Common Salt Intake?

[Kumar]

Hello,

"The increased intake in salt [since] has apparently played an
important role in the increase in the consumption of soft
drinks and, hence, also in the increase in energy intake,"
wrote authors Dr. Heikki Karppanen of the University of
Helsinki and Dr. Eero Mervaala of the University of Kuopio.

"Higher consumption of sweetened beverages was associated with
both a greater magnitude of weight gain and an increase risk
for development of type-2 diabetes," they wrote." http://www.-
bakeryandsnacks.com/news/ng.asp?n=71941-salt-obesity-sodium "

"To our surprise, the sales figures of the American Salt
Institute divulged that salt intake increased more than 50 %
in USA during 15 years from mid-1980s to the late 1990s", says
Professor Karppanen. The study reports that the prevalence of
high blood pressure, which had long shown a decreasing trend,
turned to a marked increase concomitantly with the increase in
salt intake.

Perhaps the most interesting finding of the study is the
close link between salt intake and obesity. The study reports
that increasing intakes of sodium (salt) obligatorily produce
a progressive increase in thirst. The progressive increase in
the average intake of salt explains the observed concomitant
increase in the intake of beverages which, in turn, has
caused a marked net increase in the intake of calories during
the same period in the United States. http://www.sciencedail-
y.com/releases/2006/11/061101151027.htm "

Above links relate salt intake with many CV related problems.
But it is also related to getting obesity and diabetes. Sugar
and salt are co-transpoted from intestine to blood as active
transport mechanism. Personally being diabetic, I do get
control on overeating by decreasing or discontinuing added
salt intake for some time. Being hypertensive, my father take
restricted salt intake and do has best diet control(surprising
to us) since more than last 15 years.

Can you furthur evaluate it?

Best wishes

[Kumar]

kumar wrote:

Accidently I got it;

"There were no natrums in the Garden of Eden until Adam and
Eve evoked the wrath of the Creator. From then on they were
ashamed, and led difficult lives far from the gates of
Paradise, where they considered themselves sinners, and longed
to return to home. This little allegory is very appropriate
for describing the origins of the Natrum psyche, which now is
the psyche of the majority of Humanity."

Is it right?

[spamfree]

On 24 Jan 2007 01:54:52 -0800, "Kumar"
<lordshiva5753@rediffmail.com> wrote:

>
>kumar wrote:
>
>Accidently I got it;
>
>"There were no natrums in the Garden of Eden until Adam and
>Eve evoked the wrath of the Creator. From then on they were
>ashamed, and led difficult lives far from the gates of
>Paradise, where they considered themselves sinners, and
>longed to return to home. This little allegory is very
>appropriate for describing the origins of the Natrum psyche,
>which now is the psyche of the majority of Humanity."
>
>Is it right?

Homeopathic bullshit, sorry

jack

[Andrew B.]

convicted neighbor "kumar" wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> "The increased intake in salt [since] has apparently played
> an important role in the increase in the consumption of soft
> drinks and, hence, also in the increase in energy intake,"
> wrote authors Dr. Heikki Karppanen of the University of
> Helsinki and Dr. Eero Mervaala of the University of Kuopio.
>
> "Higher consumption of sweetened beverages was associated
> with both a greater magnitude of weight gain and an increase
> risk for development of type-2 diabetes," they wrote."http:-
> //www.bakeryandsnacks.com/news/ng.asp?n=71941-salt-obesity--
> sodium "
>
> "To our surprise, the sales figures of the American Salt
> Institute divulged that salt intake increased more than 50 %
> in USA during 15 years from mid-1980s to the late 1990s",
> says Professor Karppanen. The study reports that the
> prevalence of high blood pressure, which had long shown a
> decreasing trend, turned to a marked increase concomitantly
> with the increase in salt intake.
>
> Perhaps the most interesting finding of the study is the
> close link between salt intake and obesity. The study
> reports that increasing intakes of sodium (salt)
> obligatorily produce a progressive increase in thirst. The
> progressive increase in the average intake of salt explains
> the observed concomitant increase in the intake of
> beverages which, in turn, has caused a marked net increase
> in the intake of calories during the same period in the
> United States.http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/11-
> /061101151027.htm"
>
> Above links relate salt intake with many CV related
> problems. But it is also related to getting obesity and
> diabetes. Sugar and salt are co-transpoted from intestine to
> blood as active transport mechanism. Personally being
> diabetic, I do get control on overeating by decreasing or
> discontinuing added salt intake for some time. Being
> hypertensive, my father take restricted salt intake and do
> has best diet control(surprising to us) since more than last
> 15 years.
>
> Can you furthur evaluate it?

Salt enhances the flavor of food so that foods taste better.

Better tasting food does make folks hungry.

Again, the weight gain is arising because of overeating that
is occurring because of the false belief that "hunger is bad."

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD http://EmoryCardiology.com

[Tc]

Hey Chung-turd, how's the job?

TC

On Jan 26, 1:46 pm, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<ach...@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
> convicted neighbor "kumar" wrote:
>
> > Hello,
>
> > "The increased intake in salt [since] has apparently
> > played an important role in the increase in the
> > consumption of soft drinks and, hence, also in the
> > increase in energy intake," wrote authors Dr. Heikki
> > Karppanen of the University of Helsinki and Dr. Eero
> > Mervaala of the University of Kuopio.
>
> > "Higher consumption of sweetened beverages was associated
> > with both a greater magnitude of weight gain and an
> > increase risk for development of type-2 diabetes," they
> > wrote."http://www.bakeryandsnacks.com/news/ng.asp?n=71941-
> > -salt-obesity-sodium "
>
> > "To our surprise, the sales figures of the American Salt
> > Institute divulged that salt intake increased more than 50
> > % in USA during 15 years from mid-1980s to the late
> > 1990s", says Professor Karppanen. The study reports that
> > the prevalence of high blood pressure, which had long
> > shown a decreasing trend, turned to a marked increase
> > concomitantly with the increase in salt intake.
>
> > Perhaps the most interesting finding of the study is the
> > close link between salt intake and obesity. The study
> > reports that increasing intakes of sodium (salt)
> > obligatorily produce a progressive increase in thirst. The
> > progressive increase in the average intake of salt
> > explains the observed concomitant increase in the intake
> > of beverages which, in turn, has caused a marked net
> > increase in the intake of calories during the same period
> > in the United States.http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases-
> > /2006/11/061101151027.htm"
>
> > Above links relate salt intake with many CV related
> > problems. But it is also related to getting obesity and
> > diabetes. Sugar and salt are co-transpoted from intestine
> > to blood as active transport mechanism. Personally being
> > diabetic, I do get control on overeating by decreasing or
> > discontinuing added salt intake for some time. Being
> > hypertensive, my father take restricted salt intake and do
> > has best diet control(surprising to us) since more than
> > last 15 years.
>
> > Can you furthur evaluate it?Salt enhances the flavor of
> > food so that foods taste better.
>
> Better tasting food does make folks hungry.
>
> Again, the weight gain is arising because of overeating
> that is occurring because of the false belief that "hunger
> is bad."
>
> Andrew <><
> --
> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhDhttp://EmoryCardiology.com- Hide
> quoted text -- Show quoted text -

