PDA

View Full Version : Study links diet to prostate cancer


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums

Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!



kebaldwin
Thu, Oct-11-07, 16:12
Study links diet to prostate cancer

The Seattle Times

10-11-07

Oct. 11--Prostate cancer strikes nearly a quarter-million American men each year -- more than any other cancer except skin cancer. But while scientists are still not certain what causes it, they suspect diet and obesity somehow play a role.

Now a very small clinical trial by Seattle researchers is offering tantalizing glimpses into that link.

The pilot study, involving eight local men recently diagnosed with prostate cancer, found that dramatically cutting back on dietary fats and carbohydrates and/or calories actually alters the levels of genes in prostate tissues that can potentially regulate cancer growth.

The researchers did not attempt to identify the cancer's culprit. But the study, published Wednesday in the October issue of the journal Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, suggests that whatever its cause, prostate cancer may respond quickly and markedly to significant changes in weight and diet.

Strikingly, the changes occurred after four of the men spent just six weeks on a low-fat, low-carb diet, said Dr. Daniel Lin, assistant professor of urology at the University of Washington and the paper's lead author.

"Imagine what could happen in four years or even 40 years," Lin said.

Scientists don't exactly understand the mechanism between cancer and excess weight or diet. But the link exists, said Marian Neuhouser, the paper's co-author and a scientist at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle.

One explanation may be that body fat synthesizes hormones, such as estrogen, that raise the risk of certain cancers, Neuhouser said. Fat cells also trigger low-grade inflammation in the body, and that also could be a risk factor for some cancers, she said.

One argument for a dietary or environmental cause of prostate cancer, Lin said, is that it's much less common in Asia than in the United States -- but Asian men get it more often after immigrating here.

Still, only a few definitive risk factors for prostate cancer are known, including age, race and family history.

Lin cautioned that the latest study was extremely small and did not measure whether the cancer progressed more slowly among the men in the low-calorie group. Also, those men consumed an average of 1,500 calories a day -- 40 percent less than the men in the control group who stuck to a "standard American diet" rich in fat and carbohydrates.

Researchers found significant differences in about 30 out of 7,000 genes in the two groups of prostate-tissue samples. Though few in number, Lin said the affected genes included important ones, such as genes that control cell growth or cellular repair, both of which can influence cancer development.

Kyung Song: 206-464-2423 or ksong~seattletimes.com

-----

To see more of The Seattle Times, or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to http://www.seattletimes.com.

Copyright (c) 2007, Seattle Times

Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

For reprints, email tmsreprints~permissionsgroup.com, call 800-374-7985 or 847-635-6550, send a fax to 847-635-6968, or write to The Permissions Group Inc., 1247 Milwaukee Ave., Suite 303, Glenview, IL 60025, USA.

http://www.lef.org/news/LefDailyNews.htm?NewsID=5976&Section=DISEASE

Wifezilla
Thu, Oct-11-07, 17:50
Scientists don't exactly understand the mechanism between cancer and excess weight or diet

THE SMART ONES DO!!!!

Gezzz. A guy got a freaking Nobel Prize almost 80 years ago for figuring this out!!!

"A long time ago in a galaxy far far away...well...ok...it was 1931 and right on this planet, but anyway...a man by the name of Otto Warburg was awarded a Nobel Prize for discovering that, basically, cancer cells like sugar. REALLY like it! They use 4 to 5 times more glucose than normal cells. Like a 2 year-old on Halloween, cancer cells happily munch away on sweets while growing rapidly and leaving a path of mayhem and destruction in their wake."
http://wifezillasway.blogspot.com/2007/09/low-carb-cancer.html

ProfGumby
Thu, Oct-11-07, 17:53
Right on Wifezilla!

Oh, and for the record, if they did the study again, using the Atkins guidelines and allowed dietary fat, the results would prolly be the same.....it aint the fat that causes cancer.......IMHO.....

Wifezilla
Thu, Oct-11-07, 18:02
You bring up a good point Professor...how the studies are performed. Here we are, living examples of what a low carb, high fat, right amount of protein diet can do, yet none of the studies use that particular dietary profile.

As for the 1500 calorie average. I can easily do 1500 calories on high fat/low carb. I feel perfectly satisfied and have no cravings. On a high carb diet, I can chow down 2800 calories and I still want more!!!!

kebaldwin
Fri, Oct-12-07, 04:24
You bring up a good point Professor...how the studies are performed.
Most of us could manipulate studies to achieve a predetermined outcome.

Not only how studies are performed - but how they jump to a conclusion.

For example, how many studies feed a group of people a high glycemic diet (i.e. the typical western diet) - see bad effects - and then blame it on the small amount of fat in the diet - completly ignoring the fact that the diet contained a lot of high glycemic foods?

Wifezilla
Fri, Oct-12-07, 08:20
For example, how many studies feed a group of people a high glycemic diet (i.e. the typical western diet) - see bad effects - and then blame it on the small amount of fat in the diet - completly ignoring the fact that the diet contained a lot of high glycemic foods?

Almost all of them?!?!??!

Zei
Fri, Oct-12-07, 14:26
Okay, let's get this straight. The guys ate low-carb, low-fat...high what? Water? Protein powder with a little chicken? What? And we're supposed to think of what this would do in four or fourty years for guys who eat this way? Okay, I don't know what they really ate. It just sounds like an unmanageable diet to stick to for that long regardless of any possible benefit, and furthermore if there really was a benefit is was probably just the weight loss anyway, not how miserably that was accomplished by this group.

bike2work
Fri, Oct-12-07, 15:33
The diets described as lowfat and low carb are typically the "good carb" diets -- lots of "healthy" whole grains. Even Ornish describes his diet as "low sugar".