PDA

View Full Version : Jane Brody "triumphs" over cholesterol


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums

Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!



Daryl
Fri, Nov-30-07, 17:27
Last December, a routine nonfasting blood test revealed that my total cholesterol level, which had long wavered between 190 and 205 milligrams per deciliter of blood serum, was now 222 and flagged as “high” by the laboratory’s computer. A heart-healthy reading should be under 200.

The HDLs, the so-called good cholesterol that protects against heart disease, were also high at 69, so that was good. My triglycerides, at 95, were well within the normal range of zero to 149. The VLDLs, also a potentially harmful form, measured 19, again within the normal range of 5 to 49.

But the LDLs, the bad guys that deposit plaque on artery walls, were 134 — “high” since they should be under 100 if I want to maintain a healthy cardiovascular system.

My doctor wasn’t too concerned because my blood pressure is low, I eat a healthful diet and I exercise every day for 60 to 90 minutes and run up and down scores of steps. Still, I decided to cut out cheese, lose a few pounds and return in three months for another test, this time after an all-night fast.

So in early March, three pounds lighter and taking a daily supplement of plant stanols, which are supposed to lower cholesterol, I had a second test. But now my total cholesterol had risen to 236 and the LDLs were up to 159.

Still, my doctor was not as alarmed as I was. My father and his father and his father’s brother had heart attacks in their 50s, and my father and grandfather died of their second attacks at 71. I was 65. Were my days going to be numbered by a surprise coronary or stroke? Not if I could help it.

Now it was time to further limit red meat (though I never ate it often and always lean), stick to low-fat ice cream, eat even more fish, increase my fiber intake and add fish oils to my growing list of supplements. But the latest test, in early June, was even more of a shock: total cholesterol, 248, and LDLs, 171.

My doctor’s conclusion: “Your body is spewing out cholesterol and nothing you do to your diet is likely to stop it.” I was not inclined to become a total vegetarian to see if that would help. The time had come to try a statin, one of the miraculously effective cholesterol-lowering drugs.

By studying the effects of statins in thousands of people who already had heart disease or were likely to develop it, researchers finally proved that lowering total and LDL cholesterol in people at risk was both health-saving and life-saving. I’ll know by fall if the low-dose statin I now take nightly will do the trick, or if I’ll need a higher dose. [See Fall Update, below.]

Lifestyle Changes

Americans tend to turn far too quickly to drugs to solve their health problems. Drugs should be the last resort, if there are reasonable measures people can take first to control a problem. And there are dozens of such measures that, individually or together, can help to lower LDLs.

High LDL cholesterol is an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease, and lowering it by 60 milligrams can reduce coronary events like heart attacks, angina and sudden death by 50 percent after only two years, experts from Oregon Health and Sciences University wrote recently in The Journal of Family Practice.

The Oregon specialists, Dr. Elizabeth Powers, Dr. John Saultz and Andrew Hamilton, recommended that doctors start with lifestyle modifications when a patient has high LDLs. And Dr. Vincent Lo of French Camp, Calif., suggested that the patient’s culture, preferences and practical issues like cost and availability be considered. Not everyone can afford to join a gym, and a traveling salesman may have a hard time sticking to a low-fat, calorie-controlled diet.

These are the measures that have been found to work, based on randomized, controlled clinical trials, the gold standard of clinical research.

Alcohol. Consuming one or two drinks a day can lower LDLs by 4 to 10 milligrams. Red wine is considered most effective. For those who cannot drink alcohol, purple grape juice may be a reasonable, albeit less effective, substitute.

Exercise. Aerobic exercise, like brisk walking, jogging, cycling and lap swimming, can reduce LDLs by 3 to 16 milligrams and raise the good HDLs. Consistency is important. Aerobic activities should be performed at least five times a week for maximum benefit.

Weight loss. When achieved through diet and exercise, weight loss can reduce LDL levels by as much as 42 milligrams. When achieved through drug therapy, weight loss has been associated with an LDL drop of 10 to 31 milligrams.

Yoga and tai chi. These forms of exercise, which are accessible to just about everyone who can walk, even the elderly, have reduced LDLs by 20 to 26 milligrams when done for 12 to 14 weeks.

Smoking. An analysis of several studies found that LDL cholesterol was 1.7 percent higher in smokers, but two smoking cessation studies found little or no difference. In any case, smoking is a strong independent risk factor for heart disease and sudden coronary death, so it is best avoided.