[Kumar]

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
> convicted neighbor "kumar" wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > "The increased intake in salt [since] has apparently
> > played an important role in the increase in the
> > consumption of soft drinks and, hence, also in the
> > increase in energy intake," wrote authors Dr. Heikki
> > Karppanen of the University of Helsinki and Dr. Eero
> > Mervaala of the University of Kuopio.
> >
> > "Higher consumption of sweetened beverages was associated
> > with both a greater magnitude of weight gain and an
> > increase risk for development of type-2 diabetes," they
> > wrote."http://www.bakeryandsnacks.com/news/ng.asp?n=71941-
> > -salt-obesity-sodium "
> >
> > "To our surprise, the sales figures of the American Salt
> > Institute divulged that salt intake increased more than 50
> > % in USA during 15 years from mid-1980s to the late
> > 1990s", says Professor Karppanen. The study reports that
> > the prevalence of high blood pressure, which had long
> > shown a decreasing trend, turned to a marked increase
> > concomitantly with the increase in salt intake.
> >
> > Perhaps the most interesting finding of the study is the
> > close link between salt intake and obesity. The study
> > reports that increasing intakes of sodium (salt)
> > obligatorily produce a progressive increase in thirst. The
> > progressive increase in the average intake of salt
> > explains the observed concomitant increase in the intake
> > of beverages which, in turn, has caused a marked net
> > increase in the intake of calories during the same period
> > in the United States.http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases-
> > /2006/11/061101151027.htm"
> >
> > Above links relate salt intake with many CV related
> > problems. But it is also related to getting obesity and
> > diabetes. Sugar and salt are co-transpoted from intestine
> > to blood as active transport mechanism. Personally being
> > diabetic, I do get control on overeating by decreasing or
> > discontinuing added salt intake for some time. Being
> > hypertensive, my father take restricted salt intake and do
> > has best diet control(surprising to us) since more than
> > last 15 years.
> >
> > Can you furthur evaluate it?
>
> Salt enhances the flavor of food so that foods taste better.
>
> Better tasting food does make folks hungry.
>
> Again, the weight gain is arising because of overeating
> that is occurring because of the false belief that "hunger
> is bad."
>
> Andrew <><
> --
> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD http://EmoryCardiology.com

As you said, taste can be dependant on body status of
any nutrient.

As such, can defficiency of any nutrient cause increased taste
and hunger for that nutrient and opposite on nutrients
sufficiency or excesses?

Can defficiency of any nutrient cause increased taste and
hunger for food (in general) and opposite on any nutrients
sufficiency or excesses?

Can defficiency or excessiveness of any nutrient cause
excessess or defficiency of other nutrients respectively due
to more or less food intake?

Probably, K supplements may help to diabetics. Mg defficiency
is related to K defficiency. What this Mg can do for K influx?

[Art Deco]

False prophet Andrew B. Chung spammed:

>Salt enhances the flavor of food so that foods taste better.
>
>Better tasting food does make folks hungry.
>
>Again, the weight gain is arising because of overeating
>that is occurring because of the false belief that
>"hunger is bad."

More idiocy.

--
"To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert

[Ah]

Art Deco wrote:
> False prophet Andrew B. Chung spammed:
>
>>Salt enhances the flavor of food so that foods taste better.
>>
>>Better tasting food does make folks hungry.
>>
>>Again, the weight gain is arising because of overeating
>>that is occurring because of the false belief that "hunger
>>is bad."
>
> More idiocy.

Obviously, Dr. Chung has absolutely no idea what "Fluid and
Electrolyte Balance" is all about.

Good thing he's not speciali(s)ing in, for example,
cardiovascular medicine.

[Double-A]

On Jan 27, 8:31 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Art Deco wrote:
> > ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>Art Deco wrote:
> >>> False prophet Andrew B. Chung spammed:
>
> >>>>Salt enhances the flavor of food so that foods taste
> >>>>better.
>
> >>>>Better tasting food does make folks hungry.
>
> >>>>Again, the weight gain is arising because of overeating
> >>>>that is occurring because of the false belief that
> >>>>"hunger is bad."
>
> >>> More idiocy.
>
> >>Obviously, Dr. Chung has absolutely no idea what "Fluid
> >>and Electrolyte Balance" is all about.
>
> >>Good thing he's not speciali(s)ing in, for example,
> >>cardiovascular medicine.
>
> > Yeah, think what might happen to his patients.*shudders

What is it you like about Art Deco, ah?

It is the profound Earth Science Officers of alt.astronomy who
are the salt of the Earth!

Double-A

[Andrew B.]

convicted neighbor kumar wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > convicted neighbor "kumar" wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > "The increased intake in salt [since] has apparently
> > > played an important role in the increase in the
> > > consumption of soft drinks and, hence, also in the
> > > increase in energy intake," wrote authors Dr. Heikki
> > > Karppanen of the University of Helsinki and Dr. Eero
> > > Mervaala of the University of Kuopio.
> > >
> > > "Higher consumption of sweetened beverages was
> > > associated with both a greater magnitude of weight gain
> > > and an increase risk for development of type-2
> > > diabetes," they wrote."http://www.bakeryandsnacks.com/n-
> > > ews/ng.asp?n=71941-salt-obesity-sodium "
> > >
> > > "To our surprise, the sales figures of the American Salt
> > > Institute divulged that salt intake increased more than
> > > 50 % in USA during 15 years from mid-1980s to the late
> > > 1990s", says Professor Karppanen. The study reports that
> > > the prevalence of high blood pressure, which had long
> > > shown a decreasing trend, turned to a marked increase
> > > concomitantly with the increase in salt intake.
> > >
> > > Perhaps the most interesting finding of the study is the
> > > close link between salt intake and obesity. The study
> > > reports that increasing intakes of sodium (salt)
> > > obligatorily produce a progressive increase in thirst.
> > > The progressive increase in the average intake of salt
> > > explains the observed concomitant increase in the intake
> > > of beverages which, in turn, has caused a marked net
> > > increase in the intake of calories during the same
> > > period in the United States.http://www.sciencedaily.com-
> > > /releases/2006/11/061101151027.htm"
> > >
> > > Above links relate salt intake with many CV related
> > > problems. But it is also related to getting obesity and
> > > diabetes. Sugar and salt are co-transpoted from
> > > intestine to blood as active transport mechanism.
> > > Personally being diabetic, I do get control on
> > > overeating by decreasing or discontinuing added salt
> > > intake for some time. Being hypertensive, my father take
> > > restricted salt intake and do has best diet
> > > control(surprising to us) since more than last 15 years.
> > >
> > > Can you furthur evaluate it?
> >
> > Salt enhances the flavor of food so that foods taste
> > better.
> >
> > Better tasting food does make folks hungry.
> >
> > Again, the weight gain is arising because of overeating
> > that is occurring because of the false belief that "hunger
> > is bad."
>
> As you said, taste can be dependant on body status of any
> nutrient.
>
> As such, can defficiency of any nutrient cause increased
> taste and hunger for that nutrient and opposite on nutrients
> sufficiency or excesses?

