxidized Al is very reactive
: towards water and form Al(OH)3 easily, if it wasn't that it
: within nanoseconds reacts with O2 to form the oxide instead.
: Also extreme heating of pan can expose pure Al if you heat a
: pan until glowing and then pour water in it, the water (in
: addition to the instant vaporisation due to the heat) will
: react fiercely with the Al to form Al(OH)3
If the above is true, how is it that road salt and ocean spray
will corrode aluminum, although somewhat slower than it will
rust iron?
A few years ago I cold have told you what chemical solution it
was that I used to etch the surface of Al for cleaning
contamination from high purity lab samples - but I have
forgotten and no longer have access to the reference books. I
do remember that it was not anything exotic.
: Al theory as reason for Alzheimer has been disproven by
: the way.
Disproven or disputed? Not arguing, just asking. (I am not up
to date on this either.)
Ben Fullerton
Katra
Thu, Mar-06-03, 16:59
"Scott T. Jensen" wrote:
>
> Been hearing about the risks of aluminum, namely how it
> might be linked to Alzheimer's Disease. All my pans, pots,
> and silverware are made out of aluminum. Do I have anything
> to be concerned about? Will this be viewed by our
> descendents like how lead jugs, cups, water pipe systems,
> etc. of ancient Rome is viewed by us today?
>
> Scott Jensen
> --
> Like a cure for A.I.D.S, Alzheimer, Parkinson, & Mad Cow
> Disease? Volunteer your computer for folding-protein
> research for when it's idle. Go to
> http://www.distributedfolding.org/ to sign up your computer.
--
Yes. Go out and buy stainless steel and cast iron. Your food
will taste better too. Anything you cook that is acidic will
dissolve aluminum and get it into your food. Too much of any
trace mineral can slowly poison you.
K.
Alf Christ
Thu, Mar-06-03, 16:59
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 01:37:44 +0000 (UTC),
ac608nospam@chebucto.ns.ca (Ben Fullerton) wrote:
>If the above is true, how is it that road salt and ocean
>spray will corrode aluminum, although somewhat slower than it
>will rust iron?
Salt make water lead electricity and if aluminium is in
contact with other metals, Al is not electrically inert and
will corrode. But do you cut off pieces of the pan and use for
food??That could be dangerous out of other reasons, making
scars in the intestines eg.
Ben Fuller
Thu, Mar-06-03, 16:59
Alf Christophersen (alf.christophersen@basalmed.uio.no) wrote:
: On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 01:37:44 +0000 (UTC),
: ac608nospam@chebucto.ns.ca (Ben Fullerton) wrote:
: >If the above is true, how is it that road salt and ocean
: >spray will corrode aluminum, although somewhat slower than
: >it will rust iron?
: Salt make water lead electricity and if aluminium is in
: contact with other metals, Al is not electrically inert and
: will corrode. But do you cut off pieces of the pan and use
: for food??That could be dangerous out of other reasons,
: making scars in the intestines eg.
Solid chunks of aluminum (BB size pellets, for example) would
worry me a lot less than the Al that has been lost to create
the pitted surface that can be found in the lower inside
surfaces of old aluminum pots .... or do you think that the
pitting of the surface is from the soaps used for washing. (If
it was, it should be uniform over the entire surface, rather
than deepest on the inside bottom.)
As an aside, it has been proven that the Nickel (and Chromium,
if present) will leach from the inside of stainless steel pots
if used to cook or heat acidic foods. After learning that, we
gave up using a stainless pot for mulling apple cider.
I hope that nobody will be uninformed enough to question the
toxicity of Nickel and Chromium.
Ben Fullerton
Alf Christ
Thu, Mar-06-03, 16:59
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 15:02:04 +0000 (UTC),
ac608nospam@chebucto.ns.ca (Ben Fullerton) wrote:
>Solid chunks of aluminum (BB size pellets, for example) would
>worry me a lot less than the Al that has been lost to create
>the pitted surface that can be found in the lower inside
>surfaces of old aluminum pots .... or do you think that the
>pitting of the surface is from the soaps used for washing.
>(If it was, it should be uniform over the entire surface,
>rather than deepest on the inside bottom.)
Overheating the aluminium (putting it with little water on a
red hot heating plate) may be one cause of corrosion of Al,
other things may be presentation of ligands etc that react.
But how many mg Al has disappeared during the years you have
used it?? Most possibly not anymore the amount aluminium in
one tablespoon of antacids composed of highly soluble
aluminium salts. If aluminium should be dangerous, then
everyone who has used antacids one or twice time in lifetime
have developed Alzheimer already in very young time.
>
>As an aside, it has been proven that the Nickel (and
>Chromium, if present) will leach from the inside of stainless
>steel pots if used to cook or heat acidic foods. After
>learning that, we gave up using a stainless pot for mulling
>apple cider.
Good idea to either use al-pots or enamelled pots. (Which
is the best)
>"Ben Fullerton" <ac608nospam@chebucto.ns.ca> wrote: I hope
>that nobody will be uninformed enough to question the
>toxicity of Nickel and Chromium.
>
> Ben Fullerton
--
I guess I'm uninformed because both, nickel and chromium, are
essential at trace amounts for humans (that's why they are
called essential trace elements). I would not hesitate for one
minute to supplement either one if I could not get enough from
my diet. Toxicity - like everything else - is relative, and
depends on the type and amount ingested. -FM
Gym Bob
Fri, Mar-07-03, 04:58
Anti-acids (as far as the ones I have seen in Canada) do not
contain aluminum. The USA ones typically do.
"Alf Christophersen" <alf.christophersen@basalmed.uio.no>
wrote in message
news:fhre6v0cnnuks2fp7gktkcmm0vu57cono8@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 15:02:04 +0000 (UTC),
> ac608nospam@chebucto.ns.ca (Ben Fullerton) wrote:
>
> >Solid chunks of aluminum (BB size pellets, for example)
> >would worry me a lot less than the Al that has been lost to
> >create the pitted surface that can be found in the lower
> >inside surfaces of old aluminum pots .... or do you think
> >that the pitting of the surface is from the soaps used for
> >washing. (If it was, it should be uniform over the entire
> >surface, rather than deepest on the inside bottom.)
>
> Overheating the aluminium (putting it with little water on a
> red hot heating plate) may be one cause of corrosion of Al,
> other things may be presentation of ligands etc that react.
> But how many mg Al has disappeared during the years you have
> used it?? Most possibly not anymore the amount aluminium in
> one tablespoon of antacids composed of highly soluble
> aluminium salts. If aluminium should be dangerous, then
> everyone who has used antacids one or twice time in lifetime
> have developed Alzheimer already in very young time.
>
> >
> >As an aside, it has been proven that the Nickel (and
> >Chromium, if
present)
> >will leach from the inside of stainless steel pots if used
> >to cook or
heat
> >acidic foods. After learning that, we gave up using a
> >stainless pot for mulling apple cider.
>
> Good idea to either use al-pots or enamelled pots. (Which is
> the best)
Larry Hoov
Fri, Mar-07-03, 04:58
"Gym Bob" <NoneAtAll@notspam.com> wrote in message
news:eiS9a.193$5%2.41644169@mantis.golden.net...
> Anti-acids (as far as the ones I have seen in Canada) do not
> contain aluminum. The USA ones typically do.
>
Check the label of Maalox or equivalent house brands. Maalox
stands for MAgnesium (and) ALuminum hydrOXide(s).
Gym Bob
Fri, Mar-07-03, 04:58
Will do thanx
"Larry Hoover" <larryhoover@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:w6S9a.7193$Or5.893505@news20.bellglobal.com...
>
> "Gym Bob" <NoneAtAll@notspam.com> wrote in message
> news:eiS9a.193$5%2.41644169@mantis.golden.net...
> > Anti-acids (as far as the ones I have seen in Canada) do
> > not contain aluminum. The USA ones typically do.
> >
>
> Check the label of Maalox or equivalent house brands. Maalox
> stands for MAgnesium (and) ALuminum hydrOXide(s).
