PDA

View Full Version : The Weight-Watcher General who wants us to eat her words


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums

Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!



Demi
Sat, Feb-24-07, 03:13
The Times
London, UK
24 February, 2007
Alice Miles and Helen Rumbelow


The Weight-Watcher General who wants us to eat her words

The policewoman of our supermarkets is keeping an eye on our shopping baskets to make us healthier

As we talked vices with the head of the Food Standards Agency, it was hard not to be distracted by two large plates on the desk in front of her. One was heaped with raw carrot, corn and celery, the other equally ostentatiously with grapes and pineapple cubes. Dame Deirdre Hutton did not ruin their alignment by eating from one of them.

“It’s the only job I’ve had where not putting on weight is a key performance indicator,” she said — and she was not entirely joking.

Dame Deirdre is the woman who polices our increasingly fraught relationship with food, from warning us against the dietary dangers lurking in a Turkey Twizzler to reassuring us that it was safe to eat turkey itself in the latest bird flu outbreak. As the mover behind this week’s announcement of a ban on advertising junk food to children, and creator of the red, amber and green “traffic lights” labelling on supermarket food, you could call her the nation’s Übernanny. Imagine someone with the clipped, elegant authority of Sue MacGregor, urging you to eat up your greens.

Did she ever treat herself to something naughty but nice? What, according to her traffic lights system, were the reds in her life? She paused to think.

“I eat muesli sometimes . . .” Muesli? Her sin was muesli?

“The red is not for added sugar,” she said quickly, “it’s for the sugar in fruit. But fruit’s good for you, so . . .”

She did not eat biscuits, cakes or crisps: “It’s partly the way you are brought up.”

Chocolate, we press on, cheese? “I love gooey brie,” she conceded. Ah.

“But brie is lower in fat than hard cheese. But again we would not ask for a label on brie. Yes, of course I eat brie – just not too much.”

Dame Deirdre, razor sharp and, we hardly need add, slim, obviously did not share Britain’s problems with food —only this week we were told that we had the fattest women in Europe. But we did have a first impression, and perhaps it was just her breeding, composure or enviable diet, of her speaking from a moral high ground.

This was not really true; she ticked us off later for being patronising about the eating habits of the poor. But it did reflect the problems that some have had with her work. Many food manufacturers, our biggest supermarket and the more libertarian consumers have taken issue with her interventions, saying that people were more savvy than she gave them credit for.

When we presented her with the nanny accusation, her deportment straightened, her smile tightened. We thought she may have heard this one before.

“Of course, somebody would say that if they wanted to be critical, and it’s a very convenient sort of tag, isn’t it? I cannot see, I really cannot see, how you could describe me as a nanny if what I’m trying to do is give Joe Bloggs the information so that he can make his own choices.

“That’s what we’re doing. It’s not about telling people what to eat. And if you think about how surprised people are to find out what’s in processed food, then apparently clearer information is helpful to them.”

Slapped wrist. Yet her next project is the largest national survey of our eating habits; Dame Deirdre behind all of us in the queue for the till, peering into our shopping baskets.

This was her idea in response to a schism over food labels. It is hard to imagine anyone defying Dame Deirdre but Tesco, our biggest supermarket, has, along with most of the major food manufacturers: Nestlé, Unilever, Kellogg’s, Cadbury Schweppes, Coca-Cola, Danone, Masterfoods, PepsiCo and Unilever.

They have refused to adopt the Food Standards Agency traffic lights system, despite independent research showing that it was the one that consumers preferred. Instead, they have introduced their own labels, leading to a confusing array of hieroglyphics on food packets.

When we asked Dame Deirdre what possible reason, other than protecting the profitability of unhealthy foods, Tesco and the rest could have for sticking to their own system, she demurred.

“I’m not going to be drawn into knocking Tesco, because actually I think the bigger achievement is that we have got the whole food-labelling industry to recognise that front-of-pack labelling is important.”

Her tactics are more subtle and ambitious: persuading Tesco and the other supermarkets to track our shopping behaviour for the next 18 months, to see which labelling system is best at changing people’s behaviour. “What we’ve done is engage 55 million UK consumers in the biggest piece of behavioural research that’s ever been done anywhere in the world,” she said.

“We will get the sales data that comes out of the supermarkets, so effectively you get everybody. I think it’s terribly exciting and nobody else in the world has done anything like this.”