Deficiency of essential nutritients leads to poor health
and anorexia.

> Can defficiency of any nutrient cause increased taste and
> hunger for food (in general) and opposite on any nutrients
> sufficiency or excesses?

You have it backwards.

> Can defficiency or excessiveness of any nutrient cause
> excessess or defficiency of other nutrients respectively due
> to more or less food intake?

When there is overeating there is overnutrition.

> Probably, K supplements may help to diabetics. Mg
> defficiency is related to K defficiency. What this Mg can do
> for K influx?

Where there is overeating there is no deficiencies.

Having VAT means you are overnourished and not undernourished.

Truth is simple.

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD http://EmoryCardiology.com

[Ah]

Art Deco wrote:
> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Art Deco wrote:
>>> False prophet Andrew B. Chung spammed:
>>>
>>>>Salt enhances the flavor of food so that foods taste
>>>>better.
>>>>
>>>>Better tasting food does make folks hungry.
>>>>
>>>>Again, the weight gain is arising because of overeating
>>>>that is occurring because of the false belief that "hunger
>>>>is bad."
>>>
>>> More idiocy.
>>
>>Obviously, Dr. Chung has absolutely no idea what "Fluid and
>>Electrolyte Balance" is all about.
>>
>>Good thing he's not speciali(s)ing in, for example,
>>cardiovascular medicine.
>
> Yeah, think what might happen to his patients.

*shudders*

[Art Deco]

Double-A <double-aa@hush.ai> wrote:

>On Jan 27, 8:31 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Art Deco wrote:
>> > ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >>Art Deco wrote:
>> >>> False prophet Andrew B. Chung spammed:
>>
>> >>>>Salt enhances the flavor of food so that foods taste
>> >>>>better.
>>
>> >>>>Better tasting food does make folks hungry.
>>
>> >>>>Again, the weight gain is arising because of overeating
>> >>>>that is occurring because of the false belief that
>> >>>>"hunger is bad."
>>
>> >>> More idiocy.
>>
>> >>Obviously, Dr. Chung has absolutely no idea what "Fluid
>> >>and Electrolyte Balance" is all about.
>>
>> >>Good thing he's not speciali(s)ing in, for example,
>> >>cardiovascular medicine.
>>
>> > Yeah, think what might happen to his patients.*shudders
>
>
>What is it you like about Art Deco, ah?
>
>It is the profound Earth Science Officers of alt.astronomy
>who are the salt of the Earth!
>
>Double-A

Good boy, have a biscuit.

--
"To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert

[Art Deco]

Double-A <double-aa@hush.ai> wrote:

>On Jan 28, 4:22 am, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Double-A wrote:
>>
>> > On Jan 27, 8:31 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Art Deco wrote:
>> >> > ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >>Art Deco wrote:
>> >> >>> False prophet Andrew B. Chung spammed:
>>
>> >> >>>>Salt enhances the flavor of food so that foods taste
>> >> >>>>better.
>>
>> >> >>>>Better tasting food does make folks hungry.
>>
>> >> >>>>Again, the weight gain is arising because of
>> >> >>>>overeating that is occurring because of the false
>> >> >>>>belief that "hunger is bad."
>>
>> >> >>> More idiocy.
>>
>> >> >>Obviously, Dr. Chung has absolutely no idea what
>> >> >>"Fluid and Electrolyte Balance" is all about.
>>
>> >> >>Good thing he's not speciali(s)ing in, for example,
>> >> >>cardiovascular medicine.
>>
>> >> > Yeah, think what might happen to his
>> >> > patients.*shudders
>>
>> > What is it you like about Art Deco, ah?
>>
>> > It is the profound Earth Science Officers of
>> > alt.astronomy who are the salt of the Earth!
>
>> I can't tolerate salt.
>
>
>I can't tolerate pepper!
>
>Double-A

Yet you tolerate outhouse john and war-fizzy. Why is that?

--
"To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert

[Nemo]

"Art Deco" <erfc-1024@usa.net> wrote in message
news:270120070924147857%erfc-1024@usa.net...
> False prophet Andrew B. Chung spammed:
>
> >Salt enhances the flavor of food so that foods taste
> >better.
> >
> >Better tasting food does make folks hungry.
> >
> >Again, the weight gain is arising because of overeating
> >that is occurring because of the false belief that "hunger
> >is bad."
>
> More idiocy.
>
> --
Putting Sodium Hexacyanoferrate 2 (Sodium Ferrocyanide!) in
table salt just to make it flow better is the *real* idiocy.

[Double-A]

On Feb 8, 5:41 am, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Double-A wrote:
>
> > On Jan 28, 8:07 am, Art Deco <erfc-1...@usa.net> wrote:
> >> Double-A <double...@hush.ai> wrote:
> >> >On Jan 28, 4:22 am, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>
> >> >> > On Jan 27, 8:31 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com>
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >> Art Deco wrote:
> >> >> >> > ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >>Art Deco wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> False prophet Andrew B. Chung spammed:
>
> >> >> >> >>>>Salt enhances the flavor of food so that foods
> >> >> >> >>>>taste better.
>
> >> >> >> >>>>Better tasting food does make folks hungry.
>
> >> >> >> >>>>Again, the weight gain is arising because of
> >> >> >> >>>>overeating that is occurring because of the
> >> >> >> >>>>false belief that "hunger is bad."
>
> >> >> >> >>> More idiocy.
>
> >> >> >> >>Obviously, Dr. Chung has absolutely no idea what
> >> >> >> >>"Fluid and Electrolyte Balance" is all about.
>
> >> >> >> >>Good thing he's not speciali(s)ing in, for
> >> >> >> >>example, cardiovascular medicine.
>
> >> >> >> > Yeah, think what might happen to his
> >> >> >> > patients.*shudders
>
> >> >> > What is it you like about Art Deco, ah?
>
> >> >> > It is the profound Earth Science Officers of
> >> >> > alt.astronomy who are the salt of the Earth!
>
> >> >> I can't tolerate salt.
>
> >> >I can't tolerate pepper!
>
> Sew?

it up!

Double-A

[Andrew B.]

neighbor Jack (spamfree@spam.heaven) wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
> >Deficiency of essential nutritients leads to poor health
> >and anorexia.
>
> Doesn't it depend on which ones?

No.

> And how defficient?

No.

> >> Can defficiency of any nutrient cause increased taste and
> >> hunger for food (in general) and opposite on any
> >> nutrients sufficiency or excesses?
> >
> >You have it backwards.
>
> Is he referring to pica, perhaps?

Pica is a craving for something other than food.

