View Full Version : How can one argue
Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!
claudiusde
Mon, Apr-21-08, 17:21
On Apr 18, 10:17 pm, rmacfarl
<rmacf...@alphalink.com.au> wrote:
> On Apr 19, 12:23 pm, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
> > Human intellectual, communal, and social behaviors would
> > have had to have been selected by the process of natural
> > selection or they would not exist. Right?
>
> Wrong.
How can one argue with logic like this?
Makouli
Mon, Apr-21-08, 17:21
<claudiusdenk@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:8c95a3fd-4-
e8e-428d-8b70-9c390786b09b@q1g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 18, 10:17 pm, rmacfarl
> <rmacf...@alphalink.com.au> wrote:
>> On Apr 19, 12:23 pm, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
>
>> > Human intellectual, communal, and social behaviors would
>> > have had to have been selected by the process of natural
>> > selection or they would not exist. Right?
>>
>> Wrong.
>
> How can one argue with logic like this?
You'll find a way, Dimmy. You always do. But if you want to
consider why Ross responded as he did, you might consider that
your leading question was, in fact, "Wrong". Then you might do
a little *library research*, or take an elementary class in
biological evolution, or (better yet) ask a polite question in
a sci NG. Wouldn't that be fun?
Try this: http://tinyurl.com/5kusdx
===================================
" Where's the hypothesis? Where are the details?" Dimmy
--01/14/08
Lee Olsen
Mon, Apr-21-08, 17:21
On Apr 19, 5:49=A0pm, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
> Oh really? =A0Aren't you going to bother to explain to us
> how in the fuck that is possible, you nitwit?
1 Nobody lived on the savanna until the advent of jeeps and
guns. 2 Lions evolved from saber-tooth cats. 3 Apiths never
ventured more than 50/100 yds away from a tree. 4 Climate
change is not happening presently. 5 Agriculture probably
stretches back hundreds of thousand if not millions of years.
6 Genetic drift is a pseudo-scientific notion. 7 Spears are
useless against hyena and lions.
8 ..then what purpose do the stone weapons (spears, bow and
arrow) serve that show up in the fossil record starting
about 2.5 mya?
9. Then you should stop;pissing into it. 10 Speak for
yourself. I see just fine at night.
10. Uh, er. These artifacts don't come with notes attached to
them that indicate how they were actually used.
11. Why we see stasis in tool advancement up until a few
thousand years ago.
12. So Paul, now that you've, finally, come to accept the
fact that early hominids--both A'pith and HE--resided in
treed habitat
claudiusde
Mon, Apr-21-08, 17:21
On Apr 19, 6:08=A0pm, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 19, 5:49=A0pm, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
>
> > Oh really? =A0Aren't you going to bother to explain to us
> > how in the fuck that is possible, you nitwit?
>
> 1 Nobody lived on the savanna until the advent of jeeps and
> guns. =A02 Lions evolved from saber-tooth cats. =A03 Apiths
> never ventured more than 50/100 yds away from a tree. 4
> Climate change is not happening presently. 5 Agriculture
> probably stretches back hundreds of thousand if not millions
> of years. 6 Genetic drift is a pseudo-scientific notion. 7
> Spears are useless against hyena and lions.
> 8 ..then what purpose do the stone weapons (spears, bow and
> arrow) serve that show up in the fossil record starting
> about 2.5 mya?
> 9. Then you should stop;pissing into it. 10 =A0Speak for
> yourself. I see just fine at night.
> 11. Uh, er. =A0These artifacts don't come with notes
> attached to them that =A0indicate how they were actually
> used.
> 12. Why we see stasis in tool advancement up until a few
> thousand =A0years ago. =A013. =A0So Paul, now that
> you've, finally, come to accept the fact that early
> =A0hominids--both A'pith and HE--resided in treed
> habitat
How can one argue with a zealot
Rmacfarl
Mon, Apr-21-08, 17:21
On Apr 20, 5:03=A0am, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
> On Apr 18, 10:17 pm, rmacfarl
> <rmacf...@alphalink.com.au> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 19, 12:23 pm, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
> > > Human intellectual, communal, and social behaviors would
> > > have had to have been selected by the process of natural
> > > selection or they would not exist. =A0Right?
>
> > Wrong.
>
> How can one argue with logic like this?
When you display any awareness of the existence of a world of
logic and reason, we may engage in an argument. Until then...
Ross Macfarlane
Lee Olsen
Mon, Apr-21-08, 17:21
On Apr 20, 12:38=A0am, Marc Verhaegen
<m_verhae...@skynet.be> wrote:
> > 1 Nobody lived on the savanna until the advent of jeeps
> > and guns. =A02 Lions evolved from saber-tooth cats. =A03
> > Apiths never ventured more than 50/100 yds away from a
> > tree. 4 Climate change is not happening presently. 5
> > Agriculture probably stretches back hundreds of thousand
> > if not millions of years. 6 Genetic drift is a
> > pseudo-scientific notion. 7 Spears are useless against
> > hyena and lions.
