PDA

View Full Version : One meal may contain enough fat for a day


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums

Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!



Demi
Tue, Aug-28-07, 02:49
The Telegraph
London, UK
28 August, 2007


One meal may contain enough fat for a day

Restaurants and takeaways (in the UK) could be forced to carry labels warning customers about the nutritional value of their meals.

A pilot scheme has been started in which food is given a green, amber or red light according to its healthiness.

The project follows research which showed that some takeaway and restaurant meals contain more calories and salt in one serving than the recommended intake for a whole day.

A pepperoni pizza that was sampled had 3,320 calories - 30 per cent higher than the recommended 2,550 a day for men and 71 per cent more than the 1,940 suggested for women.

The research, conducted in Liverpool, also found a Chinese meal of beef and green peppers in a black bean sauce with fried rice, contained 27.6g of salt - more than four times the recommended daily intake for an adult.

It is hoped that the "traffic light" scheme, which is being piloted at 15 restaurants in the city, will help inform customers and persuade chefs to produce healthier versions of their meals. If successful it could be replicated across the country.

Dave Horsfield, a trading standards officer, said: "Takeaways and restaurants don't have to tell you what is in their meals.

"Consequently, it is very hard for people to make a judgement about what they are eating.

"We like the idea of using traffic light logos on menus to provide information on calories, fat and salt. It is simple and easily understood.

"The context for this is concern about the rising obesity, heart disease and poor health. At the end of the day this is about improving the quality and nutrition of what we are eating.

"Our hope is that we would see a change in recipes by the chefs and a change in what consumers decide to eat."

But the scheme, which remains voluntary at the moment, is likely to meet with resistance from the restaurant trade, particularly the big chains, such as McDonald's, which say they already provide nutritional information.

David Baldwin, of the Restaurant Association, said: "Our members will think this idea is stark staring barmy. It is absolute nonsense.

"It is typical of the meddlers who are looking to justify their salaries. The Government should concentrate on educating people about good food rather than laying more bureaucracy on the trade.

"It is all very well coming up with labels for mass-produced ready meals in a factory but you can't do that with a restaurant meal.

"If you have to conform and repeat the dish in the same proportions every time, you take away the flair," he said.


How a meal may contain enough calories for a day

................................................................................. Fat Salt Calories
Recommended daily intake for men .................................. 95g 6g 2,550
Recommened daily intake for women ................................ 70g 6g 1,940
Beef and Green peppers in black bean sauce with fried rice .. 48g 27.6g 1,382
Chicken tikka masala with keema rice ............................... 104.3g 12.5g 1,913
Pepperoni pizza ............................................................ 160.8g 12.8g 3,320
Fish and chips .............................................................. 129.1g 1.3g 2,476




http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/08/28/nfood128.xml

ruthla
Tue, Aug-28-07, 02:59
Who exactly is determining the criteria for "red light, yellow light, and green light" meals? Are they even measuring carbs or protein for this?

I'd much rather have restaurants provide nutritional information and let us make our own choices about what foods to eat.

pauleo
Tue, Aug-28-07, 06:37
Who exactly is determining the criteria for "red light, yellow light, and green light" meals? Are they even measuring carbs or protein for this?

I'd much rather have restaurants provide nutritional information and let us make our own choices about what foods to eat.

There are individual 'traffic lights' for fat, saturated fat, sugar, and salt. It's a labeling scheme for food products in stores - it doesn't restrict what restaurants can tell you.

http://www.eatwell.gov.uk/foodlabels/trafficlights/

gryfonclaw
Tue, Aug-28-07, 10:10
stark staring barmy

:confused:

Whaaa?

pennink
Tue, Aug-28-07, 10:35
who the heck is it at the telegraph who is on the low fat payroll?

What a lot of rot is coming out of that place.

MizKitty
Tue, Aug-28-07, 10:38
Our members will think this idea is stark staring barmy

LOL... so... I assume that's not a good thing?

It's not a bad idea, but if it's voluntary, who's going to do it, and if it becomes mandatory, who's going to enforce and check it? And do they want to spend money on that, with all the more important things there are? A restaurant meal is supposed to be a treat.

We won't even get into who determines what's healthy, carbs, fats, grains, red meat. You just know that's going to be all screwed up.

renegadiab
Tue, Aug-28-07, 11:52
Who exactly is determining the criteria for "red light, yellow light, and green light" meals? Are they even measuring carbs or protein for this?

I'd much rather have restaurants provide nutritional information and let us make our own choices about what foods to eat.

Don't you know that you need carbs? Carbs are good and fat is the root of all evil. And saturated fat? We can't even mention that.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

It amazes me that the dietary community is more concerned about some arbitrary mix of macronutrients (fat, carbs, & protein), rather than getting enough micronutrients (vitamins & minerals). Most low fat regimes come up deficient on the latter.

OH NO. I must be in trouble because I'm greatly exceeding the recommended fat intake, though not the recommended calorie intake. ;)

deirdra
Tue, Aug-28-07, 13:11
barm·y (bärm)
adj. barm·i·er, barm·i·est
1. Full of barm (the yeasty foam that rises to the surface of fermenting malt liquors), foamy.
2. Eccentric; daft.

CVH
Tue, Aug-28-07, 14:40
Very true, like yesterday, After 56 hour of not being hungry, it kicked in, I had a 16oz ribeye steak, lobster tail, 7oz sirloin steak+shrimp skewer and a 1/2 pound black angus burger with 2 slices of cheese, all rare.

This was at 2pm and was enough for the day, but the way it's presented in this article as unhealthy is BS.

amberview
Wed, Aug-29-07, 19:23
All the foods mentioned were extremely high in carbs. I wonder why that wasn't mentioned.

Hybrid
Wed, Aug-29-07, 20:25
147 grams of fat in one meal? Sounds yummy.

kyrasdad
Thu, Aug-30-07, 10:06
147 grams of fat in one meal? Sounds yummy.

Sounds a bit low to me. :)

Hybrid
Thu, Aug-30-07, 10:13
Sounds a bit low to me. :)

It is. I'm doing a caloric-retriction (http://www.lef.org/protocols/lifestyle_longevity/caloric_restriction_01.htm) version of NeanderThin, in the hopes of incrasing lifespan.

That being said, my average saturated fat is over twice that of the RDA put out by the FDA. I'm very put out by the FDA myself, so I understand how the saturated fat must feel.