Hua Kul
Fri, Mar-07-03, 16:58
Alf Christophersen <alf.christophersen@basalmed.uio.no> wrote
in message
news:<kbnc6vsnnvq1mgb0op73j1cpdh415jkbf2@4ax.com>...
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 13:33:31 -0600, "Scott T. Jensen"
> <stj@charter.net> wrote:
>
> >Been hearing about the risks of aluminum, namely how it
> >might be linked to Alzheimer's Disease. All my pans, pots,
> >and silverware are made out of aluminum. Do I have anything
> >to be concerned about? Will this be viewed by our
> >descendents like how lead jugs, cups, water pipe systems,
> >etc. of ancient Rome is viewed by us today?
>
> If dangerous, only antacid preparats would be of any danger.
> These are pure aluminium salt preparates. Pans etc. has a
> layer of alimunium oxide outmost and this is very tough
> against chemical attacks, but pure, metallic Hg may displace
> the layer and expose pure Al against water, which make a
> noisy reaction possible :-) (nonoxidized Al is very reactive
> towards water and form Al(OH)3 easily, if it wasn't that it
> within nanoseconds reacts with O2 to form the oxide instead.
> Also extreme heating of pan can expose pure Al if you heat a
> pan until glowing and then pour water in it, the water (in
> addition to the instant vaporisation due to the heat) will
> react fiercely with the Al to form Al(OH)3
>
> Al theory as reason for Alzheimer has been disproven by
> the way.
Hello Alf. I usually agree with your posts, but I can't accept
your last statement. I don't believe Al has been ruled out as
a cause of Alzheimer's, although it hasn't been proven yet.
Another way that Al appears to be dangerous is the production
of aluminum fluoride when fluoridated tap water is boiled in
aluminum pans. In one study, the reference to which I can't
locate at the moment, "boiling fluoridated tap water in an
aluminum pan leached almost 200 parts per million (ppm) of
aluminum into the water in 10 minutes. Leaching of up to 600
PPM occurred with prolonged boiling. Different releases of
aluminum depend upon the composition of the pan and the type
of food being cooked. Using non-fluoridated water showed
almost no leaching from aluminum pans."
(http://www.mercola.com/2001/may/16/fluoride.htm) As far as
I'm concerned, there is enough evidence for harm that I avoid
fluoridated water and aluminum cookware. But that's just me.
"Epidemiologic data suggest that Al exposure via drinking
water is associated with an increased incidence of AD
(McLachlan, 1995). The data are problematic with respect to
duration of exposure and show an association rather than
causality, although some indication of a dose trend was seen
in five of eight studies as noted above (Nieboer et al.,
1995)(Table 5). On the basis of the experimental database,
McLachlan (1995) has recommended a lowering aluminum exposure
in municipal drinking water to below 50 mg/L, at least in the
province of Ontario, Canada. Alternatively, Nieboer et al.
(1995) support strict enforcement of a 100 mg/L drinking water
guideline. The devastating nature of the disease, the lack of
an effective treatment or prevention, and the high cost to the
health care system were cited as factors weighing against the
moderate cost of reducing aluminum in drinking water
(McLachlan, 1995).
Another observation linking Al neurotoxicity to AD is that of
a clinical trial involving the treatment of AD with the Al
chelator desferrioxamine (McLachlan et al., 1991; Savory et
al., 1998). While the beneficial effects noted on AD could
have been due to reducing oxidative stress-induced neuronal
damage, it seems more likely to have been related to Al
removal. As noted above there is no substantiated mechanism
for AD, however the possible role of Al as one of several
factors in the tau-AD disease link should not be ignored
(Savory and Garruto, 1998). Although it has not been
established that AD is a result of Al intoxication, there is
considerable evidence that Al is neurotoxic in man. Perl et
al. (1982) showed prominent accumulation of Al within the
nuclear region and perikaryal cytoplasm of neurofibrillary
tangle-bearing neurons in patients with ALS and
Parkinsonism-dementia of Guam. High levels of Al and unusually
low levels of calcium and magnesium have been found in samples
of drinking water and garden soils from Guam. Studies
measuring trace elements in subcellular compartments
demonstrated increased Al and Fe concentrations in Lewy bodies
(Hirsch et al., 1991), which are a hallmark of
Parkinson’s disease (PD), and in the neuromelanin
granules of neurons in the substantia nigra of patients with
PD (Good et al., 1992a,b). Thus, aluminum, in conjunction with
different modes of action in each disease, may contribute to
the cascade of events which eventually results in neuron death
in AD, PD, and the Guam PD/ALS syndrome (McLachlan, 1995).
Altmann et al. (1999) conducted a retrospective study of
neurological effects in a population accidentally exposed to
aluminum sulphate in the drinking water. In 1988 20 tons of
aluminum sulfate were accidentally emptied into a treated
water reservoir that served 20,000 residents of the Camelford
area of Cornwall in the United Kingdom. Early health
complaints included rashes and gastrointestinal disturbances
within days and later musculoskeletal pains, malaise, and
impaired concentration and memory. Two years later 400 people
were suffering from symptoms attributed to the incident. The
retrospective survey involved 55 exposed adults three years
after the incident and 15 unexposed siblings of similar age.
The study included an assessment of premorbid IQ with the
national adult reading test, a computerized battery of
psychomotor testing, and measurement of the difference in
latencies between the flash and pattern visual evoked
potentials. The mean IQ was above average,
114.4, siblings, 116.3. The most sensitive of the psychomotor
tests for organic brain disease was the symbol digit
coding test which has a normal score of 100, with abnormal
less than 85. Exposed subjects performed badly: 51.8 ±
16.6 (SE) vs. 87.5 ± 4.9 (SE) for the unexposed siblings
(p = 0.03). The flash-pattern differences in the
Al-exposed group were greater than in 42 unrelated control
subjects of similar age (p = 0.0002). The authors
concluded that the aluminum sulfate water contamination
incident probably led to long term cerebral impairment in
some of the exposed people in Camelford. Although no
additional follow up studies have been conducted,
anecdotally, some affected individuals still have symptoms
11 years later."
http://www.oehha.ca.gov/water/phg/pdf/Alumin.pdf
The daily ingestion of Al by humans is estimated to be 30 to
50 mg (National Library of Medicine 2000). The increase in Al
exposure of the general population becomes of increasing
concern with studies that suggest possible association between
exposure and neurological diseases (Harris, Berthon et al.
1996; van Landeghem, D'Haese et al. 1997; Altmann, Cunningham
et al. 1999).
Toxicity of Al in humans is known to occur in at least two
specific situations. Dementia in dialysis patients is related
to Al exposure (van Landeghem, D'Haese et al. 1997;
Suarez-Fernandez, Soldado et al.
115). A second prominent Al toxicity found in dialysis
patients is osteomalacia or metabolic bone disease (Kausz,
Antonsen et al. 1999) (Klein 1998). Preterm infants with
parenteral administration of nutritional solutions are
also at risk for Al-induced neurotoxicity (Hawkins, Coffey
et al. 1994; Driscoll, Cummings et al. 1997). Al
inhalation, especially in workers, may be associated with
increased incidence of asthma (Sorgdrager, de Looff et al.
1998; Vandenplas, Delwiche et al. 1998). Pre-term infants
are also at risk for Al-induced metabolic bone disease
(Klein 1995; Klein 1998).
Two studies in rats report enhanced mortality in rats exposed
to 0.5 ppm AlF3 complexes in the drinking water (Varner,
Horvath et al. 1994; Varner, Jensen et al. 1998). Recently,
evidence of increased absorption of Al has also been
demonstrated with an inorganic Al-complex, AlF3 . Fluoride
also enhances the neurotoxicity of Al (van der Voet, Schijns
et al. 1999). The potential relevance of such Al- complexes
derives from the observation that under slightly acidic source
water conditions organic Al-complexes and Al-F complexes
predominate, and these can persist to a significant degree
through drinking water treatment. http://ntp-server.niehs.nih-
.gov/htdocs/Chem_Background/ExSumPdf/Aluminumalt.pdf
--Hua Kul
Ff123
Sat, Mar-08-03, 04:57
On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 09:18:34 -0600, Katra
<Katra@centurytel.net> wrote:
>"Scott T. Jensen" wrote:
>>
>> Been hearing about the risks of aluminum, namely how it
>> might be linked to Alzheimer's Disease. All my pans, pots,
>> and silverware are made out of aluminum. Do I have anything
>> to be concerned about? Will this be viewed by our
>> descendents like how lead jugs, cups, water pipe systems,
>> etc. of ancient Rome is viewed by us today?