> >> Can defficiency or excessiveness of any nutrient cause
> >> excessess or defficiency of other nutrients respectively
> >> due to more or less food intake?
> >
> >When there is overeating there is overnutrition.
>
> Only in the nutrients being overeaten, surely

Food by definition contain nutrients.

It logically follows from this definition that a person who is
eating excessive amounts of food will be overnourished rather
than undernourished.

> >> Probably, K supplements may help to diabetics. Mg
> >> defficiency is related to K defficiency. What this Mg can
> >> do for K influx?
> >
> >Where there is overeating there are no deficiencies.
>
> V3ery misleading, Andrew. Many American (and Australians)
> overeat and are deficient in many vital nutrients.

Not the ones who have a healthy appetite (ie hungry).

"Hunger is good." -- Holy Spirit

Amen.

"Blessed are you who hunger now for you will be satisfied." --
LORD Jesus Christ (Luke 6:21)

Amen ! Laus Deo ! ! ! Marana tha ! ! ! ! ! ! !

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD http://EmoryCardiology.com

[Malscribe]

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD barfed up this disgusting mess:

>> >Deficiency of essential nutritients leads to poor
>> >health and
anorexia.
>>
>> Doesn't it depend on which ones?
>
> No.
>
>> And how defficient?
>
> No.

You're suggesting that a severe deficiency in (say) potassium
won't lead to poor health as long the person has no other
nutritional deficiencies? I very seriously doubt that. In
fact, in the case of potassium, I believe a severe enough
deficiency can be fatal.

>> Only in the nutrients being overeaten, surely
>
> Food by definition contain nutrients.
>
> It logically follows from this definition that a person who
> is eating excessive amounts of food will be overnourished
> rather than undernourished.

How come you don't distinguish between nutrition and
malnutrition? Are you fucking stupid? (The second question is
rhetorical.)

[Ah]

Double-A wrote:
> On Feb 8, 4:14 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Double-A wrote:
>> > On Feb 8, 5:41 am, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Double-A wrote:
>>
>> >> > On Jan 28, 8:07 am, Art Deco <erfc-1...@usa.net>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> Double-A <double...@hush.ai> wrote:
>> >> >> >On Jan 28, 4:22 am, ah <splifing...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >wrote:
>> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> > On Jan 27, 8:31 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> Art Deco wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> > ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>Art Deco wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >>> False prophet Andrew B. Chung spammed:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>Salt enhances the flavor of food so that
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>foods taste better.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>Better tasting food does make folks hungry.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>Again, the weight gain is arising because
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>of overeating that is occurring because of
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>the false belief that "hunger is bad."
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>> More idiocy.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>Obviously, Dr. Chung has absolutely no idea
>> >> >> >> >> >>what "Fluid and Electrolyte Balance" is all
>> >> >> >> >> >>about.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>Good thing he's not speciali(s)ing in, for
>> >> >> >> >> >>example, cardiovascular medicine.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > Yeah, think what might happen to his
>> >> >> >> >> > patients.*shudders
>>
>> >> >> >> > What is it you like about Art Deco, ah?
>>
>> >> >> >> > It is the profound Earth Science Officers of
>> >> >> >> > alt.astronomy who are the salt of the Earth!
>>
>> >> >> >> I can't tolerate salt.
>>
>> >> >> >I can't tolerate pepper!
>>
>> >> Sew?
>>
>> > it up!
>>
>> "I'm sorry, but I can't do that, Dave."
>
> Atchoo!

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0702/mcnaught3_kemp-
painen.jpg

[Ah]

Double-A wrote:
> On Feb 9, 3:51 am, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Double-A wrote:
>> > On Feb 8, 4:14 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Double-A wrote:
>> >> > On Feb 8, 5:41 am, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>>
>> >> >> > On Jan 28, 8:07 am, Art Deco <erfc-1...@usa.net>
>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> Double-A <double...@hush.ai> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >On Jan 28, 4:22 am, ah <splifing...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> >wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > On Jan 27, 8:31 pm, ah
>> >> >> >> >> > <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> Art Deco wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> > ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>Art Deco wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> False prophet Andrew B. Chung spammed:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>Salt enhances the flavor of food so that
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>foods taste better.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>Better tasting food does make folks
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>hungry.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>Again, the weight gain is arising
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>because of overeating that is occurring
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>because of the false belief that "hunger
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>is bad."
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> More idiocy.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>Obviously, Dr. Chung has absolutely no
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>idea what "Fluid and Electrolyte Balance"
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>is all about.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>Good thing he's not speciali(s)ing in, for
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>example, cardiovascular medicine.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Yeah, think what might happen to his
>> >> >> >> >> >> > patients.*shudders
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > What is it you like about Art Deco, ah?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > It is the profound Earth Science Officers of
>> >> >> >> >> > alt.astronomy who are the salt of the Earth!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> I can't tolerate salt.
>>
>> >> >> >> >I can't tolerate pepper!
>>
>> >> >> Sew?
>>
>> >> > it up!
>>
>> >> "I'm sorry, but I can't do that, Dave."
>>
>> > Atchoo!
>>
>> http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0702/mcnaught3_kemp-
>> painen.jpg
>
>
> Space Shuttle?

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070205.html

[Ah]

Double-A wrote:
> On Feb 9, 8:18 am, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Double-A wrote:
>> > On Feb 9, 3:51 am, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Double-A wrote:
>> >> > On Feb 8, 4:14 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>> >> >> > On Feb 8, 5:41 am, ah <splifing...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> > On Jan 28, 8:07 am, Art Deco <erfc-1...@usa.net>
>> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> Double-A <double...@hush.ai> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >On Jan 28, 4:22 am, ah <splifing...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> >> >wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > On Jan 27, 8:31 pm, ah
>> >> >> >> >> >> > <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Art Deco wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>Art Deco wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> False prophet Andrew B. Chung
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> spammed:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>Salt enhances the flavor of food so
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>that foods taste better.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>Better tasting food does make folks
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>hungry.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>Again, the weight gain is arising
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>because of overeating that is
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>occurring because of the false belief
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>that "hunger is bad."
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> More idiocy.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>Obviously, Dr. Chung has absolutely no
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>idea what "Fluid and Electrolyte
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>Balance" is all about.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>Good thing he's not speciali(s)ing in,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>for example, cardiovascular medicine.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Yeah, think what might happen to his
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > patients.*shudders
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > What is it you like about Art Deco, ah?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > It is the profound Earth Science Officers
>> >> >> >> >> >> > of alt.astronomy who are the salt of the
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Earth!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> I can't tolerate salt.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >I can't tolerate pepper!
>>
>> >> >> >> Sew?
>>
>> >> >> > it up!
>>
>> >> >> "I'm sorry, but I can't do that, Dave."
>>
>> >> > Atchoo!
>>
>> >>http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0702/mcnaught3_ke-
>> >>mppainen.jpg
>>
>> > Space Shuttle?
>>
>> http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070205.html
>
>
> Nice aerial display!
>
> Did you see the "next day" picture, "The Sun Explodes"?
>
> Doomed again!

