PDA

View Full Version : Mikey, your nap is over


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums

Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!



claudiusde
Tue, Apr-15-08, 06:16
On Apr 14, 4:00 pm, mclark <mbclar...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Apr 14, 9:31 am, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
> > On Apr 14, 4:10 am, mclark <mbclar...@comcast.net> wrote:
> > > On Apr 13, 11:48 pm, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
> > > > On Apr 13, 7:57 pm, mclark <mbclar...@comcast.net>
> > > > wrote:
> [hack]
> > > > Speaking of nonexistent, how's that hypothesis going?
> > > > Got one yet?-
>
> > > Which hypothesis would that be, Dimmy?-
>
> > Oh, so you admit you don't have one. Right? Answer the
> > question you evasive twit.
>
> Have one what, Dimmy?

The net sum of your contribution to the science under
discussion is that it didn't happen in water. That's it.
That's all you have to contribute. Even Lee Olsen came through
with his long-distance running ape. But now that the laughter
is dieing out we really need you to step up to the plate.
C'mon Mikey. Tell us your hypothesis. Come on. Be a sport.

Lee Olsen
Tue, Apr-15-08, 06:16
On Apr 14, 9:16=A0pm, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:

>

The net sum of Claud's contribution to the science under
discussion
is:

1 Nobody lived on the savanna until the advent of jeeps and
guns. 2 Lions evolved from saber-tooth cats. 3 Apiths never
ventured more than 50/100 yds away from a tree. 4 Climate
change is not happening presently. 5 Agriculture probably
stretches back hundreds of thousand if not millions of years.
6 Genetic drift is a pseudo-scientific notion. 7 Spears are
useless against hyena and lions.
8 ..then what purpose do the stone weapons (spears, bow and
arrow) serve that show up in the fossil record starting
about 2.5 mya?
9. Then you should stop;pissing into it. 10 Speak for
yourself. I see just fine at night.
10. Uh, er. These artifacts don't come with notes attached to
them that indicate how they were actually used.
11. Why we see stasis in tool advancement up until a few
thousand years ago.
12. So Paul, now that you've, finally, come to accept the
fact that early hominids--both A'pith and HE--resided in
treed habitat

claudiusde
Tue, Apr-15-08, 06:16
On Apr 14, 9:34=A0pm, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 14, 9:16=A0pm, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
>
>
>
> =A0The net sum of Claud's contribution to the science under
> discussion
> is:
>
> 1 Nobody lived on the savanna until the advent of jeeps and
> guns. =A02 Lions evolved from saber-tooth cats. =A03 Apiths
> never ventured more than 50/100 yds away from a tree. 4
> Climate change is not happening presently. 5 Agriculture
> probably stretches back hundreds of thousand if not millions
> of years. 6 Genetic drift is a pseudo-scientific notion. 7
> Spears are useless against hyena and lions.
> 8 ..then what purpose do the stone weapons (spears, bow and
> arrow) serve that show up in the fossil record starting
> about 2.5 mya?
> 9. Then you should stop;pissing into it. 10 =A0Speak for
> yourself. I see just fine at night.
> 11. Uh, er. =A0These artifacts don't come with notes
> attached to them that =A0indicate how they were actually
> used.
> 12. Why we see stasis in tool advancement up until a few
> thousand =A0years ago. =A013. =A0So Paul, now that
> you've, finally, come to accept the fact that early
> =A0hominids--both A'pith and HE--resided in treed
> habitat

McLark
Tue, Apr-15-08, 06:16
On Apr 14, 11:16=A0pm, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
> On Apr 14, 4:00 pm, mclark <mbclar...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 14, 9:31 am, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
> > > On Apr 14, 4:10 am, mclark <mbclar...@comcast.net>
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Apr 13, 11:48 pm, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
> > > > > On Apr 13, 7:57 pm, mclark <mbclar...@comcast.net>
> > > > > wrote:
> > [hack]
> > > > > Speaking of nonexistent, how's that hypothesis
> > > > > going? =A0Got one y=
et?-
>
> > > > Which hypothesis would that be, Dimmy?-
>
> > > Oh, so you admit you don't have one. =A0Right? =A0Answer
> > > the question =
you
> > > evasive twit.
>
> > Have one what, Dimmy?
>
> The net sum of your contribution to the science under
> discussion is that it didn't happen in water. =A0That's it.
> =A0That's all you have to contribute. =A0Even Lee Olsen came
> through with his long-distance running ape. =A0But now that
> the laughter is dieing out we really need you to step up to
> the plate. =A0C'mon Mikey. =A0Tell us your hypothesis. Come
> on. =A0Be a sport.