>
>Yes. Go out and buy stainless steel and cast iron. Your food
>will taste better too. Anything you cook that is acidic will
>dissolve aluminum and get it into your food. Too much of any
>trace mineral can slowly poison you.
The same goes for the iron in cast iron cookware. Acidic foods
(such as something that is tomato-based) cooked in cast-iron
can increase the iron content of a meal by many times. There
may (or may not, I'm not sure) be a link between excess iron
and heart disease.
Stainless steel cookware is generally safe, as is
anodized aluminum.
ff123
Marcio Wat
Sat, Mar-08-03, 04:57
gmp@adres.nl (Hua Kul) wrote:
>Hello Alf. I usually agree with your posts, but I can't
>accept your last statement. I don't believe Al has been ruled
>out as a cause of Alzheimer's, although it hasn't been proven
>yet. Another way that Al appears to be dangerous is the
>production of aluminum fluoride when fluoridated tap water is
>boiled in aluminum pans.
If someone knows how the Alzheimer's rates are in Brazil
compared to the USA or other countries, that might give an
interesting insight. Contrary to the USA, in Brazil, the vast
majority of pans are made of non-anodized aluminum, including
pressure cookers, which are used in many households to cook
beans, a staple of Brazilian diet. I remember that aluminum
is so prevalent that is even used for plates, drinking
"glasses", and food containers (marmitas). And since water in
Brazil is fluoridated (for the ones who receive potable
water, that is), and beans are cooked in water in aluminum
pressure cookers or for hours in aluminum pans, and these
cooked beans are a daily food for most Brazilians, a higher
rate of Alzheimer's is expected if aluminum is indeed as
dangerous as Hua is claiming.
I'll be in Brazil in May, and I'll take a look at pots and
pans to make sure my memory is not failing me or if the
materials used have changed.
--
Marcio Watanabe
Gym Bob
Sat, Mar-08-03, 04:57
This sounds like we may be able to chelate/leach aluminum from
our bodies by taking flouride supplements. Aluminum, has never
been able to be removed by any technique to my knowledge.
"Hua Kul" <gmp@adres.nl> wrote in message
news:3da4c6e5.0303071336.6d0f8f33@posting.google.com...
> Another way that Al appears to be dangerous is the
> production of aluminum fluoride when fluoridated tap water
> is boiled in aluminum pans. In one study, the reference to
> which I can't locate at the moment, "boiling fluoridated
> tap water in an aluminum pan leached almost 200 parts per
> million (ppm) of aluminum into the water in 10 minutes.
> Leaching of up to 600 PPM occurred with prolonged boiling.
> Different releases of aluminum depend upon the composition
> of the pan and the type of food being cooked. Using
> non-fluoridated water showed almost no leaching from
> aluminum pans."
> (http://www.mercola.com/2001/may/16/fluoride.htm) As far as
> I'm concerned, there is enough evidence for harm that I
> avoid fluoridated water and aluminum cookware. But that's
> just me.
Julius Sid
Sat, Mar-08-03, 04:57
Julius: the kidneys remove aluminum hydroxide. Aluminum has
caused dementia in end stage renal failure patients being
treated with aluminum hydroxide in the hopes of binding
"excess" phosphate and carrying it out of the GI tract.
This has been a topic in the past on the usenet. Google it.
"Gym Bob" <NoneAtAll@notspam.com> wrote in message
news:icfaa.331$Cs6.53589029@mantis.golden.net...
> This sounds like we may be able to chelate/leach aluminum
> from our bodies
by
> taking flouride supplements. Aluminum, has never been able
> to be removed
by
> any technique to my knowledge.
Gym Bob
Sat, Mar-08-03, 04:57
Memory fail you? Is there a control person in that study?
LOL "Marcio Watanabe" <marcio@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:amdi6v0e2qtmba930ebahp3ingg49k8tm4@4ax.com...
> gmp@adres.nl (Hua Kul) wrote:
>
> >Hello Alf. I usually agree with your posts, but I can't
> >accept your last statement. I don't believe Al has been
> >ruled out as a cause of Alzheimer's, although it hasn't
> >been proven yet. Another way that Al appears to be
> >dangerous is the production of aluminum fluoride when
> >fluoridated tap water is boiled in aluminum pans.
>
> If someone knows how the Alzheimer's rates are in Brazil
> compared to the USA or other countries, that might give an
> interesting insight. Contrary to the USA, in Brazil, the
> vast majority of pans are made of non-anodized aluminum,
> including pressure cookers, which are used in many
> households to cook beans, a staple of Brazilian diet. I
> remember that aluminum is so prevalent that is even used for
> plates, drinking "glasses", and food containers (marmitas).
> And since water in Brazil is fluoridated (for the ones who
> receive potable water, that is), and beans are cooked in
> water in aluminum pressure cookers or for hours in aluminum
> pans, and these cooked beans are a daily food for most
> Brazilians, a higher rate of Alzheimer's is expected if
> aluminum is indeed as dangerous as Hua is claiming.
>
> I'll be in Brazil in May, and I'll take a look at pots and
> pans to make sure my memory is not failing me or if the
> materials used have changed.
>
> --
> Marcio Watanabe
Moosh:)
Sat, Mar-08-03, 17:00
On Wed, 05 Mar 2003 21:32:15 +0100, Alf Christophersen
<alf.christophersen@basalmed.uio.no> wrote:
>On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 13:33:31 -0600, "Scott T. Jensen"
><stj@charter.net> wrote:
>
>>Been hearing about the risks of aluminum, namely how it
>>might be linked to Alzheimer's Disease. All my pans, pots,
>>and silverware are made out of aluminum. Do I have anything
>>to be concerned about? Will this be viewed by our
>>descendents like how lead jugs, cups, water pipe systems,
>>etc. of ancient Rome is viewed by us today?
>
>If dangerous, only antacid preparats would be of any danger.
A lot of them have changed from aluminium hydroxide to calcium
carbonate, probably due to the public scare campaign of 30
years ago. Funny that they only changed in the last few years.
Nothing to do with science, I suspect, but...
Moosh:)
Moosh:)
Sat, Mar-08-03, 17:00
On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 09:18:34 -0600, Katra
<Katra@centurytel.net> wrote:
>"Scott T. Jensen" wrote:
>>
>> Been hearing about the risks of aluminum, namely how it
>> might be linked to Alzheimer's Disease. All my pans, pots,
>> and silverware are made out of aluminum. Do I have anything
>> to be concerned about? Will this be viewed by our
>> descendents like how lead jugs, cups, water pipe systems,
>> etc. of ancient Rome is viewed by us today?
>>
>> Scott Jensen
>> --
>> Like a cure for A.I.D.S, Alzheimer, Parkinson, & Mad Cow
>> Disease? Volunteer your computer for folding-protein
>> research for when it's idle. Go to
>> http://www.distributedfolding.org/ to sign up your
>> computer.
>
>--
>
>Yes. Go out and buy stainless steel and cast iron. Your food
>will taste better too. Anything you cook that is acidic will
>dissolve aluminum and get it into your food. Too much of any
>trace mineral can slowly poison you.
Aluminium needs an awful lot to be toxic. Many antacid preps
over the years gave seen tonnes swallowed with no effect.