Modifying Your Diet

About 85 percent of the cholesterol in your blood is made in your body. The remaining 15 percent comes from food. But by reducing dietary sources of saturated fats and cholesterol and increasing consumption of cholesterol-fighting foods and drink, you can usually lower the amount of harmful cholesterol in your blood. My college roommate, for example, recently adopted a mostly vegetarian-and-fish diet, minus cheese but with occasional meat and chicken, and lowered her total cholesterol from 240 to 160 milligrams.

There are exceptions, of course, and I happen to be one of them. Still, I intend to continue to follow a heart-healthy diet, because that will enhance the effectiveness of the medication I’m taking.

Start by switching to low-fat and nonfat dairy products, like skim milk and, if you can stand it, fat-free cheese. Substitute sorbet, sherbet or fruit ices for ice cream, or choose ice milk or ice cream with half the fat.

For protein, choose fish and shellfish, poultry without the skin and lean meats, all prepared with low-fat recipes. Eat more dried beans and peas (cooked, of course), soy products like tofu, and nuts like walnuts and almonds. Grains should be mostly or entirely whole — 100 percent whole wheat bread and cereals made from whole wheat or oats, brown rice, bulgur and the like. Oats and oatmeal are rich in soluble fiber, which lowers cholesterol.

Pile on the vegetables and fruits. Especially helpful are those high in fiber like Brussels sprouts, cabbage, spinach, carrots, blueberries, oranges and apples.

Cook with canola or olive oil, and use margarine made from plant stanols.

And enjoy a glass of wine with dinner.

Equally important are the foods to limit or avoid: organ meats like liver, egg yolks, most fried and fast foods, doughnuts and pastries, full-fat cheeses and ice cream, processed meats like salami, bacon and other fatty cuts of pork, and untrimmed red meats.

Fall Update

The low-dose statin I’d been taking did the trick. After four months of taking 10 mg a day of Lipitor, my total cholesterol went from 248 to 159. The bad cholesterol, or LDL, went from 171 to 84. My good cholesterol also went up slightly. My ratio of total cholesterol to good cholesterol has me living forever!

Updated online, November 26, 2007.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/21/health/21brod.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1196467831-+NMNBY+s1qfGp3dE7mrOjg

Dodger
Fri, Nov-30-07, 18:58
So, the more fat she cut from her diet, the worse her blood chemistry got. Any reasonably intelligent person would have eventually figured out that if reducing fat made things worse, then increasing fat should make them better.

Good thing she can afford drugs. They won't make her healthier,but they do lower LDL cholesterol (but don't increase the particle size).

mrfreddy
Fri, Nov-30-07, 19:43
So, the more fat she cut from her diet, the worse her blood chemistry got. Any reasonably intelligent person would have eventually figured out that if reducing fat made things worse, then increasing fat should make them better.

Good thing she can afford drugs. They won't make her healthier,but they do lower LDL cholesterol (but don't increase the particle size).


the most incredible thing to me is that she turned her nose up at the idea of getting a CT scan. That would tell her whether or not she even has anything to worry about,heart disease wise. Instead, she'd prefer to take drugs known to have serious side affects, and also known to be of little use to women her age. Lordy, what a dolt.

renegadiab
Sat, Dec-01-07, 10:52
So, the more fat she cut from her diet, the worse her blood chemistry got. Any reasonably intelligent person would have eventually figured out that if reducing fat made things worse, then increasing fat should make them better.

Good thing she can afford drugs. They won't make her healthier,but they do lower LDL cholesterol (but don't increase the particle size).

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
:) :)

Even though the fat cutting didn't work for her, she still polly-parrots the standard "cut the saturated fat & cholesterol" nonsense for heart health. Obviously, she isn't up on the current research about LDL particle size either. Even some low fatties are recognizing that dietary cholesterol doesn't raise your serum cholesterol. Some health guru she is.

mike_d
Sat, Dec-01-07, 11:39
But by reducing dietary sources of saturated fats and cholesterol and increasing consumption of cholesterol-fighting foods and drink, you can usually lower the amount of harmful cholesterol in your blood.You bet your boneless, skinless chicken breasts washed down with non-fat milk :p

ceberezin
Sat, Dec-01-07, 14:42
And enjoy a glass of wine with dinner. Right, she has you eat the most unappetizing of foods prepared in the most unappetizing way, and then tells you to go enjoy!

herselfNYC
Sat, Dec-01-07, 17:29
I think she takes a perverse pleasure in self-deprivation, and wants all the readers of the NY Times to suffer as well. She's incredibly smug about everything she doesn't eat.

