PDA

View Full Version : high consumption of sugar in children


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums

Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!



ReginaW
Wed, Jun-11-08, 16:03
High sucrose intake is associated with poor quality of diet and growth between 13 months and 9 years of age: the special Turku Coronary Risk Factor Intervention Project.

Pediatrics. 2008 Jun;121(6):e1676-85

BACKGROUND. Previous studies have suggested that interventions to lower dietary fat content and improved fat quality lead to a compensatory increase in sucrose content.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this work was to determine what associations exist between sucrose intake and intake of nutrients, intake of specific foods, and growth in children aged 13 months to 9 years of age in the prospective, randomized Special Turku Coronary Risk Factor Intervention Project.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Nutrient intake and food consumption were evaluated annually at ages 13 months through 9 years by using food records. Altogether, 543 children were divided into 3 groups according to mean sucrose intake: constantly high sucrose intake (highest 10%), constantly low sucrose intake (lowest 10%), and average sucrose intake (80%). Absolute and relative weights and heights were recorded at 7, 13, and 24 months of age and annually thereafter until 9 years old.

RESULTS. The high sucrose-intake group exceeded the recommended sucrose intake (<10% of energy intake, World Health Organization) already at the age of 2 years.

Energy and total fat intake did not differ between the sucrose-intake groups. Children with low and average sucrose intake consumed more protein and had a better dietary fat quality than children with high sucrose intake.

They also tended to receive more vitamin E, niacin, calcium, iron, zinc, and dietary fiber than children who consumed a high sucrose diet.

Children in the low sucrose-intake group consumed more grains, vegetables, and dairy products than the other children.

Sugar intake had no direct association with obesity, but weight, height, and BMI of children differed between the sucrose-intake groups between 7 months and 9 years of age.

CONCLUSIONS. In children aged 13 months to 9 years, long-term low sucrose intake is associated with better nutrient intake and growth than high sucrose intake.


link to Full-Text (http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/121/6/e1676)

lowcarbUgh
Wed, Jun-11-08, 16:06
Why do we need expensive studies to confirm that too much sugar is bad for you? Our grandparents knew this.

Squarecube
Thu, Jun-12-08, 08:09
Why do we need expensive studies to confirm that too much sugar is bad for you? Our grandparents knew this.

To counter what our parents supposedly know - that carbohydrates are important to our health, etc.

renegadiab
Thu, Jun-12-08, 08:22
To counter what our parents supposedly know - that carbohydrates are important to our health, etc.

Where would be be without the wonders of modern dietary wisdom?????

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

ReginaW
Thu, Jun-12-08, 08:55
Why do we need expensive studies to confirm that too much sugar is bad for you? Our grandparents knew this.

I actually think the data in this one is pretty good...while the conclusions failed to consider the BMI similarities as evidence of lower LBM and higher fatness, despite BMI, it did clearly show a relationship where protein intake is significantly lower in children fed a high sucrose diet....along with lower intake of essential nutrients. While they might not be getting fat on the diet they're fed - they're malnourished by such a diet for both protein (amino acids) and other essential nutrients.

KarenJ
Thu, Jun-12-08, 09:20
Definitely a step in the right direction. For so long, we've been told that sugar is harmless- it won't stunt growth, it won't cause hyperactivity, etc.

rightnow
Thu, Jun-12-08, 10:40
It does sort of highlight one of the things that eating lowcarb and eating healthy (both) makes you realize: that everything you eat that is not specifically good for you, is bad for two reasons: first, that it isn't good for you; and second, that by ingesting it, you are NOT ingesting something else which could have been good for you.

My problem with sugar/starch foods is that when I eat them I lose most all desire to eat anything else.

Dodger
Thu, Jun-12-08, 17:04
But what about all the sugar industry studies that show that dietary sugar causes no problems? Of course the ADA thinks so too.