Moosh:)
Alf Christ
Sat, Mar-08-03, 17:00
On 7 Mar 2003 13:36:47 -0800, gmp@adres.nl (Hua Kul) wrote:
>appears to be dangerous is the production of aluminum
>fluoride when fluoridated tap water is boiled in aluminum
>pans. In one study, the reference to which I can't locate at
>the moment, "boiling fluoridated tap water in an aluminum pan
>leached almost 200 parts per million (ppm) of aluminum into
>the water in 10 minutes. Leaching of up to 600
Since wedon't fluorize tap water over here, but add it to the
dental paste instead, that is not a topic over here :-)
Alf Christ
Sat, Mar-08-03, 17:00
On Sat, 08 Mar 2003 05:54:04 GMT, ff123
<ff123@noneya.org> wrote:
>the iron content of a meal by many times. There may (or
>may not, I'm not sure) be a link between excess iron and
>heart disease.
Only if you are having hematochromatosis.
Hua Kul
Sat, Mar-08-03, 17:00
Alf Christophersen <alf.christophersen@basalmed.uio.no> wrote
in message
news:<suci6v4nvri7mb5gq6ot9ri5uhvu85rpet@4ax.com>...
> On 7 Mar 2003 13:36:47 -0800, gmp@adres.nl (Hua Kul) wrote:
>
> >appears to be dangerous is the production of aluminum
> >fluoride when fluoridated tap water is boiled in
> >aluminum pans. In one study, the reference to which I
> >can't locate at the moment, "boiling fluoridated tap
> >water in an aluminum pan leached almost 200 parts per
> >million (ppm) of aluminum into the water in 10 minutes.
> >Leaching of up to 600
>
> Since wedon't fluorize tap water over here, but add it to
> the dental paste instead, that is not a topic over here :-)
I'm glad to hear that Alf. I can't believe the blind stupidity
of authorities here in the US regarding fluoridating water,
and there is virtually no recourse to stop them. Even the EPA
doesn't allow fluoridated water in their Washington DC
headquarters, but over 60% of local water providers in the US
fluoridate. I won't comment further because there are other
threads for that, but it's hard to have to avoid ingesting
fluoride this way, especially when there is evidence that much
more fluoride is absorbed through the skin during a shower
than in the drinking water.
--Hua Kul
Moosh:)
Sat, Mar-08-03, 17:00
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 15:02:04 +0000 (UTC),
ac608nospam@chebucto.ns.ca (Ben Fullerton) wrote:
>Alf Christophersen (alf.christophersen@basalmed.uio.no)
>wrote:
>: On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 01:37:44 +0000 (UTC),
>: ac608nospam@chebucto.ns.ca (Ben Fullerton) wrote:
>
>: >If the above is true, how is it that road salt and ocean
>: >spray will corrode aluminum, although somewhat slower than
>: >it will rust iron?
>
>: Salt make water lead electricity and if aluminium is in
>: contact with other metals, Al is not electrically inert and
>: will corrode. But do you cut off pieces of the pan and use
>: for food??That could be dangerous out of other reasons,
>: making scars in the intestines eg.
>
>Solid chunks of aluminum (BB size pellets, for example) would
>worry me a lot less than the Al that has been lost to create
>the pitted surface that can be found in the lower inside
>surfaces of old aluminum pots .... or do you think that the
>pitting of the surface is from the soaps used for washing.
>(If it was, it should be uniform over the entire surface,
>rather than deepest on the inside bottom.)
>
>As an aside, it has been proven that the Nickel (and
>Chromium, if present) will leach from the inside of stainless
>steel pots if used to cook or heat acidic foods. After
>learning that, we gave up using a stainless pot for mulling
>apple cider.
>
>I hope that nobody will be uninformed enough to question the
>toxicity of Nickel and Chromium.
Yet many idots here eat extra chromium in their pills?
Moosh:)
Alf Christ
Sat, Mar-08-03, 17:00
On Sat, 08 Mar 2003 13:32:04 GMT, "Moosh:)" <ZZ@ZZ.ZZ> wrote:
>Yet many idots here eat extra chromium in their pills?
Corrosion of chromium normally leads to 5-valent chromium
which is strongly carcinogenic. Pills contain three-valent
chromium which is biologically important for correct
carbohydrate metabolism, but little is known about the exact
function of it. (Maybe because research ignore 1/2 of the
system regulating carbohydrate metabolism, that is, the other
half of glucose regulation in blood. Insuline is well
studied, but glucagon is not even measured, only used to
provoke a sugar release. If no release, it should be rather
obvious that the problem is too much glucagon is in
sirculation, not that insuline is not released. An
analogy,who tries to run a cooler (amplitude of the signal to
run the cooler is the analogy of insuline concentration in
blood) to decrease temperature while the temperature meter
reports it is colder than wanted (below setpoint of
thermometer) and thus has the heater running (whose amplitude
of signal to run the heater is the analogy of glucagon
concentration in blood). So if brain has decided that due to
the alarm niveau in body (reflected by increased adrenaline
etc.) because increased menthal or physical stress, the
setpoint has been increased to thrice the normal value when
body is in rest, insuline release should be stopped and
glucagon release should be strongly increased. But, if you
are in stress menthally, you do not use the energy at all,
and problems arise because glucose is increased in blood as
if you are facing an enemy and has to run away faster than
what a 100 m runner would have ever done and for maybe 10 km
to save your life.
Julius Sid
Sun, Mar-09-03, 04:57
Who made the change?. I've haven't seen it. Not here in the
States anyway. There is lots of aluminum hydroxide for sale in
antacid liquid formulations.
You suspect, you say? "Scare" you say. The Mellon family will
love you, anyway. Do you know the history of aluminum and who
it made rich? You'd better have good kidneys.
"Moosh:)" <ZZ@ZZ.ZZ> wrote in message
> carbonate, probably due to the public scare campaign of 30
> years ago. Funny that they only changed in the last few
> years. Nothing to do with science, I suspect, but...
>
>
>
> Moosh:)
Julius Sid
Sun, Mar-09-03, 04:57
Julius says to Moosh:) there you go again. You don't
understand toxicology. Recall the maxim, "It is the dose that
makes the poison." Chromium is required for normal glucose
tolerance in animals and humans. Supplementation of
chromium-deficient diet with Cr(III) or Cr organic chelate or
Cr organic compound found food yeast has been shown in
numerous studies to increase insulin activity and glucose
ulilization. It is good for syndrome X, do you know what that
is? Do you have a good sized spare tire around your gut? It is
likely you have syndrome X to some degree or another. Some
deficiency signs are elevated cholesterol, elevated
triglycerides, peripheral neuropathy and metabolic
encephalopathy. It appears that adults need over 200 mcgs for
optimum health in the healthy:). Those with impaired glucose
tolerance need several times the aforementioned value. Recall
also, that different forms are said to have different
absorption percentages.
I must comment on your spelling.....you write
"idot".........idiot
In industry, the workers that are adversely effect are receive
huge doses and often generous doses of other toxics at the
same time. There is also the issue of route whether dermal, by
inhalation, or oral..............
"Moosh:)" <ZZ@ZZ.ZZ> wrote in message
news:nasj6v8nqd7i78n6ccur96orn4peo1iknm@4ax.com...
>
> >I hope that nobody will be uninformed enough to question
> >the toxicity
of................................................
> >Nickel and Chromium.
>
> Yet many idots here eat extra chromium in their pills?
>
>
> Moosh:)
Alf Christ
Sun, Mar-09-03, 17:00
On 8 Mar 2003 10:58:20 -0800, gmp@adres.nl (Hua Kul) wrote:
>I'm glad to hear that Alf. I can't believe the blind
>stupidity of authorities here in the US regarding
>fluoridating water, and there is virtually no recourse to
>stop them. Even the EPA doesn't allow
Well, the medal has a backside :-( After having had one
generation of children without almost no holes in their teeth
(I'm too old to be one of that, so I have almost none left :-(
), now they are parents and don't know why their teeth are
almost without holes, but they read much bad rumours about
fluorine (from US!) so they decide to use fluorine-free
toothpaste for their children and denies dentists to apply
fluorine on the teeth of their children, and now dentists
reports that almost all children have at least one hole pr
tooth :-( In average!! Some are due to the plastic bottle with
a screw cork and mineral water (sugar water more correctly
with phosphor acids or other acids, but also their parents did
drink a lot of such without getting a hole at all.
