PDA

View Full Version : USDA recalls 143 million pounds of frozen beef


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums

Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!



kwikdriver
Sun, Feb-17-08, 16:30
LOS ANGELES, California (AP) -- The U.S. Department of Agriculture on Sunday ordered the recall of 143 million pounds of frozen beef from a Southern California slaughterhouse that is being investigated for mistreating cattle.


Officials said this is the largest recall in the United States, surpassing a 1999 recall of 35 million pounds.

Officials said it was the largest beef recall in the United States, surpassing a 1999 ban of 35 million pounds of ready-to-eat meats. The amount of beef -- 143 million pounds -- is roughly enough for two hamburgers for each man, woman and child in the United States.

The federal agency said the recall will affect beef products dating to February 1, 2006, that came from Chino-based Westland/Hallmark Meat Co., which supplies meat to the federal school lunch program and to some major fast-food chains.

Secretary of Agriculture Ed Schafer said his department has evidence that Westland did not routinely contact its veterinarian when cattle became non-ambulatory after passing inspection, violating health regulations.

"Because the cattle did not receive complete and proper inspection, Food Safety and Inspection Service has determined them to be unfit for human food and the company is conducting a recall," Schafer said in a statement.

A phone message left for Westland president Steve Mendell was not immediately returned.

Federal officials suspended operations at Westland/Hallmark after an undercover video surfaced showing crippled and sick animals being shoved with forklifts.

Two former employees were charged Friday with animal cruelty. No charges have been filed against Westland, but an investigation by federal authorities continues.

Authorities said the video showed workers kicking, shocking and otherwise abusing "downer" animals that were apparently too sick or injured to walk into the slaughterhouse. Some animals had water forced down their throats, San Bernardino County prosecutor Michael Ramos said.

No charges have been filed against Westland, but an investigation by federal authorities continues.

Officials estimate that about 37 million pounds of the recalled beef went to school programs, but they believe most of the meat probably has already been eaten. There have been no reported illnesses linked to the beef at any of the schools.

"We don't know how much product is out there right now. We don't think there is a health hazard, but we do have to take this action," said Dr. Dick Raymond, USDA Undersecretary for Food Safety.

Most of the beef was sent to distribution centers in bulk packages. The USDA said it will work with distributors to determine how much meat remains.

Federal regulations call for keeping downed cattle out of the food supply because they may pose a higher risk of contamination from E. coli, salmonella or mad cow disease because they typically wallow in feces and their immune systems are often weak.

About 150 school districts around the nation have stopped using ground beef from Hallmark Meat Packing Co., which is associated with Westland.

Jack in the Box, a San Diego-based company with restaurants in 18 states, told its meat suppliers not to use Hallmark until further notice, but it was unclear whether it had used any Hallmark meat. In-N-Out, an Irvine-based chain, also halted use of the Westland/Hallmark beef. Other chains such as McDonald's and Burger King said they do not buy beef from Westland.

Raymond countered a claim leveled by Humane Society President and CEO Wayne Pacelle, who said a USDA inspector was at the Westland plant for about two hours each day. USDA inspectors are there at slaughterhouses "continuously," Raymond said.

Federal lawmakers on Thursday had called for the Government Accountability Office to investigate the safety of meat in the National School Lunch Program.

Upon learning about the recall, some legislators criticized the USDA, saying the federal agency should conduct more thorough inspections to ensure tainted beef doesn't get to the public.

"Today marks the largest beef recall in U.S. history, and it involves the national school lunch program and other federal food and nutrition programs," said U.S. Sen. Tom Harkin, chairman of the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry. "This begs the question: how much longer will we continue to test our luck with weak enforcement of federal food safety regulations?"


Advocacy groups also weighed in, noting the problems at Westland wouldn't have been revealed had it not been for animal right activists.