> > 8 ..then what purpose do the stone weapons (spears, bow
> > and arrow) serve that show up in the fossil record
> > starting about 2.5 mya?
> > 9. Then you should stop;pissing into it. 10 =A0Speak for
> > yourself. I see just fine at night.
> > 11. Uh, er. =A0These artifacts don't come with notes
> > attached to them that =A0indicate how they were
> > actually used.
> > 12. Why we see stasis in tool advancement up until a few
> > thousand =A0years ago. =A013. =A0So Paul, now that
> > you've, finally, come to accept the fact tha=
t
> > early =A0hominids--both A'pith and HE--resided in treed
> > habitat
>
> No need to repeat this, Olson little boy,
Still obsessed with little boys, eh? Pervert, get some help.
Message-ID:
<1124488751.733008.185170@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
"You're a nutcase, a delusional fool who passes off his
correspondence to Nature like it was a peer reviewed article,
who passes off his TREE article like it was original research
and not an opinion piece, and who pretends that he's got
stratocladistic support for things for which he does not.
You're a fraud, and on top of that, you're an asshole. And I'm
not "your boy," dickhead."
I already knew you were stupid stupid stupid.
Lee Olsen
Mon, Apr-21-08, 17:21
On Apr 20, 5:07=A0am, Marc Verhaegen
<m_verhae...@skynet.be> wrote:
> SF:
>
> > And I'm not "your boy," dickhead."
>
Then why you keep behaving like a pervert, asshole?
> BTW, thanks for confirming that "Aplodontia have primitive
> simple kidney structure. Unable to concentrate urine
> effectively. Require large quantiti=
es
> of water daily - a diet heavy with succulent plants."
Thanks for confirming they are not semi-aquatic, nor do they
live in swamps, glad to see you finally admit that.
Marc Verha
Mon, Apr-21-08, 17:21
Savanna Fool keeps repeating this nonsense:
> 1 Nobody lived on the savanna until the advent of jeeps and
> guns. 2 Lions evolved from saber-tooth cats. 3 Apiths never
> ventured more than 50/100 yds away from a tree. 4 Climate
> change is not happening presently. 5 Agriculture probably
> stretches back hundreds of thousand if not millions of
> years. 6 Genetic drift is a pseudo-scientific notion. 7
> Spears are useless against hyena and lions.
> 8 ..then what purpose do the stone weapons (spears, bow and
> arrow) serve that show up in the fossil record starting
> about 2.5 mya?
> 9. Then you should stop;pissing into it. 10 Speak for
> yourself. I see just fine at night.
> 11. Uh, er. These artifacts don't come with notes attached
> to them that indicate how they were actually used.
> 12. Why we see stasis in tool advancement up until a few
> thousand years ago.
> 13. So Paul, now that you've, finally, come to accept the
> fact that early hominids--both A'pith and HE--resided
> in treed habitat
No need to repeat this, Olson little boy, I already knew you
were stupid stupid stupid.
Marc Verha
Mon, Apr-21-08, 17:21
SF:
> And I'm not "your boy," dickhead."
Then why you keep behaving like a little child, my little boy?
BTW, thanks for confirming that "Aplodontia have primitive
simple kidney structure. Unable to concentrate urine
effectively. Require large quantities of water daily - a diet
heavy with succulent plants."
:-D
Makouli
Mon, Apr-21-08, 17:21
"Marc Verhaegen" <m_verhaegen@skynet.be> wrote in message
news:C430FEBA.117AF%m_verhaegen@skynet.be...
> SF:
>> And I'm not "your boy," dickhead."
>
> Then why you keep behaving like a little child, my little
> boy? BTW, thanks for confirming that "Aplodontia have
> primitive simple kidney structure. Unable to concentrate
> urine effectively. Require large quantities of water daily -
> a diet heavy with succulent plants."
>
> :-D
Big deal. Beaver diet says nothing about hominid diet. You're
clutching at straws --for the umpteenth time.
Here it is again, Day. Should we just shake our heads and go
about our business? Or should we point out some rather obvious
conclusions? I think it needs to be pointed out as some
readers here (cough) just don't get it.
And what do you think about Marco's habit of treating his
critics like children (little boy, etc)? He's been doing it
for years. What level of intellectual maturity would you
assign to that? Well?
==============================
"My lttle boy, is it so funny to repeat
this nonsense?" Marco --02/06/2008
Copyright 2000-2009 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
vBulletin, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.