Sport? What sport?

McLark
Tue, Apr-15-08, 06:16
On Apr 15, 12:49=A0am, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
> On Apr 14, 9:34=A0pm, Lee Olsen
> <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 14, 9:16=A0pm, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
>
> > =A0The net sum of Claud's contribution to the science
> > under discussion
> > is:
>
> > 1 Nobody lived on the savanna until the advent of jeeps
> > and guns. =A02 Lions evolved from saber-tooth cats. =A03
> > Apiths never ventured more than 50/100 yds away from a
> > tree. 4 Climate change is not happening presently. 5
> > Agriculture probably stretches back hundreds of thousand
> > if not millions of years. 6 Genetic drift is a
> > pseudo-scientific notion. 7 Spears are useless against
> > hyena and lions.
> > 8 ..then what purpose do the stone weapons (spears, bow
> > and arrow) serve that show up in the fossil record
> > starting about 2.5 mya?
> > 9. Then you should stop;pissing into it. 10 =A0Speak for
> > yourself. I see just fine at night.
> > 11. Uh, er. =A0These artifacts don't come with notes
> > attached to them that =A0indicate how they were
> > actually used.
> > 12. Why we see stasis in tool advancement up until a few
> > thousand =A0years ago. =A013. =A0So Paul, now that
> > you've, finally, come to accept the fact tha=
t
> > early =A0hominids--both A'pith and HE--resided in treed
> > habitat- Hide quoted t=
ext -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Speechless, Dimmy? That's not like you. Gratuitous insults in
the subject line? That's just like Marco. Congratulations.
You've arrived. And all this time you've been led. What a
sucker you are.

Jerry Warn
Tue, Apr-15-08, 06:16
Lee Olsen wrote:

> On Apr 14, 9:16 pm, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
>
> >
>
> The net sum of Claud's contribution to the science under
> discussion
> is:
>
> 1 Nobody lived on the savanna until the advent of jeeps and
> guns. 2 Lions evolved from saber-tooth cats. 3 Apiths never
> ventured more than 50/100 yds away from a tree. 4 Climate
> change is not happening presently. 5 Agriculture probably
> stretches back hundreds of thousand if not millions of
> years. 6 Genetic drift is a pseudo-scientific notion. 7
> Spears are useless against hyena and lions.
> 8 ..then what purpose do the stone weapons (spears, bow and
> arrow) serve that show up in the fossil record starting
> about 2.5 mya?
> 9. Then you should stop;pissing into it. 10 Speak for
> yourself. I see just fine at night.
> 11. Uh, er. These artifacts don't come with notes attached
> to them that indicate how they were actually used.
> 12. Why we see stasis in tool advancement up until a few
> thousand years ago.
> 13. So Paul, now that you've, finally, come to accept the
> fact that early hominids--both A'pith and HE--resided
> in treed habitat

Maybe the name "Claudius Denk" should have tipped you off?

I mean camels dont ride bicycles on I-80 every day, just
on Tuesdays!

Lee Olsen
Tue, Apr-15-08, 17:16
On Apr 14, 10:49=A0pm, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
> On Apr 14, 9:34=A0pm, Lee Olsen
> <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 14, 9:16=A0pm, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
>
> > =A0The net sum of Claud's contribution to the science
> > under discussion
> > is:
>
> > 1 Nobody lived on the savanna until the advent of jeeps
> > and guns. =A02 Lions evolved from saber-tooth cats. =A03
> > Apiths never ventured more than 50/100 yds away from a
> > tree. 4 Climate change is not happening presently. 5
> > Agriculture probably stretches back hundreds of thousand
> > if not millions of years. 6 Genetic drift is a
> > pseudo-scientific notion. 7 Spears are useless against
> > hyena and lions.
> > 8 ..then what purpose do the stone weapons (spears, bow
> > and arrow) serve that show up in the fossil record
> > starting about 2.5 mya?
> > 9. Then you should stop;pissing into it. 10 =A0Speak for
> > yourself. I see just fine at night.
> > 11. Uh, er. =A0These artifacts don't come with notes
> > attached to them that =A0indicate how they were
> > actually used.
> > 12. Why we see stasis in tool advancement up until a few
> > thousand =A0years ago. =A013. =A0So Paul, now that
> > you've, finally, come to accept the fact tha=
t
> > early =A0hominids--both A'pith and HE--resided in treed
> > habitat