Every preventive steps that was taken during the late 60'ies,
70'ies and up until a few years ago are just vasted.
:-(
Gym Bob
Sun, Mar-09-03, 17:00
My wife took flouride supplements daily during her pregnancy
with our first son. After he was born he was given flouride
drops daily for the first 5 years.He is currently 26 years old
and has never had an etching on his teeth. He requires very
little maintenance as far as home care goes and is very
relaxed about it.
The other two sons are successively more riduled with caries.
No supplementation was done for them. The second son is
obsessive with his dental hygeine though.
Good luck to my third..he follows in his Dad's footsteps
except for the mercury (formerly called silver) amalgams
wall to wall.
"Alf Christophersen" <alf.christophersen@basalmed.uio.no>
wrote in message
news:kmtk6vst840ehc76ip3dr701gghqgi535o@4ax.com...
> On 8 Mar 2003 10:58:20 -0800, gmp@adres.nl (Hua Kul) wrote:
>
> >I'm glad to hear that Alf. I can't believe the blind
> >stupidity of authorities here in the US regarding
> >fluoridating water, and there is virtually no recourse to
> >stop them. Even the EPA doesn't allow
>
> Well, the medal has a backside :-( After having had one
> generation of children without almost no holes in their
> teeth (I'm too old to be one of that, so I have almost none
> left :-( ), now they are parents and don't know why their
> teeth are almost without holes, but they read much bad
> rumours about fluorine (from US!) so they decide to use
> fluorine-free toothpaste for their children and denies
> dentists to apply fluorine on the teeth of their children,
> and now dentists reports that almost all children have at
> least one hole pr tooth :-( In average!! Some are due to the
> plastic bottle with a screw cork and mineral water (sugar
> water more correctly with phosphor acids or other acids, but
> also their parents did drink a lot of such without getting a
> hole at all.
>
> Every preventive steps that was taken during the late
> 60'ies, 70'ies and up until a few years ago are just vasted.
> :-(
Gym Bob
Sun, Mar-09-03, 17:00
Yeah I have to comment on your grammar or whatever the
undecipherable problem is too.
"that are adversely effect are receive"
The more intellegent one here (minimal levels required)
understood completely what was meant by "idot" from the
context. ESL?
"Julius Siden" <nospambaby@nukeit.net> wrote in message
news:3e6aee16_3@corp-news.newsgroups.com...
> I must comment on your spelling.....you write
> "idot".........idiot
>
> In industry, the workers that are adversely effect are
> receive huge doses and often generous doses of other toxics
> at the same time.
Alf Christ
Sun, Mar-09-03, 17:00
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003 14:27:44 -0500, "Gym Bob"
<NoneAtAll@notspam.com> wrote:
>My wife took flouride supplements daily during her pregnancy
>with our first son. After he was born he was given flouride
>drops daily for the first 5 years.He is currently 26 years
>old and has never had an etching on his teeth. He requires
>very little maintenance as far as home care goes and is very
>relaxed about it.
>
>The other two sons are successively more riduled with caries.
>No supplementation was done for them. The second son is
>obsessive with his dental hygeine though.
>
>Good luck to my third..he follows in his Dad's footsteps
>except for the mercury (formerly called silver) amalgams
>wall to wall.
Well, what can I say, history repeats? I think this has common
denominators with most of things that happen thorugh lifetime.
When someone experience something bad personally, he or she
will make most arrangements to hinder those episodes to repeat
with the children and yes, it is succesful, but in next turn,
since the children has no personally experience with the same,
they do nothing to prevent the things to happen to their
children, and, correctly, the bad things repeats again.
Caries, nazism, whatever you may think of.
Moosh:)
Mon, Mar-10-03, 05:00
On 7 Mar 2003 13:36:47 -0800, gmp@adres.nl (Hua Kul) wrote:
>Alf Christophersen <alf.christophersen@basalmed.uio.no> wrote
>in message
>news:<kbnc6vsnnvq1mgb0op73j1cpdh415jkbf2@4ax.com>...
>> On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 13:33:31 -0600, "Scott T. Jensen"
>> <stj@charter.net> wrote:
>>
>> >Been hearing about the risks of aluminum, namely how it
>> >might be linked to Alzheimer's Disease. All my pans, pots,
>> >and silverware are made out of aluminum. Do I have
>> >anything to be concerned about? Will this be viewed by our
>> >descendents like how lead jugs, cups, water pipe systems,
>> >etc. of ancient Rome is viewed by us today?
>>
>> If dangerous, only antacid preparats would be of any
>> danger. These are pure aluminium salt preparates. Pans etc.
>> has a layer of alimunium oxide outmost and this is very
>> tough against chemical attacks, but pure, metallic Hg may
>> displace the layer and expose pure Al against water, which
>> make a noisy reaction possible :-) (nonoxidized Al is very
>> reactive towards water and form Al(OH)3 easily, if it
>> wasn't that it within nanoseconds reacts with O2 to form
>> the oxide instead. Also extreme heating of pan can expose
>> pure Al if you heat a pan until glowing and then pour water
>> in it, the water (in addition to the instant vaporisation
>> due to the heat) will react fiercely with the Al to form
>> Al(OH)3
>>
>> Al theory as reason for Alzheimer has been disproven by
>> the way.
>
>
>Hello Alf. I usually agree with your posts, but I can't
>accept your last statement. I don't believe Al has been ruled
>out as a cause of Alzheimer's, although it hasn't been proven
>yet. Another way that Al appears to be dangerous is the
>production of aluminum fluoride when fluoridated tap water is
>boiled in aluminum pans. In one study, the reference to which
>I can't locate at the moment, "boiling fluoridated tap water
>in an aluminum pan leached almost 200 parts per million (ppm)
>of aluminum into the water in 10 minutes. Leaching of up to
>600 PPM occurred with prolonged boiling. Different releases
>of aluminum depend upon the composition of the pan and the
>type of food being cooked. Using non-fluoridated water showed
>almost no leaching from aluminum pans."
>(http://www.mercola.com/2001/may/16/fluoride.htm) As far as
>I'm concerned, there is enough evidence for harm that I avoid
>fluoridated water and aluminum cookware. But that's just me.
So you avoid "chloridated" water too?
If boiling in one ppm sodium fluoride dissolves some
aluminium, then surely several hundred ppm sodium chloride is
going to dissolve more. I think that food acids will be so
much more potent at this dissolution. Aluminium is virtually
unavoidable in the environment. Just because it appears in
certain diseased states seems to me to be extremely remote
causatively.
>"Epidemiologic data suggest that Al exposure via drinking
>water is associated with an increased incidence of AD
>(McLachlan, 1995).
What about aluminium in food? What about kaolin given for the
trots? Antacids?
>The data are problematic with respect to duration of exposure
>and show an association rather than causality, although some
>indication of a dose trend was seen in five of eight studies
>as noted above (Nieboer et al., 1995)(Table 5). On the basis
>of the experimental database, McLachlan (1995) has
>recommended a lowering aluminum exposure in municipal
>drinking water to below 50 mg/L, at least in the province of
>Ontario, Canada.
Some public health measures are extreme, for public
perception, not scientific reasons.
BTW, 50 mg/l (ppm) is 50 times the normal fluoridation
concentration.
>Alternatively, Nieboer et al. (1995) support strict
>enforcement of a 100 mg/L drinking water guideline.
That's over three ounces of aluminium in a unit of water
purchased (1000litres) (NaF is added at one thirtieth of an
ounce to this same amount of water) I wouldn't think it
matters much. How on earth do you get that much aluminium in
solution? Most of our water supplies are stored in
aluminosilicate storage tanks (earth dams)
>The devastating nature of the disease, the lack of an
>effective treatment or prevention, and the high cost to the
>health care system were cited as factors weighing against the
>moderate cost of reducing aluminum in drinking water
>(McLachlan, 1995).
Lime the water -- increase the pH. But only to calm the folks
who think the sky is falling.