It's, uh, been doing that for, oh, at least a billion years.
Probably do it for--at least--another billion.

How old are you NB? 24? 31?

The chances of things falling-apart in the next fifty years
is, well, as close to nil as anything can get.

Unless you get Chung as your heart specialist, that is . . . .

[Ah]

Double-A wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>
>> >> >> >>http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0702/mcnaug-
>> >> >> >>ht3_kemppainen.jpg
>>
>> >> >> > Space Shuttle?
>>
>> >> >>http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070205.html
>>
>> >> > Nice aerial display!
>>
>> >> > Did you see the "next day" picture, "The Sun
>> >> > Explodes"?
>>
>> >> > Doomed again!
>>
>> >> It's, uh, been doing that for, oh, at least a billion
>> >> years.
>>
>> > Really?

Duh.

>>
>> >> Probably do it for--at least--another billion.
>>
>> > Wow!
>>
>> >> How old are you NB? 24? 31?
>>
>> > 11, you old fart!
>>
>> Well, then . . . change the following to read "in the next
>> eighty years".
>>
>> >> The chances of things falling-apart in the next fifty
>> >> years is, well, as close to nil as anything can get.
>>
>> > Then why are the polar caps melting?
>>
>> Why do icesicles melt?
>
> Because the Sun is out of control!

From whence is this supposed control alleged to originate?

>
>>
>> >> Unless you get Chung as your heart specialist, that is
>> >> . . .
>>
>> > Don't worry about that. I don't believe in doctors!
>>
>> "There's no place like home! There's no place like home!"
>
> That's right. But even if you don't go out looking for
> trouble, it will come looking for you. There's no escape!

It's inevitable: we will all eventually traverse the purple
holes at the centers of our galaxies.

[Double-A]

On Feb 11, 9:34 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Double-A wrote:
> > On Feb 11, 5:04 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Double-A wrote:
> >> > On Feb 11, 7:46 am, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> [...]
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >>http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/070-
> >> >> >> >> >> >>2/mcnaught3_kemppainen.jpg
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > Space Shuttle?
>
> >> >> >> >> >>http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070205.html
>
> >> >> >> >> > Nice aerial display!
>
> >> >> >> >> > Did you see the "next day" picture, "The Sun
> >> >> >> >> > Explodes"?
>
> >> >> >> >> > Doomed again!
>
> >> >> >> >> It's, uh, been doing that for, oh, at least a
> >> >> >> >> billion years.
>
> >> >> >> > Really?
>
> >> >> Duh.
>
> >> >> >> >> Probably do it for--at least--another billion.
>
> >> >> >> > Wow!
>
> >> >> >> >> How old are you NB? 24? 31?
>
> >> >> >> > 11, you old fart!
>
> >> >> >> Well, then . . . change the following to read "in
> >> >> >> the next eighty years".
>
> >> >> >> >> The chances of things falling-apart in the next
> >> >> >> >> fifty years is, well, as close to nil as
> >> >> >> >> anything can get.
>
> >> >> >> > Then why are the polar caps melting?
>
> >> >> >> Why do icesicles melt?
>
> >> >> > Because the Sun is out of control!
>
> >> >> From whence is this supposed control alleged to
> >> >> originate?
>
> >> >>From the big contol freak in the sky!
>
> >> CIA?
>
> >> >> >> >> Unless you get Chung as your heart specialist,
> >> >> >> >> that is . . .
>
> >> >> >> > Don't worry about that. I don't believe in
> >> >> >> > doctors!
>
> >> >> >> "There's no place like home! There's no place like
> >> >> >> home!"
>
> >> >> > That's right. But even if you don't go out looking
> >> >> > for trouble, it will come looking for you. There's
> >> >> > no escape!
>
> >> >> It's inevitable: we will all eventually traverse the
> >> >> purple holes at the centers of our galaxies.
>
> >> > I think you'll be getting lowered into a hole much
> >> > closer to home long before that!
>
> >> Duh.
>
> > Is that all you can say for yourself?
>
> Is that not enough?

I suppose, if that's all you want on your tombstone!

[Ah]

Double-A wrote:
> On Feb 11, 5:04 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Double-A wrote:
>> > On Feb 11, 7:46 am, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Double-A wrote:
>>
>> >> >>>>>>>>> [...]
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0702/-
>> >> >> >> >> >>mcnaught3_kemppainen.jpg
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > Space Shuttle?
>>
>> >> >> >> >>http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070205.html
>>
>> >> >> >> > Nice aerial display!
>>
>> >> >> >> > Did you see the "next day" picture, "The Sun
>> >> >> >> > Explodes"?
>>
>> >> >> >> > Doomed again!
>>
>> >> >> >> It's, uh, been doing that for, oh, at least a
>> >> >> >> billion years.
>>
>> >> >> > Really?
>>
>> >> Duh.
>>
>> >> >> >> Probably do it for--at least--another billion.
>>
>> >> >> > Wow!
>>
>> >> >> >> How old are you NB? 24? 31?
>>
>> >> >> > 11, you old fart!
>>
>> >> >> Well, then . . . change the following to read "in the
>> >> >> next eighty years".
>>
>> >> >> >> The chances of things falling-apart in the next
>> >> >> >> fifty years is, well, as close to nil as anything
>> >> >> >> can get.
>>
>> >> >> > Then why are the polar caps melting?
>>
>> >> >> Why do icesicles melt?
>>
>> >> > Because the Sun is out of control!
>>
>> >> From whence is this supposed control alleged to
>> >> originate?
>>
>> >>From the big contol freak in the sky!
>>
>> CIA?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >> >> >> Unless you get Chung as your heart specialist,
>> >> >> >> that is . . .
>>
>> >> >> > Don't worry about that. I don't believe in doctors!
>>
>> >> >> "There's no place like home! There's no place like
>> >> >> home!"
>>
>> >> > That's right. But even if you don't go out looking for
>> >> > trouble, it will come looking for you. There's no
>> >> > escape!
>>
>> >> It's inevitable: we will all eventually traverse the
>> >> purple holes at the centers of our galaxies.
>>
>> > I think you'll be getting lowered into a hole much closer
>> > to home long before that!
>>
>> Duh.
>
>
> Is that all you can say for yourself?

Is that not enough?