Here is what competent professional people have said about Jim
McGinn's (alias claud) science fiction masterpiece:

Message-ID: <376ED09C.69A21...@thegrid.net>#1/1 Niccolo
Caldararo: " It is embarrassing to you (or should be) for you
to continually make statements which most of us know are
unsupported by the data."

Dan Barnes: "..a number of people have suggested that the best
thing you can do is do substantial background reading, reframe
your arguement and come back again."

Greg Laden: "Read the stuff. If you have a vague memory of it,
that is not good enough." "Hit the books, kid!"

Su Solomon: "I did take the trouble to read your five thousand
four hundred words of your latest manifesto. From my reading
of this, I gathered that in the intevening 11 months you have
not appeared to have read any of the comments or advice that
were given to you last time you posted an extermely similiar
'unsubstantiated idea re evolution'. If you had taken onboard
any of the advised literature that was given at that time,
then if is not evident in this latest of postings."

Su is so sweet and kind only calling his work a "manifesto."
In ca. ten years of posting drivel on this forum, Claud
apparenlty hasn't convinced a solitary sole there is any
merit for his science- free manifesto. The real issue then is
why he is still here and not at the library?

claudiusde
Tue, Apr-15-08, 17:16
Don't you get tired of these political dodges. It's really
obvious that you are just pretending to understand any of
this. You can only get so far with pretense. Real
scientists--myself being a perfect example--are always looking
to flesh out the details and test them against the evidence.
Vagueness is the hallmark of the believer. Same goes for your
propaganda tactics. Such tactics are inconsistent with a calm,
rational examination of the evidence.

Evolutionary theory is EXTREMELY complex. You can't get better
at it unless you are willing to address it in an
intellectually honest manner.

So, do this. Take a deep breath and explain to us in a calm
rational manner why--IYHO--why our earliest A'pith ancestors
transitioned from a quadrupedal to bipedal while they still
resided in treed habitat.

Don't whine. Don't fret. Don't cry. It's not that big of a
deal. If you are so sure you are right then provide us the
details and let the chips fall where they may.

On Apr 15, 4:40=A0am, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 14, 10:49=A0pm, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 14, 9:34=A0pm, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 14, 9:16=A0pm, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
>
> > > =A0The net sum of Claud's contribution to the science
> > > under discussion=

> > > is:
>
> > > 1 Nobody lived on the savanna until the advent of jeeps
> > > and guns. =A02 Lions evolved from saber-tooth cats. =A03
> > > Apiths never ventured more than 50/100 yds away from a
> > > tree. 4 Climate change is not happening presently. 5
> > > Agriculture probably stretches back hundreds of thousand
> > > if not millions of years. 6 Genetic drift is a
> > > pseudo-scientific notion. 7 Spears are useless against
> > > hyena and lions.
> > > 8 ..then what purpose do the stone weapons (spears, bow
> > > and arrow) serve that show up in the fossil record
> > > starting about 2.5 mya?
> > > 9. Then you should stop;pissing into it. 10 =A0Speak
> > > for yourself. I see just fine at night.
> > > 11. Uh, er. =A0These artifacts don't come with notes
> > > attached to them that =A0indicate how they were
> > > actually used.
> > > 12. Why we see stasis in tool advancement up until a few
> > > thousand =A0years ago. =A013. =A0So Paul, now that
> > > you've, finally, come to accept the fact t=
hat
> > > early =A0hominids--both A'pith and HE--resided in treed
> > > habitat
>
> Here is what competent professional people have said about
> Jim McGinn's (alias claud) science fiction masterpiece:
>
> Message-ID: <376ED09C.69A21...@thegrid.net>#1/1 Niccolo
> Caldararo: " It is embarrassing to you (or should be) for
> you to continually make statements which most of us know are
> unsupported by the data."
>
> Dan Barnes: "..a number of people have suggested that the
> best thing you can do is do substantial background reading,
> reframe your arguement and come back again."
>
> Greg Laden: "Read the stuff. If you have a vague memory of
> it, that is not good enough." "Hit the books, kid!"
>
> Su Solomon: "I did take the trouble to read your five
> thousand four hundred words of your latest manifesto. From
> my reading of this, I gathered that in the intevening 11
> months you have not appeared to have read any of the
> comments or advice that were given to you last time you
> posted an extermely similiar 'unsubstantiated idea re
> evolution'. If you had taken onboard any of the advised
> literature that was given at that time, then if is not
> evident in this latest of postings."
>
> =A0Su is so sweet and kind only calling his work a
> "manifesto." In ca. ten years of posting drivel on this
> forum, Claud apparenlty hasn't convinced a solitary sole
> there is any merit for his science- free manifesto. The real
> issue then is why he is still here and not at the library?-
> Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Lee Olsen
Tue, Apr-15-08, 17:16
On Apr 15, 7:39=A0am, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
> Don't you get tired of these political dodges. =A0