>Another observation linking Al neurotoxicity to AD is that of
>a clinical trial involving the treatment of AD with the Al
>chelator desferrioxamine (McLachlan et al., 1991; Savory et
>al., 1998). While the beneficial effects noted on AD could
>have been due to reducing oxidative stress-induced neuronal
>damage, it seems more likely to have been related to Al
>removal. As noted above there is no substantiated mechanism
>for AD, however the possible role of Al as one of several
>factors in the tau-AD disease link should not be ignored
>(Savory and Garruto, 1998). Although it has not been
>established that AD is a result of Al intoxication, there is
>considerable evidence that Al is neurotoxic in man.
Or just happens to appear when this damage is apparent? Look
at the actual damage and find what other elements are in
different concentrations. Circumstantial evidence. They may
just appear because of the disease state, and have nothing to
do with the cause. If Al was the cause, there would surely be
much more AD.
>Perl et al. (1982) showed prominent accumulation of Al within
>the nuclear region and perikaryal cytoplasm of
>neurofibrillary tangle-bearing neurons in patients with ALS
>and Parkinsonism-dementia of Guam. High levels of Al and
>unusually low levels of calcium and magnesium have been found
>in samples of drinking water and garden soils from Guam.
>Studies measuring trace elements in subcellular compartments
>demonstrated increased Al and Fe concentrations in Lewy
>bodies (Hirsch et al., 1991), which are a hallmark of
>Parkinson’s disease (PD), and in the neuromelanin
>granules of neurons in the substantia nigra of patients with
>PD (Good et al., 1992a,b). Thus, aluminum, in conjunction
>with different modes of action in each disease, may
>contribute to the cascade of events which eventually results
>in neuron death in AD, PD, and the Guam PD/ALS syndrome
>(McLachlan, 1995).
>
>Altmann et al. (1999) conducted a retrospective study of
>neurological effects in a population accidentally exposed to
>aluminum sulphate in the drinking water. In 1988 20 tons of
>aluminum sulfate were accidentally emptied into a treated
>water reservoir that served 20,000 residents of the Camelford
>area of Cornwall in the United Kingdom. Early health
>complaints included rashes and gastrointestinal disturbances
>within days and later musculoskeletal pains, malaise, and
>impaired concentration and memory. Two years later 400 people
>were suffering from symptoms attributed to the incident. The
>retrospective survey involved 55 exposed adults three years
>after the incident and 15 unexposed siblings of similar age.
>The study included an assessment of premorbid IQ with the
>national adult reading test, a computerized battery of
>psychomotor testing, and measurement of the difference in
>latencies between the flash and pattern visual evoked
>potentials. The mean IQ was above average,
>114.4, siblings, 116.3. The most sensitive of the psychomotor
> tests for organic brain disease was the symbol digit
> coding test which has a normal score of 100, with
> abnormal less than 85. Exposed subjects performed badly:
> 51.8 ± 16.6 (SE) vs. 87.5 ± 4.9 (SE) for the unexposed
> siblings (p = 0.03). The flash-pattern differences in the
> Al-exposed group were greater than in 42 unrelated
> control subjects of similar age (p = 0.0002). The authors
> concluded that the aluminum sulfate water contamination
> incident probably led to long term cerebral impairment in
> some of the exposed people in Camelford. Although no
> additional follow up studies have been conducted,
> anecdotally, some affected individuals still have
> symptoms 11 years later."
> http://www.oehha.ca.gov/water/phg/pdf/Alumin.pdf
>
>The daily ingestion of Al by humans is estimated to be 30 to
>50 mg (National Library of Medicine 2000). The increase in Al
>exposure of the general population becomes of increasing
>concern with studies that suggest possible association
>between exposure and neurological diseases (Harris, Berthon
>et al. 1996; van Landeghem, D'Haese et al. 1997; Altmann,
>Cunningham et al. 1999).
>
>Toxicity of Al in humans is known to occur in at least two
>specific situations. Dementia in dialysis patients is related
>to Al exposure (van Landeghem, D'Haese et al. 1997;
>Suarez-Fernandez, Soldado et al.
>1999). A second prominent Al toxicity found in dialysis
> patients is osteomalacia or metabolic bone disease
> (Kausz, Antonsen et al. 1999) (Klein 1998). Preterm
> infants with parenteral administration of nutritional
> solutions are also at risk for Al-induced neurotoxicity
> (Hawkins, Coffey et al. 1994; Driscoll, Cummings et al.
> 1997). Al inhalation, especially in workers, may be
> associated with increased incidence of asthma
> (Sorgdrager, de Looff et al. 1998; Vandenplas, Delwiche
> et al. 1998). Pre-term infants are also at risk for
> Al-induced metabolic bone disease (Klein 1995; Klein
> 1998).
>
>Two studies in rats report enhanced mortality in rats exposed
>to 0.5 ppm AlF3 complexes in the drinking water (Varner,
>Horvath et al. 1994; Varner, Jensen et al. 1998). Recently,
>evidence of increased absorption of Al has also been
>demonstrated with an inorganic Al-complex, AlF3 . Fluoride
>also enhances the neurotoxicity of Al (van der Voet, Schijns
>et al. 1999). The potential relevance of such Al- complexes
>derives from the observation that under slightly acidic
>source water conditions organic Al-complexes and Al-F
>complexes predominate, and these can persist to a significant
>degree through drinking water treatment. http://ntp-server.n-
>iehs.nih.gov/htdocs/Chem_Background/ExSumPdf/Aluminumalt.pdf
>
>--Hua Kul
And AlCl3?
Moosh:)
Moosh:)
Mon, Mar-10-03, 05:00
On Sat, 08 Mar 2003 00:39:13 GMT, Marcio Watanabe
<marcio@nospam.com> wrote:
>gmp@adres.nl (Hua Kul) wrote:
>
>>Hello Alf. I usually agree with your posts, but I can't
>>accept your last statement. I don't believe Al has been
>>ruled out as a cause of Alzheimer's, although it hasn't been
>>proven yet. Another way that Al appears to be dangerous is
>>the production of aluminum fluoride when fluoridated tap
>>water is boiled in aluminum pans.
>
>If someone knows how the Alzheimer's rates are in Brazil
>compared to the USA or other countries, that might give an
>interesting insight. Contrary to the USA, in Brazil, the vast
>majority of pans are made of non-anodized aluminum, including
>pressure cookers, which are used in many households to cook
>beans, a staple of Brazilian diet. I remember that aluminum
>is so prevalent that is even used for plates, drinking
>"glasses", and food containers (marmitas). And since water in
>Brazil is fluoridated (for the ones who receive potable
>water, that is), and beans are cooked in water in aluminum
>pressure cookers or for hours in aluminum pans, and these
>cooked beans are a daily food for most Brazilians, a higher
>rate of Alzheimer's is expected if aluminum is indeed as
>dangerous as Hua is claiming.
>
>I'll be in Brazil in May, and I'll take a look at pots and
>pans to make sure my memory is not failing me or if the
>materials used have changed.
As a kid, I ate all my veges boiled in an aluminium saucepan
that was so pitted, it looked like a night sky in negative.
Bright background covered in myriad black pits. Was I talking
to someone....?
Moosh:)
Moosh:)
Mon, Mar-10-03, 05:00
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 20:22:47 -0500, "Gym Bob"
<NoneAtAll@notspam.com> wrote:
>This sounds like we may be able to chelate/leach aluminum
>from our bodies by taking flouride supplements. Aluminum, has
>never been able to be removed by any technique to my
>knowledge.
Why would you want to remove aluminium?
Moosh:)
Moosh:)
Mon, Mar-10-03, 05:00
On Sat, 08 Mar 2003 16:06:29 +0100, Alf Christophersen
<alf.christophersen@basalmed.uio.no> wrote:
>On 7 Mar 2003 13:36:47 -0800, gmp@adres.nl (Hua Kul) wrote:
>
>>appears to be dangerous is the production of aluminum
>>fluoride when fluoridated tap water is boiled in aluminum
>>pans. In one study, the reference to which I can't locate at
>>the moment, "boiling fluoridated tap water in an aluminum
>>pan leached almost 200 parts per million (ppm) of aluminum
>>into the water in 10 minutes. Leaching of up to 600
>
>Since wedon't fluorize tap water over here, but add it to the
>dental paste instead, that is not a topic over here :-)
What I want to know is if fluoride ions at 1ppm can dissolve
so much Al, why can't chloride ions at hundreds of times the
concentration do more. Surely hot food acids will do better.
