PDA

View Full Version : Can Large Corporations TRULY Produce Healthy Natural Products?


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums

Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!



D.
Mon, Aug-13-07, 06:15
I read recently about a new Diet Coke product, called "Diet
Coke Plus," which has a number of vitamins and minerals added
to it. Later that same day, I read a story about Coke and
Cargill getting together to market a new type of natural
sweetener based upon the ancient plant Stevia. These items
seem to be the start of a trend where some of the world's
largest companies are sitting up and taking notice of the
natural products industry.

While I haven't been able to get a confirmation of this Stevia
work, it appears to be a rumor that has really made the
rounds. It's getting a lot of play because giant corporations
such as these are not most people's choice for natural,
healthy products.

A closer examination of Diet Coke Plus shows that it is the
standard Coke product with the addition of a very small amount
of nutritional supplementation (B6, B12, niacin, zinc, and
magnesium). These five ingredients are present in this drink
at an absurdly small level, most likely due to cost. There's
about a penny's worth of these ingredients in a can of Diet
Coke Plus (my guess).

Is this going to mean that Coke drinkers are suddenly going to
start to be a lot healthier? I don't think it will make any
difference at all for most people--certainly not enough of a
health difference to overcome the health COST of drinking all
those artificial sweeteners. What it WILL do, however, is
cause some people to grab a Diet Coke when they might have
instead enjoyed something more healthy, perhaps a spring water
or juice drink.

In short, it's a marketing gimmick, pure and simple.

While I wouldn't want to see Coke or Cargill start messing
with Stevia (modifying the plant for patent purposes), Stevia
as a sweetener could indeed be a revolutionary change in a
product like Diet Coke Plus if the sugar substitute was left
in its natural state. I might even drink that product.

Dave

Full text article above extracted from
http://shamvswham.blogspot.com/

Mark Thors
Mon, Aug-13-07, 06:15
"D." wrote:
>
> While I wouldn't want to see Coke or Cargill start messing
> with Stevia (modifying the plant for patent purposes),
> Stevia as a sweetener could indeed be a revolutionary change
> in a product like Diet Coke Plus if the sugar substitute was
> left in its natural state. I might even drink that product.

What the blogspot spammer won't tell you is that there are
serious safety concerns about stevia.

He won't tell you either because his meager understanding of
health issues does not include this knowledge, or because he
avoids telling you ANY information which would reflect badly
on products sold by the companies he wants to have as sponsors
for his commercial blogspot web site.

You'll never get the whole story from the blogspot spammer.
You'll only hear the parts of the story which support sales of
the products he is "reporting" on. He doesn't care if his
poorly researched articles cause harm to anybody. His articles
always reflect his commercial interests.

Food Chem Toxicol. 2007 Apr;45(4):662-6. Analysis of genotoxic
potentiality of stevioside by comet assay. Nunes AP,
Ferreira-Machado SC, Nunes RM, Dantas FJ, De Mattos JC,
Caldeira-de-Araujo A. Departamento de Biofisica e Biometria,
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de
Biologia Roberto Alcantara Gomes, Av 28 de Setembro, 87,
20551-030 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

Stevioside is a natural non-caloric sweetener extracted from
Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni) leaves. It has been widely used in
many countries, including Japan, Korea, China, Brazil and
Paraguay, either as a substitute for sucrose in beverages and
foods or as a household sweetener. The aim of this work was to
study its genotoxic potentiality in eukaryotic cells. Wistar
rats were treated with stevioside solution (4mg/mL) through
oral administration (ad libitum) and the DNA-induced damage
was evaluated using the single cell gel electrophoresis (comet
assay). The results showed that treatment with stevioside
generates lesions in peripheral blood, liver, brain and spleen
cells in different levels, the largest effect being in liver.
Therefore, these undesired effects must be better understood,
once the data present here point to possible stevioside
mutagenic properties.