Steve Harris (sbharris@ix.netcom.com)

[John 'The]

Did I win the Turing test, ... Steve?

This post not CC'd by email On Sat, 8 Sep 2001 23:18:47 -0600,
"Steve Harris" <sbharrisREMOVECAPS@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>Feel free to email me (no advertising), but remove caps from
>my address.
--
I welcome email from any being clever enough to fix my
address. It's open book. A prize to the first spambot that
passes my Turing test.

You did say that it was open book, didn't you?

[Db]

John 'the Man' wrote:

> Did I win the Turing test, ... Steve?
>
> This post not CC'd by email On Sat, 8 Sep 2001 23:18:47
> -0600, "Steve Harris"
> <sbharrisREMOVECAPS@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>>Feel free to email me (no advertising), but remove caps from
>>my address.
> --
> I welcome email from any being clever enough to fix my
> address. It's open book. A prize to the first spambot that
> passes my Turing test.
>
> You did say that it was open book, didn't you?

You just exposed Steve's address to the software used by
spammers.

[Mark Doran]

What's this...*6* new addresses in 24 hours? I'm losing count
- and this jackass obviously doesn't have any kind of life...

Incidentally, Steve: can you see what I mean about Gohde's
mental state when he does something like this? After all, what
could be more diagnostically revealing than this degree of
demonstrative pointlessness...? And I think he probably
fancies you, too.... :)

M.

"John 'the Man'" <DeMan[08]@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:oamf7ug1kvi8li6o22v1jvval400k0dqtu@4ax.com...
> Did I win the Turing test, ... Steve?
>
> This post not CC'd by email On Sat, 8 Sep 2001 23:18:47
> -0600, "Steve Harris"
> <sbharrisREMOVECAPS@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> >Feel free to email me (no advertising), but remove caps
> >from my address.
> --
> I welcome email from any being clever enough to fix my
> address. It's open book. A prize to the first spambot that
> passes my Turing test.
>
> You did say that it was open book, didn't you?

[Alex Brand]

On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, it was written:

> Did I win the Turing test, ... Steve?

Are you a spambot, John? It clearly says a prize to the
first sapmbot. Are you proud of being smarter than the
smartest spambot?

>
> This post not CC'd by email On Sat, 8 Sep 2001 23:18:47
> -0600, "Steve Harris"
> <sbharrisREMOVECAPS@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> --
> I welcome email from any being clever enough to fix my
> address. It's open book. A prize to the first spambot that
> passes my Turing test.

[The Albatr]

"John 'the Man'" <DeMan[08]@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:oamf7ug1kvi8li6o22v1jvval400k0dqtu@4ax.com...
> Did I win the Turing test, ... Steve?
>

No, but you won the prick test, that's if it can be
found.........

Out, out damned spot, 'This rubbish is not droll For John's a
troubled sot, & only a lame-ass troll.

His name is munged, his headers forged, His smarts expunged,
His mouse engorged.

your very own, Albatross

[John 'Rule]

"DB" <wired123@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:GuVd8.42239$BK4.1352907803@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
> John 'the Man' wrote:
>
> > Did I win the Turing test, ... Steve?
> >
> > This post not CC'd by email On Sat, 8 Sep 2001 23:18:47
> > -0600, "Steve Harris" <sbharrisREMOVECAPS@ix.netcom.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>Feel free to email me (no advertising), but remove caps
> >>from my address.
> > --
> > I welcome email from any being clever enough to fix my
> > address. It's open book. A prize to the first spambot that
> > passes my Turing test.
> >
> > You did say that it was open book, didn't you?
>
> You just exposed Steve's address to the software used by
> spammers.

Only if my low IQ answered the question on my first guess.

[The Albatr]

> "DB" <wired123@pacbell.net> wrote in message
>
> > You just exposed Steve's address to the software used by
> > spammers.

Idiot!

[Susan Fein]

x-no-archive: yes

In article <3c782737$0$8507$cc9e4d1f@news.dial.pipex.com>,
"mark doran" <doran@dial.pipex.com> writes:

>
>What's this...*6* new addresses in 24 hours? I'm losing count
>- and this jackass obviously doesn't have any kind of life...
>
>Incidentally, Steve: can you see what I mean about Gohde's
>mental state when he does something like this? After all,
>what could be more diagnostically revealing than this degree
>of demonstrative pointlessness...? And I think he probably
>fancies you, too.... :)

First of all, it's quite evident that he fancies only himself,
and no one else.

Second of all, could you please restrict such irrelevent and
annoying conversations to email? The less bandwidth devoted to
JG here, the better.

Just my $.02. Change tendered upon request.

Susan

[John 'The]

x-no-archive: yes

Snobs be gone!

Once upon a time, our fellow Susan Fein rambled on about "Re:
Steve Harris <sbharris@ix.netcom.com>." Our champion being
bored in sci.med.nutrition retorts, thusly ...

Hey!

Did I win Steve's challenge or not?

>x-no-archive: yes
>
>
>In article <3c782737$0$8507$cc9e4d1f@news.dial.pipex.com>,
>"mark doran" <doran@dial.pipex.com> writes:
>
>>
>>What's this...*6* new addresses in 24 hours? I'm losing
>>count - and this jackass obviously doesn't have any kind
>>of life...

You sure are learning to count real good. :-)

>>Incidentally, Steve: can you see what I mean about Gohde's
>>mental state when he does something like this? After all,
>>what could be more diagnostically revealing than this degree
>>of demonstrative pointlessness...? And I think he probably
>>fancies you, too.... :)
>
>First of all, it's quite evident that he fancies only
>himself, and no one else.
>
>Second of all, could you please restrict such irrelevent and
>annoying conversations to email? The less bandwidth devoted
>to JG here, the better.
>
>Just my $.02. Change tendered upon request.
>
>Susan