Aliminium acetate is eminently soluble.
Moosh:)
Moosh:)
Mon, Mar-10-03, 05:00
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 11:40:10 -0800, "Julius Siden"
<nospambaby@nukeit.net> wrote:
>Who made the change?. I've haven't seen it. Not here in the
>States anyway.
The biggest selling antacid here, Walco Quick-eze by Nestle'.
>There is lots of aluminum hydroxide for sale in antacid
>liquid formulations.
But it wasn't until the Eurofreeks brought "Frankenfoods" to
your attention that you decided you didn't want all those
"genes" in your food :)
>You suspect, you say?
Dunno, where?
>"Scare" you say.
Do I? Where?
The "aluminium causes alzheimers". I remember in the late 60s
the stainless steel pot floggers used to scare the poop out
of customers by telling them their old ally pots would give
'em AD. Must of sold a shitload of pots with that little
tale. Shot 'em in the ass with a handful of buckshot when it
was debunked.
>The Mellon family will love you, anyway.
Rock or Paddy?
>Do you know the history of aluminum and who it made rich?
>You'd better have good kidneys.
Are these rich folk hard on your armstrongs?
>"Moosh:)" <ZZ@ZZ.ZZ> wrote in message
>
>> carbonate, probably due to the public scare campaign of 30
>> years ago. Funny that they only changed in the last few
>> years. Nothing to do with science, I suspect, but...
Moosh:)
Moosh:)
Mon, Mar-10-03, 05:00
On Sat, 08 Mar 2003 05:18:03 GMT, "Gym Bob"
<NoneAtAll@notspam.com> wrote:
>Memory fail you? Is there a control person in that study?
Yes a quarter of a billion Americans.
>"Marcio Watanabe" <marcio@nospam.com> wrote in message
>news:amdi6v0e2qtmba930ebahp3ingg49k8tm4@4ax.com...
>> gmp@adres.nl (Hua Kul) wrote:
>>
>> >Hello Alf. I usually agree with your posts, but I can't
>> >accept your last statement. I don't believe Al has been
>> >ruled out as a cause of Alzheimer's, although it hasn't
>> >been proven yet. Another way that Al appears to be
>> >dangerous is the production of aluminum fluoride when
>> >fluoridated tap water is boiled in aluminum pans.
>>
>> If someone knows how the Alzheimer's rates are in Brazil
>> compared to the USA or other countries, that might give an
>> interesting insight. Contrary to the USA, in Brazil, the
>> vast majority of pans are made of non-anodized aluminum,
>> including pressure cookers, which are used in many
>> households to cook beans, a staple of Brazilian diet. I
>> remember that aluminum is so prevalent that is even used
>> for plates, drinking "glasses", and food containers
>> (marmitas). And since water in Brazil is fluoridated (for
>> the ones who receive potable water, that is), and beans are
>> cooked in water in aluminum pressure cookers or for hours
>> in aluminum pans, and these cooked beans are a daily food
>> for most Brazilians, a higher rate of Alzheimer's is
>> expected if aluminum is indeed as dangerous as Hua is
>> claiming.
>>
>> I'll be in Brazil in May, and I'll take a look at pots and
>> pans to make sure my memory is not failing me or if the
>> materials used have changed.
Moosh:)
Moosh:)
Mon, Mar-10-03, 05:00
On 8 Mar 2003 10:58:20 -0800, gmp@adres.nl (Hua Kul) wrote:
>Alf Christophersen <alf.christophersen@basalmed.uio.no> wrote
>in message
>news:<suci6v4nvri7mb5gq6ot9ri5uhvu85rpet@4ax.com>...
>> On 7 Mar 2003 13:36:47 -0800, gmp@adres.nl (Hua Kul) wrote:
>>
>> >appears to be dangerous is the production of aluminum
>> >fluoride when fluoridated tap water is boiled in aluminum
>> >pans. In one study, the reference to which I can't locate
>> >at the moment, "boiling fluoridated tap water in an
>> >aluminum pan leached almost 200 parts per million (ppm)
>> >of aluminum into the water in 10 minutes. Leaching of up
>> >to 600
>>
>> Since wedon't fluorize tap water over here, but add it to
>> the dental paste instead, that is not a topic over here :-)
>
>I'm glad to hear that Alf. I can't believe the blind
>stupidity of authorities here in the US regarding
>fluoridating water, and there is virtually no recourse to
>stop them. Even the EPA doesn't allow fluoridated water in
>their Washington DC headquarters, but over 60% of local water
>providers in the US fluoridate. I won't comment further
>because there are other threads for that, but it's hard to
>have to avoid ingesting fluoride this way, especially when
>there is evidence that much more fluoride is absorbed through
>the skin during a shower than in the drinking water.
You certainly go for the fringe science.
F- absorbed by skin?
More than drinking water, with 1ppm?
Moosh:)
Moosh:)
Mon, Mar-10-03, 05:00
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 16:02:45 -0500, "Gym Bob"
<NoneAtAll@notspam.com> wrote:
>Anti-acids (as far as the ones I have seen in Canada) do not
>contain aluminum. The USA ones typically do.
They are changing coz of the scare mongering.
Moosh:)
Julius Sid
Mon, Mar-10-03, 05:00
Julius responds: The posting was wriiten in the middle of the
night. The comment reflected my irritation with Moosh:( 's
quickie posting style as much as any concern about spelling.
As the saying goes "people who live in glass houses ought not
be throwing bricks."
the undecipherable..........Julius
"Gym Bob" <NoneAtAll@notspam.com> wrote in message
news:tTMaa.394$iC2.62028915@mantis.golden.net...
> Yeah I have to comment on your grammar or whatever the
> undecipherable problem is too.
>
> "that are adversely effect are receive"
>
> The more intellegent one here (minimal levels required)
> understood completely what was meant by "idot" from the
> context. ESL?
>
>
> "Julius Siden" <nospambaby@nukeit.net> wrote in message
> news:3e6aee16_3@corp-news.newsgroups.com...
> > I must comment on your spelling.....you write
> > "idot".........idiot
> >
> > In industry, the workers that are adversely effect are
> > receive huge
doses
> > and often generous doses of other toxics at the same time.
Alf Christ
Mon, Mar-10-03, 17:02
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 03:22:52 GMT, "Moosh:)" <ZZ@ZZ.ZZ> wrote:
>>"Epidemiologic data suggest that Al exposure via drinking
>>water is associated with an increased incidence of AD
>>(McLachlan, 1995).
>
>What about aluminium in food? What about kaolin given for the
>trots? Antacids?
Have you registered that all cites that Hua Kul produces are
from the period where everything was quite uncritically
explained in terms of aluminium toxicity. No cites from the
period after when someone asked more critically if it was
corrected after having found that all proofs was based on
recitement of just one study who found deposits of Al in
neurons. Which later was found to be particles from the
apparate producing the preparate.
Alf Christ
Mon, Mar-10-03, 17:02
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 03:23:45 GMT, "Moosh:)" <ZZ@ZZ.ZZ> wrote:
>As a kid, I ate all my veges boiled in an aluminium saucepan
>that was so pitted, it looked like a night sky in negative.
>Bright background covered in myriad black pits. Was I talking
>to someone....?
Made of cheap, very impure aluminium? It was quite usual many
years ago. I have several of them myself :-) And I don't see
any changes in the patterns, except when I forget and boil lye
fish (lutefisk) in them :-) Then they are getting a black
deposit all around, but using some strong detergents, the
deposits are removed :-)
Alf Christ
Mon, Mar-10-03, 17:02
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 03:40:11 GMT, "Moosh:)" <ZZ@ZZ.ZZ> wrote:
>What I want to know is if fluoride ions at 1ppm can dissolve
>so much Al, why can't chloride ions at hundreds of times the
>concentration do more. Surely hot food acids will do better.