What part of this are you too stupid to understand?

You are an illiterate, your posts are looked at for
entertainment purposes only when things are slow. And trust
me, this is entertainment at its best:

1 Nobody lived on the savanna until the advent of jeeps and
guns. 2 Lions evolved from saber-tooth cats. 3 Apiths never
ventured more than 50/100 yds away from a tree. 4 Climate
change is not happening presently. 5 Agriculture probably
stretches back hundreds of thousand if not millions of years.
6 Genetic drift is a pseudo-scientific notion. 7 Spears are
useless against hyena and lions.
8 ..then what purpose do the stone weapons (spears, bow and
arrow) serve that show up in the fossil record starting
about 2.5 mya?
9. Then you should stop;pissing into it. 10 Speak for
yourself. I see just fine at night.
10. Uh, er. These artifacts don't come with notes attached to
them that indicate how they were actually used.
11. Why we see stasis in tool advancement up until a few
thousand years ago.
12. So Paul, now that you've, finally, come to accept the
fact that early hominids--both A'pith and HE--resided in
treed habitat

claudiusde
Tue, Apr-15-08, 17:16
Take a deep breath and explain to us in a calm rational
manner why--IYHO--why our earliest A'pith ancestors
transitioned from a quadrupedal to bipedal while they still
resided in treed habitat.

Don't whine. Don't fret. Don't cry. It's not that big of a
deal. If you are so sure you are right then provide us the
details and let the chips fall where they may.

What are you afraid of?

On Apr 15, 7:48=A0am, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 15, 7:39=A0am, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
>
> > Don't you get tired of these political dodges. =A0
>
> What part of this are you too stupid to understand?
>
> You are an illiterate, your posts are looked at for
> entertainment purposes =A0only when things are slow. And
> trust me, this is entertainment at its best:
>
> 1 Nobody lived on the savanna until the advent of jeeps and
> guns. =A02 Lions evolved from saber-tooth cats. =A03 Apiths
> never ventured more than 50/100 yds away from a tree. 4
> Climate change is not happening presently. 5 Agriculture
> probably stretches back hundreds of thousand if not millions
> of years. 6 Genetic drift is a pseudo-scientific notion. 7
> Spears are useless against hyena and lions.
> 8 ..then what purpose do the stone weapons (spears, bow and
> arrow) serve that show up in the fossil record starting
> about 2.5 mya?
> 9. Then you should stop;pissing into it. 10 =A0Speak for
> yourself. I see just fine at night.
> 11. Uh, er. =A0These artifacts don't come with notes
> attached to them that =A0indicate how they were actually
> used.
> 12. Why we see stasis in tool advancement up until a few
> thousand =A0years ago. =A013. =A0So Paul, now that
> you've, finally, come to accept the fact that early
> =A0hominids--both A'pith and HE--resided in treed
> habitat

Lee Olsen
Tue, Apr-15-08, 17:16
On Apr 15, 7:51=A0am, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
> Take a deep breath and explain to us

Apparently you are even more illiterate than this list implies
or you forgot to read my last post, so here it is again:

What part of this are you too stupid to understand?

