PDA

View Full Version : Pure fruit juice not likely to put weight on kids


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums

Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!



Lorisa
Thu, May-10-07, 10:58
NEW YORK (Reuters) -- Contrary to popular belief, drinking pure 100 percent fruit juice does not make young children overweight or at risk for becoming overweight, new research shows. Pure fruit juice provides essential nutrients and, in moderation, may actually help children maintain a healthy weight.

Inconsistent research findings have led to continued debate over the potential associations between drinking 100 percent fruit juice, nutrient intake, and overweight in children.

In the their study, researchers analyzed the juice consumption of 3,618 children ages 2 to 11 using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

"The bottom line is that 100 percent juice consumption is a valuable contributor of nutrients in children's diet and it does not have an association with being overweight," study chief Dr. Theresa Nicklas, a child nutrition specialist at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas, told Reuters. She presented the new data at the Pediatric Academic Societies' annual convention in Toronto, Canada, this week.

"If you look at the weight of the evidence there are at least 7 studies plus the one I presented (this week) that show no association between 100 percent juice and overweight among children," Nicklas added. Even among the children who consumed the most juice, there was no association with the children being overweight or at risk for overweight, she said.

The results also indicate that juice consumption "is not excessive among 2- to 11-year-olds," Nicklas said. In fact, 57 percent of the children did not consume 100 percent juice at all, "which is much higher than I expected," she said.

The average daily consumption of pure fruit juice in the study population was 4.1 ounces (about half a cup) -- an amount in line with recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics.

And while there were a few children (13 percent) who consumed larger amounts of juice (12 ounces or more), their increased intake was not associated with overweight or at risk for being overweight. In fact, children in the 2 to 3-year-old category who drank the most juice were nearly three times less likely to be overweight or at risk for overweight than children who drank no juice at all.

Nicklas and her colleagues also found that children who drank any amount of 100 percent juice ate less total fat, saturated fat, sodium, added sugars and added fats. Pure juice drinkers also had higher intakes of a number of key nutrients including vitamin C, potassium, magnesium, folate, vitamin B6 and iron. They also ate more whole fruits, like apples.

Nicklas encourages parents who are concerned about their child being overweight to look beyond their juice consumption. "My advice would be to look at the total number of calories that child is taking in and look at where the bulk of those calories are coming from and equally important look at the activity level of the child."

Copyright 2007 Reuters. All rights reserved.This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

KvonM
Thu, May-10-07, 11:17
i suppose if what you're getting really is PURE fruit juice, as in no sugars or other things added to it, then it would be fine. the problem i always ran into was finding juices that were 100%, but weren't twice the price of the other juices.

Aeon
Thu, May-10-07, 11:54
i suppose if what you're getting really is PURE fruit juice, as in no sugars or other things added to it, then it would be fine. the problem i always ran into was finding juices that were 100%, but weren't twice the price of the other juices.

Pure fruit juices have loads of (natural) sugars. That's why they are off-limits on good LC diets.

Some school districts are mandating fruit juices instead of soda in vending machines to try to show that they are doing something about the kids' health. All the while continuing to allow chips, cookies, and other junk foods to be purchased.

ysabella
Thu, May-10-07, 12:03
100% pure fruit juice these days often means mostly white grape or apple juice, sometimes with some concentrate added to make it even sweeter, and then a little bit of the aronia berry or whatever the juice flavor is actually supposed to be.

The white grape and apple juice blends (I think pear also sometimes) are really, really sugary. I think maybe this is because fruit juices are competing with sodas, and being sweeter sells better?

If a kid isn't liking whole fruits, maybe smoothies are a better way to go?

tom sawyer
Thu, May-10-07, 12:20
Another correlation study that means little or nothing. Probably the kids that at least have juice, also have slightly better dietary habits that contribute more to their lower weight.

Juice is a little more self-regulating though (pun intended). I get queazy from drinking too much of certain juices. That should keep the kids that'll drink 5 cans of pop from doing the same with juice.

Theres not a heck of a lot of difference in sugar content between soda and juice. I think they both contain a high amount of fructose too. Personally, I think they ought to ban both and just sell diet soda in the schools, or the flavored waters with almost no sugar. But its a losing battle to try and convince a nutritionist that juice is not a healthy drink.

Lorisa
Thu, May-10-07, 12:58
Ok NOW it all makes perfect sense! I found another article about the same study and my eyes went right to the bottom of the article, where I found this:

The study was funded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Juice Products Association


:lol: You gotta love what passes for "news" and "science" these days :lol:

jschwab
Thu, May-10-07, 13:10
Most can juice (Juicy Juice, etc) contains MSG besides.

KvonM
Thu, May-10-07, 13:57
Pure fruit juices have loads of (natural) sugars. That's why they are off-limits on good LC diets.

Some school districts are mandating fruit juices instead of soda in vending machines to try to show that they are doing something about the kids' health. All the while continuing to allow chips, cookies, and other junk foods to be purchased.
no i understand that completely... i guess my point is that having 100% juice was better than 10% juice with 90% chemicals and high fructose corn syrup added.

i'd rather hand the kids an apple or an orange and a glass of milk, personally.

Aeon
Thu, May-10-07, 15:34
no i understand that completely... i guess my point is that having 100% juice was better than 10% juice with 90% chemicals and high fructose corn syrup added.

i'd rather hand the kids an apple or an orange and a glass of milk, personally.

In no way did I intend my comment to be a criticism of what you wrote. I was only pointing out the folly of school districts allowing fruit juices (of any type) as a supposedly healthy choice.

pauleo
Fri, May-11-07, 06:04
almost inevitable

thanks for digging it up!

Ok NOW it all makes perfect sense! I found another article about the same study and my eyes went right to the bottom of the article, where I found this:

The study was funded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Juice Products Association


:lol: You gotta love what passes for "news" and "science" these days :lol:

amberview
Tue, May-15-07, 20:15
I like that people are now paying attention to where the studies originated from in the news articles.

tom sawyer
Wed, May-16-07, 08:26
I agree that there is bias around every corner in science. I would point out that there is probably no UNBIASED research going on. Even the public health agencies have an agenda. You can see that when they get negative results and then proceed to make contradictory conclusions. So I wouldn't necessarily throw out the data because it was funded by a juice lobby. I would simply evaluate the research based on the scientific design, and the results. Just skipping to the conclusions section is a big mistake, the good stuff is in the Materials and Methods as well as the Results. Make your own conclusoins from there.

amberview
Wed, May-16-07, 08:44
I agree with making a complete review and then making a decision based on all the information. I'm still in the predicament that "I know nothing for sure," unfortunately.