[Ah]

Double-A wrote:
> On Feb 11, 9:34 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Double-A wrote:
>> > On Feb 11, 5:04 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Double-A wrote:
>> >> > On Feb 11, 7:46 am, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> [...]
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/07-
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>02/mcnaught3_kemppainen.jpg
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Space Shuttle?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070205.ht-
>> >> >> >> >> >>ml
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > Nice aerial display!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > Did you see the "next day" picture, "The Sun
>> >> >> >> >> > Explodes"?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > Doomed again!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> It's, uh, been doing that for, oh, at least a
>> >> >> >> >> billion years.
>>
>> >> >> >> > Really?
>>
>> >> >> Duh.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Probably do it for--at least--another billion.
>>
>> >> >> >> > Wow!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> How old are you NB? 24? 31?
>>
>> >> >> >> > 11, you old fart!
>>
>> >> >> >> Well, then . . . change the following to read "in
>> >> >> >> the next eighty years".
>>
>> >> >> >> >> The chances of things falling-apart in the next
>> >> >> >> >> fifty years is, well, as close to nil as
>> >> >> >> >> anything can get.
>>
>> >> >> >> > Then why are the polar caps melting?
>>
>> >> >> >> Why do icesicles melt?
>>
>> >> >> > Because the Sun is out of control!
>>
>> >> >> From whence is this supposed control alleged to
>> >> >> originate?
>>
>> >> >>From the big contol freak in the sky!
>>
>> >> CIA?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Unless you get Chung as your heart specialist,
>> >> >> >> >> that is . . .
>>
>> >> >> >> > Don't worry about that. I don't believe in
>> >> >> >> > doctors!
>>
>> >> >> >> "There's no place like home! There's no place like
>> >> >> >> home!"
>>
>> >> >> > That's right. But even if you don't go out looking
>> >> >> > for trouble, it will come looking for you. There's
>> >> >> > no escape!
>>
>> >> >> It's inevitable: we will all eventually traverse the
>> >> >> purple holes at the centers of our galaxies.
>>
>> >> > I think you'll be getting lowered into a hole much
>> >> > closer to home long before that!
>>
>> >> Duh.
>>
>> > Is that all you can say for yourself?
>>
>> Is that not enough?
>
>
> I suppose, if that's all you want on your tombstone!

Why should I care?

[Ah]

Double-A wrote:
> On Feb 13, 12:12 am, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Double-A wrote:
>> > On Feb 11, 9:34 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Double-A wrote:
>> >> > On Feb 11, 5:04 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>> >> >> > On Feb 11, 7:46 am, ah <splifing...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> [...]
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image-
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>/0702/mcnaught3_kemppainen.jpg
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Space Shuttle?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070205-
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>.html
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Nice aerial display!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Did you see the "next day" picture, "The
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Sun Explodes"?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Doomed again!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> It's, uh, been doing that for, oh, at least
>> >> >> >> >> >> a billion years.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > Really?
>>
>> >> >> >> Duh.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Probably do it for--at least--another
>> >> >> >> >> >> billion.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > Wow!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> How old are you NB? 24? 31?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > 11, you old fart!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Well, then . . . change the following to read
>> >> >> >> >> "in the next eighty years".
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> The chances of things falling-apart in the
>> >> >> >> >> >> next fifty years is, well, as close to nil
>> >> >> >> >> >> as anything can get.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > Then why are the polar caps melting?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Why do icesicles melt?
>>
>> >> >> >> > Because the Sun is out of control!
>>
>> >> >> >> From whence is this supposed control alleged to
>> >> >> >> originate?
>>
>> >> >> >>From the big contol freak in the sky!
>>
>> >> >> CIA?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Unless you get Chung as your heart
>> >> >> >> >> >> specialist, that is . . .
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > Don't worry about that. I don't believe in
>> >> >> >> >> > doctors!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> "There's no place like home! There's no place
>> >> >> >> >> like home!"
>>
>> >> >> >> > That's right. But even if you don't go out
>> >> >> >> > looking for trouble, it will come looking for
>> >> >> >> > you. There's no escape!
>>
>> >> >> >> It's inevitable: we will all eventually traverse
>> >> >> >> the purple holes at the centers of our galaxies.
>>
>> >> >> > I think you'll be getting lowered into a hole much
>> >> >> > closer to home long before that!
>>
>> >> >> Duh.
>>
>> >> > Is that all you can say for yourself?
>>
>> >> Is that not enough?
>>
>> > I suppose, if that's all you want on your tombstone!
>>
>> Why should I care?
>
>
> I want Canadian bacon and cheese on my Tombstone Pizza!

Good L0rd, Man! Think of the cholesterol!

[Ah]

Double-A wrote:
> On Feb 13, 6:55 am, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Double-A wrote:
>> > On Feb 13, 12:12 am, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Double-A wrote:
>> >> > On Feb 11, 9:34 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>> >> >> > On Feb 11, 5:04 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>> >> >> >> > On Feb 11, 7:46 am, ah <splifing...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> [...]
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/im-
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>age/0702/mcnaught3_kemppainen.jpg

>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Space Shuttle?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070-
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>205.html
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Nice aerial display!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Did you see the "next day" picture,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > "The Sun Explodes"?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Doomed again!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> It's, uh, been doing that for, oh, at
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> least a billion years.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Really?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Duh.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Probably do it for--at least--another
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> billion.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Wow!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> How old are you NB? 24? 31?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > 11, you old fart!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Well, then . . . change the following to
>> >> >> >> >> >> read "in the next eighty years".
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> The chances of things falling-apart in
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> the next fifty years is, well, as close
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> to nil as anything can get.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Then why are the polar caps melting?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Why do icesicles melt?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > Because the Sun is out of control!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> From whence is this supposed control alleged to
>> >> >> >> >> originate?
>>
>> >> >> >> >>From the big contol freak in the sky!
>>
>> >> >> >> CIA?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Unless you get Chung as your heart
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> specialist, that is . . .
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Don't worry about that. I don't believe in
>> >> >> >> >> >> > doctors!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> "There's no place like home! There's no
>> >> >> >> >> >> place like home!"
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > That's right. But even if you don't go out
>> >> >> >> >> > looking for trouble, it will come looking for
>> >> >> >> >> > you. There's no escape!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> It's inevitable: we will all eventually
>> >> >> >> >> traverse the purple holes at the centers of our
>> >> >> >> >> galaxies.
>>
>> >> >> >> > I think you'll be getting lowered into a hole
>> >> >> >> > much closer to home long before that!
>>
>> >> >> >> Duh.
>>
>> >> >> > Is that all you can say for yourself?
>>
>> >> >> Is that not enough?
>>
>> >> > I suppose, if that's all you want on your tombstone!
>>
>> >> Why should I care?
>>
>> > I want Canadian bacon and cheese on my Tombstone Pizza!
>>
>> Good L0rd, Man! Think of the cholesterol!
>
>
> And the salt!
>
> And it's deliciously non-kosher!

You an Anti-Semite, AA?