You are an illiterate, your posts are looked at for
entertainment purposes only when things are slow. And trust
me, this is entertainment at its best:

1 Nobody lived on the savanna until the advent of jeeps and
guns. 2 Lions evolved from saber-tooth cats. 3 Apiths never
ventured more than 50/100 yds away from a tree. 4 Climate
change is not happening presently. 5 Agriculture probably
stretches back hundreds of thousand if not millions of years.
6 Genetic drift is a pseudo-scientific notion. 7 Spears are
useless against hyena and lions.
8 ..then what purpose do the stone weapons (spears, bow and
arrow) serve that show up in the fossil record starting
about 2.5 mya?
9. Then you should stop;pissing into it. 10 Speak for
yourself. I see just fine at night.
10. Uh, er. These artifacts don't come with notes attached to
them that indicate how they were actually used.
11. Why we see stasis in tool advancement up until a few
thousand years ago.
12. So Paul, now that you've, finally, come to accept the
fact that early hominids--both A'pith and HE--resided in
treed habitat

The real issue is whether this guy is a troll (pissed at sap
because he can't find anyone to buy into his lunatic work of
science fiction) or is he really that ignorant? Both has got
to be the most parsimonious the way I see it.

claudiusde
Tue, Apr-15-08, 17:16
Take a deep breath and explain to us in a calm rational
manner why--IYHO--why our earliest A'pith ancestors
transitioned from a quadrupedal to bipedal while they still
resided in treed habitat.

Don't whine. Don't fret. Don't cry. It's not that big of a
deal. If you are so sure you are right then provide us the
details and let the chips fall where they may.

What are you afraid of?

Lee Olsen
Tue, Apr-15-08, 17:16
On Apr 15, 8:16=A0am, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:

> What are you afraid of?

You are afraid of a library card, and you are asking me?

claudiusde
Tue, Apr-15-08, 17:16
Nobody is interested in your whining. If you can't answer the
question just admit it. It's not like you're fooling anybody
worth fooling anyways.

McLark
Tue, Apr-15-08, 17:16
On Apr 15, 11:33=A0am, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
> Nobody is interested in your whining. =A0If you can't answer
> the question just admit it. =A0It's not like you're fooling
> anybody worth fooling anyways.

I'm afraid Lee is correct here, Dimmy. You are an idiot and
you are being treated like one. If your "hypothesis" is so
great, why is it unreadable tripe? If you've set out to turn
all of anthropology on its head, why haven't you published?
Why don't you trot on over to the AJPA and submit your work?
Afraid of what the rejection letter would look like? That's
it, isn't it...you're afraid. Hence, all this false bravado.

Remember now, THIS is your hypothesis:

http://tinyurl.com/8fomk

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
"Who do you think you're fooling?" --Dimmy, 12/13/2005

claudiusde
Tue, Apr-15-08, 17:16
The net sum of your contribution to the science under
discussion is that it didn't happen in water. That's it.
That's all you have to contribute. Even Lee Olsen came through
with his long-distance running ape. But now that the laughter
is dieing out we really need you to step up to the plate.
C'mon Mikey. Tell us your hypothesis. Come on. Be a sport.

On Apr 15, 9:48=A0am, mclark <mbclar...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Apr 15, 11:33=A0am, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
>
> > Nobody is interested in your whining. =A0If you can't
> > answer the question just admit it. =A0It's not like you're
> > fooling anybody worth fooling anyways.
>
> I'm afraid Lee is correct here, Dimmy. =A0You are an idiot
> and you are being treated like one. =A0If your "hypothesis"
> is so great, why is it unreadable tripe?

It's written in English. If you are having trouble with the
big words you should ask for assistance.

> If you've set out to turn all of anthropology on its head,
> why haven't you published? =A0Why don't you trot on over to
> the AJPA and submit your work? =A0Afraid of what the
> rejection letter would look like? =A0That's it, isn't
> it...you're afraid. =A0Hence, all this false bravado.

I think yourself, Lee and the many other Anthrocultists
have got a lock on the dissemination of the science. IOW,
you retards have a monopoly on the propaganda aspects of
the science.

>
> Remember now, THIS is your hypothesis:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/8fomk

Where is your hypothesis?

McLark
Tue, Apr-15-08, 17:16
On Apr 15, 11:58=A0am, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
> The net sum of your contribution to the science under
> discussion is that it didn't happen in water. =A0That's it.
> =A0That's all you have to contribute. =A0Even Lee Olsen came
> through with his long-distance running ape. =A0But now that
> the laughter is dieing out we really need you to step up to
> the plate. =A0C'mon Mikey. =A0Tell us your hypothesis. Come
> on. =A0Be a sport.
>
> On Apr 15, 9:48=A0am, mclark <mbclar...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 15, 11:33=A0am, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
>
> > > Nobody is interested in your whining. =A0If you can't
> > > answer the question just admit it. =A0It's not like
> > > you're fooling anybody worth fooling anyways.
>
> > I'm afraid Lee is correct here, Dimmy. =A0You are an idiot
> > and you are being treated like one. =A0If your
> > "hypothesis" is so great, why is it unreadable tripe?
>
> It's written in English. =A0If you are having trouble with
> the big words you should ask for assistance.

That's not what makes it unreadable, Dimmy.

> > If you've set out to turn all of anthropology on its head,
> > why haven't you published? =A0Why don't you trot on over
> > to the AJPA and submit your work? =A0Afraid of what the
> > rejection letter would look like? =A0That's it, isn't
> > it...you're afraid. =A0Hence, all this false bravado.
>
> I think yourself, Lee and the many other Anthrocultists have
> got a lock on the dissemination of the science. =A0IOW, you
> retards have a monopoly on the propaganda aspects of the
> science.

What you think is absolutely worthless, Dimmy

> > Remember now, THIS is your hypothesis:
>
> >http://tinyurl.com/8fomk
>
> Where is your hypothesis?

I don't have some a "hypothesis" as I've said many times. It
isn't necessary for me to have a hypothesis. I do support
others --Crompton being one example. (Click here for examples
of real papers: http://tinyurl.com/68z75k )

I don't support you because you don't know what you are
talking about as evidenced by this poorly written, disjointed,
and pointless insult to a tapeworm's intelligence:
http://tinyurl.com/8fomk

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=-
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
"This is plainly amateurish nonsense." --Dimmy 12/24/2005

claudiusde
Tue, Apr-15-08, 17:16
On Apr 15, 10:58=A0am, mclark <mbclar...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Apr 15, 11:58=A0am, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
> > The net sum of your contribution to the science under
> > discussion is that it didn't happen in water. =A0That's
> > it. =A0That's all you have to contribute. =A0Even Lee
> > Olsen came through with his long-distance running ape.
> > =A0But now that the laughter is dieing out we really need
> > you to step up to the plate. =A0C'mon Mikey. =A0Tell us
> > your hypothesis.=

> > Come on. =A0Be a sport.
>
> > On Apr 15, 9:48=A0am, mclark <mbclar...@comcast.net>
> > wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 15, 11:33=A0am, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
>
> > > > Nobody is interested in your whining. =A0If you can't
> > > > answer the question just admit it. =A0It's not like
> > > > you're fooling anybody wort=
h
> > > > fooling anyways.
>
> > > I'm afraid Lee is correct here, Dimmy. =A0You are an
> > > idiot and you are being treated like one. =A0If your
> > > "hypothesis" is so great, why is it unreadable tripe?
>
> > It's written in English. =A0If you are having trouble with
> > the big words=

> > you should ask for assistance.
>
> That's not what makes it unreadable, Dimmy.

I know fully well what makes it unreadable to you anthro
cultists. No mystery here. It's unreadable to you because the
social selection (communal selection) of my scenario is taboo
to the anthro-cult paradigm. This is why not only can you not
read it but you can't even acknowledge its existence. You have
to pretend its unreadable and put links to long forgotten
versions of the hypothesis. This is the kind of desperate
behavior that is typical of cultists everwhere.

> > > If you've set out to turn all of anthropology on its
> > > head, why haven't you published? =A0Why don't you trot
> > > on over to the AJPA and submit your work? =A0Afraid of
> > > what the rejection letter would look like? =A0That's it,
> > > isn't it...you're afraid. =A0Hence, all this false
> > > bravado.
>
> > I think yourself, Lee and the many other Anthrocultists
> > have got a lock on the dissemination of the science.
> > =A0IOW, you retards have a monopoly on the propaganda
> > aspects of the science.
>
> What you think is absolutely worthless, Dimmy

Why, because I'm not a member of the anthrocult?

> > > Remember now, THIS is your hypothesis:
>
> > >http://tinyurl.com/8fomk

This is an old, old version. I've presented newer versions.
Why do you not refer them? What are you afraid of?

> > Where is your hypothesis?
>
> I don't have some a "hypothesis" as I've said many times.

You haven't said it many times. You've been evasive
about this.

> It isn't necessary for me to have a hypothesis. =A0

It's not a matter of necessity, you retard. It's a matter of
assessing your authority. When somebody says somebody else is
wrong, can't say why they are wrong, and has not alternative
it suggests that they are an imbecile.

So, Mikey. Why should anybody believe you are not a imbecile?

> I do support others --Crompton being one

Why do you support him? Because your teacher told you too?

> example. =A0(Click here for examples of real
> papers:http://tinyurl.com/68z75k=A0)
>
> I don't support you because you don't know what you are
> talking about

Reference?

> as evidenced by this poorly written, disjointed, and
> pointless insult to a tapeworm's
> intelligence:http://tinyurl.com/8fomk=

Why not refer to my newer version you evasive jackass. (You
can't dispute a word of it so you must dismiss all of it.

Lee Olsen
Tue, Apr-15-08, 17:16
On Apr 15, 11:41=A0am, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:

> Why not refer to my newer version you evasive jackass.

Jim McGinn: "we can be fairly certain that they never ventured
more than 50 or maybe a 100 yards from the safety of trees."

You probably have a cited data table to verify this?

claudiusde
Tue, Apr-15-08, 17:16
On Apr 15, 12:53=A0pm, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> On Apr 15, 11:41=A0am, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
>
> > Why not refer to my newer version you evasive jackass.
>
> Jim McGinn: "we can be fairly certain that they never
> ventured more than 50 or maybe a 100 yards from the safety
> of trees."
>
> You probably have a =A0cited data table to verify this?

So, tell us more about how large brains are a long distance
running adaptation.

Don't you think it's a bit silly to propose a long distance
running hypothesis to explain the origins of what
is--undeniably--the most communal species that has ever
existed? Did you even consider this before you presented your
simpleminded hypothesis?

Lee Olsen
Tue, Apr-15-08, 17:16
On Apr 15, 1:40=A0pm, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
> On Apr 15, 12:53=A0pm, Lee Olsen
> <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 15, 11:41=A0am, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
>
> > > Why not refer to my newer version you evasive jackass.
>
> > Jim McGinn: "we can be fairly certain that they never
> > ventured more than 50 or maybe a 100 yards from the safety
> > of trees."
>
> > You probably have a =A0cited data table to verify this?

No answer.

claudiusde
Wed, Apr-16-08, 06:16
My hypothesis has no real competition. There are just
cult-based whackjobs like yourself pretending that you can
dispute something that you obvious cannot.

On Apr 15, 2:21=A0pm, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 15, 1:40=A0pm, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
>
> > On Apr 15, 12:53=A0pm, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 15, 11:41=A0am, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
>
> > > > Why not refer to my newer version you evasive jackass.
>
> > > Jim McGinn: "we can be fairly certain that they never
> > > ventured more than 50 or maybe a 100 yards from the
> > > safety of trees."
>
> > > You probably have a =A0cited data table to verify this?
>
> No answer.

Lee Olsen
Wed, Apr-16-08, 06:16
On Apr 15, 4:10=A0pm, claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
> My hypothesis has no real competition. =A0

1 Nobody lived on the savanna until the advent of jeeps and
guns. 2 Lions evolved from saber-tooth cats. 3 Apiths never
ventured more than 50/100 yds away from a tree. 4 Climate
change is not happening presently. 5 Agriculture probably
stretches back hundreds of thousand if not millions of years.
6 Genetic drift is a pseudo-scientific notion. 7 Spears are
useless against hyena and lions.
8 ..then what purpose do the stone weapons (spears, bow and
arrow) serve that show up in the fossil record starting
about 2.5 mya?
9. Then you should stop;pissing into it. 10 Speak for
yourself. I see just fine at night.
10. Uh, er. These artifacts don't come with notes attached to
them that indicate how they were actually used.
11. Why we see stasis in tool advancement up until a few
thousand years ago.
12. So Paul, now that you've, finally, come to accept the
fact that early hominids--both A'pith and HE--resided in
treed habitat.

How could it have any competition based on the illiteracy
expressed above? How could anyone compete with ignorance at
the depth of yours? You are truly in a class by yourself.