The shops will hand over their data to an independent panel, run by the Government’s chief social scientist, and a winner will be declared. If it shows that a simple coloured label helps to decide what we put on our plate, effectively saving lives, the impact could be global.

“I had the Canadian Parliament on the phone the other day, the States are looking at it waiting for the results, so is the European Union.”

Those that argue that she should be tougher on Tesco and the big food companies, with public denunciations of the rival scheme, or alternatively should leave the supermarkets alone, may be interested to know that she has shares in Tesco and Unilever.

The Food Standards Agency is an independent government body, but if there were a minister in charge, he or she would probably get rid of any shares in food companies to avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest. Why not her? She may be right that it did not matter — but there was that edge in her voice again.

“Well, you can take that view if you want, but we have rules around transparency. What I have is there in the public domain. It’s on the website. So anybody can see it. So it’s not a problem.”

Dame Deirdre served her opinions crisply, unnervingly so. What about the furore over the rules on banning junk-food advertising during children’s television programmes? She coolly dismissed the “howls of pain from some parts of the industry”, which have complained that some healthy products will be barred. “I’m quite surprised at them, because actually I have never seen olive oil and Stilton advertised to children anyway — it’s daft, it’s just crazy.”

She seemed like one of those formidable women who built the Empire — and this made sense when we found out more about her background. After attending a pedigree girls’ boarding school, she spent time working in Palestinian refugee camps and then lived in South Africa, where she was arrested in an antiapartheid demonstration. As the riot raged around the cathedral in Cape Town, she managed to get in to sing in the concert that night: “Beethoven’s Ninth, which, as I’m sure you know, is a hymn to freedom. I don’t think I’ve sung it in the same way before or since.”

Finally, she returned to her heritage: she comes from a family of shopping-basket pokers; it was, as she put it, in her lifeblood. Her mother, a government dietician, created the National Loaf in the Second World War, substituting white bread with a fortified calcium wholemeal loaf. From an era of shortages to an era of obesity, the aim – better health – was the same. Her mother, now 92, looks on fascinated at her daughter’s work.

“When I got here I found there was a photograph of her in the library downstairs. It was a bit of a shock to find she got here 60 years before I did,” Dame Deirdre said.

Her mother “thinks it a pity that people don’t cook more”, but compared with her involvement with rationing and the National Loaf, Dame Deirdre’s efforts against obesity look positively laissez faire.

“When you’ve got, on the one hand, a quarter of teenagers classified as overweight or obese and the graph going upwards, and then you’ve got six-year-olds going on diets and people size 12 thinking they’re too fat — we have a very odd relationship with food in this country which seems to operate at both extremes. The implications of people getting fatter and fatter are actually quite important, and the Government is just waking up to it. But we can’t regulate for people to be thinner.”

Freedom, to her, is not leaving people alone but educating them. “If you’re going to make something work on a voluntary basis it means you’ve had to win hearts and minds, and hearts and minds usually in the end works better than regulation.”

Or as she put it as we cleared up at the end of the interview: “If you think about it, you have regulation where there’s market failure. One of the reasons for market failure is because consumers don’t have the right information.” Yep, that was the small talk as we tucked into the grapes.

Some consumers will keep doing things that are bad for them, no matter how much information you give them. Is more information helpful or bossy? Liberating or stifling? Let Dame Deirdre know what you think when you next go shopping. She’s going to find out anyway.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/health/article1431776.ece

LilithD
Mon, Feb-26-07, 15:40
Just the facts ma'am. Just the ingredients and the price per 100g for all items (for comparison). Then let people make up their own minds. But any value system that calls foods 'red' or 'bad' or whatever just because you think it is - that's going beyond the facts into your anti-fat fantasyland.

jedswife
Tue, Feb-27-07, 11:40
in Texas we have a word for what she's spewing and its called BS!

and what if after testing both labeling options - nobody changes their shopping habits. basically she is saying everyone is just too stupid to know what is healthy or not.

where is the discussion about how we've been given bad info by the medical profession for years- healthwise regarding food. for years the med. profession has been telling diabetics to eat a high carb low fat diet when in reality the diabetics should have been eating high fat low carb. my dad died from diabetes eating the wrong way which was prescribed by medical doctors and dieticians.

i have no doubt that if my father had tried low carb he would still be alive today instead of eating the crappy low fat high carb crap that sent him right into dialysis.