[Ah]

Double-A wrote:
> On Feb 13, 2:19 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Double-A wrote:
>> > On Feb 13, 6:55 am, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Double-A wrote:
>> >> > On Feb 13, 12:12 am, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>> >> >> > On Feb 11, 9:34 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>> >> >> >> > On Feb 11, 5:04 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> > On Feb 11, 7:46 am, ah
>> >> >> >> >> > <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> [...]
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod-
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>/image/0702/mcnaught3_kemppainen-
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>.jpg
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Space Shuttle?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap-
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>070205.html
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Nice aerial display!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Did you see the "next day" picture,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > "The Sun Explodes"?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Doomed again!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> It's, uh, been doing that for, oh, at
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> least a billion years.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Really?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Duh.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Probably do it for--at least--another
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> billion.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Wow!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> How old are you NB? 24? 31?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 11, you old fart!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Well, then . . . change the following to
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> read "in the next eighty years".
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The chances of things falling-apart in
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> the next fifty years is, well, as
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> close to nil as anything can get.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Then why are the polar caps melting?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Why do icesicles melt?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Because the Sun is out of control!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> From whence is this supposed control alleged
>> >> >> >> >> >> to originate?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >>From the big contol freak in the sky!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> CIA?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Unless you get Chung as your heart
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> specialist, that is . . .
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Don't worry about that. I don't believe
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > in doctors!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> "There's no place like home! There's no
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> place like home!"
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > That's right. But even if you don't go out
>> >> >> >> >> >> > looking for trouble, it will come looking
>> >> >> >> >> >> > for you. There's no escape!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> It's inevitable: we will all eventually
>> >> >> >> >> >> traverse the purple holes at the centers of
>> >> >> >> >> >> our galaxies.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > I think you'll be getting lowered into a hole
>> >> >> >> >> > much closer to home long before that!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Duh.
>>
>> >> >> >> > Is that all you can say for yourself?
>>
>> >> >> >> Is that not enough?
>>
>> >> >> > I suppose, if that's all you want on your
>> >> >> > tombstone!
>>
>> >> >> Why should I care?
>>
>> >> > I want Canadian bacon and cheese on my Tombstone
>> >> > Pizza!
>>
>> >> Good L0rd, Man! Think of the cholesterol!
>>
>> > And the salt!
>>
>> > And it's deliciously non-kosher!
>>
>> You an Anti-Semite, AA?
>
>
> Not at all. My posting history will bear that out.
>
> But neither am I Semite.

Oho! Fence-sitter!

>
> Just prefer '"west coast style" pizza.
>
> I have no problem at all with washing it down with
> Manishevitz wine!

What type of climate favo(u)rs these "Manishevitz" grapes?

[Kumar]

In view of NaCl related to hypertension and Potassium(has
vasodilating effect), whether NaCl or Na and Cl is/are
vasocostrictor/s?

[Ah]

Double-A wrote:
> On Feb 13, 7:12 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Double-A wrote:
>> > On Feb 13, 2:44 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Double-A wrote:
>> >> > On Feb 13, 2:19 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>> >> >> > On Feb 13, 6:55 am, ah <splifing...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>> >> >> >> > On Feb 13, 12:12 am, ah <splifing...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> > On Feb 11, 9:34 pm, ah
>> >> >> >> >> > <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> > On Feb 11, 5:04 pm, ah
>> >> >> >> >> >> > <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Feb 11, 7:46 am, ah
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> [...]
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.go-
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>v/apod/image/0702/mcnaught-
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>3_kemppainen.jpg
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Space Shuttle?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/a-
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>pod/ap070205.html
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Nice aerial display!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Did you see the "next day"
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > picture, "The Sun Explodes"?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Doomed again!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> It's, uh, been doing that for,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> oh, at least a billion years.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Really?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Duh.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Probably do it for--at
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> least--another billion.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Wow!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> How old are you NB? 24? 31?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 11, you old fart!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Well, then . . . change the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> following to read "in the next
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> eighty years".
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The chances of things
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> falling-apart in the next fifty
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> years is, well, as close to nil
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> as anything can get.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Then why are the polar caps
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > melting?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Why do icesicles melt?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Because the Sun is out of control!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From whence is this supposed control
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> alleged to originate?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>From the big contol freak in the sky!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> CIA?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Unless you get Chung as your
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> heart specialist, that is . . .
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Don't worry about that. I don't
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > believe in doctors!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "There's no place like home!
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> There's no place like home!"
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > That's right. But even if you don't
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > go out looking for trouble, it will
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > come looking for you. There's no
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > escape!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> It's inevitable: we will all
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> eventually traverse the purple holes
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> at the centers of our galaxies.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I think you'll be getting lowered into
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > a hole much closer to home long before
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > that!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Duh.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Is that all you can say for yourself?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Is that not enough?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > I suppose, if that's all you want on your
>> >> >> >> >> > tombstone!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Why should I care?
>>
>> >> >> >> > I want Canadian bacon and cheese on my Tombstone
>> >> >> >> > Pizza!
>>
>> >> >> >> Good L0rd, Man! Think of the cholesterol!
>>
>> >> >> > And the salt!
>>
>> >> >> > And it's deliciously non-kosher!
>>
>> >> >> You an Anti-Semite, AA?
>>
>> >> > Not at all. My posting history will bear that out.
>>
>> >> > But neither am I Semite.
>>
>> >> Oho! Fence-sitter!
>>
>> >> > Just prefer '"west coast style" pizza.
>>
>> >> > I have no problem at all with washing it down with
>> >> > Manishevitz wine!
>>
>> >> What type of climate favo(u)rs these "Manishevitz"
>> >> grapes?
>>
>> > New York State climate and that of other northeastern US
>> > states were the concord grape is native. What kind of
>> > grapes do they grow in that desert where you live?
>>
>> Grapenuts.
>
>
> And you probably put them in the microwave to soften them up
> first. Easier to gum them that way.

Quiet, Child--you know nothing of which you speak!

[Double-A]