"On the one hand, I'm glad that the recall is taking place. On the other, it's somewhat disturbing, given that obviously much of this food has already been eaten," said Jean Halloran, director of food policy initiatives at Consumers Union. "It's really closing the barn door after the cows left."

http://www.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/02/17/usdabeef.recall.ap/index.html?eref=rss_topstories

rightnow
Sun, Feb-17-08, 16:32
That's pretty disgusting. Nice (not) to see it was headed for fast food and school lunch, the more pervasive distributions of meat in the country probably. Mistreatment of animals makes me literally sick. That's just morally deeply wrong, totally aside from the health aspect.

PJ

ElleH
Sun, Feb-17-08, 16:51
Are most of the meats recalled (now and in the past) in those tubes? I never buy that stuff--it's gross to me. I always get the stuff they grind in the store--at least I think they do. But I tell you, I "hold my breath" every time we eat it. I'm just so uncomfortable with ground beef any more.

Songwriter
Sun, Feb-17-08, 17:06
It makes me sick the way we treat animals, as well. I keep thinking that some day I might go vegetarian because it bothers me to exploit animals. But that would be really hard on low carb. It's a quandary, my conscience bothers me.

I have not hunted in over 20 years, used to be a big hunter. Maybe I could only eat what I catch or shoot. But that is certainly not practical for the masses. Unless the honeybees all die. Then, it'll be a free for all, anyway, survival of the fittest.

rightnow
Sun, Feb-17-08, 17:11
I was a vegetarian for 5 years, solely because I felt so badly about the animal situation.

It merely contributed to further ruining my health. And you know what, I seriously doubt that my abstaining from the necessary nutrients for my life, changed anything about animal treatment.

PJ

kwikdriver
Sun, Feb-17-08, 17:35
Like some of the people here, I did the vegetarian thing for a while, and I'm sure it contributed to my spiraling completely out of control on the eating front. I'm happy I'm not doing it anymore. But stuff like this just serves to remind me of why I went down that path at all. It's pretty routine to bag on PETA, and they are, in fact, extremist. But there is something to some of what they say. For me, I ended up deciding it was me or the animals -- I could go on eating an out of control diet until it killed me, or do this. But I can see, and respect, why other people would go down a different path.

kyrasdad
Sun, Feb-17-08, 18:08
Like some of the people here, I did the vegetarian thing for a while, and I'm sure it contributed to my spiraling completely out of control on the eating front. I'm happy I'm not doing it anymore. But stuff like this just serves to remind me of why I went down that path at all. It's pretty routine to bag on PETA, and they are, in fact, extremist. But there is something to some of what they say. For me, I ended up deciding it was me or the animals -- I could go on eating an out of control diet until it killed me, or do this. But I can see, and respect, why other people would go down a different path.
The cruelty issues are the part of PETA almost anyone with a conscience can agree with. Too bad it doesn't end there. Still, there are groups that aren't as radical or asinine that address the same issues. I've never studied it much, but I wonder how they feel about the way PETA garners hatred for their cause? PETA and PCRM deserve the abuse they get--the animals don't.

Legeon
Mon, Feb-18-08, 01:32
Safety aside, I'd hate for them to waste so much meat over a moral issue. They'd better find a use for it.

Nancy LC
Mon, Feb-18-08, 07:50
They were processing "downer" cattle which is not allowed.

mike_d
Mon, Feb-18-08, 08:20
It seems like a knee jerk reaction or a punitive move against the company(s) practices to me. I think its been going on for a long time. Dead or ill cattle are supposed to be used for pet food not human consumption, even though the risk of mad cow is low here. I expect most of the beef, not already eaten will be thrown out instead of tested. Well fish is looking even better to me now :idea:

LessLiz
Mon, Feb-18-08, 08:22
I expect most of it has already been consumed seeing as how the recall dates back to something like February 2006.

ReginaW
Mon, Feb-18-08, 15:50
http://www.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/02/18/beef.recall/index.html?eref=rss_latest

USDA: Most recalled beef has probably been eaten (http://www.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/02/18/beef.recall/index.html?eref=rss_latest)

(CNN) -- Federal officials are trying to track down the 143 million pounds of beef recalled Sunday, but they say that most of it has probably been eaten.

