PDA

View Full Version : Babies caught up in obesity epidemic


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums

Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!



Demi
Mon, Oct-14-13, 05:27
From The Sunday Times
London, UK
13 October, 2013

Babies caught up in obesity epidemic

A 10-MONTH-OLD baby was among hundreds of children admitted to hospital because of obesity in the past three years.

She was one of two baby girls diagnosed as dangerously overweight amid serious concerns about the threat that childhood obesity poses to public health.

A total of 45 out of 164 hospital trusts have responded to Freedom of Information (FoI) requests, revealing that 932 children under the age of 15 were admitted to hospital with a primary diagnosis of obesity in the past three years. Among them were 283 of primary school age and 101 under five.

As less than a third of trusts responded to the FoI requests, the total number of obese children across the country is likely to be far higher.

The findings have sparked fears that Britain’s childhood obesity crisis is growing. The National Child Measurement Programme figures for 2012 show a third of 10-year-olds and a fifth of four-year-olds were overweight or obese.

Last night, a leading expert called on the government to intervene, claiming obesity is the “foremost public health threat facing the nation”.

Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust said in its FoI response that a 10-month-old girl had been treated for obesity in the past year.

A one-year-old girl was also referred to Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust, which said she had “no investigations/procedures during this inpatient spell” but declined to comment further.

Milton Keynes Hospital, Sheffield Children’s and Cambridge University Hospitals were among the trusts that recorded two-year-olds admitted to their wards for obesity.

A total of 172 children — or 18% of all under-15s admitted to hospital for obesity — were treated by Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. The trust declined to comment.

The second highest number of admissions was at Great Ormond Street Hospital in London, where 97 children were admitted over the past three years.

A spokesman for the hospital said: “Great Ormond Street is a specialist paediatric hospital and we see many patients with rare, complex or multiple conditions from all over the country.

“It is therefore not surprising to us that our patient obesity figure is higher than that of many other hospitals.”

Health problems associated with being overweight or obese cost the NHS more than £5bn a year, a figure likely to rise, according to Dr Mars Skae, a consultant paediatrician at Royal Manchester Children’s Hospital. He said: “Obesity puts an incredible strain on the distribution of NHS finances and resources. I am increasingly being referred children as young as four in our specialist obesity clinics who suffer from morbid obesity.

“It is not unusual for me to see 18-stone teenagers in our clinics any more and this is extremely worrying, not least because they are much more likely to develop serious health complications, such as type 2 diabetes, high blood-fat levels, fatty liver disease, joint and mobility problems and some cancers when they get older.

“Childhood obesity is the foremost public health threat currently facing the youth of this nation.”

Yesterday, Tam Fry, honorary chairman of the Child Growth Foundation, accused the NHS and the government of failing to tackle childhood obesity. He said: "Children are beginning to become obese from the day they are born. We are starting to find children in hospital from an unimaginably early age with a condition which is totally preventable.

“The real tragedy is that the NHS does not set itself up to look for the early signs of childhood obesity in the first year of life. It is key that the government educate parents much better in nutrition. The correct age of weaning is being ignored and babies are being fed with solid foods, which is disastrous.”

Sugar and spice and all things fattening

THE amount of sugar found in some baby and toddler foods is as much as three times higher than a limit set by the government, a Sunday Times investigation has found.

Department of Health guidelines categorise more than 22.5g of total sugars per 100g as “high”. Yet one product tested was found to have nearly 70g of natural fruit sugar per 100g.

Others had high levels of artificially added sugar, which is frowned on by nutritionists. Public Health England, an agency of the heath department, said: “We recommend that babies have no added sugar and that parents check the labels on all food.”

The generous helpings of sugar in some baby foods are revealed amid mounting concern about links to obesity. Some doctors consider the risk to health from excessive sugar consumption has been underestimated.

Under government guidelines, foods are considered low in sugar only if they contain 5g of sugar or less per 100g.

Tests showed that Organix Goodies strawberry and apple fruit gummies, aimed at children over 12 months, contains the equivalent of 69.5g of sugar per 100g. The gummies, sold in 12g packets, are labelled with a “no junk promise”.