On Feb 14, 7:55 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Double-A wrote:
> > On Feb 14, 3:38 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Double-A wrote:
> >> > On Feb 14, 2:29 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> Double-A wrote:
> >> >> > On Feb 13, 7:12 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com>
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
> >> >> >> > On Feb 13, 2:44 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
> >> >> >> >> > On Feb 13, 2:19 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> > On Feb 13, 6:55 am, ah
> >> >> >> >> >> > <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Feb 13, 12:12 am, ah
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Feb 11, 9:34 pm, ah
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Feb 11, 5:04 pm, ah
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Feb 11, 7:46 am, ah
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> [...]
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>http://antwrp.gsfc-
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>.nasa.gov/apod/ima-
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>ge/0702/mcnaught3_-
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>kemppainen.jpg
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Space Shuttle?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>http://antwrp.gsfc.na-
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>sa.gov/apod/ap070205.-
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>html
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Nice aerial display!
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Did you see the "next
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > day" picture, "The Sun
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Explodes"?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Doomed again!
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> It's, uh, been doing
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> that for, oh, at least a
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> billion years.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Really?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Duh.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Probably do it for--at
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> least--another billion.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Wow!
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> How old are you NB? 24?
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 31?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 11, you old fart!
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Well, then . . . change the
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> following to read "in the
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> next eighty years".
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The chances of things
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> falling-apart in the
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> next fifty years is,
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> well, as close to nil as
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> anything can get.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Then why are the polar
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > caps melting?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Why do icesicles melt?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Because the Sun is out of
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > control!
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From whence is this supposed
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> control alleged to originate?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>From the big contol freak in
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>the sky!
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> CIA?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Unless you get Chung as
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> your heart specialist,
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> that is . . .
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Don't worry about that. I
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > don't believe in doctors!
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "There's no place like
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> home! There's no place like
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> home!"
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > That's right. But even if
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > you don't go out looking for
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > trouble, it will come
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > looking for you. There's no
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > escape!
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> It's inevitable: we will all
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> eventually traverse the purple
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> holes at the centers of our
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> galaxies.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I think you'll be getting
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > lowered into a hole much closer
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > to home long before that!
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Duh.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Is that all you can say for
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > yourself?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Is that not enough?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I suppose, if that's all you want on
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > your tombstone!
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Why should I care?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I want Canadian bacon and cheese on my
> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Tombstone Pizza!
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Good L0rd, Man! Think of the cholesterol!
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > And the salt!
>
> >> >> >> >> >> > And it's deliciously non-kosher!
>
> >> >> >> >> >> You an Anti-Semite, AA?
>
> >> >> >> >> > Not at all. My posting history will bear that
> >> >> >> >> > out.
>
> >> >> >> >> > But neither am I Semite.
>
> >> >> >> >> Oho! Fence-sitter!
>
> >> >> >> >> > Just prefer '"west coast style" pizza.
>
> >> >> >> >> > I have no problem at all with washing it down
> >> >> >> >> > with Manishevitz wine!
>
> >> >> >> >> What type of climate favo(u)rs these
> >> >> >> >> "Manishevitz" grapes?
>
> >> >> >> > New York State climate and that of other
> >> >> >> > northeastern US states were the concord grape is
> >> >> >> > native. What kind of grapes do they grow in that
> >> >> >> > desert where you live?
>
> >> >> >> Grapenuts.
>
> >> >> > And you probably put them in the microwave to soften
> >> >> > them up first. Easier to gum them that way.
>
> >> >> Quiet, Child--you know nothing of which you speak!
>
> >> > You don't know mush!
>
> >> Oh, I know mush.
>
> > How about gruel?
>
> Yup; that, too.

How about stool?

You don't know shit, do you?

[Ah]

Double-A wrote:
> On Feb 15, 10:09 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Double-A wrote:
>> > On Feb 14, 7:55 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Double-A wrote:
>> >> > On Feb 14, 3:38 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>> >> >> > On Feb 14, 2:29 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>> >> >> >> > On Feb 13, 7:12 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> > On Feb 13, 2:44 pm, ah
>> >> >> >> >> > <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> > On Feb 13, 2:19 pm, ah
>> >> >> >> >> >> > <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Feb 13, 6:55 am, ah
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Feb 13, 12:12 am, ah
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Feb 11, 9:34 pm, ah
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Feb 11, 5:04 pm, ah
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Feb 11, 7:46 am, ah
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <splifing...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> [...]
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>http://antwrp.-
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>gsfc.nasa.gov/-
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>apod/image/070-
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>2/mcnaught3_ke-
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>mppainen.jpg
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Space Shuttle?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>http://antwrp.gsf-
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>c.nasa.gov/apod/a-
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>p070205.html
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Nice aerial
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > display!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Did you see the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > "next day"
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > picture, "The Sun
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Explodes"?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Doomed again!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> It's, uh, been doing
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> that for, oh, at
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> least a billion
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> years.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Really?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Duh.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Probably do it
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> for--at
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> least--another
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> billion.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Wow!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> How old are you NB?
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 24? 31?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > 11, you old fart!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Well, then . . . change
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> the following to read
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "in the next eighty
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> years".
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The chances of
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> things falling-apart
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> in the next fifty
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> years is, well, as
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> close to nil as
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> anything can get.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Then why are the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > polar caps melting?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Why do icesicles melt?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Because the Sun is out
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > of control!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From whence is this
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> supposed control alleged
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> to originate?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>From the big contol freak
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>in the sky!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> CIA?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Unless you get Chung
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> as your heart
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> specialist, that is
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> . . .
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Don't worry about
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > that. I don't believe
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > in doctors!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "There's no place like
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> home! There's no place
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> like home!"
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > That's right. But even
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > if you don't go out
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > looking for trouble, it
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > will come looking for
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > you. There's no escape!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> It's inevitable: we will
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> all eventually traverse
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> the purple holes at the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> centers of our galaxies.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I think you'll be getting
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > lowered into a hole much
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > closer to home long before
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > that!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Duh.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Is that all you can say for
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > yourself?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Is that not enough?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I suppose, if that's all you want
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > on your tombstone!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Why should I care?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I want Canadian bacon and cheese on
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > my Tombstone Pizza!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Good L0rd, Man! Think of the
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> cholesterol!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > And the salt!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > And it's deliciously non-kosher!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> You an Anti-Semite, AA?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Not at all. My posting history will bear
>> >> >> >> >> >> > that out.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > But neither am I Semite.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Oho! Fence-sitter!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > Just prefer '"west coast style" pizza.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > I have no problem at all with washing it
>> >> >> >> >> >> > down with Manishevitz wine!
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> What type of climate favo(u)rs these
>> >> >> >> >> >> "Manishevitz" grapes?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > New York State climate and that of other
>> >> >> >> >> > northeastern US states were the concord grape
>> >> >> >> >> > is native. What kind of grapes do they grow
>> >> >> >> >> > in that desert where you live?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Grapenuts.
>>
>> >> >> >> > And you probably put them in the microwave to
>> >> >> >> > soften them up first. Easier to gum them that
>> >> >> >> > way.
>>
>> >> >> >> Quiet, Child--you know nothing of which you speak!
>>
>> >> >> > You don't know mush!
>>
>> >> >> Oh, I know mush.
>>
>> >> > How about gruel?
>>
>> >> Yup; that, too.
>>
>> > How about stool?
>>
>> > You don't know shit, do you?
>>
>> I had quite a few bowel movements in my day . . . it was,
>> well, easier, then.
>
>
> Really? You should be drinking more cheap gut rot wine! Old
> winos never have a problem going. Their only problem is not
> going in their pants!

Give me some good advice, please.

[Art Deco]

ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
>Double-A wrote:
>> On Feb 16, 3:37 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Double-A wrote:
>>> > On Feb 16, 11:17 am, ah <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> Double-A wrote:
>>> >> > On Feb 15, 10:09 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com>
>>> >> > wrote:
>>> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>>> >> >> > On Feb 14, 7:55 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com>
>>> >> >> > wrote:
>>> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>>> >> >> >> > On Feb 14, 3:38 pm, ah <splifing...@gmail.com>
>>> >> >> >> > wrote:
>>> >> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>>> >> >> >> >> > On Feb 14, 2:29 pm, ah
>>> >> >> >> >> > <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> >> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>>> >> >> >> >> >> > On Feb 13, 7:12 pm, ah
>>> >> >> >> >> >> > <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Feb 13, 2:44 pm, ah
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Double-A wrote:
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Feb 13, 2:19 pm, ah
>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <splifing...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> >> >> >> >>