Ron Ritzma
Sun, May-19-02, 13:56
On 14 May 2002 02:35:12 -0700, bgreenwood2000@yahoo.com
(Barbara) wrote:
>Also watch out for fructose - fruit sugar - as an added
>ingredient, because the general guideline is that it's fine
>in moderation, but not in excess. Rule of thumb - if you eat
>fructose only in its naturally occurring forms (in fruit, or
>as part of the sucrose naturally occurring in fruit), it's
>fine, but if you eat foods with added fructose, your intake
>will be too high for optimum health. That's one of the
>reasons for limiting intake of added sugar (sucrose) in the
>first place, because sucrose is made up of glucose and
>fructose.
But doesn't the "sugar" on food labels include all the "oses"?
(simple sugars, glucose/dextrose, maltose, lactose, etc.) If
true then you would have to both read the ingredients to know
which sugars they are talking about and of course which
disaccharides contain a fructose molecule.
For example, if a food item has 42 grams of sugar listed on
the label but the ingredients only say "dextrose" then eating
a serving of that food would be no different then eating a
serving of pasta or a potato.
Though in reality, "sugar" on food labels for most items is
mostly sucrose and "high fructose corn syrup".
>A high intake of frutose tends to adversely affect
>lipids, although I can't remember which component it
>raises or lowers.
Doesn't it raise triglycerides if liver glycogen is full?
--
Ron Ritzman |Obesity hurts no one but the |person
carrying the lard
|-- A_Mazzagazze@hotmail.com
(Barbara) wrote:
>Also watch out for fructose - fruit sugar - as an added
>ingredient, because the general guideline is that it's fine
>in moderation, but not in excess. Rule of thumb - if you eat
>fructose only in its naturally occurring forms (in fruit, or
>as part of the sucrose naturally occurring in fruit), it's
>fine, but if you eat foods with added fructose, your intake
>will be too high for optimum health. That's one of the
>reasons for limiting intake of added sugar (sucrose) in the
>first place, because sucrose is made up of glucose and
>fructose.
But doesn't the "sugar" on food labels include all the "oses"?
(simple sugars, glucose/dextrose, maltose, lactose, etc.) If
true then you would have to both read the ingredients to know
which sugars they are talking about and of course which
disaccharides contain a fructose molecule.
For example, if a food item has 42 grams of sugar listed on
the label but the ingredients only say "dextrose" then eating
a serving of that food would be no different then eating a
serving of pasta or a potato.
Though in reality, "sugar" on food labels for most items is
mostly sucrose and "high fructose corn syrup".
>A high intake of frutose tends to adversely affect
>lipids, although I can't remember which component it
>raises or lowers.
Doesn't it raise triglycerides if liver glycogen is full?
--
Ron Ritzman |Obesity hurts no one but the |person
carrying the lard
|-- A_Mazzagazze@hotmail.com