>Aliminium acetate is eminently soluble.
The problem is that F is a magic buzzword that makes
everything billion times more toxic, just by belief. Ar least
many believe so :-( By the way, small amounts of Ca5(PO4)F
(apatite) is needed as a key building block in bones.
Moosh:)
Mon, Mar-10-03, 17:02
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 11:41:03 -0800, "Julius Siden"
<nospambaby@nukeit.net> wrote:
>Julius says to Moosh:) there you go again. You don't
>understand toxicology. Recall the maxim, "It is the dose that
>makes the poison."
>Chromium is required for normal glucose tolerance in animals
>and humans.
Yes, and who is deficient when on a varied wholefood diet?
From Berkeleywellness:
"Bottom Line: Chromium is an essential mineral, but
deficiency is rare in the U.S. There's no evidence that
chromium picolinate supplements perform as claimed, promote
weight loss, or benefit healthy people. There is some
evidence that they may harm cells. Diabetics should take only
on medical advice."
>Supplementation of chromium-deficient diet with Cr(III) or Cr
>organic chelate or Cr organic compound found food yeast has
>been shown in numerous studies to increase insulin activity
>and glucose ulilization. It is good for syndrome X, do you
>know what that is? Do you have a good sized spare tire around
>your gut? It is likely you have syndrome X to some degree or
>another. Some deficiency signs are elevated cholesterol,
>elevated triglycerides, peripheral neuropathy and metabolic
>encephalopathy.
Patronising attitude noted. Running out of argument?
>It appears that adults need over 200 mcgs for optimum health
>in the healthy:).
From Merck:
"The estimated requirement for chromium in humans is about 1
µg/day, but only 1 to 3% of trivalent chromium is absorbed.
In the USA, chromium intakes range from 20 to 50 µg/day,
with plasma levels from .05 to 0.50 µg/L (1.0 to 9.6
nmol/L). The Food and Nutrition Board of the NAS/NRC states
that a safe, adequate intake of chromium for an adult is 50
to 200 µg/day."
> Those with impaired glucose tolerance need several times the
> aforementioned value.
Evidence? NIDDM (you DO know what that is, don't you? :) is
NOT a chromium deficiency disease.
>Recall also, that different forms are said to have different
>absorption percentages.
No shit, Sherlock. I wonder why deficiency is rare in USA? The
only time they found any was patients on TPN for a long time.
You DO know what that is, don't you?
>I must comment on your spelling.....you write
>"idot".........idiot
Childish pointing out typos noted.
>In industry, the workers that are adversely effect are
>receive huge doses and often generous doses of other toxics
>at the same time. There is also the issue of route whether
>dermal, by inhalation, or oral..............
Of what? Have you lost the plot? We are talking about need for
megadose supplements, No?
>"Moosh:)" <ZZ@ZZ.ZZ> wrote in message
>news:nasj6v8nqd7i78n6ccur96orn4peo1iknm@4ax.com...
> >
>> >I hope that nobody will be uninformed enough to question
>> >the toxicity
>of................................................
>> >Nickel and Chromium.
>>
>> Yet many idots here eat extra chromium in their pills?
Moosh:)
Julius Sid
Mon, Mar-10-03, 17:02
Moosh says "no shit sherlock".
Get this thru your thick skull. 600 mcgs is not a 10X dose it
is a 3X dose. Even supplement advocates are much more
conservative with minerals amounts than vitamin amounts.
"Moosh:)" <ZZ@ZZ.ZZ> wrote in message
news:1tvo6v8g9d4lvr0cpnv0fuv71pprmnnrke@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 11:41:03 -0800, "Julius Siden"
> <nospambaby@nukeit.net> wrote:
>
> >Julius says to Moosh:) there you go again. You don't
> >understand toxicology. Recall the maxim, "It is the dose
> >that makes the poison."
>
> >Chromium is required for normal glucose tolerance in
> >animals and humans.
>
> Yes, and who is deficient when on a varied wholefood diet?
Then go eat.
>
> From Berkeleywellness:
These jokers publish four or five health letters that all say
the same thing. Having said that even they are more willing to
use supplement than Moo.She
>
> "Bottom Line: Chromium is an essential mineral, but
> deficiency is rare in the U.S. There's no evidence that
> chromium picolinate supplements perform as claimed, promote
> weight loss, or benefit healthy people. There is some
> evidence that they may harm cells. Diabetics should take
> only on medical advice."
More research is needed. I use the yeast base form.
>
> >Supplementation of chromium-deficient diet with Cr(III) or
> >Cr organic chelate or Cr organic compound found food yeast
> >has been shown in numerous studies to increase insulin
> >activity and glucose ulilization. It is good for syndrome
> >X, do you know what that is? Do you have a good sized spare
> >tire around your gut? It is likely you have syndrome X to
> >some degree or another. Some deficiency signs are elevated
> >cholesterol, elevated triglycerides, peripheral neuropathy
> >and metabolic encephalopathy.
>
> Patronising attitude noted. Running out of argument?
Am I starting to sound like you? With a different message of
course. I can be lazy like you too. You may become my role
mold for posting style. Lowest common denominator.
>
> >It appears that adults need over 200 mcgs for optimum
> >health in the healthy:).
>
> From Merck:
>
> "The estimated requirement for chromium in humans is about 1
> µg/day, but only 1 to 3% of trivalent chromium is absorbed.
> In the USA, chromium intakes range from 20 to 50 µg/day,
> with plasma levels from .05 to 0.50 µg/L (1.0 to 9.6
> nmol/L). The Food and Nutrition Board of the NAS/NRC states
> that a safe, adequate intake of chromium for an adult is 50
> to 200 µg/day."
Yeah, true .
>
> > Those with impaired glucose tolerance need several times
> > the aforementioned value.
>
> Evidence? NIDDM (you DO know what that is, don't you? :)
Do you;)?
> is NOT a chromium deficiency disease.
It moderates aspects of the ailment. Look at the clinical
studies. It improves glucose tolerance, lowers cholesterol,
lowers triglyceride, and increasing HDL. It is more efective
for hypoglycemia.
>
> >Recall also, that different forms are said to have
> >different absorption percentages.
>
> No shit, Sherlock. I wonder why deficiency is rare in USA?
Gross recognized deficiency. Is anyone even looking?
> The only time they found any was patients on TPN for a long
> time. You DO know what that is, don't you?
Right into the vein.
>
><snip> <snip>
>
> >"Moosh:)" <ZZ@ZZ.ZZ> wrote in message
> >news:nasj6v8nqd7i78n6ccur96orn4peo1iknm@4ax.com...
> > >
> >> >I hope that nobody will be uninformed enough to question
> >> >the toxicity
> >of................................................
> >> >Nickel and Chromium.
> >>
> >> Yet many idots here eat extra chromium in their pills?
>
>
>
> Moosh:)
Gym Bob
Mon, Mar-10-03, 17:02
Thanx...that was my next comment. Been there too
"Julius Siden" <nospambaby@nukeit.net> wrote in message
news:3e6c4dc7_4@corp-news.newsgroups.com...
> Julius responds: The posting was wriiten in the middle of
> the night. The comment reflected my irritation with Moosh:(
> 's quickie posting style as much as any concern about
> spelling. As the saying goes "people who live in glass
> houses ought not be throwing bricks."
>
> the undecipherable..........Julius
Julius Sid
Tue, Mar-11-03, 16:59
Or they are changing so as to be able to use the Tums
selling point which is that their antacid has Ca and is
therefore good for the bones. The line is "Calcium something
you need anyway."
Tums isn't scare mongering that I know of.
"Moosh:)" <ZZ@ZZ.ZZ> wrote in message
news:bh0o6v06bmufv7s99iva5ub9rlr0u5leht@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 16:02:45 -0500, "Gym Bob"
> <NoneAtAll@notspam.com> wrote:
>
> >Anti-acids (as far as the ones I have seen in Canada) do
> >not contain aluminum. The USA ones typically do.
>
> They are changing coz of the scare mongering.
>
>
> Moosh:)
Copyright 2000-2010 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
vBulletin, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.