She must be hungry and cranky all the time.

Daryl
Sat, Dec-01-07, 17:47
Tsk tsk..... you people are so cynical. :lol:

oakdryad
Sat, Dec-01-07, 18:00
I seem to remember reading recently that higher cholesterol in women over 60 was a protective factor against heart disease. If that's correct, then by taking statins (which don't do much for women's health anyway) and lowering her cholesterol, then Jane Brody is actually increasing her risk factors...besides being hungry and cranky all the time AND eating the most boring food on earth. Lowfat ice cream, nonfat milk, skinless chicken, whatever. Blech!

Give me LC style eating any day. I can live without the sugar. :D

FenwayGuy
Sat, Dec-01-07, 18:18
My ratio of total cholesterol to good cholesterol has me living forever!

Please say it ain't so. Imagine having to continue to listen to her drivel for who knows how many years?? :lol: :lol:

Seriously, folks, just calling her a dolt is being rather kind. I knew little about her but have quickly got up to speed by reading much of her writings. It is almost unbelievable that one human being could be so utterly clueless. Her smugness is disgusting.

eryalen
Sat, Dec-01-07, 19:21
Seriously, folks, just calling her a dolt is being rather kind. I knew little about her but have quickly got up to speed by reading much of her writings. It is almost unbelievable that one human being could be so utterly clueless. Her smugness is disgusting.
I feel sorry for her. She has been duped as much as anyone. I'm not sure if anyone is to blame as they all feel they are doing what is right, no matter how misguided they are. It seems to me that they are all praising the Emperors new clothes.

KarenJ
Sat, Dec-01-07, 20:53
I feel sorry for her. She has been duped as much as anyone. I'm not sure if anyone is to blame as they all feel they are doing what is right, no matter how misguided they are. It seems to me that they are all praising the Emperors new clothes.

Ditto. The Emperors new clothes is a perfect analogy.

fujiwara
Mon, Dec-03-07, 17:06
You bet your boneless, skinless chicken breasts washed down with non-fat milk :p

I gagged when I read this just thinking about how dry and tasteless that would be.

I feel sorry for Jane Brody. She's my mom's age and from what I can tell, she means well, just believes the party line. But it's mostly that she's my mom's age, and I really love my mom.

The "health" writer I can't stand is Gina Kolata. To me, she seems to KNOW that she's obfuscating information. She likes to tell us poor, poor things that we're all gonna get fat and die, and there's nothing we can do about it except take more and more drugs.

Groggy60
Tue, Dec-04-07, 11:37
Lowfat ice cream is an oxymoron isn't it.

Turtle2003
Tue, Dec-04-07, 13:47
Lowfat ice cream is an oxymoron isn't it.

You think that's bad. My daughter-in-law served me fat free whipped cream.
How can you have fat free fat? Oh the wonders of modern chemistry.

teaser
Tue, Dec-04-07, 19:52
Besides her brush with "heart disease," she's survived breast cancer and gone through knee replacement. I hate to think what she'd have gone through if she hadn't been right at the cutting edge of preventative medicine for the last forty years.

KarenJ
Tue, Dec-04-07, 21:16
Besides her brush with "heart disease," she's survived breast cancer and gone through knee replacement. I hate to think what she'd have gone through if she hadn't been right at the cutting edge of preventative medicine for the last forty years.

I wonder what she'd have gone through if she HAD been right at the cutting edge of preventative medicine for the last forty years (and honestly evaluating the data). That's what doesn't make sense. Cutting edge meaning real science... maybe no breast cancer, no knee replacement, no bad lab values.?. :idea:

Kary
Wed, Dec-05-07, 02:08
Eating like that I would need waaay more than just one glass of wine at dinner :).

rightnow
Wed, Dec-05-07, 07:50
I wonder what she'd have gone through if she HAD been right at the cutting edge of preventative medicine for the last forty years (and honestly evaluating the data). That's what doesn't make sense. Cutting edge meaning real science... maybe no breast cancer, no knee replacement, no bad lab values.?. :idea:
I think in this case "the cutting edge" has an entirely different meaning. :rolleyes:

LessLiz
Wed, Dec-05-07, 08:36
ROTFLMAO!!! I needed that this morning!

Groggy60
Wed, Dec-05-07, 12:01
And low-carb bread, another oxymoron.