Keith Williams, a U.S. Department of Agriculture spokesman, said investigators have found no cases of illness related to the recalled meat.

The beef recall came after inspectors said they found "clear violations" of USDA regulations at a California slaughterhouse that has been accused of mistreating cows.

"We do not know how much of this product is out there at this time. We do not feel this product presents a health risk of any significance," said Dick Raymond, the undersecretary of agriculture for food safety. "But the product was produced in noncompliance with our regulations, so therefore we do have to take this action." Watch what sparked the recall »

Federal officials called the recall by Westland/Hallmark Meat Packing Company the largest beef recall in U.S. history.

Raymond said cattle that had passed pre-slaughter inspections but then lost the ability to walk were slaughtered without being re-examined for chronic illness by an inspector, a practice he said violated federal regulations and had been going on for at least two years.

In January, the Humane Society of the United States accused Westland/Hallmark of abusing "downed" cattle. The Humane Society released video that showed workers kicking cows, jabbing them near their eyes, ramming them with a forklift and shooting high-pressure water up their noses in an effort to force them to their feet for slaughter.

California prosecutors on Friday announced animal cruelty charges against two former employees of the plant.

Federal regulations are aimed at preventing the spread of bovine spongiform encephalopathy, popularly known as mad cow disease, and other diseases.

Raymond said the average age of the cattle involved is 5 to 7 years, meaning most of them were probably born long after a 1997 ban on a type of cattle feed suspected to cause the disease. He said the incidence of the disease in U.S. cattle is "extremely rare."

It's important to keep downed cattle out of the food supply because the animals have weaker immune systems and sometimes wallow in feces, raising the risk of contamination, according to The Associated Press.

In a statement issued February 3, Westland Meat President Steve Mendell said that the company was cooperating with the USDA and that the practices depicted in the Humane Society video are "a serious breach of our company's policies and training."

"We have taken swift action regarding the two employees identified on the video and have already implemented aggressive measures to ensure all employees follow our humane handling policies and procedures," Mendell said.

The recall dates back to February 1, 2006, and Raymond said "the great majority" of the meat has probably been eaten.

"A lot of this is fresh, raw product and with ground beef, et cetera, that has a very short shelf life and refrigerator life," he said.

About 37 million pounds of the recalled meat went to school lunch programs and other federal nutrition programs since October 2006, said Ron Vogel of the USDA's Food and Nutrition Service.

Most of the beef was sent to distribution centers in bulk packages. The USDA said it will work with distributors to determine how much meat remains, the AP reported.

The largest U.S. meat recall before Sunday came in 1999, when about 35 million pounds of product possibly contaminated with listeria were ordered off shelves. USDA officials said that was Class I recall, involving a known risk to human health.

Sunday's action was a Class II recall, under which authorities say there is "a remote probability" the meat could cause illness.

The amount of beef -- 143 million pounds -- is roughly enough for two hamburgers for each man, woman and child in the United States.

kimberlysc
Mon, Feb-18-08, 16:21
If we want to eat meat and are concerned with the treatment of animals (as we're all supposed to be good stewards on this planet) most of us have choices. If you have a co-op or health food store near you you can join and support the cause by buying there. You will find free range, grass fed, and pesticide, antibiotic, and hormone free meat, poultry, and eggs. You will be also supporting local commerce as well as helping the enviromnent as they tend to transport goods locally as much as possible. If you dont live near one ask at the meat counter where their meat comes from and ask if they have or can get you organic grass fed beef. If you find a local meat market and ask them they may tell you where to find it if they don't have it. If you can't find it in your area then ask for local meat, especially in small towns. It will generaly bypass the big contaminated slaughterhouses. These market areas seem to be groing rapidly. Great news for all of us and the happy cows and chicks!

rightnow
Mon, Feb-18-08, 18:37
Dead or ill cattle are supposed to be used for pet food not human consumption,
Gosh, I bet that makes my seven cats breathe a sigh of relief. :rolleyes: