PDA

View Full Version : Bias in research


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums

Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!



doreen T
Wed, Nov-01-00, 07:09
1) Several years ago, I was involved in a drug study, ie, as an RN, I was part of the research team - monitoring cardiac/pulmonary function, drawing blood, recording data, etc. The research was completely funded by an international drug giant, even my meals and parking were paid for. The purpose of the study was to find a specific desired result for the new use of an old drug. That's the thing with privately funded research. The scientists are mandated to get specific desired results. All too often, other discoveries made along the way get "brushed aside" or minimized. And researchers know that if they want to keep the funding coming, they had bloody well better find the desired results.

2) As part of a physical rehab. program (I have fibromyalgia and CFIDS) I had to attend "nutrition counselling". A dietician from the local public health unit came in one morning a week and gave generic talks to a large group of people with all variety of health needs, nothing individualized at all. (Ya gotta love insurance companies!!) It was like a mantra "fat kills, eat more fiber, fat kills, eat more fiber" She handed out pamphlets with the red Canadian Heart & Stroke Foundation symbol on the front cover. It continued the theme of how eating ground beef, butter or egg yolks would cause instant clogging of the arteries, and we'd all keel over in a second from eating these things. I flipped it over, and there on the back, in wee tiny print, were the words "provided free of charge by the makers of BECEL margarine".

3) Billions and billions of dollars are invested in the lowFAT food industry. Remember when pasta meant spaghetti, macaroni and egg noodles, maybe a shelf or two in the store?? Now, it's like a food fair! And fat-free cookies and crackers, and nachos and chips. . . . Make no mistake, the companies that manufacture these over-refined, de-nutrified foods are spending a fortune to pay for research that will "prove" their products are "healthy". (Personal rant here: Notice that our Canadian wheat farmers, producing the whole, unrefined, natural thing, aren't getting any richer from all this lowfat propaganda? - just the manufacturers)

Just personal observation, thanks for reading this rant. It's so frustrating to read big, loud headlines that shout how the latest research shows this, and another news-breaker study shows that, and when you actually read through the findings, it doesn't show anything meaningful or conclusive at all.

Doreen

r.mines
Wed, Nov-01-00, 08:46
I absolutely agree with you Doreen. By the same token, that's one reason I'm glad to see some studies supporting low-carb that don't come directly out of Atkins. Not that I disbelieve the Atkins research (or I wouldn't be a low-carber!), but the positive findings are made that much stronger if they're published by an organization that doesn't actively support low-carb to begin with.

Rachel

Webmaster
Wed, Nov-01-00, 22:07
Originally posted by doreen T
Make no mistake, the companies that manufacture these over-refined, de-nutrified foods are spending a fortune to pay for research that will "prove" their products are "healthy".


In addition, they are spending a fortune, proving low-carb diets (their biggest threat) are unhealthy. Check the "Studies" section, and you'll see a couple of nasty publications/articles against low-carb diets, by the sugar association, and the wheat association (against PP).

Wa'il

doreen T
Fri, Aug-17-01, 10:30
.. Since many members are questioning the meaning of lowcarb, and the media pressure and propaganda that makes us feel guilty every time we eat a steak ....

LowFAT is not for everybody. LowCARB is not for everybody. But, we should all be able to try it out, and work with what's best for us as individuals, and not be a slave to the current mythology.

Remember that only a few hundred years ago, scholars were burned at the stake for proposing the notion that the Earth was round, not flat .... and that it revolved around the Sun, not vice-versa. Those of us who grew up in the 60's knew for a "fact" that eating starch and sugar made you fat, and if you wanted to lose weight, you had to cut out the bread, potatoes and pasta. Big money, and profitable gains has a greater influence on what we are directed to eat than we imagine.

Just my thoughts

Doreen