Organix Goodies apple and orange soft oaty bars contain 28.8g of sugar per 100g.

A spokesman for Organix said the two products contain fruit purées and concentrates that raise the level of naturally occurring sugar. They contain no added sugar.

Heinz fruit with yoghurt cereal, which does include added sugar, contains 27.6g of sugar per 100g. It is aimed at babies over four months — an age when some nutritionists recommend babies should still be on a diet of breast or formula milk.

There is also added sugar in Heinz biscotti organic, targeted at infants aged over seven months. They contain 28g of sugar per 100g.

Heinz said: “Heinz biscotti are free from artificial colours and preservatives and contain no added salt. The amount of sugar is kept to a minimum consistent with the need to provide a biscuit-like texture which also dissolves easily to avoid choking. Heinz fruit with yogurt contains key nutrients.”

A Hipp Organic cocoa and vanilla dessert, which includes added sugar and is targeted at infants, has 14.3g of sugar per 100g.

Karen Smith, group product manager at Hipp Organic, said sugar was only added to foods on “an exceptional basis”.

She added: “Most of our baby-food products do not contain added sugars; only the sugars which are found naturally in ingredients such as fruit or milk.”

Among the products with lower sugar content are Cow & Gate fruity muesli, which has 12.7g of sugar per 100g, and Ella’s Kitchen banana baby brekkie with 12.4g of sugar per 100g. Both companies said the products had no added sugar.

The findings come after a study revealed that baby food from shops was half as nutritious as homemade meals. The research, conducted by the department of human nutrition at Glasgow University, showed that many products contained high levels of sugar and were often marketed to be eaten by babies from four months of age.

Dr Helen Crawley, director of First Steps Nutrition Trust, said: “Nobody needs to buy special baby food.” http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/news/uk_news/Health/article1326826.ece

WereBear
Mon, Oct-14-13, 05:43
Ya know, this throws all their "eat too much and move too little" ridiculousness right back in their face.

How can infants be taking elevators instead of the stairs and hitting the drive-through window too often? This is starkly what they eat. So? What are they eating?

My MIL was recovering from cancer treatment, and what they gave her was that highly advertised protein drink. I showed her the label, which was all soy protein and corn syrup.

She'd have been better off with broth and a multi-vitamin! Why don't they tell her that?

RonnieScot
Mon, Oct-14-13, 06:12
The levels of sugar in children's food make me want to cry. These are things that come with labels like 'healthy' and 'junk free', etc. It is unbelievable and so saddening.

ojoj
Mon, Oct-14-13, 06:15
The levels of sugar in children's food make me want to cry. These are things that come with labels like 'healthy' and 'junk free', etc. It is unbelievable and so saddening. ...... and is the start of the addiction trail. Its a bit like giving a baby its first cigarette!

Jo xxx

Kirsteen
Mon, Oct-14-13, 06:41
I always wonder if something like growth hormones in the food chain might be attributing to the obesity problem. Sugar has always been added to products for babies. However, where children would probably have been given creamy full-fat milk to drink 20-30 years ago, they're more likely to be given fruit juice now.

ojoj
Mon, Oct-14-13, 07:05
I always wonder if something like growth hormones in the food chain might be attributing to the obesity problem. Sugar has always been added to products for babies. However, where children would probably have been given creamy full-fat milk to drink 20-30 years ago, they're more likely to be given fruit juice now. Its quantity and availability thats the problem in my opinion. I noticed the difference between my two batches of children (I have 3 now in their late 20s and two in their teens). When my older ones were babies, they had water to drink and the occasional fruit juice. When we went to mother and toddler groups, they didnt eat while there and they would be given milk or water to drink. Wind the clock forward: I went to the same mother and toddler group with my younger ones and this time, they had milk or fruit juice AND a variety of fruity, chocolatey, cheesy snacks!!!

Just an example

Jo xxx

rightnow
Mon, Oct-14-13, 10:33
The article 'implies' to me, though it does not say, that a routine checkup for a baby resulted in them essentially kidnapping the child into the hospital for 'obesity.'

Have you ever known parents, and apparently a lot of them in this case, in a culture where obesity is considered your/mom fault, to take their kids to the HOSPITAL to say, "Hey, my kid is obese." ?

PJ

rightnow
Mon, Oct-14-13, 10:36
My MIL was recovering from cancer treatment, and what they gave her was that highly advertised protein drink. I showed her the label, which was all soy protein and corn syrup.
Good god! The irony. Talk about an industry designed to perpetuate itself.

PJ

WereBear
Mon, Oct-14-13, 15:51
Good god! The irony. Talk about an industry designed to perpetuate itself.

PJ

The thought kinda crossed my mind, as well. But it's not like cancer patients are singled out, either.

Look how many of those baby foods had names like "Organix" or something that sounded like it, and yet were processed & full of sugar.

deirdra
Mon, Oct-14-13, 20:21
Before 1950, most infants got only breast milk or formula or water until they were 6 mos old because that is what doctors recommended (my grandfather was one). In the 1950's mothers would compete to have their baby be the first on the street to eat cereal promoted in TV advertising and it kept getting pushed earlier - to ~3 mos, even though babies' natural tongue reflexes kept trying to push it out! Gerber baby foods only had plain meat, vegs or fruit, packed in glass jars, not plastic.

Nancy LC
Mon, Oct-14-13, 20:37
The obesity of these children probably started with their mothers or even their grandmothers. Dietary changes have been shown to change gene expressions that can be handed down to children.

rightnow
Mon, Oct-14-13, 21:20
Before 1950, most infants got only breast milk or formula or water until they were 6 mos old because that is what doctors recommended (my grandfather was one). In the 1950's mothers would compete to have their baby be the first on the street to eat cereal promoted in TV advertising and it kept getting pushed earlier - to ~3 mos, even though babies' natural tongue reflexes kept trying to push it out!
When my daughter was born I told them I wanted to breastfeed. They said ok and then tried to talk me into letting them give her a bottle "just until my milk came in." But I'd read that if the baby isn't hungry and sucking hard, the milk doesn't come in the same or as soon, so I refused.

A week later when she had lost the % of her birthweight which according to the big chart on the wall, was well within expected tolerance, a young doctor insisted that I add bottle feeding. I was massively hormonal, and the thought that my baby was starving to death put me instantly into hysterical tears. An old doctor was coming down the hall and he stepped in and sent the young guy out, and asked me what was wrong, and I told him the story, and he said, this is what they teach the young doctors nowdays, they try to get them on formula one way or another. The baby is within the norm, so don't worry about this ok? Come back in another week with her.

But when we went home, I was so scared she was starving, that despite my determination to not give her formula, I asked my husband to go get some, and we had some little bottles I'd been given. The doc had insisted on 2oz which is a LOT for a newborn infant! So basically crying about it, I gave her the bottle and helped her drink it. Just as my husband came in the room, she projectile vomited it all over LOL. He yelled, "That's it! No formula!" LOL So I took the money I was saving up to fix my car and he went and bought me an automated breast pump. And I fed her, and pumped, and fed her what I pumped, and fed her again...

She really grew. When she was 7 months she was the size (not fat, just the size) of the babies in the doc's office that were 14-18 months! That seemed to slow down, as by the time she was about 2 she was about average size.

When she grew old enough to start biting down with her razor sharp little teeth, she got a bottle. And for awhile she sometimes got soy milk, since I'd been indoctrinated by media to believe that soy was the healthiest thing in the world. Otherwise she just got whole milk. I wanted to start feeding her baby food -- I was working then -- but by the time I reminded her dad that I wanted to do that, he told me she was eating just fine.

He was feeding her schnitzel and onions and toast, gah! "No beer!" I insisted as a compromise, not sure if that was obvious or not lol. Where he was from in Czech, in his era, there was no such thing as baby food, or cat food. The parents had food and everyone else ate what they could of whatever they had. She never went through the babyfood phase. He just minced little pieces of whatever he happened to be eating and fed that to her. Fortunately he ate pretty well, aside from his taste in germanic foods I considered weird. And she was pretty old by that time.

PJ