PDA

View Full Version : Watchdog blasts 'X-treme Eating'


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums

Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!



Demi
Tue, Feb-27-07, 02:22
BBC News
London, UK
27 February, 2007


Watchdog blasts 'X-treme Eating'

Chain restaurants in the United States are promoting dangerous "X-treme Eating", a US watchdog has said.

They are serving up "ever-more harmful new creations," says the Center for Science in the Public Interest.

It says that some individual dishes can exceed 2,000 calories, more than the recommended daily intake for women.

As more than one in five US adults are obese, it says restaurants should list nutritional information on their menus to make consumers more aware.

'Hybrid horribles'

Some 60 million adults in the US are obese, according to the American Obesity Association, which says that obesity is not a simple matter of overeating.

But the CPSI said many restaurants are doing little to alleviate the problem.

"Rather than compete to make their products healthier, restaurant chains are competing with each other to make their appetizers, main courses, and desserts bigger, badder, and cheesier than ever before," a CPSI statement said.

"Burgers, pizzas, and quesadillas were never health foods to begin with," CPSI executive director Michael Jacobson said.

"Now we see lasagne with meatballs on top; ice cream with cookies, brownies, and candy mixed in; bacon cheeseburger pizzas, buffalo-chicken-stuffed quesadillas, and other hybrid horribles that are seemingly designed to promote obesity, heart disease, and stroke."

Huge calorie counts

Some American restaurant chains have menus that contain 2,000-calorie appetizers, 2,000-calorie main courses and 1,700 calorie desserts.

The health watchdog points its finger at chains such as Ruby Tuesday, Uno Chicago Grill and the Cheesecake Factory.

The latter's Chris' Outrageous Chocolate Cake combines brownie, pie, and cheesecake into 1,380-calorie pudding.

The CPSI says this is "the equivalent of eating two [McDonald's] Quarter Pounders plus a large fries - for dessert".

"Since those chains make almost zero nutrition information available on menus, their customers don't have a clue that they might be getting a whole day's worth of calories in a single dish, or several days' worth in the whole meal," the centre says.

CSPI nutrition policy director Margo Wootan said that Americans eat out for an average of four meals a week.

She said studies show that women who eat out more than five times a week eat an average of 300 more calories per day than women who eat out less often.

"With dishes like these, it's easy blow your diet not just for the day but for the whole week," Mrs Wootan said.

None of the companies mentioned in the report were immediately available to comment on the CSPI's claims.



http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/6399267.stm

unitydkn
Tue, Feb-27-07, 02:31
you are very good at finding things like these...thank you

Calianna
Tue, Feb-27-07, 10:04
Oh this is just... On so many levels.... I hardly know where to begin.
Some American restaurant chains have menus that contain 2,000-calorie appetizers, 2,000-calorie main courses and 1,700 calorie desserts.

Chris' Outrageous Chocolate Cake combines brownie, pie, and cheesecake into 1,380-calorie pudding.

The CPSI says this is "the equivalent of eating two [McDonald's] Quarter Pounders plus a large fries - for dessert".

She said studies show that women who eat out more than five times a week eat an average of 300 more calories per day than women who eat out less often.

They're blaming the obesity problem on individul 2000 calorie restaurant appetizers or meals, or 1380-1700 calorie desserts, but saying that women who eat out 5 times a week are only eating an average of 300 calories more per day? That just doesn't add up, because that means that women who don't eat out that often are eating...

Well, let's see...

2000 calorie appetizer
2000 calorie entree
1380 calorie dessert
5380 calories for one full meal?

That means that the average woman who eats all her breakfasts and dinners at home and brown bags it for lunch takes in an average of 5080 calories per day?!

I'm apparently not eating my share....

Then they blame the whole problem on

"Rather than compete to make their products healthier, restaurant chains are competing with each other to make their appetizers, main courses, and desserts bigger, badder, and cheesier than ever before," a CPSI statement said.

"Burgers, pizzas, and quesadillas were never health foods to begin with," CPSI executive director Michael Jacobson said.

"Now we see lasagne with meatballs on top; ice cream with cookies, brownies, and candy mixed in; bacon cheeseburger pizzas, buffalo-chicken-stuffed quesadillas, and other hybrid horribles that are seemingly designed to promote obesity, heart disease, and stroke."

Ok, obviously the high sugar, starch and transfat content is a problem, but what's the problem with things being cheesier, and meat on top of the lasagne? "Burgers, pizzas and quesadillas were never health foods to begin with" - but only because of all the starches in them!

Bring on the cheese and meat, hold the tortillas, buns and crusts! :thup:

Angeline
Tue, Feb-27-07, 10:30
I think point I agree with, in this article, is that there is a rather unhealthy competition between restaurant chains as to who is going to come out with the biggest baddest portions. That has resulted in a unfortunate inflation of portion sizes. This has been going on for the past 25 years. If a restaurant doesn't follow suit, they appear stingy and loose customers.

So we have a society where quantity is valued over quality. Every time you eat out, portions are too big, and if you eat out a lot, then you tend to eat more.

So going out to eat on your birthday and gobbling a 5000 calories meal is not going to make you fat. But going out 5 times a week and being consistently being served bigger portions will.

And that's part of the explanation for the "obesity epidemic".

pbowers
Tue, Feb-27-07, 10:47
the CSPI needs to define what they mean by "healthy" and then support it with evidence instead of spouting exhausted ideas and ambiguous notions.

Calianna
Tue, Feb-27-07, 11:01
the CSPI needs to define what they mean by "healthy" and then support it with evidence instead of spouting exhausted ideas and ambiguous notions.

Unfortunately, we already know what their idea of "healthy" is: low fat, high carb foods, full of primarily worthless grains, teensy bites of extremely lean meats, and so much fruit that they might as well be eating candy, with a few veggies thrown in for something healthy. And we also know what tired, old, flawed evidence they'll be supprting that with too.

With the exception of the veggies, we eat pretty much the exact opposite way!