PDA

View Full Version : Beef! What's in it?


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums

Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!



lpioch
Sun, Mar-04-07, 19:22
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Food and Drug Administration may be poised to approve a controversial antibiotic for cattle despite fears it could hurt human health, The Washington Post reported in Sunday's edition.

The drug, called cefquinome, is a fourth-generation cephalosporin, a class of antibiotics used for a range of human diseases including serious gastrointestinal diseases in children and meningitis.

The fear is that using such drugs in animals can lead to the emergence of new drug-resistant "superbugs" which will be immune to similar drugs when used in people.

The overuse of antibiotics in both humans and animals has already helped such bacteria evolve, and infectious disease experts have been warning doctors to use them more judiciously.

The FDA's own advisors, the Veterinary Medical Advisory Committee, voiced such concerns when they voted in September to reject approval of cefquinome by InterVet Inc. of Millsboro, Del., which makes it.

Yet the Post quoted experts as saying the FDA was moving toward approval anyway, overriding the advice of the panel, the American Medical Association and other health groups.

The Post said the FDA was being pressured to approve the drug because of an internal guidance document called "Guidance for Industry #152" on how to weigh threats to human health from by proposed new animal drugs.

It quoted experts saying the rule makes it difficult for the FDA to deny a new animal drug unless it is likely to threaten the effectiveness of an antibiotic critical in treating food-borne illness.

Edward Belongia, an epidemiologist at the Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation in Wisconsin, said that made it difficult for the FDA to say no to some drugs, according to the newspaper.


"The industry says that 'until you show us a direct link to human mortality from the use of these drugs in animals, we don't think you should preclude their use,"' it quoted Belongia as saying.

"But do we really want to drive more resistance genes into the human population? It's easy to open the barn door, but it's hard to close the door once it's open," he was quoted as saying.

InterVet developed cefquinome to treat bovine respiratory disease, the most common disease in cattle. But more than a dozen antibiotics are on the market for the respiratory syndrome, and all are still effective.

The disease becomes a problem for cattle raised on intensive farms, and when they are packed into trains for shipment.

In January, New York Democratic Rep. Louise Slaughter, a Democrat who chairs the U.S. House of Representatives Rules Committee, sent the FDA a letter asking it not to approve the drug. She is a microbiologist.

"Over the past several years, the integrity of the FDA's drug review process has been called into question amid allegations that your agency has put the interests of industry and politics above science," Slaughter wrote at the time.

"Given the recent outbreaks of E. coli and other food borne illnesses across the nation, it is hardly the time to ignore the advice of scientists, and potentially impair our ability to treat deadly infections," she wrote.



Article from Scientific American:
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa003&articleID=8DB966959676F75BD2BA06C4A2EA266A

tweetybrd
Sun, Mar-04-07, 19:47
I was reading your journal and had to laugh at your little rope at the end. It sounds just like me! I would have a baby, lose weight, have a baby lose weight, I did that four times. I lost the weight the first time on Protein power. On my fourth one I did the less calories, exercise a lot etc. I am almost to my goal weight of 135 but haven't been able to budge the scale for almost a yr. now. I have been sick for the last two yrs. with severe sinus migraines. I am pretty sure I have candidas and that is how I started back on the low carb route. I am trying south beach this time. Good luck with everything and thanks for the good article, isn't it scary what they are doing to our food. No wonder people are getting cancer etc.

lpioch
Sun, Mar-04-07, 20:22
I can't wait until I'm at the end of my rope. :-)

I am sold on this way of eating / way of life. Always have. But there's something about a pregnancy (or 3 or 4) that is guaranteed to derail you in one way or a thousand. Illnesses, too. It really is harder to get back up on the horse and try again. But I find that when you do, it is easier to ride the horse (no matter how slow he goes).

As for the foods, I often thought "why bother" with the organic, the nitrate/ite-free, the you-name-it-label. It's just a way for them to charge double. To some extent that may be a little true? But I think the older I get, and the more "junk" I hear about, the more willing I am to look into it a little further.

dina1957
Mon, Mar-05-07, 18:17
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Food and Drug Administration may be poised to approve a controversial antibiotic for cattle despite fears it could hurt human health, The Washington Post reported in Sunday's edition.

The drug, called cefquinome, is a fourth-generation cephalosporin, a class of antibiotics used for a range of human diseases including serious gastrointestinal diseases in children and meningitis.

The fear is that using such drugs in animals can lead to the emergence of new drug-resistant "superbugs" which will be immune to similar drugs when used in people.

The overuse of antibiotics in both humans and animals has already helped such bacteria evolve, and infectious disease experts have been warning doctors to use them more judiciously.

The FDA's own advisors, the Veterinary Medical Advisory Committee, voiced such concerns when they voted in September to reject approval of cefquinome by InterVet Inc. of Millsboro, Del., which makes it.

Yet the Post quoted experts as saying the FDA was moving toward approval anyway, overriding the advice of the panel, the American Medical Association and other health groups.

The Post said the FDA was being pressured to approve the drug because of an internal guidance document called "Guidance for Industry #152" on how to weigh threats to human health from by proposed new animal drugs.

It quoted experts saying the rule makes it difficult for the FDA to deny a new animal drug unless it is likely to threaten the effectiveness of an antibiotic critical in treating food-borne illness.

Edward Belongia, an epidemiologist at the Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation in Wisconsin, said that made it difficult for the FDA to say no to some drugs, according to the newspaper.


"The industry says that 'until you show us a direct link to human mortality from the use of these drugs in animals, we don't think you should preclude their use,"' it quoted Belongia as saying.

"But do we really want to drive more resistance genes into the human population? It's easy to open the barn door, but it's hard to close the door once it's open," he was quoted as saying.

InterVet developed cefquinome to treat bovine respiratory disease, the most common disease in cattle. But more than a dozen antibiotics are on the market for the respiratory syndrome, and all are still effective.

The disease becomes a problem for cattle raised on intensive farms, and when they are packed into trains for shipment.

In January, New York Democratic Rep. Louise Slaughter, a Democrat who chairs the U.S. House of Representatives Rules Committee, sent the FDA a letter asking it not to approve the drug. She is a microbiologist.

"Over the past several years, the integrity of the FDA's drug review process has been called into question amid allegations that your agency has put the interests of industry and politics above science," Slaughter wrote at the time.

"Given the recent outbreaks of E. coli and other food borne illnesses across the nation, it is hardly the time to ignore the advice of scientists, and potentially impair our ability to treat deadly infections," she wrote.



Article from Scientific American:
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa003&articleID=8DB966959676F7 (http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa003&articleID=8DB966959676F75BD2BA06C4A2EA266A)
5BD2BA06C4A2EA266A (http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa003&articleID=8DB966959676F75BD2BA06C4A2EA266A)
Consider the amount of commerially raised beef is consumed in US, I wonder if all the medication and hormones given to cattle does something to do with obesity and diabetes raise in addition to transfats, HFCS, and other crap in american food. Supermarket meat and dairy alone enough to ruin one's health. JMO